Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

Svenonius, E.: Bibliographical classification (1990) 0.01

0.013399946 = product of:
  0.053599782 = sum of:
    0.053599782 = weight(_text_:library in 2404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053599782 = score(doc=2404,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.40671125 = fieldWeight in 2404, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2404)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Library classification and its functions. Int. Conf. on ..., 20.-21.6.1989, Edmonton, Alberta. Ed.: A. Nitecki u. T. Fell

Svenonius, E.: Design of controlled vocabularies (1990) 0.01

0.013399946 = product of:
  0.053599782 = sum of:
    0.053599782 = weight(_text_:library in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053599782 = score(doc=1271,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.40671125 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.45, [=Suppl.10]

Svenonius, E.; Molto, M.: Automatic derivation of name access points in cataloging (1990) 0.01

0.010828791 = product of:
  0.043315165 = sum of:
    0.043315165 = weight(_text_:library in 3569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043315165 = score(doc=3569,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 3569, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3569)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract: Reports the results of research designed to explore the feasibility of automatically deriving name access points from machine readable title pages of English language monographs. Results show that approximately 88% of the access points selected by the Library of Congress or the National Library of Medicine could be automatically derived from title page data. These results have implications for the design of bibliographic standards and on-line catalogues.

Svenonius, E.; McGarry, D.: Objectivity in evaluating subject heading assignment (1993) 0.01
```
0.008633038 = product of:
  0.034532152 = sum of:
    0.034532152 = product of:
      0.069064304 = sum of:
        0.069064304 = weight(_text_:project in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069064304 = score(doc=5612,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21156175 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.32644984 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

Recent papers have called attention to discrepancies in the assignment of LCSH. While philosophical arguments can be made that subject analysis, if not a logical impossibility, at least is point-of-view dependent, subject headings continue to be assigned and continue to be useful. The hypothesis advanced in the present project is that to a considerable degree there is a clear-cut right and wrong to LCSH subject heading assignment. To test the hypothesis, it was postulated that the assignment of a subject heading is correct if it is supported by textual warrant (at least 20% of the book being cataloged is on the topic) and is constructed in accordance with the LoC Subject Cataloging Manual: Subject Headings. A sample of 100 books on scientific subjects was used to test the hypothesis
Molto, M.; Svenonius, E.: ¬An electronic interface to AACR2 (1998) 0.01
```
0.008633038 = product of:
  0.034532152 = sum of:
    0.034532152 = product of:
      0.069064304 = sum of:
        0.069064304 = weight(_text_:project in 2838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069064304 = score(doc=2838,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21156175 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.32644984 = fieldWeight in 2838, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2838)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

Reports results of a project to explore ways of reconfiguring AACR2 for use in an automated environment. A subset of AACR2 title proper rules for books was chosen for analysis. A functional classification of the rule subset was developed, based on the 4 facets: Source, Choice, Form, and Definition. The rules were also classified according to whether they were core or peripheral. A prototype electronic interface was developed for searching and displaying the classified rules. The greatest problem in the rule reconfiguration stemmed from the structural problems of AACR2: rule groupings combining multiple subfacets under a single rule; rule redundancy; and rule scatter, between chapters, and between sections of chapters and appendices

Liu, S.; Svenonius, E.: DORS: DDC online retrieval system (1991) 0.01

0.0076571116 = product of:
  0.030628446 = sum of:
    0.030628446 = weight(_text_:library in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030628446 = score(doc=1155,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Library resources and technical services. 35(1991), S.359-375

Svenonius, E.: ¬The impact of computer technology on knowledge representations (1992) 0.01

0.006699973 = product of:
  0.026799891 = sum of:
    0.026799891 = weight(_text_:library in 2379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026799891 = score(doc=2379,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 2379, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2379)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Imprint: Bangalore : Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science

Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Themes