-
Comaroni, J.P.: Use of the Dewey Decimal Classification in the United States and Canada (1978)
0.03
0.025283787 = product of:
0.050567575 = sum of:
0.026799891 = weight(_text_:library in 1151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026799891 = score(doc=1151,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 1151, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1151)
0.023767682 = product of:
0.047535364 = sum of:
0.047535364 = weight(_text_:22 in 1151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047535364 = score(doc=1151,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1151, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1151)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 22(1978), S.402-408
-
Tauber, M.F.; Feinberg, H.: ¬The Dewey Decimal and Library of Congress Classifications : an overview (1974)
0.02
0.018950384 = product of:
0.07580154 = sum of:
0.07580154 = weight(_text_:library in 1264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07580154 = score(doc=1264,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.57517654 = fieldWeight in 1264, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1264)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Drexel library quarterly. 10(1974) no.4, S.56-74
-
Wellisch, H.H.: UDC: present and potential (1974)
0.02
0.015314223 = product of:
0.061256893 = sum of:
0.061256893 = weight(_text_:library in 1263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061256893 = score(doc=1263,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.46481284 = fieldWeight in 1263, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1263)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Drexel library quarterly. 10(1974) no.4, S.75-89
-
Immroth, J.P.: Library of Congress Classification (1976)
0.02
0.015314223 = product of:
0.061256893 = sum of:
0.061256893 = weight(_text_:library in 1274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061256893 = score(doc=1274,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.46481284 = fieldWeight in 1274, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1274)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Mowery, R.L.: ¬The "¬trend to LC" in college and university libraries (1975)
0.01
0.010828791 = product of:
0.043315165 = sum of:
0.043315165 = weight(_text_:library in 1152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043315165 = score(doc=1152,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 1152, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1152)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Seeking to document the extent to which libraries of four-year colleges and universities have adopted the LCC system, this study surveys the classification systems used by the libraries of 1.160 accredited four-year-colleges and universities. The LC system is presently being used by more than half of these libraries; however, throughout 1968-71 the "trend to LC" clearly lost momentum. Data are provided on the extent to which the Library of Congress and The DDC systems were used in 1967 and 1971 by libraries of various sizes and categories
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 19(1975), S.389-397
-
Dahlberg, I.: Grundlagen universaler Wissensordnung : Probleme und Möglichkeiten eines universalen Klassifikationssystems des Wissens (1974)
0.01
0.008488459 = product of:
0.033953834 = sum of:
0.033953834 = product of:
0.06790767 = sum of:
0.06790767 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06790767 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Footnote
- Zugleich Dissertation Univ. Düsseldorf. - Rez. in: ZfBB. 22(1975) S.53-57 (H.-A. Koch)
-
Reynolds, D.J.: ¬The introduction and use of forms of decimal classification in Russia, 1895-1921 : UDC, DDC, and the normal plan (1977)
0.01
0.008121594 = product of:
0.032486375 = sum of:
0.032486375 = weight(_text_:library in 1129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032486375 = score(doc=1129,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.24650425 = fieldWeight in 1129, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1129)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The first mention of the decimal system of classification in the Russian library literature occured in 1895. Between 1895 and 1907, the system made little headway in Russia. In the few instances in which it was adopted during this period, the form was generally that of the UDC rather than that of the DDC. In 1908, the decimal system began to receive greater attention in Russia, owing in part to the efforts of the bibliographer B.S. Bodnarskii, a UDC proponent. In 1911, a group of St. Petersburg librarians put forward their own scheme of decimal classification for small Russian libaries. In addition to the UDC and the domestic Russian variant, DDC also received some serious attention and appears to have been most popular form in Russia following the revolution of 1917. In early 1921, however, the Russian government issued a decree singling out the UDC as the system of classification to be used in all libraries in Russia
- Source
- Library quarterly. 47(1977), S.431-450
