-
Fox, E.A.; Urs, S.R.: Digital libraries (2002)
0.07
0.06532348 = product of:
0.13064696 = sum of:
0.10898937 = weight(_text_:digital in 4299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10898937 = score(doc=4299,freq=20.0), product of:
0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.5512679 = fieldWeight in 4299, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4299)
0.021657582 = weight(_text_:library in 4299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021657582 = score(doc=4299,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.16433616 = fieldWeight in 4299, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4299)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The emergence of digital libraries (DLs), at the interface of library and information science with computer and communication technologies, helped to expand significantly the literature in all of these areas during the late 1990s. The pace of development is reflected by the number of special issues of major journals in information science and computer science, and the increasing number of workshops and conferences an digital libraries. For example, starting in 1995, the Communications of the ACM has devoted three special issues to the topic (Fox, Akscyn, Furuta, & Leggett, 1995; Fox & Marchionini, 1998, 2001). The Journal of the American Society for Information Science devoted two issues to digital libraries (H. Chen, 2000; Fox & Lunin, 1993); Information Processing & Management and the Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation each had one special issue (Chen & Fox, 1996; Marchionini & Fox, 1999). The domain of digital libraries, though still evolving, has matured over the last decade, as demonstrated by coverage through D-Lib (http://www.dlib.org), the International Journal an Digital Libraries (http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/00799), and two overview works (W Y Arms, 2000; Lesk, 1997; both of which have also served as textbooks). Sun Microsystems published a small book to guide those planning a digital library (Noerr, 2000), and IBM has been developing commercial products for digital libraries since 1994 (IBM, 2000). A number of Web sites have extensive sets of pointers to information an DLs (D-Lib Forum, 2001; Fox, 1998a; Habing, 1998; Hein, 2000; Schwartz, 2001a, 2001b). Further, the field has attracted the attention of diverse academics, research groups, and practitionersmany of whom have attended tutorials, workshops, or conferences, e.g., the Joint Conference an Digital Libraries, which is a sequel to a separate series run by ACM and IEEE-CS. Therefore, it is timely that ARIST publishes this first review focusing specifically an digital libraries. There has been no ARIST chapter to date directly dealing with the area of DLs, though some related domains have been covered-particularly: information retrieval, user interfaces (Marchionini & Komlodi, 1998), social informatics of DLs (Bishop & Star, 1996), and scholarly communication (see Borgman and Furner's chapter in this volume). This chapter provides an overview of the diverse aspects and dimensions of DL research, practice, and literature, identifying trends and delineating research directions.
-
Desale, S.K.; Kumbhar, R.: Research on automatic classification of documents in library environment : a literature review (2013)
0.05
0.048820432 = product of:
0.097640865 = sum of:
0.051698197 = weight(_text_:digital in 1071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051698197 = score(doc=1071,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.26148933 = fieldWeight in 1071, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1071)
0.045942668 = weight(_text_:library in 1071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045942668 = score(doc=1071,freq=8.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.34860963 = fieldWeight in 1071, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1071)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This paper aims to provide an overview of automatic classification research, which focuses on issues related to the automatic classification of documents in a library environment. The review covers literature published in mainstream library and information science studies. The review was done on literature published in both academic and professional LIS journals and other documents. This review reveals that basically three types of research are being done on automatic classification: 1) hierarchical classification using different library classification schemes, 2) text categorization and document categorization using different type of classifiers with or without using training documents, and 3) automatic bibliographic classification. Predominantly this research is directed towards solving problems of organization of digital documents in an online environment. However, very little research is devoted towards solving the problems of arrangement of physical documents.
-
Siqueira, J.; Martins, D.L.: Workflow models for aggregating cultural heritage data on the web : a systematic literature review (2022)
0.05
0.046881348 = product of:
0.093762696 = sum of:
0.07461992 = weight(_text_:digital in 464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07461992 = score(doc=464,freq=6.0), product of:
0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.37742734 = fieldWeight in 464, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=464)
0.01914278 = weight(_text_:library in 464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01914278 = score(doc=464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.14525402 = fieldWeight in 464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=464)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- In recent years, different cultural institutions have made efforts to spread culture through the construction of a unique search interface that integrates their digital objects and facilitates data retrieval for lay users. However, integrating cultural data is not a trivial task; therefore, this work performs a systematic literature review on data aggregation workflows, in order to answer five questions: What are the projects? What are the planned steps? Which technologies are used? Are the steps performed manually, automatically, or semi-automatically? Which perform semantic search? The searches were carried out in three databases: Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations, Scopus and Web of Science. In Q01, 12 projects were selected. In Q02, 9 stages were identified: Harvesting, Ingestion, Mapping, Indexing, Storing, Monitoring, Enriching, Displaying, and Publishing LOD. In Q03, 19 different technologies were found it. In Q04, we identified that most of the solutions are semi-automatic and, in Q05, that most of them perform a semantic search. The analysis of the workflows allowed us to identify that there is no consensus regarding the stages, their nomenclatures, and technologies, besides presenting superficial discussions. But it allowed to identify the main steps for the implementation of the aggregation of cultural data.
- Series
- JASIST special issue on digital humanities (DH): B. Infrastructures of DH
-
Weiss, A.K.; Carstens, T.V.: ¬The year's work in cataloging, 1999 (2001)
0.04
0.03868373 = product of:
0.07736746 = sum of:
0.053599782 = weight(_text_:library in 6084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053599782 = score(doc=6084,freq=8.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.40671125 = fieldWeight in 6084, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6084)
0.023767682 = product of:
0.047535364 = sum of:
0.047535364 = weight(_text_:22 in 6084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047535364 = score(doc=6084,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6084, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6084)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The challenge of cataloging Web sites and electronic resources was the most important issue facing the cataloging world in the last year. This article reviews attempts to analyze and revise the cataloging code in view of the new electronic environment. The difficulties of applying traditional library cataloging standards to Web resources has led some to favor metadata as the best means of providing access to these materials. The appropriate education and training for library cataloging personnel remains crucial during this transitional period. Articles on user understanding of Library of Congress subject headings and on cataloging practice are also reviewed.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 45(2001) no.1, S
-
Woodward, J.: Cataloging and classifying information resources on the Internet (1996)
0.04
0.037770826 = product of:
0.07554165 = sum of:
0.045942668 = weight(_text_:library in 7397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045942668 = score(doc=7397,freq=8.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.34860963 = fieldWeight in 7397, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7397)
0.029598987 = product of:
0.059197973 = sum of:
0.059197973 = weight(_text_:project in 7397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059197973 = score(doc=7397,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21156175 = queryWeight, product of:
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.27981415 = fieldWeight in 7397, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7397)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- State of the art review exploring the problem of bibliographic citations to resources that exist only in electronic form where the cited items may no longer be locatable at the URL indicated. Notes that the Internet is currently in a state of near chaos in terms of access and organization, while searching, usually performed with word based search engines, is generally not adequate for the needs of most users. Reviews strategies used by librarians for cataloguing and classifying information resources on the Internet. Techniques used include: automatic classification projects and classified subject trees, like the BUBL Subject Tree; CyberDewey, and the WWW Virtual Library. Considers OPAC like library catalogues such as the UK's CATRIONA Project and OCLC's InterCat. Explores retrieval tools used with concept analysis and other non traditional proposals, which include some library expertise, usually the use of one of the major library classifications. Pays particular attention to the UDC
-
Yu, N.: Readings & Web resources for faceted classification
0.04
0.037334766 = product of:
0.07466953 = sum of:
0.051698197 = weight(_text_:digital in 4394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051698197 = score(doc=4394,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.26148933 = fieldWeight in 4394, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4394)
0.022971334 = weight(_text_:library in 4394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022971334 = score(doc=4394,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 4394, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4394)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The term "facet" has been used in various places, while in most cases it is just a buzz word to replace what is indeed "aspect" or "category". The references below either define and explain the original concept of facet or provide guidelines for building 'real' faceted search/browse. I was interested in faceted classification because it seems to be a natural and efficient way for organizing and browsing Web collections. However, to automatically generate facets and their isolates is extremely difficult since it involves concept extraction and concept grouping, both of which are difficult problems by themselves. And it is almost impossible to achieve mutually exclusive and jointly exhaustive 'true' facets without human judgment. Nowadays, faceted search/browse widely exists, implicitly or explicitly, on a majority of retail websites due to the multi-aspects nature of the data. However, it is still rarely seen on any digital library sites. (I could be wrong since I haven't kept myself updated with this field for a while.)
-
Rader, H.B.: Library orientation and instruction - 1993 (1994)
0.04
0.0361197 = product of:
0.0722394 = sum of:
0.03828556 = weight(_text_:library in 209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03828556 = score(doc=209,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.29050803 = fieldWeight in 209, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=209)
0.033953834 = product of:
0.06790767 = sum of:
0.06790767 = weight(_text_:22 in 209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06790767 = score(doc=209,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 209, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=209)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Reference services review. 22(1994) no.4, S.81-
-
El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008)
0.04
0.035239115 = product of:
0.07047823 = sum of:
0.043315165 = weight(_text_:library in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043315165 = score(doc=249,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
0.027163066 = product of:
0.054326132 = sum of:
0.054326132 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054326132 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This paper reviews library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2005-06. It covers pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of cataloging; Functional Requirement for Bibliographic Records (FRBR); metadata and its applications and relation to Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC); cataloging tools and standards; authority control; and recruitment, training, and the changing role of catalogers.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 52(2008) no.3, S.148-163
-
Gödert, W.: Literatur zur Inhaltserschließung : ein Projekt an der FHBD in Köln (1994)
0.04
0.035046883 = product of:
0.070093766 = sum of:
0.030628446 = weight(_text_:library in 5148) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030628446 = score(doc=5148,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 5148, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5148)
0.039465316 = product of:
0.07893063 = sum of:
0.07893063 = weight(_text_:project in 5148) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07893063 = score(doc=5148,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21156175 = queryWeight, product of:
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.37308553 = fieldWeight in 5148, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5148)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Cologne Library School ran a project to construct a database for literature on content cataloguing and fringe disciplines. Software was the BISMAS 1.0 programme and is now the 1.5 version. The category scheme, indexes and retrieval possibilities are described. Retrieval is mainly free text, using the whole document description and all descriptive categories. BISMAS does not permit standard data file administration so a further database was provided ...
-
Bearman, D.: Digital libraries (2007)
0.03
0.034465462 = product of:
0.13786185 = sum of:
0.13786185 = weight(_text_:digital in 5634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13786185 = score(doc=5634,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.69730484 = fieldWeight in 5634, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5634)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Chambers, S.; Myall, C.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2007-8 (2010)
0.03
0.030834224 = product of:
0.06166845 = sum of:
0.03790077 = weight(_text_:library in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03790077 = score(doc=4309,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
0.023767682 = product of:
0.047535364 = sum of:
0.047535364 = weight(_text_:22 in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047535364 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This paper surveys library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2007-8, indicating its extent and range in terms of types of literature, major subject areas, and themes. The paper reviews pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of bibliographic control, general cataloging standards and texts, Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), cataloging varied resources, metadata and cataloging in the Web world, classification and subject access, questions of diversity and diverse perspectives, additional reports of practice and research, catalogers' education and careers, keeping current through columns and blogs, and cataloging history.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 54(2010) no.2, S.90-114
-
Galloway, P.: Preservation of digital objects (2003)
0.03
0.030463453 = product of:
0.12185381 = sum of:
0.12185381 = weight(_text_:digital in 4275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12185381 = score(doc=4275,freq=16.0), product of:
0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.6163362 = fieldWeight in 4275, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4275)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The preservation of digital objects (defined here as objects in digital form that require a computer to support their existence and display) is obviously an important practical issue for the information professions, with its importance growing daily as more information objects are produced in, or converted to, digital form. Yakel's (2001) review of the field provided a much-needed introduction. At the same time, the complexity of new digital objects continues to increase, challenging existing preservation efforts (Lee, Skattery, Lu, Tang, & McCrary, 2002). The field of information science itself is beginning to pay some reflexive attention to the creation of fragile and unpreservable digital objects. But these concerns focus often an the practical problems of short-term repurposing of digital objects rather than actual preservation, by which I mean the activity of carrying digital objects from one software generation to another, undertaken for purposes beyond the original reasons for creating the objects. For preservation in this sense to be possible, information science as a discipline needs to be active in the formulation of, and advocacy for, national information policies. Such policies will need to challenge the predominant cultural expectation of planned obsolescence for information resources, and cultural artifacts in general.
-
Kim, K.-S.: Recent work in cataloging and classification, 2000-2002 (2003)
0.03
0.028895756 = product of:
0.057791512 = sum of:
0.030628446 = weight(_text_:library in 152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030628446 = score(doc=152,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 152, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=152)
0.027163066 = product of:
0.054326132 = sum of:
0.054326132 = weight(_text_:22 in 152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054326132 = score(doc=152,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 152, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=152)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 47(2003) no.3, S.96-108
-
Miksa, S.D.: ¬The challenges of change : a review of cataloging and classification literature, 2003-2004 (2007)
0.03
0.028895756 = product of:
0.057791512 = sum of:
0.030628446 = weight(_text_:library in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030628446 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
0.027163066 = product of:
0.054326132 = sum of:
0.054326132 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054326132 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 51(2007) no.1, S.51-68
-
Smeaton, A.F.: Indexing, browsing, and searching of digital video (2003)
0.03
0.02849595 = product of:
0.1139838 = sum of:
0.1139838 = weight(_text_:digital in 4274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1139838 = score(doc=4274,freq=14.0), product of:
0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.57652974 = fieldWeight in 4274, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4274)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Video is a communications medium that normally brings together moving pictures with a synchronized audio track into a discrete piece or pieces of information. A "piece" of video is variously referred to as a frame, a shot, a scene, a Clip, a program, or an episode; these pieces are distinguished by their length and by their composition. We shall return to the definition of each of these in the section an automatically structuring and indexing digital video. In modern society, Video is commonplace and is usually equated with television, movies, or home Video produced by a Video camera or camcorder. We also accept Video recorded from closed circuit TVs for security and surveillance as part of our daily lives. In short, Video is ubiquitous. Digital Video is, as the name suggests, the creation or capture of Video information in digital format. Most Video produced today, commercial, surveillance, or domestic, is produced in digital form, although the medium of Video predates the development of digital computing by several decades. The essential nature of Video has not changed with the advent of digital computing. It is still moving pictures and synchronized audio. However, the production methods and the end product have gone through significant evolution, in the last decade especially.
-
Genereux, C.: Building connections : a review of the serials literature 2004 through 2005 (2007)
0.03
0.026429337 = product of:
0.052858673 = sum of:
0.032486375 = weight(_text_:library in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032486375 = score(doc=2548,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.24650425 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
0.0203723 = product of:
0.0407446 = sum of:
0.0407446 = weight(_text_:22 in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0407446 = score(doc=2548,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This review of 2004 and 2005 serials literature covers the themes of cost, management, and access. Interwoven through the serials literature of these two years are the importance of collaboration, communication, and linkages between scholars, publishers, subscription agents and other intermediaries, and librarians. The emphasis in the literature is on electronic serials and their impact on publishing, libraries, and vendors. In response to the crisis of escalating journal prices and libraries' dissatisfaction with the Big Deal licensing agreements, Open Access journals and publishing models were promoted. Libraries subscribed to or licensed increasing numbers of electronic serials. As a result, libraries sought ways to better manage licensing and subscription data (not handled by traditional integrated library systems) by implementing electronic resources management systems. In order to provide users with better, faster, and more current information on and access to electronic serials, libraries implemented tools and services to provide A-Z title lists, title by title coverage data, MARC records, and OpenURL link resolvers.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 51(2007) no.4, S.293-304
-
Martin, K.E.; Mundle, K.: Positioning libraries for a new bibliographic universe (2014)
0.03
0.026429337 = product of:
0.052858673 = sum of:
0.032486375 = weight(_text_:library in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032486375 = score(doc=2608,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.24650425 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
0.0203723 = product of:
0.0407446 = sum of:
0.0407446 = weight(_text_:22 in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0407446 = score(doc=2608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This paper surveys the English-language literature on cataloging and classification published during 2011 and 2012, covering both theory and application. A major theme of the literature centered on Resource Description and Access (RDA), as the period covered in this review includes the conclusion of the RDA test, revisions to RDA, and the implementation decision. Explorations in the theory and practical applications of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), upon which RDA is organized, are also heavily represented. Library involvement with linked data through the creation of prototypes and vocabularies are explored further during the period. Other areas covered in the review include: classification, controlled vocabularies and name authority, evaluation and history of cataloging, special formats cataloging, cataloging and discovery services, non-AACR2/RDA metadata, cataloging workflows, and the education and careers of catalogers.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 58(2014) no.4, S.233-249
-
Winget, M.A.: Videogame preservation and massively multiplayer online role-playing games : a review of the literature (2011)
0.02
0.022385975 = product of:
0.0895439 = sum of:
0.0895439 = weight(_text_:digital in 4760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0895439 = score(doc=4760,freq=6.0), product of:
0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.4529128 = fieldWeight in 4760, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4760)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Videogames are important cultural and economic artifacts. They also present challenges that anticipate the problems inherent in any complex digital interactive system. Not only are they digital and hence very difficult to preserve but they also are software systems that have significant hardware, peripheral, and network dependencies, which are difficult to collect and formally represent. This article reviews the literature related to videogame preservation. In addition to covering the traditional technology-related issues inherent in all digital preservation endeavors, this review also attempts to describe the complexities and relationships between the traditional acts of technology preservation, representation, and collection development. Future work should include the identification of important user groups, an examination of games' context of use, and the development of representational models to describe interaction of players with the game and the interactions between players playing the game.
-
Corbett, L.E.: Serials: review of the literature 2000-2003 (2006)
0.02
0.022024449 = product of:
0.044048898 = sum of:
0.027071979 = weight(_text_:library in 1088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027071979 = score(doc=1088,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.2054202 = fieldWeight in 1088, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1088)
0.016976917 = product of:
0.033953834 = sum of:
0.033953834 = weight(_text_:22 in 1088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033953834 = score(doc=1088,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1088, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1088)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The topic of electronic journals (e-journals) dominated the serials literature from 2000 to 2003. This review is limited to the events and issues within the broad topics of cost, management, and archiving. Coverage of cost includes such initiatives as PEAK, JACC, BioMed Central, SPARC, open access, the "Big Deal," and "going e-only." Librarians combated the continued price increase trend for journals, fueled in part by publisher mergers, with the economies found with bundled packages and consortial subscriptions. Serials management topics include usage statistics; core title lists; staffing needs; the "A-Z list" and other services from such companies as Serials Solutions; "deep linking"; link resolvers such as SFX; development of standards or guidelines, such as COUNTER and ERMI; tracking of license terms; vendor mergers; and the demise of integrated library systems and a subscription agent's bankruptcy. Librarians archived print volumes in storage facilities due to space shortages. Librarians and publishers struggled with electronic archiving concepts, discussing questions of who, where, and how. Projects such as LOCKSS tested potential solutions, but missing online content due to the Tasini court case and retractions posed more archiving difficulties. The serials literature captured much of the upheaval resulting from the rapid pace of changes, many linked to the advent of e-journals.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 50(2006) no.1, S.xx-xx
-
Mostafa, J.: Digital image representation and access (1994)
0.02
0.021324418 = product of:
0.085297674 = sum of:
0.085297674 = weight(_text_:digital in 1102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.085297674 = score(doc=1102,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.43143538 = fieldWeight in 1102, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1102)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- State of the art review of techniques used to generate, store and retrieval digital images. Explains basic terms and concepts related to image representation and describes the differences between bilevel, greyscale, and colour images. Introduces additional image related data, specifically colour standards, correction values, resolution parameters and lookup tables. Illustrates the use of data compression techniques and various image data formats that have been used. Identifies 4 branches of imaging research related to dtaa indexing and modelling: verbal indexing; visual surrogates; image indexing; and data structures. Concludes with a discussion of the state of the art in networking technology with consideration of image distribution, local system requirements and data integrity
