Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × subject_ss:"Classification of sciences"
  1. Szostak, R.: Classifying science : phenomena, data, theory, method, practice (2004) 0.03
    0.027409516 = product of:
      0.054819033 = sum of:
        0.054819033 = product of:
          0.109638065 = sum of:
            0.109638065 = weight(_text_:2.2 in 325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.109638065 = score(doc=325,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.40031564 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048447352 = queryNorm
                0.27387905 = fieldWeight in 325, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=325)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: - Chapter 1: Classifying Science: 1.1. A Simple Classificatory Guideline - 1.2. The First "Cut" (and Plan of Work) - 1.3. Some Preliminaries - Chapter 2: Classifying Phenomena and Data: 2.1. Classifying Phenomena - 2.2. Classifying Data - Chapter 3: Classifying Theory: 3.1. Typology of Theory - 3.2. What Is a Theory? - 3.3. Evaluating Theories - 3.4. Types of Theory and the Five Types of Causation - 3.5. Classifying Individual Theories - 3.6. Advantages of a Typology of Theory - Chapter 4: Classifying Method: 4.1. Classifying Methods - 4.2. Typology of Strengths and Weaknesses of Methods - 4.3. Qualitative Versus Quantitative Analysis Revisited - 4.4. Evaluating Methods - 4.5. Classifying Particular Methods Within The Typology - 4.6. Advantages of a Typology of Methods - Chapter 5: Classifying Practice: 5.1. Errors and Biases in ScienceChapter - 5.2. Typology of (Critiques of) Scientific Practice - 5.3. Utilizing This Classification - 5.4. The Five Types of Ethical Analysis - Chapter 6: Drawing Connections Across These Classifications: 6.1. Theory and Method - 6.2. Theory (Method) and Phenomena (Data) - 6.3. Better Paradigms - 6.4. Critiques of Scientific Practice: Are They Correlated with Other Classifications? - Chapter 7: Classifying Scientific Documents: 7.1. Faceted or Enumerative? - 7.2. Classifying By Phenomena Studied - 7.3. Classifying By Theory Used - 7.4. Classifying By Method Used - 7.5 Links Among Subjects - 7.6. Type of Work, Language, and More - 7.7. Critiques of Scientific Practice - 7.8. Classifying Philosophy - 7.9. Evaluating the System - Chapter 8: Concluding Remarks: 8.1. The Classifications - 8.2. Advantages of These Various Classifications - 8.3. Drawing Connections Across Classifications - 8.4. Golden Mean Arguments - 8.5. Why Should Science Be Believed? - 8.6. How Can Science Be Improved? - 8.7. How Should Science Be Taught?
  2. Boerner, K.: Atlas of science : visualizing what we know (2010) 0.01
    0.006563947 = product of:
      0.013127894 = sum of:
        0.013127894 = product of:
          0.026255788 = sum of:
            0.026255788 = weight(_text_:22 in 3359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026255788 = score(doc=3359,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16965437 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048447352 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3359, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3359)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2017 17:12:16