Search (231 results, page 2 of 12)

  • × theme_ss:"Elektronisches Publizieren"
  1. Ferro, N.; Silvello, G.: NESTOR: a formal model for digital archives (2013) 0.05 
    0.05084595 = product of:
  0.1016919 = sum of:
    0.07461992 = weight(_text_:digital in 2707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07461992 = score(doc=2707,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.37742734 = fieldWeight in 2707, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2707)
    0.027071979 = weight(_text_:library in 2707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027071979 = score(doc=2707,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.2054202 = fieldWeight in 2707, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2707)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Archives are an extremely valuable part of our cultural heritage since they represent the trace of the activities of a physical or juridical person in the course of their business. Despite their importance, the models and technologies that have been developed over the past two decades in the Digital Library (DL) field have not been specifically tailored to archives. This is especially true when it comes to formal and foundational frameworks, as the Streams, Structures, Spaces, Scenarios, Societies (5S) model is. Therefore, we propose an innovative formal model, called NEsted SeTs for Object hieRarchies (NESTOR), for archives, explicitly built around the concepts of context and hierarchy which play a central role in the archival realm. NESTOR is composed of two set-based data models: the Nested Sets Model (NS-M) and the Inverse Nested Sets Model (INS-M) that express the hierarchical relationships between objects through the inclusion property between sets. We formally study the properties of these models and prove their equivalence with the notion of hierarchy entailed by archives. We then use NESTOR to extend the 5S model in order to take into account the specific features of archives and to tailor the notion of digital library accordingly. This offers the possibility of opening up the full wealth of DL methods and technologies to archives. We demonstrate the impact of NESTOR on this problem through three example use cases.
  2. Kemp, A. de: Information provision : a publisher's point of view in changing times and with new technologies (1993) 0.05 
    0.049779683 = product of:
  0.09955937 = sum of:
    0.068930924 = weight(_text_:digital in 6235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.068930924 = score(doc=6235,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.34865242 = fieldWeight in 6235, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6235)
    0.030628446 = weight(_text_:library in 6235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030628446 = score(doc=6235,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 6235, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6235)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Almost everybody seems to be talking about document delivery and digital libraries. Library networks are starting joint ventures with journal subscription agencies and offering electronic tables of contents. Integrated systems for image management and document management are being implemented. Academic networks and Internet are being used at an exponential rate. At the same time budgets for the acquisition of books and journals are shrinking and alternatives for the delivery of information are being discussed. Are there alternatives and what will be their impact?
  3. Pullinger, D.; Baldwin, C.: Superjournal : what readers really want from electronic journals (1997) 0.05 
    0.049563773 = product of:
  0.099127546 = sum of:
    0.043315165 = weight(_text_:library in 1375) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043315165 = score(doc=1375,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 1375, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1375)
    0.055812385 = product of:
      0.11162477 = sum of:
        0.11162477 = weight(_text_:project in 1375) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11162477 = score(doc=1375,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21156175 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.52762264 = fieldWeight in 1375, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1375)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Describes the Superjournal project, a part of the eLib Programme which is researching factors that will make electronic journals successful and of real value to the academic community. The project focuses on usefulness: the key features that will make electronic journals valuable to researchers and compelling to use. Describes the design of the research, the application developed and initial results on reader expectations
    Source
    Electronic library and visual information research: Proceedings of the 4th ELVIRA Conference (ELVIRA 4), Electronic Library and Visual Information Research, De Montfort University, Milton Keynes, May 1997. Ed. by C. Davies u. A. Ramsden
  4. Santos Green, L.; Johnston, M.P.: ¬A contextualization of editorial misconduct in the library and information science academic information ecosystem (2022) 0.05 
    0.048820432 = product of:
  0.097640865 = sum of:
    0.051698197 = weight(_text_:digital in 612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051698197 = score(doc=612,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.26148933 = fieldWeight in 612, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=612)
    0.045942668 = weight(_text_:library in 612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045942668 = score(doc=612,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.34860963 = fieldWeight in 612, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=612)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    In the last decade, one of the most effective tools applied in combating the erosion of public trust in academic research has been an increased level of transparency in the peer review and editorial process. Publicly available publication ethics guidelines and policies are vital in creating a transparent process that prevents unethical research, publication misconduct, manipulation of the communication of research to practitioners, and the erosion of public trust. This study investigated how these unethical practices, specifically those coded as editorial misconduct, bring the authenticity and integrity of the library and information science academic research digital record into question. Employing a multi-layered approach, including key informant interviews, researchers determined the frequency and the content of ethical publishing policies and procedures in library and information science journals; exploring the ways the lack of, or nonadherence to these policies and procedures impacted library and information science researchers in instances of editorial misconduct.
  5. Kerscher, G.: DAISY Consortium : information technology for the world's blind and print-disabled population - past, present, and into the future (2001) 0.05 
    0.048041813 = product of:
  0.096083626 = sum of:
    0.073112294 = weight(_text_:digital in 4810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.073112294 = score(doc=4810,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.36980176 = fieldWeight in 4810, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4810)
    0.022971334 = weight(_text_:library in 4810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022971334 = score(doc=4810,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 4810, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4810)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The DAISY Consortium created the first digital talking book (DTB) and this is now known worldwide as the DAISY format. The DAISY DTB is the application of existing worldwide standards used to define the next generation of information technology for people who are blind and print disabled. The acronym DAISY, digital audio-based information system, is a name both for a reading system and for the consortium of libraries, non-profit organizations and for-profit Friends of the Consortium around the world that spearhead the development of the International standard. This article will briefly trace the history of DAISY's development and go on to explain the current activities and future plans for the single worldwide standard.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 19(2001) no.1, S.11-15
  6. Tenopir, C.: Electronic publishing : research issues for academic librarians and users (2003) 0.05 
    0.048041813 = product of:
  0.096083626 = sum of:
    0.073112294 = weight(_text_:digital in 35) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.073112294 = score(doc=35,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.36980176 = fieldWeight in 35, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=35)
    0.022971334 = weight(_text_:library in 35) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022971334 = score(doc=35,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 35, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=35)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Increased reliance on electronic resources requires examination of the roles of librarians in several key ways. This paper addresses the need for further research into three important areas of electronic publishing. How is the change to digital information sources affecting the scholarly work of college and university students? Previous research shows that students rely on Web and online resources and ask for less help from librarians. We do not know, however, how these changes will affect the learning and scholarly work of college and university students. Research is also needed to determine how the differences between separate article and full journal databases affect the way research is done. What are the implications for scholarship of decisions being made about what publishers publish and what librarians purchase? Finally, are librarians--as intermediaries to the search process--still necessary in a digital age? Online systems are designed to be used independently but that may not always yield the best results.
    Source
    Library trends. 51(2003) no.4, S.614-635
  7. Internet publishing and beyond : the economics of digital information and intellectual property ; a publication of the Harvard Information Infrastructure Project in collab. with the School of Information Management and Systems at the Univ. of California at Berkeley (2000) 0.05 
    0.047423355 = product of:
  0.09484671 = sum of:
    0.060314562 = weight(_text_:digital in 526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060314562 = score(doc=526,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.30507088 = fieldWeight in 526, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=526)
    0.034532152 = product of:
      0.069064304 = sum of:
        0.069064304 = weight(_text_:project in 526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069064304 = score(doc=526,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21156175 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.32644984 = fieldWeight in 526, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=526)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
  8. Gilbert, S.K.: SGML theory and practice (1989) 0.05 
    0.046257675 = product of:
  0.09251535 = sum of:
    0.05305003 = weight(_text_:library in 5944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05305003 = score(doc=5944,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.40253976 = fieldWeight in 5944, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5944)
    0.039465316 = product of:
      0.07893063 = sum of:
        0.07893063 = weight(_text_:project in 5944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07893063 = score(doc=5944,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21156175 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.37308553 = fieldWeight in 5944, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5944)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Provides information for people who want (or need) to know what the SGML is and want to make use of it. Gives a fairly detailed description of what SGML is, why it exists, and provides a list of SGML players who are actively involved in either developing tools, providing services, offering consultancy or enganging in research for SGML. Describes the SGML work undertaken at Hatfield Polytechnic as part of Project Quartet funded by the British Library Research and Development Dept. The results and findings conclude that SGML forms a strong backbone for present and future document handling systems
    Imprint
    London : British Library
    Series
    British Library research paper; 68
  9. Catenazzi, N.; Sommaruga, L.: ¬An electronic library based on hyper-books : the Hyper-Lib project (1995) 0.04 
    0.0438086 = product of:
  0.0876172 = sum of:
    0.03828556 = weight(_text_:library in 2440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03828556 = score(doc=2440,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.29050803 = fieldWeight in 2440, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2440)
    0.049331643 = product of:
      0.098663285 = sum of:
        0.098663285 = weight(_text_:project in 2440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.098663285 = score(doc=2440,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21156175 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.4663569 = fieldWeight in 2440, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2440)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
  10. Snowhill, L.: E-books and their future in academic libraries (2001) 0.04 
    0.043557227 = product of:
  0.08711445 = sum of:
    0.060314562 = weight(_text_:digital in 1218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060314562 = score(doc=1218,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.30507088 = fieldWeight in 1218, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1218)
    0.026799891 = weight(_text_:library in 1218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026799891 = score(doc=1218,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 1218, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1218)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The University of California's California Digital Library (CDL) formed an Ebook Task Force in August 2000 to evaluate academic libraries' experiences with electronic books (e-books), investigate the e-book market, and develop operating guidelines, principles and potential strategies for further exploration of the use of e-books at the University of California (UC). This article, based on the findings and recommendations of the Task Force Report, briefly summarizes task force findings, and outlines issues and recommendations for making e-books viable over the long term in the academic environment, based on the long-term goals of building strong research collections and providing high level services and collections to its users.
  11. Isaac, K.A.: Future of the book : will the printed book survive the digital age? (2006) 0.04 
    0.042943195 = product of:
  0.08588639 = sum of:
    0.043081827 = weight(_text_:digital in 1507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043081827 = score(doc=1507,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.21790776 = fieldWeight in 1507, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1507)
    0.042804558 = weight(_text_:library in 1507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042804558 = score(doc=1507,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.32479787 = fieldWeight in 1507, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1507)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Discusses the factors, especially developments in information and communication technologies (ICTs) that influence the access and use of information by a person - as student at various levels. researcher, on the job, and for general purpose. Concludes that- books and libraries will continue to be with us and are in no danger of being replaced by the products and services that are ITC-based. There will be changes in the nature and size of library holdings and library services. Books of recreation and books of inspiration will continue to appear in the conventional form. Acquisition of books of information will he confined to the essentially required for continuous reading. For the other books and journals in each field, full text databases accessed online will have to be depended on. Reference hooks and costly books and journals required can he acquired in CD-ROM at a fraction of the cost of the printed versions. So the future library will be a combination of the conventional books and IT products in varying degrees or a hybrid library, depending on the types of library. The Impact of ICTs will be highest on research libraries.
  12. Corthouts, J.; Philips, R.: SGML: a librarian's perception (1996) 0.04 
    0.042092286 = product of:
  0.08418457 = sum of:
    0.051698197 = weight(_text_:digital in 5093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051698197 = score(doc=5093,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.26148933 = fieldWeight in 5093, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5093)
    0.032486375 = weight(_text_:library in 5093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032486375 = score(doc=5093,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.24650425 = fieldWeight in 5093, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5093)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The SGML is an international standard (ISO 8879) allowing the logical structure of electronic documents to be represented rigorously and independent of applications. Proposes a strategy that libraries can consider when implementing SGML applications on top of existing products, or when embedding these in innovative end user services. Discusses experiences of SGML, within the VUBIS-Antwerpen Library Network (Belgium). VUBIS-Antwerpen has adopted SGML as a key standard for the exploitation of its bibliograpical data (union catalogues, document ordering, online contents, current awareness, publishing on the WWW). With the move towards electronic publication and distribution of documents, SGML tends to become a crucial standard for digital libraries. Projects such as TEI, ELSA, DECOMATE and ELVYN now focus on access to and elivery of full text electronic documents, using SGML to manipulate, process and transform documents for the purpose of full text searching or hypertext navigation
    Source
    Electronic library. 14(1996) no.2, S.101-110
  13. Schmale, W.: Strategische Optionen für universitäre Repositorien in den Digital Humanities (2018) 0.04 
    0.042041123 = product of:
  0.084082246 = sum of:
    0.060314562 = weight(_text_:digital in 3909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060314562 = score(doc=3909,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.30507088 = fieldWeight in 3909, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3909)
    0.023767682 = product of:
      0.047535364 = sum of:
        0.047535364 = weight(_text_:22 in 3909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047535364 = score(doc=3909,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3909, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3909)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    20. 9.2018 12:22:39
  14. Woodward, H.: Electronic journals : myths and realities (1997) 0.04 
    0.04139024 = product of:
  0.08278048 = sum of:
    0.043315165 = weight(_text_:library in 807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043315165 = score(doc=807,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 807, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=807)
    0.039465316 = product of:
      0.07893063 = sum of:
        0.07893063 = weight(_text_:project in 807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07893063 = score(doc=807,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21156175 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.37308553 = fieldWeight in 807, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=807)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Considers the preliminray findings of the British Library funded Cafe Jus ('Commercial and free electronic journals, a user study') research project, investigating end user reactions to electronic journals. Issues explored include: access to electronic journals; reading habits; human factors; financial implications; and the future roles of librarians, subscription agents and publishers in the elctronic environment
    Source
    Library management. 18(1997) nos.3/4, S.155-162
  15. Brown, D.J.: Electronic publishing and libraries : Planning for the impact and growth to 2003 (1996) 0.04 
    0.040475465 = product of:
  0.08095093 = sum of:
    0.04641878 = weight(_text_:library in 3256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04641878 = score(doc=3256,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.3522223 = fieldWeight in 3256, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3256)
    0.034532152 = product of:
      0.069064304 = sum of:
        0.069064304 = weight(_text_:project in 3256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069064304 = score(doc=3256,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21156175 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.32644984 = fieldWeight in 3256, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3256)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Reports results of a study, conducted by DJB Associates on behalf of the British Library, to forecast the future trends in electronic publishing during the period 1995 to 2003. The emphasis is on scholarly publishing and the project, initiated by the BL, Corporate Research Group, aimed to help in the BL's assessment of the acqusition policy for electronic media
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Library review 45(1996) no.8, S.54-55 (A.S. Duff)
    Series
    British Library research series
  16. Pinfield, S.: How do physicists use an e-print archive? : implications for institutional e-print services (2001) 0.04 
    0.038982287 = product of:
  0.077964574 = sum of:
    0.043081827 = weight(_text_:digital in 1226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043081827 = score(doc=1226,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.21790776 = fieldWeight in 1226, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1226)
    0.034882743 = product of:
      0.069765486 = sum of:
        0.069765486 = weight(_text_:project in 1226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069765486 = score(doc=1226,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21156175 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.32976416 = fieldWeight in 1226, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1226)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    It has been suggested that institutional e-print services will become an important way of achieving the wide availability of e-prints across a broad range of subject disciplines. However, as yet there are few exemplars of this sort of service. This paper describes how physicists make use of an established centralized subject-based e-prints service, arXiv (formerly known as the Los Alamos XXX service), and discusses the possible implications of this use for institutional multidisciplinary e-print archives. A number of key points are identified, including technical issues (such as file formats and user interface design), management issues (such as submission procedures and administrative staff support), economic issues (such as installation and support costs), quality issues (such as peer review and quality control criteria), policy issues (such as digital preservation and collection development standards), academic issues (such as scholarly communication cultures and publishing trends), and legal issues (such as copyright and intellectual property rights). These are discussed with reference to the project to set up a pilot institutional e-print service at the University of Nottingham, UK. This project is being used as a pragmatic way of investigating the issues surrounding institutional e-print services, particularly in seeing how flexible the e-prints model actually is and how easily it can adapt itself to disciplines other than physics.
  17. Weiner, S.T.: Electronic journals, four part series : an introduction (1997) 0.04 
    0.037334766 = product of:
  0.07466953 = sum of:
    0.051698197 = weight(_text_:digital in 834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051698197 = score(doc=834,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.26148933 = fieldWeight in 834, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=834)
    0.022971334 = weight(_text_:library in 834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022971334 = score(doc=834,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 834, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=834)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    First in a series of 4 articles discussing the future of the e-journal considering such issues as pricing, implementation, distribution copyright and format from the perspectives of publiahers, librarians and editors. Lists articles providing an overview of what has been happening with e-journals over the last 2 years from the following titles: access methods to electronic journals via the Internet; the alarmists versus the equilibrists: re-examining the role of the serials professionals in the information ages; BH Blackwell, Readmore to develop electronic journal service; cheaper by the case; electronic chemistry journals: elemental concerns; electronic journals: trends in the WWW Internet access; electronic journals market and technology; electronics journbal update; CJTCS - Chicago Journal of Theoretical Computer Science; Elsevier rolls out digital library; IT and the sciences; JAVELIN: an approach to the development of a new kind of electronic journal; projecting the electronic revolution while budgeting for the status quo; a theory of polar information; TULIP: participating in an experiment of electronic journal access - administrative challenges to ensure success; The University Licensing Program (TULIP); electronic journals in materials science; and the weekly journal of sciences goes electronic
  18. Vaughan, K.T.L.: impacts of electronic equivalents on print chemistry journal use : Changing use patterns of print journals in the digital age (2003) 0.04 
    0.037334766 = product of:
  0.07466953 = sum of:
    0.051698197 = weight(_text_:digital in 1873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051698197 = score(doc=1873,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.26148933 = fieldWeight in 1873, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1873)
    0.022971334 = weight(_text_:library in 1873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022971334 = score(doc=1873,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 1873, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1873)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Little data are available that can help librarians solve issues surrounding print versus online journals management, including ascertaining when print journals are no longer needed. This study examines the short-term effects of online availability an the use of print chemistry journals. The Duke University Chemistry Library gained access to Elsevier titles via ScienceDirect in February 2000. By comparing reshelving data for the print journals from 1999, 2000, and 2001, this study identif!es the shortterm changes in journals use that can be attributed to the introduction of ScienceDirect. In the first two years after ScienceDirect was introduced, use of print journals nearly halved. The diminished use of the print collection has important implications for collection management in sci-tech libraries.
  19. Veltman, K.H.: Von der aufgezeichneten Welt zur Aufzeichnung der Welten (2007) 0.04 
    0.037334766 = product of:
  0.07466953 = sum of:
    0.051698197 = weight(_text_:digital in 200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051698197 = score(doc=200,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.26148933 = fieldWeight in 200, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=200)
    0.022971334 = weight(_text_:library in 200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022971334 = score(doc=200,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 200, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=200)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    "Auf der Tagung "Herausforderung: Digitale Langzeitarchivierung - Strategien und Praxis europäischer Kooperation" welche vom 20. bis 21. April 2007 in der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek (Frankfurt am Main) stattfand, befassten sich die einzelnen Referentinnen nicht nur mit der Bewahrung des Kulturgutes, sondern u.a. auch mit der "Aufzeichnung der Welten". Wie man diese "Weltaufzeichnung" in Anbetracht der Fülle und stetigen Zunahme an Informationen zukünftig (noch) besser bewältigen kann, thematisierte Kim H. Veltman in seinem Vortrag. Er präsentierte dazu vier äußerst denkwürdige Ansätze: - Schaffung einer zentralen europäischen Instanz, welche die Gedächtnisinstitutionen über die neusten technologischen Entwicklungen informiert - Errichtung eines digitalen Referenzraums und einer virtuellen Agora innerhalb der Europäischen Digitalen Bibliothek - Gründung eines Instituts zur Wissensorganisation - Erforschen der Anforderungen für eine "Universal Digital Library"."
  20. Geschuhn, K.; Sikora, A.: Management von Article Processing Charges : Herausforderungen für Bibliotheken (2015) 0.04 
    0.037334766 = product of:
  0.07466953 = sum of:
    0.051698197 = weight(_text_:digital in 2147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051698197 = score(doc=2147,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.26148933 = fieldWeight in 2147, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2147)
    0.022971334 = weight(_text_:library in 2147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022971334 = score(doc=2147,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 2147, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2147)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Seit mehreren Jahren betreiben Hochschulbibliotheken Publikationsfonds, um Open-Access-Artikelgebühren, Article Processing Charges, für die Autorinnen und Autoren ihrer Einrichtungen zu übernehmen. Der dynamische Anstieg der Open-Access-Publikationen in den letzten Jahren wirft die Frage auf, ob die derzeitigen Verfahren zwischen Verlagen und wissenschaftlichen Einrichtungen stabil genug sind und bei einer vollständigen Umstellung auf Open Access skalieren. Die Max Planck Digital Library übernimmt derzeit jährlich zentral Gebühren für etwa 600 Open-Access-Artikel aus der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft. Der Beitrag gibt einen Überblick über die strategischen Hintergründe dieser zentralen Kostenübernahme und zeigt anschließend die einzelnen Prozessschritte sowie die Hürden hierbei auf. Die größten Desiderate im Hinblick auf die Etablierung effizienter und nachhaltiger Prozesse sind optimierte Artikel-Einreichungssysteme, eine bessere Autorenidentifizierung sowie ein vereinheitlichtes, verbessertes Reporting.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 169
  • d 60
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 199
  • el 14
  • m 13
  • r 9
  • s 9
  • b 1
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications