Search (44 results, page 2 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Kataloganreicherung"
  1. Tseng, Y.-H.: Automatic cataloguing and searching for retrospective data by use of OCR text (2001) 0.01
    0.012924549 = product of:
      0.051698197 = sum of:
        0.051698197 = weight(_text_:digital in 5421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051698197 = score(doc=5421,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.26148933 = fieldWeight in 5421, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5421)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes our efforts in supporting information retrieval from OCR degraded text. In particular, we report our approach to an automatic cataloging and searching contest for books in multiple languages. In this contest, 500 books in English, German, French, and Italian published during the 1770s to 1970s are scanned into images and OCRed to digital text. The goal is to use only automatic ways to extract information for sophisticated searching. We adopted the vector space retrieval model, an n-gram indexing method, and a special weighting scheme to tackle this problem. Although the performance by this approach is slightly inferior to the best approach, which is mainly based on regular expression match, one advantage of our approach is that it is less language dependent and less layout sensitive, thus is readily applicable to other languages and document collections. Problems of OCR text retrieval for some Asian languages are also discussed in this article, and solutions are suggested
  2. Hauer, M.; Diedrichs, R.: Kataloganreicherung in Europa : Bibliotheken als Information-Retrieval-Systeme in einer digitalen Welt (2010) 0.01
    0.012924549 = product of:
      0.051698197 = sum of:
        0.051698197 = weight(_text_:digital in 3571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051698197 = score(doc=3571,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.26148933 = fieldWeight in 3571, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3571)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Series
    Lesesaal: Information digital
  3. Cataloguing for online access : 9th National Cataloguing Conference, papers presented Nov. 28-30 1991 (1991) 0.01
    0.012332911 = product of:
      0.049331643 = sum of:
        0.049331643 = product of:
          0.098663285 = sum of:
            0.098663285 = weight(_text_:project in 1785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098663285 = score(doc=1785,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21156175 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050121464 = queryNorm
                0.4663569 = fieldWeight in 1785, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1785)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Enthält Beiträge zu MARC, AUSMARC, HYPERMARC; 'Enriched Subject Project' (=SAP); OPACs
  4. Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978) 0.01
    0.011883841 = product of:
      0.047535364 = sum of:
        0.047535364 = product of:
          0.09507073 = sum of:
            0.09507073 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09507073 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050121464 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
  5. Ingwersen, P.; Wormell, I.: Modern indexing and retrieval techniques matching different types of information needs (1989) 0.01
    0.011883841 = product of:
      0.047535364 = sum of:
        0.047535364 = product of:
          0.09507073 = sum of:
            0.09507073 = weight(_text_:22 in 7322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09507073 = score(doc=7322,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050121464 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7322, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7322)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 14(1989), S.17-22
  6. Weintraub, T.S.; Shimoguchi, W.: Catalog record contents enhancement (1993) 0.01
    0.011604695 = product of:
      0.04641878 = sum of:
        0.04641878 = weight(_text_:library in 4650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04641878 = score(doc=4650,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.3522223 = fieldWeight in 4650, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4650)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Contents enhancement of catalog records may increase access to books in collections and aid in effective resource sharing by providing more detailed descriptions about library holdings in the catalog. A sample of monographs in San Diego State Univ. Library was studied to determine the extent to which information in books from parts of the collection could be represented better by content notes, and to determine how much of this information has subject or analytical applications. The study revealed that approximately 23% of the books contain discrete content information not already represented in catalog records that could be added. Of those, 52% would be citation-based enhancements and 48% would be subject-based. Nearly 65% would require fewer than 25 enhancements, with an average of 8.03 enhancements per book for the total population
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 37(1993) no.2, S.167-180
  7. Syracuse, R.O.; Poyer, R.K.: Enhancing access to the library's collections : a view from an academy health center library (1991) 0.01
    0.011604695 = product of:
      0.04641878 = sum of:
        0.04641878 = weight(_text_:library in 516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04641878 = score(doc=516,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.3522223 = fieldWeight in 516, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=516)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    With the advent of online public access catalogs, catalog librarians and their staffs have been freed from the labor-intensive processes involved in the creation and maintenance of card catalogs. At the Medical University of South Carolina Library, this new found time has been devoted to enhancing access to the library's collections. Enhancements discussed include the creation of bibliographic records for vertical file materials, the National Library of Medicine bibliographies, and reserve items, as well as providing subject access to individual chapters in books and articles in monographic serials.
  8. Diodato, V.: Tables of contents and book indexes : how well do they match readers' descriptions of books? (1986) 0.01
    0.011485667 = product of:
      0.045942668 = sum of:
        0.045942668 = weight(_text_:library in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045942668 = score(doc=376,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.34860963 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The author collected information about tables of content and index terms in 125 books borrowed by patrons in a medium-sized academic library. To learn how useful the term would be as subject terms in a library catalog, he determined which of these terms were the same as the words used by the patrons to describe the books. For 72,4% of the books assigned LCSH, the patron's term matched the LCheading. The patron's term matched the table of contents term for (1,3% of the books with tables of contents. If the catalog had included terms from the tables of contents and the indexes in addition to the LCSH, the success rate would have been 97,3%. One problem in using terms from books in a library catalog is that many books lack indexes and/or tables of context
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 30(1986), S.402-412
  9. "Catalogue enrichment" : hbz kooperiert mit Springer (2006) 0.01
    0.010770457 = product of:
      0.043081827 = sum of:
        0.043081827 = weight(_text_:digital in 5165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043081827 = score(doc=5165,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.21790776 = fieldWeight in 5165, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5165)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Series
    Information digital
  10. Dwyer, J.: Bibliographic records enhancement : from the drawing board to the catalog screen (1991) 0.01
    0.009866329 = product of:
      0.039465316 = sum of:
        0.039465316 = product of:
          0.07893063 = sum of:
            0.07893063 = weight(_text_:project in 514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07893063 = score(doc=514,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21156175 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050121464 = queryNorm
                0.37308553 = fieldWeight in 514, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=514)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Contents notes can improve online access to works containing essays, short stories, and significantly titles chapters. Few records in bibliographic utilities include contents notes. The OCLC PRISM service may provide an opportunity to cooperatively build a contents-enriched database. This paper discusses some issues related to the creation of enhanced records and their display in online cataloges. It also describes one library's efforts to add contents notes lically and to participate in an anticipated OCLC pilot project
  11. Diodato, V.P.: Author indexing (1981) 0.01
    0.00957139 = product of:
      0.03828556 = sum of:
        0.03828556 = weight(_text_:library in 6983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03828556 = score(doc=6983,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.29050803 = fieldWeight in 6983, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6983)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Indexing terms supplied by authors can increase subject control of their documents. The terms can be used in the creation of indexes, abstracts, and other devices for information retrieval in the special library. An examination of the American Mathematical Society author indexing program suggests that contributions of authors enhance indexing efforts of editors
  12. Wormell, I.: Indizacion SAP para la exploracion del amplio contexto tematico de libros y para el accesso a entidades semanticos mas pequenas (1994) 0.01
    0.008633038 = product of:
      0.034532152 = sum of:
        0.034532152 = product of:
          0.069064304 = sum of:
            0.069064304 = weight(_text_:project in 4652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.069064304 = score(doc=4652,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21156175 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050121464 = queryNorm
                0.32644984 = fieldWeight in 4652, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4652)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes an approach to indexing which seeks to eliminate the shortcoming of the representation of information in existing bibliographic catalogues: Subject Access Project (SAP) indexing which has been used successfully at Lund University and elsewhere. Existing catalogue records have been enriched with terms selected from lists of contents and indexes in books thus facilitating access to specific parts of documents and smaller semantic entites such as chapter titles, subject titles and data in graphic or tabulated form available in a wide range of publications
  13. Beatty, S.: ESP at ADFA after five years (1991) 0.01
    0.0076571116 = product of:
      0.030628446 = sum of:
        0.030628446 = weight(_text_:library in 4245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030628446 = score(doc=4245,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 4245, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4245)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Since Dec 86, the Australian Defence Force Academy (ADFA) library has been enriching bibliographic records by adding terms from either the contents pages or indexes of books. 40.000 records are now enriched, representing about 25% coverage of the ADFA database of 210.000 titles. Evaluates the retrieval effectiveness of the enriched data in an OPAC, in comparison with title and LCSH, using 90 topics from 6 different subject areas
  14. Smith, I.A.; O'Brien, A.: Signposts to information : keywords, indexes and thesauri (1993) 0.01
    0.0076571116 = product of:
      0.030628446 = sum of:
        0.030628446 = weight(_text_:library in 8116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030628446 = score(doc=8116,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 8116, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8116)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Shortened and revised version of a paper presented during an Education Librarian's Group session at the Under One Umbrella Two Conference, organized by the Library Association in Manchester, 9-11 Jul 93. With the possibility of free text searching and easy access to CD-ROM databases, users often do not realise that subject searching is enhanced by familiarity with the controlled vocabulary underlying the indexing system of the database. Discusses the construction of information retrieval thesauri, the problems of terminology and how the use of thesauri can make searching more effective, using education thesauri as examples
  15. Knutson, G.: Subject enhancement : report on an experiment (1991) 0.01
    0.0076571116 = product of:
      0.030628446 = sum of:
        0.030628446 = weight(_text_:library in 4648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030628446 = score(doc=4648,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 4648, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4648)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This report describes an experiment in subject enhancement conducted at an academic research library. Subjects and contents notes were added to online catalog records for a group of previously uncirculated social science essay collections, and circulation was monitored over one academic year. A control group, plus a third group with added contents notes but no extra subjects, were also monitored. Results showed an improvement in recorded use for the subject-enhanced titles, but not for titles that only had added contents notes. The effects of browsing, keyword searching, and OPAC display are discussed
  16. Kartus, E.: ¬A fully automated cataloguing workbench with enhanced subject access : the cataloguer's dream or nightmare? (1993) 0.01
    0.0073997467 = product of:
      0.029598987 = sum of:
        0.029598987 = product of:
          0.059197973 = sum of:
            0.059197973 = weight(_text_:project in 4651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059197973 = score(doc=4651,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21156175 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050121464 = queryNorm
                0.27981415 = fieldWeight in 4651, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4651)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the Intelligent Literature Search Assistant (ILSA) which demonstrates the possibilities of a fully automated cataloguing workbench in an object orientated environment. Although developed with OPAC users in mind, it can be very useful to cataloguers in aiding both classification and subject heading access. Also describes work done at the University of Strathclyde in the area of machine learning and knowledge based systems, the Structured Information Management: Processing and Retrieval project (SIMPR). Advocates the use of uncontrolled vocabulary headings in conjunction with systems like ILSA, a layered approach rather than direct first point access, in order to make subject cataloguing easier and more relevant and the subject catalogue more useful to others
  17. Pienaar, R.E.: Enhancement of subject access in online public access catalogues (OPACs) (1989) 0.01
    0.0057428335 = product of:
      0.022971334 = sum of:
        0.022971334 = weight(_text_:library in 2863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022971334 = score(doc=2863,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 2863, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2863)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    South African journal of library and information science. 57(1989) no.4, S.378-382
  18. Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Colenbrander-Dijkman, A.-M.: Subject access to central catalogues : incompatibility issues of library classification systems and subject headings in subject cataloguing (1986) 0.01
    0.0057428335 = product of:
      0.022971334 = sum of:
        0.022971334 = weight(_text_:library in 3926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022971334 = score(doc=3926,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 3926, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3926)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  19. Beck, C.: ¬Die Qualität der Fremddatenanreicherung FRED (2021) 0.01
    0.0057428335 = product of:
      0.022971334 = sum of:
        0.022971334 = weight(_text_:library in 377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022971334 = score(doc=377,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 377, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=377)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Das Projekt Fremddatenanreicherung (FRED) der Zentralbibliothek Zürich und der Universitätsbibliotheken Basel und Bern wurde schon verschiedentlich in Präsentationen vorgestellt und in der Literatur (Bucher et al. 2018) behandelt, wobei allerdings nur das Projekt vorgestellt und statistische Werte zur quantitativen Datenanreicherung sowie die Kooperation innerhalb des Projekts, also bei der Implementierung von FRED, dargestellt wurden. Der vorliegende Beitrag versucht weiterführend, die Qualität dieser Fremddatenanreicherung mittels einer subjektiven Beschreibung und Bewertung zu untersuchen. Zudem werden abschließend ein paar Fragen zum weiteren Einsatz von FRED in der völlig veränderten Bibliothekslandschaft der Schweiz mit der Swiss Library Service Platform (SLSP) ab 2021 aufgeworfen. Die Untersuchung erfolgt mittels einer Stichprobe aus Printbüchern für zwei sozialwissenschaftliche Fächer, stellt aber nur eine Art Beobachtung dar, deren Ergebnisse nicht repräsentativ für die Datenanreicherung durch FRED sind. Nicht behandelt wird im Folgenden die zeitweilig in Zürich, Basel und Bern erfolgte Datenanreicherung von E-Books. Auch ist die Qualität der geleisteten intellektuellen Verschlagwortung in den Verbünden, aus denen FRED schöpft, kein Thema. Es geht hier nur, aber immerhin, um die mit FRED erzielten Resultate im intellektuellen Verschlagwortungsumfeld des Frühjahres 2020.
  20. Oehlschläger, S.: Aus der 48. Sitzung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme am 12. und 13. November 2004 in Göttingen (2005) 0.01
    0.0053852284 = product of:
      0.021540914 = sum of:
        0.021540914 = weight(_text_:digital in 3556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021540914 = score(doc=3556,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.10895388 = fieldWeight in 3556, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3556)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Die Deutsche Bibliothek Retrieval von Content In dem Projekt wird angestrebt, Verfahren zu entwickeln und einzuführen, die automatisch und ohne intellektuelle Bearbeitung für das Content-Retrieval ausreichend Sucheinstiege bieten. Dabei kann es sich um die Suche nach Inhalten von Volltexten, digitalen Abbildern, Audiofiles, Videofiles etc. von in Der Deutschen Bibliothek archivierten digitalen Ressourcen oder digitalen Surrogaten archivierter analoger Ressourcen (z. B. OCR-Ergebnisse) handeln. Inhalte, die in elektronischer Form vorhanden sind, aber dem InternetBenutzer Der Deutschen Bibliothek bisher nicht oder nur eingeschränkt zur Verfügung stehen, sollen in möglichst großem Umfang und mit möglichst großem Komfort nutzbar gemacht werden. Darüber hinaus sollen Inhalte benutzt werden, die für ein in ILTIS katalogisiertes Objekt beschreibenden Charakter haben, um auf das beschriebene Objekt zu verweisen. Die höchste Priorität liegt dabei auf der Erschließung von Inhalten in Textformaten. In einem ersten Schritt wurde der Volltext aller Zeitschriften, die im Projekt "Exilpresse digital" digitalisiert wurden, für eine erweiterte Suche genutzt. In einem nächsten Schritt soll die PSI-Software für die Volltextindexierung von Abstracts evaluiert werden. MILOS Mit dem Einsatz von MILOS eröffnet sich die Möglichkeit, nicht oder wenig sachlich erschlossene Bestände automatisch mit ergänzenden Inhaltserschließungsinformationen zu versehen, der Schwerpunkt liegt dabei auf der Freitext-Indexierung. Das bereits in einigen Bibliotheken eingesetzte System, das inzwischen von Der Deutschen Bibliothek für Deutschland lizenziert wurde, wurde in eine UNIX-Version überführt und angepasst. Inzwischen wurde nahezu der gesamte Bestand rückwirkend behandelt, die Daten werden im Gesamt-OPAC für die Recherche zur Verfügung stehen. Die in einer XMLStruktur abgelegten Indexeinträge werden dabei vollständig indexiert und zugänglich gemacht. Ein weiterer Entwicklungsschritt wird in dem Einsatz von MILOS im Online-Verfahren liegen.