Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × type_ss:"s"
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Informetrics '91 : selected papers from the 3rd International Conference on Bibliometrics, 9-12 Aug. 1991, Bangalore (1993) 0.01
    0.011485667 = product of:
      0.045942668 = sum of:
        0.045942668 = weight(_text_:library in 5063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045942668 = score(doc=5063,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.34860963 = fieldWeight in 5063, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5063)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Imprint
    Bangalore : Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science
  2. Proceedings of the Fifth Biennial Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (1995) 0.01
    0.011485667 = product of:
      0.045942668 = sum of:
        0.045942668 = weight(_text_:library in 7868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045942668 = score(doc=7868,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.34860963 = fieldWeight in 7868, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7868)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Library and information science research 18(1996) no.1, S.90-92 (E. Davenport)
  3. Metrics in research : for better or worse? (2016) 0.01
    0.0086163655 = product of:
      0.034465462 = sum of:
        0.034465462 = weight(_text_:digital in 3312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034465462 = score(doc=3312,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.17432621 = fieldWeight in 3312, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3312)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    If you are an academic researcher but did not earn (yet) your Nobel prize or your retirement, it is unlikely you never heard about research metrics. These metrics aim at quantifying various aspects of the research process, at the level of individual researchers (e.g. h-index, altmetrics), scientific journals (e.g. impact factors) or entire universities/ countries (e.g. rankings). Although such "measurements" have existed in a simple form for a long time, their widespread calculation was enabled by the advent of the digital era (large amount of data available worldwide in a computer-compatible format). And in this new era, what becomes technically possible will be done, and what is done and appears to simplify our lives will be used. As a result, a rapidly growing number of statistics-based numerical indices are nowadays fed into decisionmaking processes. This is true in nearly all aspects of society (politics, economy, education and private life), and in particular in research, where metrics play an increasingly important role in determining positions, funding, awards, research programs, career choices, reputations, etc.
  4. Scholarly metrics under the microscope : from citation analysis to academic auditing (2015) 0.01
    0.0067907665 = product of:
      0.027163066 = sum of:
        0.027163066 = product of:
          0.054326132 = sum of:
            0.054326132 = weight(_text_:22 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054326132 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050121464 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2017 17:12:50