Search (60 results, page 1 of 3)

0.03862616 = product of:
  0.15450464 = sum of:
    0.15450464 = weight(_text_:personalized in 5864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15450464 = score(doc=5864,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.27847424 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1017675 = idf(docFreq=98, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039211962 = queryNorm
        0.5548256 = fieldWeight in 5864, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          7.1017675 = idf(docFreq=98, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5864)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Current retrieval and recommendation approaches rely on hard-wired data models. This hinders personalized cus-tomizations to meet information needs of users in a more flexible manner. Therefore, the paper investigates how similarity-basedretrieval strategies can be combined with graph queries to enable users or system providers to explore repositories in the LinkedOpen Data (LOD) cloud more thoroughly. For this purpose, we developed novel content-based recommendation approaches.They rely on concept annotations of Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS) vocabularies and a SPARQL-based querylanguage that facilitates advanced and personalized requests for openly available knowledge graphs. We have comprehensivelyevaluated the novel search strategies in several test cases and example application domains (i.e., travel search and multimediaretrieval). The results of the web-based online experiments showed that our approaches increase the recall and diversity of rec-ommendations or at least provide a competitive alternative strategy of resource access when conventional methods do not providehelpful suggestions. The findings may be of use for Linked Data-enabled recommender systems (LDRS) as well as for semanticsearch engines that can consume LOD resources. (PDF) Similarity-based knowledge graph queries for recommendation retrieval. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333358714_Similarity-based_knowledge_graph_queries_for_recommendation_retrieval [accessed May 21 2020].

0.032775383 = product of:
  0.13110153 = sum of:
    0.13110153 = weight(_text_:personalized in 2961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13110153 = score(doc=2961,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27847424 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1017675 = idf(docFreq=98, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039211962 = queryNorm
        0.47078514 = fieldWeight in 2961, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.1017675 = idf(docFreq=98, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2961)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Learning non-taxonomic relations becomes an important research topic in ontology extension. Most of the existing learning approaches are mainly based on expert crafted corpora. These approaches are normally domain-specific and the corpora acquisition is laborious and costly. On the other hand, based on the static corpora, it is not able to meet personalized needs of semantic relations discovery for various taxonomies. In this paper, we propose a novel approach for learning non-taxonomic relations on demand. For any supplied taxonomy, it can focus on the segment of the taxonomy and collect information dynamically about the taxonomic concepts by using Wikipedia as a learning source. Based on the newly generated corpus, non-taxonomic relations are acquired through three steps: a) semantic relatedness detection; b) relations extraction between concepts; and c) relations generalization within a hierarchy. The proposed approach is evaluated on three different predefined taxonomies and the experimental results show that it is effective in capturing non-taxonomic relations as needed and has good potential for the ontology extension on demand.

0.032775383 = product of:
  0.13110153 = sum of:
    0.13110153 = weight(_text_:personalized in 589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13110153 = score(doc=589,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27847424 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1017675 = idf(docFreq=98, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039211962 = queryNorm
        0.47078514 = fieldWeight in 589, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.1017675 = idf(docFreq=98, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=589)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Plurality of beliefs and theories in different knowledge domains calls for modelling multi-viewpoint ontologies and knowledge organization systems (KOS). A generic theoretical approach recently proposed for heterogeneity representation in KOS was linking each ontological statement to a specific validity scope to determine a set of conditions under which the statement is valid. However, the practical applicability of this approach has yet to be empirically assessed. In addition, there is still a need to investigate the types of inconsistencies that might arise in multi-viewpoint ontologies as well as their possible causes. This study proposes a new framework for systematic analysis and classification of inconsistencies in multi-viewpoint ontologies. The framework is based on eight generic logical structures of ontological statements. To test the validity of the proposed framework, two ontologies from different knowledge domains were examined. We found that only three of the eight structures led to inconsistencies in both ontologies, while the other two structures were always present in logically consistent statements. The study has practical implications for building diversified and personalized knowledge systems.

0.027312819 = product of:
  0.109251276 = sum of:
    0.109251276 = weight(_text_:personalized in 2719) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.109251276 = score(doc=2719,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27847424 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1017675 = idf(docFreq=98, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039211962 = queryNorm
        0.39232093 = fieldWeight in 2719, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.1017675 = idf(docFreq=98, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2719)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Personalized search is aimed at tailoring the search outcome to users; to this aim user profiles play an important role: the more faithfully a user profile represents the user interests and preferences, the higher is the probability to improve the search process. In the approaches proposed in the literature, user profiles are formally represented as bags of words, as vectors, or as conceptual taxonomies, generally defined based on external knowledge resources (such as the WordNet and the ODP - Open Directory Project). Ontologies have been more recently considered as a powerful expressive means for knowledge representation. The advantage offered by ontological languages is that they allow a more structured and expressive knowledge representation with respect to the above mentioned approaches. A challenging research activity consists in defining user profiles by a knowledge extraction process from an existing ontology, with the main aim of producing a semantically rich representation of the user interests. In this paper a method to automatically define a personal ontology via a knowledge extraction process from the general purpose ontology YAGO is presented; starting from a set of keywords, which are representatives of the user interests, the process is aimed to define a structured and semantically coherent representation of the user topical interests. In the paper the proposed method is described, as well as some evaluations that show its effectiveness.

0.027312819 = product of:
  0.109251276 = sum of:
    0.109251276 = weight(_text_:personalized in 5204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.109251276 = score(doc=5204,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27847424 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1017675 = idf(docFreq=98, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039211962 = queryNorm
        0.39232093 = fieldWeight in 5204, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.1017675 = idf(docFreq=98, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5204)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

Introduction.- Ontology Development.- Compliance using Metadata.- Variety Management for Big Data.- Text Mining in Economics.- Generation of Natural Language Texts.- Sentiment Analysis.- Building Concise Text Corpora from Web Contents.- Ontology-Based Modelling of Web Content.- Personalized Clinical Decision Support for Cancer Care.- Applications of Temporal Conceptual Semantic Systems.- Context-Aware Documentation in the Smart Factory.- Knowledge-Based Production Planning for Industry 4.0.- Information Exchange in Jurisdiction.- Supporting Automated License Clearing.- Managing cultural assets: Implementing typical cultural heritage archive's usage scenarios via Semantic Web technologies.- Semantic Applications for Process Management.- Domain-Specific Semantic Search Applications.

0.015569748 = product of:
  0.062278993 = sum of:
    0.062278993 = product of:
      0.18683697 = sum of:
        0.18683697 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18683697 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33243945 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039211962 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.

0.010925127 = product of:
  0.04370051 = sum of:
    0.04370051 = weight(_text_:personalized in 4472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04370051 = score(doc=4472,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27847424 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.1017675 = idf(docFreq=98, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039211962 = queryNorm
        0.15692838 = fieldWeight in 4472, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.1017675 = idf(docFreq=98, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=4472)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

However, this assumption does not hold in all cases, the needs of the user evolve over time and can move away from his previous interests stored in his profile. In other cases, the user's profile may be misused to extract or infer new information needs. This problem is much more accentuated with ambiguous queries. When multiple POIs linked to a search query are identified in the user's profile, the system is unable to select the relevant data from that profile to respond to that request. This has a direct impact on the quality of the results provided to this user. In order to overcome some of these limitations, in this research thesis, we have been interested in the development of techniques aimed mainly at improving the relevance of the results of current SRIs and facilitating the exploration of major collections of documents. To do this, we propose a solution based on a new concept and model of indexing and information retrieval called multi-spaces projection. This proposal is based on the exploitation of different categories of semantic and social information that enrich the universe of document representation and search queries in several dimensions of interpretations. The originality of this representation is to be able to distinguish between the different interpretations used for the description and the search for documents. This gives a better visibility on the results returned and helps to provide a greater flexibility of search and exploration, giving the user the ability to navigate one or more views of data that interest him the most. In addition, the proposed multidimensional representation universes for document description and search query interpretation help to improve the relevance of the user's results by providing a diversity of research / exploration that helps meet his diverse needs and those of other different users. This study exploits different aspects that are related to the personalized search and aims to solve the problems caused by the evolution of the information needs of the user. Thus, when the profile of this user is used by our system, a technique is proposed and used to identify the interests most representative of his current needs in his profile. This technique is based on the combination of three influential factors, including the contextual, frequency and temporal factor of the data. The ability of users to interact, exchange ideas and opinions, and form social networks on the Web, has led systems to focus on the types of interactions these users have at the level of interaction between them as well as their social roles in the system. This social information is discussed and integrated into this research work. The impact and how they are integrated into the IR process are studied to improve the relevance of the results.

0.010379832 = product of:
  0.04151933 = sum of:
    0.04151933 = product of:
      0.12455798 = sum of:
        0.12455798 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12455798 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33243945 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039211962 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.

0.010379832 = product of:
  0.04151933 = sum of:
    0.04151933 = product of:
      0.12455798 = sum of:
        0.12455798 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12455798 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33243945 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039211962 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.

0.006640849 = product of:
  0.026563397 = sum of:
    0.026563397 = product of:
      0.053126793 = sum of:
        0.053126793 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053126793 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1373136 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039211962 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Pages

S.11-22

0.006640849 = product of:
  0.026563397 = sum of:
    0.026563397 = product of:
      0.053126793 = sum of:
        0.053126793 = weight(_text_:22 in 5576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053126793 = score(doc=5576,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1373136 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039211962 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5576, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5576)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

13.12.2017 14:17:22

0.006640849 = product of:
  0.026563397 = sum of:
    0.026563397 = product of:
      0.053126793 = sum of:
        0.053126793 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053126793 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1373136 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039211962 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

26.12.2011 13:22:07

0.006640849 = product of:
  0.026563397 = sum of:
    0.026563397 = product of:
      0.053126793 = sum of:
        0.053126793 = weight(_text_:22 in 3406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053126793 = score(doc=3406,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1373136 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039211962 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3406, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3406)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

30. 5.2010 16:22:35

0.006640849 = product of:
  0.026563397 = sum of:
    0.026563397 = product of:
      0.053126793 = sum of:
        0.053126793 = weight(_text_:22 in 4523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053126793 = score(doc=4523,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1373136 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039211962 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4523, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4523)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2018, H.1, S.22-27

0.0056349477 = product of:
  0.02253979 = sum of:
    0.02253979 = product of:
      0.04507958 = sum of:
        0.04507958 = weight(_text_:22 in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04507958 = score(doc=3355,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1373136 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039211962 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 1.2017 16:54:03
22. 1.2017 17:10:56

0.0053126793 = product of:
  0.021250717 = sum of:
    0.021250717 = product of:
      0.042501435 = sum of:
        0.042501435 = weight(_text_:22 in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042501435 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1373136 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039211962 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

31. 7.2010 16:58:22

0.0053126793 = product of:
  0.021250717 = sum of:
    0.021250717 = product of:
      0.042501435 = sum of:
        0.042501435 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042501435 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1373136 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039211962 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

14. 8.2011 13:33:22

0.0053126793 = product of:
  0.021250717 = sum of:
    0.021250717 = product of:
      0.042501435 = sum of:
        0.042501435 = weight(_text_:22 in 4476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042501435 = score(doc=4476,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1373136 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039211962 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4476, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4476)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

1.10.2018 14:13:22

0.0053126793 = product of:
  0.021250717 = sum of:
    0.021250717 = product of:
      0.042501435 = sum of:
        0.042501435 = weight(_text_:22 in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042501435 = score(doc=318,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1373136 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039211962 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 5.2021 12:43:05

0.004648594 = product of:
  0.018594377 = sum of:
    0.018594377 = product of:
      0.037188753 = sum of:
        0.037188753 = weight(_text_:22 in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037188753 = score(doc=5095,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1373136 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039211962 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 1.2016 17:47:06