Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × author_ss:"Poulter, A."
  1. Poulter, A.: Metaviews: metadata research and teaching in the United Kingdom and Ireland (2003) 0.05 
    0.047041588 = product of:
  0.094083175 = sum of:
    0.060926907 = weight(_text_:digital in 1996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060926907 = score(doc=1996,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.3081681 = fieldWeight in 1996, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1996)
    0.033156272 = weight(_text_:library in 1996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033156272 = score(doc=1996,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.25158736 = fieldWeight in 1996, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1996)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Although research and teaching can (and should) be seen as international, there must also be an underlying national focus, based on the structure of higher education in a particular country and a corresponding unique pattern of teaching and research. This column therefore looks at research and teaching in metadata in the UK and Ireland, since I work at Strathclyde University in the UK that teaches and researches metadata. This column illustrates that, indeed, the current state of research and teaching in metadata is currently healthy in the UK and Ireland. There are a variety or research activities related to metadata taking place. These range from metadata for digital preservation through 'mainstream' metadata applications in library and information work to contributing to work an the semantic web itself. Among the leading organisational foci of metadata research in the UK are: - the Metadata Group at UKOLN (formerly the UK Office of Library and Information Networking) at the University of Bath (http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/) - the Semantic Web Research Group at the Institute for Learning and Research Technology (ILRT) at the University of Bristol (http://www.ilrt.bristol.ac.uk/discovery/) - the Centre for Digital Library Research (CDLR) at the University of Strathclyde (http://cdlr.strath.ac.uk/).
  2. Poulter, A.; Brunt, R.: On reading "Information storage and retrieval in the professional curriculum" by Rodney Brunt (2007) 0.04 
    0.041847028 = product of:
  0.083694056 = sum of:
    0.059926376 = weight(_text_:library in 870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059926376 = score(doc=870,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050121464 = queryNorm
        0.45471698 = fieldWeight in 870, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=870)
    0.023767682 = product of:
      0.047535364 = sum of:
        0.047535364 = weight(_text_:22 in 870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047535364 = score(doc=870,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 870, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=870)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Purpose - Reflects on a paper extolling teaching cataloguing and indexing at library school written for Library Review in 1980. Design/methodology/approach - Reflective debate on the content of the original paper. Findings - The sentiments of the original paper were supported, with the added proviso that nowadays the ability to organise information is a basic skill everyone needs. Practical implications - May be of interest to practitioners and library educators interested in this long standing debate. Originality/value - Paper carries a response by the original author to the reflections on his paper.
    Content
    Bezugnahme auf Brunt, R.: Information storage and retrieval in the professional curriculum, Spring, 1980 [Wiederabdruck]: in: Library review. 56(2007) no.7, S.552-556.
    Date
    23.12.2007 18:40:22
    Source
    Library review. 56(2007) no.7, S.557-562

Themes