Search (3672 results, page 2 of 184)

  1. #2434 0.05 
    0.04594763 = product of:
  0.09189526 = sum of:
    0.09189526 = product of:
      0.18379052 = sum of:
        0.18379052 = weight(_text_:22 in 2433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18379052 = score(doc=2433,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16965437 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048447352 = queryNorm
            1.0833232 = fieldWeight in 2433, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=2433)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    4. 9.2011 12:28:22
  2. #2819 0.05 
    0.04594763 = product of:
  0.09189526 = sum of:
    0.09189526 = product of:
      0.18379052 = sum of:
        0.18379052 = weight(_text_:22 in 2818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18379052 = score(doc=2818,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16965437 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048447352 = queryNorm
            1.0833232 = fieldWeight in 2818, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=2818)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.1998 19:49:25
  3. #4316 0.05 
    0.04594763 = product of:
  0.09189526 = sum of:
    0.09189526 = product of:
      0.18379052 = sum of:
        0.18379052 = weight(_text_:22 in 4315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18379052 = score(doc=4315,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16965437 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048447352 = queryNorm
            1.0833232 = fieldWeight in 4315, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=4315)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.1998 19:49:25
  4. #7401 0.05 
    0.04594763 = product of:
  0.09189526 = sum of:
    0.09189526 = product of:
      0.18379052 = sum of:
        0.18379052 = weight(_text_:22 in 7400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18379052 = score(doc=7400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16965437 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048447352 = queryNorm
            1.0833232 = fieldWeight in 7400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=7400)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.1998 19:49:25
  5. Reinmann-Rothmeier, G.: Wissen Managen : das Münchener Modell (2001) 0.05 
    0.045682527 = product of:
  0.091365054 = sum of:
    0.091365054 = product of:
      0.18273011 = sum of:
        0.18273011 = weight(_text_:2.2 in 3452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18273011 = score(doc=3452,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40031564 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048447352 = queryNorm
            0.45646507 = fieldWeight in 3452, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3452)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    1. Mit Wissensmanagement zur lernenden Organisation 1.1 " Outlearning the wolves" - eine Geschichte zum Enstieg 1.2 Der individuelle und der organisationale Lernzyklus 2. Das Wissens- und Managementverständnis im Münchener Modell 2.1 Bedeutungswandel beim Wissensbegriff 2.2 Balanceakt beim Managementbegriff 3. Die Auffassung von Wissensmanagement im Münchener Modell 3.1 Die Integrationsfunktion des Münchener Modells 3.2 Der Bedeutungsrahmen des Münchener Modells 4. Vier Phänomenbereiche im Münchener Modell 4.1 Wissensrepräsentation 4.2 Wissenskommunikation 4.3 Wissensgenerierung 4.4 Wissensnutzung 5. Die Rolle von Communities im Münchener Modell 5.1 Communities als innovative Organisationsstruktur 5.2 Communities als Keimzelle des Wissensmanagements 6. Ausblick: Forschungsstrategische Überlegungen zum Wissensmanagement
  6. Goldberg, J.E.: Development of a universal law classification : a retrospective on Library of Congress Class K (2003) 0.05 
    0.045682527 = product of:
  0.091365054 = sum of:
    0.091365054 = product of:
      0.18273011 = sum of:
        0.18273011 = weight(_text_:2.2 in 5640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18273011 = score(doc=5640,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40031564 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048447352 = queryNorm
            0.45646507 = fieldWeight in 5640, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5640)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Introduction 1. The Early Years of Library of Congress Collecting and Classifying (1801-1901) 1.1 Setting the Stage. The American Century 1.2 Expanding General Collections: The Window on Europe 1.3 A New Classification for the Library of Congress 2. Breaking Ground for Law: Classifications for the Discipline and its Literature 2.1 The Early Proposals for a Law Book Classification 2.2 Expanding Law Collections: The Second Window on Europe 2.3 The Law Classification Theater and the Players 2.4 Structure and Scope of the Anticipated Class K. Jurisdictionality 3. The Code vs. the Court report: Model Schemes for Civil and Common Law 3.1 The Washington Dialogues: Law for Law 3.2 In Search for Common Ground 3.2.1 The Committee Dialogues: Joint in Dissent 3.3 The Anglo-American Law: Model KF (Law of the United States) 3.4 The Law of the American Indians 4. The Civil law: Model KK (Law of Germany) 4.1 The Historic German Split and History of Law 4.2 KF and KK Comparatively 4.2.1 Private Law: Mixed Aspects 4.2.2 Constitutional and Administrative Law: Mixed Messages 4.3 KKA (Law of East Germany): Classification by Comparison 4.4 German States and Territories 5. The Regional Law: Model KJ (Law of Europe). Regionalism 5.1 The Resulting New Hierarchy 5.2 European Legal History: A Comparative Discipline 5.3 KJC Regional Comparative and Uniform Law 5.4 KJE Regional Organization and Integration 6. Regional Classification: KL-KWX ("The Rest of the World") Conclusion
  7. Goldberg, J.E.: Development of a universal law classification : a retrospective on Library of Congress Class K (2003) 0.05 
    0.045682527 = product of:
  0.091365054 = sum of:
    0.091365054 = product of:
      0.18273011 = sum of:
        0.18273011 = weight(_text_:2.2 in 5641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18273011 = score(doc=5641,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40031564 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048447352 = queryNorm
            0.45646507 = fieldWeight in 5641, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5641)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Introduction 1. The Early Years of Library of Congress Collecting and Classifying (1801-1901) 1.1 Setting the Stage. The American Century 1.2 Expanding General Collections: The Window on Europe 1.3 A New Classification for the Library of Congress 2. Breaking Ground for Law: Classifications for the Discipline and its Literature 2.1 The Early Proposals for a Law Book Classification 2.2 Expanding Law Collections: The Second Window on Europe 2.3 The Law Classification Theater and the Players 2.4 Structure and Scope of the Anticipated Class K. Jurisdictionality 3. The Code vs. the Court report: Model Schemes for Civil and Common Law 3.1 The Washington Dialogues: Law for Law 3.2 In Search for Common Ground 3.2.1 The Committee Dialogues: Joint in Dissent 3.3 The Anglo-American Law: Model KF (Law of the United States) 3.4 The Law of the American Indians 4. The Civil law: Model KK (Law of Germany) 4.1 The Historic German Split and History of Law 4.2 KF and KK Comparatively 4.2.1 Private Law: Mixed Aspects 4.2.2 Constitutional and Administrative Law: Mixed Messages 4.3 KKA (Law of East Germany): Classification by Comparison 4.4 German States and Territories 5. The Regional Law: Model KJ (Law of Europe). Regionalism 5.1 The Resulting New Hierarchy 5.2 European Legal History: A Comparative Discipline 5.3 KJC Regional Comparative and Uniform Law 5.4 KJE Regional Organization and Integration 6. Regional Classification: KL-KWX ("The Rest of the World") Conclusion
  8. Fensel, D.; Harmelen, F. van; Horrocks, I.: OIL and DAML+OIL : ontology languages for the Semantic Web (2004) 0.05 
    0.045682527 = product of:
  0.091365054 = sum of:
    0.091365054 = product of:
      0.18273011 = sum of:
        0.18273011 = weight(_text_:2.2 in 3244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18273011 = score(doc=3244,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40031564 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048447352 = queryNorm
            0.45646507 = fieldWeight in 3244, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3244)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This chapter discusses OIL and DAML1OIL, currently the most prominent ontology languages for the Semantic Web. The chapter starts by discussing the pyramid of languages that underlie the architecture of the Semantic Web (XML, RDF, RDFS). In section 2.2, we briefly describe XML, RDF and RDFS. We then discuss in more detail OIL and DAML1OIL, the first proposals for languages at the ontology layer of the semantic pyramid. For OIL (and to some extent DAML1OIL) we discuss the general design motivations (Section 2.3), describe the constructions in the language (Section 2.4), and the various syntactic forms of these languages (Section 2.5). Section 2.6 discusses the layered architecture of the language, section 2.7 briefly mentions the formal semantics, section 2.8 discusses the transition from OIL to DAML+OIL, and section 2.9 concludes with our experience with the language to date and future development in the context of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). This chapter is not intended to give full and formal definitions of either the syntax or the semantics of OIL or DAML1OIL. Such definitions are already available elsewhere: http://www.ontoknowledge.org/oil/ for OIL and http://www.w3.org/submission/2001/12/ for DAML1OIL.
  9. Horny, S.: Katalogisierung mehrbändiger begrenzter Werke (2006) 0.05 
    0.045682527 = product of:
  0.091365054 = sum of:
    0.091365054 = product of:
      0.18273011 = sum of:
        0.18273011 = weight(_text_:2.2 in 674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18273011 = score(doc=674,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40031564 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048447352 = queryNorm
            0.45646507 = fieldWeight in 674, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=674)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Inhalt: 1 Gesamtaufnahme 2 Bände (F-/f-Satz) 2.1 f-Sätze 2.2 F-Sätze 3 Mehrfach-Verknüpfungen 3.1 Mehrbändiges begrenztes Werk innerhalb einer Schriftenreihe 3.2 Mehrbändiges begrenztes Werk innerhalb eines anderen mehrbändigen begrenzten Werkes 3.3 Bandliste 4 Abteilungen und übergeordnete Bandangaben 4.1 Mehrbändige begrenzte Werke mit Abteilungen und durchlaufender Zählung 4.1.1 Mehrbändige begrenzte Werke mit Abteilungen und durchlaufender Zählung für die Einzelbände (RAK-WB § 167,2) 4.1.2 Mehrbändige begrenzte Werke mit Abteilungen und durchlaufender Zählung für die Einzelbände bezogen auf das Gesamtwerk sowie durchlaufender Zählung innerhalb der Abteilung (RAK-WB § 167,2) 4.2 Mehrbändige begrenzte Werke ohne eigene durchlaufende Zählung mit Abteilungen 4.3 Mehrbändige begrenzte Werke mit über- und untergeordneten Bandangaben 4.3.1 Mehrbändige begrenzte Werke mit über- und untergeordneten Bandzählungen, zu deren einzelnen Gliederungsstufen keine eigenen Angaben gehören 4.3.2 Mehrbändige begrenzte Werke mit über- und untergeordneten Bandzählungen, zu deren einzelnen Gliederungsstufen eigene Angaben gehören 4.3.3 Mehrbändige begrenzte Werke mit Abteilungen und über- und untergeordneten Bandangaben (Mischform) 4.3.3.1 Mehrbändige begrenzte Werke mit durchlaufender Zählung für die Einzelbände und mit Abteilungen (Fall 1) 4.3.3.2 Mehrbändige begrenzte Werke ohne eigene durchlaufende Zählung mit Abteilungen (Fall 2) 4.3.4 Sonderfall bei mehrbändigen begrenzten Werken mit über- und untergeordneten Bandangaben 4.3.5 Sonderfall bei mehrbändigen begrenzten Werken mit Abteilungen und durchlaufender Zählung für die Einzelbände 4.4 Bandlisten mit Abteilungen 5 Besonderheiten bei Korrekturen von mehrbändigen begrenzten Werken 5.1 Wechsel von einem mehrbändigen begrenzten Werk zu einem fortlaufenden Sammelwerk 5.2 Wechsel von einem fortlaufenden Sammelwerk zu einem mehrbändigen begrenzten Werk 5.3 Wechsel von einem Einzelwerk zu einem mehrbändigen begrenzten Werk
  10. Liu, W.; Dog(an, R.I.; Kim, S.; Comeau, D.C.; Kim, W.; Yeganova, L.; Lu, Z.; Wilbur, W.J.: Author name disambiguation for PubMed (2014) 0.05 
    0.045682527 = product of:
  0.091365054 = sum of:
    0.091365054 = product of:
      0.18273011 = sum of:
        0.18273011 = weight(_text_:2.2 in 1240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18273011 = score(doc=1240,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40031564 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048447352 = queryNorm
            0.45646507 = fieldWeight in 1240, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1240)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Log analysis shows that PubMed users frequently use author names in queries for retrieving scientific literature. However, author name ambiguity may lead to irrelevant retrieval results. To improve the PubMed user experience with author name queries, we designed an author name disambiguation system consisting of similarity estimation and agglomerative clustering. A machine-learning method was employed to score the features for disambiguating a pair of papers with ambiguous names. These features enable the computation of pairwise similarity scores to estimate the probability of a pair of papers belonging to the same author, which drives an agglomerative clustering algorithm regulated by 2 factors: name compatibility and probability level. With transitivity violation correction, high precision author clustering is achieved by focusing on minimizing false-positive pairing. Disambiguation performance is evaluated with manual verification of random samples of pairs from clustering results. When compared with a state-of-the-art system, our evaluation shows that among all the pairs the lumping error rate drops from 10.1% to 2.2% for our system, while the splitting error rises from 1.8% to 7.7%. This results in an overall error rate of 9.9%, compared with 11.9% for the state-of-the-art method. Other evaluations based on gold standard data also show the increase in accuracy of our clustering. We attribute the performance improvement to the machine-learning method driven by a large-scale training set and the clustering algorithm regulated by a name compatibility scheme preferring precision. With integration of the author name disambiguation system into the PubMed search engine, the overall click-through-rate of PubMed users on author name query results improved from 34.9% to 36.9%.
  11. Liu, B.; Yuan, Q.; Cong, G.; Xu, D.: Where your photo is taken : geolocation prediction for social images (2014) 0.05 
    0.045682527 = product of:
  0.091365054 = sum of:
    0.091365054 = product of:
      0.18273011 = sum of:
        0.18273011 = weight(_text_:2.2 in 1290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18273011 = score(doc=1290,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40031564 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048447352 = queryNorm
            0.45646507 = fieldWeight in 1290, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1290)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Social image-sharing websites have attracted a large number of users. These systems allow users to associate geolocation information with their images, which is essential for many interesting applications. However, only a small fraction of social images have geolocation information. Thus, an automated tool for suggesting geolocation is essential to help users geotag their images. In this article, we use a large data set consisting of 221 million Flickr images uploaded by 2.2 million users. For the first time, we analyze user uploading patterns, user geotagging behaviors, and the relationship between the taken-time gap and the geographical distance between two images from the same user. Based on the findings, we represent a user profile by historical tags for the user and build a multinomial model on the user profile for geotagging. We further propose a unified framework to suggest geolocations for images, which combines the information from both image tags and the user profile. Experimental results show that for images uploaded by users who have never done geotagging, our method outperforms the state-of-the-art method by 10.6 to 34.2%, depending on the granularity of the prediction. For images from users who have done geotagging, a simple method is able to achieve very high accuracy.
  12. Hjoerland, B.: Subject (of documents) (2016) 0.05 
    0.045682527 = product of:
  0.091365054 = sum of:
    0.091365054 = product of:
      0.18273011 = sum of:
        0.18273011 = weight(_text_:2.2 in 3182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18273011 = score(doc=3182,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40031564 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048447352 = queryNorm
            0.45646507 = fieldWeight in 3182, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3182)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Contents: 1. Introduction; 2. Theoretical views: 2.1 Charles Ammi Cutter (1837-1903), 2.2 S. R. Ranganathan (1892-1972), 2.3 Patrick Wilson (1927-2003), 2.4 "Content oriented" versus "request oriented" views, 2.5 Issues of subjectivity and objectivity, 2.6 The subject knowledge view, 2.7 Other views and definitions; 3. Related concepts: 3.1 Words versus concepts versus subjects, 3.2 Aboutness, 3.3 Topic, 3.4 Isness, 3.5 Ofness, 3.6 Theme.
  13. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.04 
    0.04488589 = product of:
  0.08977178 = sum of:
    0.08977178 = product of:
      0.26931533 = sum of:
        0.26931533 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26931533 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4107372 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048447352 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  14. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.04 
    0.04488589 = product of:
  0.08977178 = sum of:
    0.08977178 = product of:
      0.26931533 = sum of:
        0.26931533 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26931533 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4107372 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048447352 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  15. Bravo, B.R. -> Rodriguez Bravo, B.: 0.04 
    0.039383683 = product of:
  0.07876737 = sum of:
    0.07876737 = product of:
      0.15753473 = sum of:
        0.15753473 = weight(_text_:22 in 1) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15753473 = score(doc=1,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16965437 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048447352 = queryNorm
            0.92856276 = fieldWeight in 1, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=1)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 4.2007 19:43:53
  16. Wal, T. Vander -> Vander Wal, T.: 0.04 
    0.039383683 = product of:
  0.07876737 = sum of:
    0.07876737 = product of:
      0.15753473 = sum of:
        0.15753473 = weight(_text_:22 in 580) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15753473 = score(doc=580,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16965437 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048447352 = queryNorm
            0.92856276 = fieldWeight in 580, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=580)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 6.2009 9:15:50
  17. #778 0.04 
    0.039383683 = product of:
  0.07876737 = sum of:
    0.07876737 = product of:
      0.15753473 = sum of:
        0.15753473 = weight(_text_:22 in 777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15753473 = score(doc=777,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16965437 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048447352 = queryNorm
            0.92856276 = fieldWeight in 777, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=777)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    15. 2.1998 9:45:22
  18. Álvarez, E. Corera- -> Corera-Álvarez, E.: 0.04 
    0.039383683 = product of:
  0.07876737 = sum of:
    0.07876737 = product of:
      0.15753473 = sum of:
        0.15753473 = weight(_text_:22 in 942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15753473 = score(doc=942,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16965437 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048447352 = queryNorm
            0.92856276 = fieldWeight in 942, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=942)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    8. 2.2008 12:22:10
  19. Alvis, R. de -> Seidler-de Alvis, R.: 0.04 
    0.039383683 = product of:
  0.07876737 = sum of:
    0.07876737 = product of:
      0.15753473 = sum of:
        0.15753473 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15753473 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16965437 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048447352 = queryNorm
            0.92856276 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    2.10.1996 17:14:22
  20. Castillo, M. Davey => Davey Castillo, M.: 0.04 
    0.039383683 = product of:
  0.07876737 = sum of:
    0.07876737 = product of:
      0.15753473 = sum of:
        0.15753473 = weight(_text_:22 in 2447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15753473 = score(doc=2447,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16965437 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048447352 = queryNorm
            0.92856276 = fieldWeight in 2447, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=2447)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2018 18:02:42

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 3057
  • m 354
  • el 168
  • s 140
  • b 40
  • x 36
  • i 23
  • r 17
  • ? 8
  • n 4
  • p 4
  • d 3
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications