Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

0.049779683 = product of:
  0.09955937 = sum of:
    0.068930924 = weight(_text_:digital in 1888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.068930924 = score(doc=1888,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.34865242 = fieldWeight in 1888, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1888)
    0.030628446 = weight(_text_:library in 1888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030628446 = score(doc=1888,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 1888, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1888)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Describes the position claiming that the contemporary technological, socio-political, and socio-economic environment gives us pause to consider the core theory and practices of bibliography, combining bibliography of the work (in library and information science), bibliography of the text (in textual studies and scholarly editing), and bibliography of the artifact (in book history and now digital forensics), and calls for collaborative multidisciplinary research at the intersection of these fields to ask, is there a new bibliography?

0.006699973 = product of:
  0.026799891 = sum of:
    0.026799891 = weight(_text_:library in 2828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026799891 = score(doc=2828,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 2828, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2828)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

In France monograph collections are traditionally catalogues as serials, in accordance with the ISDS definition. Such collections are created by publishers in response to identified intellectual and cultural needs: there are no objective fixed criteria. Practice at the National Library of France is based on respecting the integrity of collection projects, and thereafter evaluating both their reality and precision. This work requires continual comparison of publishers' projects with their practices, albeit the information available is insufficient and fragmentary

0.0057428335 = product of:
  0.022971334 = sum of:
    0.022971334 = weight(_text_:library in 1506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022971334 = score(doc=1506,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 1506, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1506)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Library trends. 45(1997) no.3, S.448-461

0.0057428335 = product of:
  0.022971334 = sum of:
    0.022971334 = weight(_text_:library in 1985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022971334 = score(doc=1985,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 1985, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1985)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The goal of this research is investigating the situation of existing bibliographic records in the online public access catalog of the National Library of Iran in order to use Resource Description and Access (RDA). A sample of 111 bibliographic records was selected for this purpose. These records were analyzed according to the RDA codes. The results reveal that more than 88% of the records show a rather good conformity with RDA, but 47% of the remaining problematic records show direct inconformity with RDA. Based on an in-depth analysis of the fields, most of the discrepancies deal with the assumed rules based on which the data is entered. The results of this study indicate that there is a good level of conformity between contents of current records and RDA, but as for the rest of the records there are some major tasks to be done.