Search (1427 results, page 1 of 72)

0.15249044 = product of:
  0.30498087 = sum of:
    0.30498087 = sum of:
      0.26420766 = weight(_text_:memory in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.26420766 = score(doc=2090,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.31615055 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050156675 = queryNorm
          0.83570206 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
      0.040773224 = weight(_text_:22 in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040773224 = score(doc=2090,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17564014 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050156675 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

In order to test how associated verbal and spatial stimuli are processed in memory, undergraduates studied a reference map as either an intact unit or as a series of individual features, and read a text containing facts related to map features. In Addition, the map was presented either before or after reading the text. Seeing the intact map prior to the text led to better recall of both map information and facts from the text. These results support a dual coding modell, where stimuli such as maps possess a retrieval advantage because they allow simultaneous representation in working memory. This advantage occurs because information from the map can be used to cue retrieval of associated verbal facts, without exceeding the processing constraints of the memorial system

Date

22. 7.2000 19:18:18

0.15173084 = product of:
  0.30346167 = sum of:
    0.30346167 = sum of:
      0.24909738 = weight(_text_:memory in 678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.24909738 = score(doc=678,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.31615055 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050156675 = queryNorm
          0.7879075 = fieldWeight in 678, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=678)
      0.054364298 = weight(_text_:22 in 678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.054364298 = score(doc=678,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17564014 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050156675 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 678, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=678)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Community networks have existed since the 1970s when Community Memory in Berkeley, Californis, installed terminals in public places for people to read and post material of all sorts on a centralised time sharing system. Community Memory was the first known community access network. Several foundations and government agencies have funded community networks, known as freenets. Discusses the freenet movement; library involvement; the Apple Library of Tomorrow and the Morino Foundation conference on community networks and how to keep in touch with community network developments

Source

Library journal. 119(1994) no.11, S.22-24

0.11525136 = product of:
  0.23050272 = sum of:
    0.23050272 = sum of:
      0.17613843 = weight(_text_:memory in 1904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.17613843 = score(doc=1904,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.31615055 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050156675 = queryNorm
          0.5571347 = fieldWeight in 1904, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1904)
      0.054364298 = weight(_text_:22 in 1904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.054364298 = score(doc=1904,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17564014 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050156675 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1904, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1904)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Considers the underlying elements involved in the organization and representation of knowledge with particular reference to classical classification systems and expert systems. Concludes that, the computerization of intellectual processes must be based on the study and modelling of the psychological mechanisms of the functioning of the human memory

Source

International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.4, S.3-10

0.11525136 = product of:
  0.23050272 = sum of:
    0.23050272 = sum of:
      0.17613843 = weight(_text_:memory in 1534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.17613843 = score(doc=1534,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.31615055 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050156675 = queryNorm
          0.5571347 = fieldWeight in 1534, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1534)
      0.054364298 = weight(_text_:22 in 1534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.054364298 = score(doc=1534,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17564014 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050156675 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1534, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1534)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Enthält folgende Kapitel: (1) Motivation; (2) Language philosophical foundations; (3) Structural comparison of extensions; (4) Earlier approaches towards term association; (5) Experiments; (6) Spreading-activation networks or memory models; (7) Perspective. Appendices: Heads and modifiers of 'car'. Glossary. Index. Language and computer. Word semantics and term association. Methods towards an automatic semantic classification

Footnote

Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.3/4, S.182-184 (M.T. Rolland)

0.11379813 = product of:
  0.22759625 = sum of:
    0.22759625 = sum of:
      0.18682303 = weight(_text_:memory in 3749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.18682303 = score(doc=3749,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.31615055 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050156675 = queryNorm
          0.5909306 = fieldWeight in 3749, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3749)
      0.040773224 = weight(_text_:22 in 3749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040773224 = score(doc=3749,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17564014 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050156675 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3749, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3749)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Lists 19 tips, based on the author's experience with IBM compatible CD-ROM workstations, designed to yield improved performance by more efficient use of the computer hardware, particularly the hard disc. The tips also apply to Macintosh workstations. Covers: optimising files; placing CD-ROM software at the front of the hard disc; using disc caching software; use of the autopark facility; checking the interleave; browsing for orphan files; using CHKDSK/f command; low level formatting of hard disc; purchasing of microcomputers with large RAM caches; stepping up in MHZ and CPU; using more memory and memory management software; putting full path before software is loaded by AUTOEXEC.BAT and batch files; REM software specific lines in AUTOEXEC.BAT and CONFIG.SYS; feeding paper tp printer from a box on the flor; booting up in turbo mode and with Num Lock off; speeding up cursor keys; and protecting system enhancements

Source

CD-ROM professional. 6(1993) no.1, S.17-22

0.10194155 = product of:
  0.2038831 = sum of:
    0.2038831 = product of:
      0.4077662 = sum of:
        0.4077662 = weight(_text_:memory in 1728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4077662 = score(doc=1728,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.31615055 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050156675 = queryNorm
            1.2897849 = fieldWeight in 1728, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1728)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The notion of corporate or organizational memory has been discussed for over a quarter of a century. A major objective of this work is to review the conceptual foundations of organizational memory drawing from information systems research, management science, economics, systems theory, political theory, organizational behaviour, decision making, and communication theory. Provides a working definition of organizational memory, identifies ways to distinguish the contents of organizational memory, and explicates the processes of memory including knowledge acquisition, retention, maintenance and retrieval. Recommendations are made throughout the work regarding ways information managers can assess and control the effects of organizational memory

0.10084495 = product of:
  0.2016899 = sum of:
    0.2016899 = sum of:
      0.15412113 = weight(_text_:memory in 5054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15412113 = score(doc=5054,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.31615055 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050156675 = queryNorm
          0.48749286 = fieldWeight in 5054, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5054)
      0.04756876 = weight(_text_:22 in 5054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04756876 = score(doc=5054,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17564014 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050156675 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5054, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5054)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The 1991 IFLA programme given by the section on bibliography presented the theme that national bibliography becomes part of national memeory by recording the publications of the nation. Examines whether the widely distributed publications of popular culture are 'forgotten' by national bibliography. Considers the bibliographic control of newspapers, mass market publications and erotica in the US bibliographic control system. For the last 2 categories, searches selected titles in the OCLC database where many publications were found with wide distribution but recorded by few or no libraries. Popular culture materials should be recorded in national bibliographies to provide a more extended and historically accurate national memory

Source

International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 22(1993) no.1, S.13-17

0.10084495 = product of:
  0.2016899 = sum of:
    0.2016899 = sum of:
      0.15412113 = weight(_text_:memory in 2151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15412113 = score(doc=2151,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.31615055 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050156675 = queryNorm
          0.48749286 = fieldWeight in 2151, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2151)
      0.04756876 = weight(_text_:22 in 2151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04756876 = score(doc=2151,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17564014 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050156675 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2151, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2151)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

We present a model of semantic memory that utilizes a high dimensional semantic space constructed from a co-occurrence matrix. This matrix was formed by analyzing a lot) million word corpus. Word vectors were then obtained by extracting rows and columns of this matrix, These vectors were subjected to multidimensional scaling. Words were found to cluster semantically. suggesting that interword distance may be interpretable as a measure of semantic similarity, In attempting to replicate with our simulation the semantic and ...

Source

Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society: July 22 - 25, 1995, University of Pittsburgh / ed. by Johanna D. Moore and Jill Fain Lehmann

0.09341151 = product of:
  0.18682303 = sum of:
    0.18682303 = product of:
      0.37364605 = sum of:
        0.37364605 = weight(_text_:memory in 7972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.37364605 = score(doc=7972,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.31615055 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050156675 = queryNorm
            1.1818612 = fieldWeight in 7972, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7972)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Describes the background to the development of the multimedia CD-ROM database: American Memory; produced by the Library of Congress in cooperation with other libraries and institutions

0.09341151 = product of:
  0.18682303 = sum of:
    0.18682303 = product of:
      0.37364605 = sum of:
        0.37364605 = weight(_text_:memory in 3310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.37364605 = score(doc=3310,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.31615055 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050156675 = queryNorm
            1.1818612 = fieldWeight in 3310, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3310)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Special issue aimed at promoting and celebrating the new Unesco General Information Initiative: the Memory of the World Programme

0.088069215 = product of:
  0.17613843 = sum of:
    0.17613843 = product of:
      0.35227686 = sum of:
        0.35227686 = weight(_text_:memory in 4181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.35227686 = score(doc=4181,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31615055 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050156675 = queryNorm
            1.1142694 = fieldWeight in 4181, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4181)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.088069215 = product of:
  0.17613843 = sum of:
    0.17613843 = product of:
      0.35227686 = sum of:
        0.35227686 = weight(_text_:memory in 6369) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.35227686 = score(doc=6369,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31615055 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050156675 = queryNorm
            1.1142694 = fieldWeight in 6369, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6369)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.088069215 = product of:
  0.17613843 = sum of:
    0.17613843 = product of:
      0.35227686 = sum of:
        0.35227686 = weight(_text_:memory in 6373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.35227686 = score(doc=6373,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31615055 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050156675 = queryNorm
            1.1142694 = fieldWeight in 6373, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6373)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.088069215 = product of:
  0.17613843 = sum of:
    0.17613843 = product of:
      0.35227686 = sum of:
        0.35227686 = weight(_text_:memory in 6374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.35227686 = score(doc=6374,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31615055 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050156675 = queryNorm
            1.1142694 = fieldWeight in 6374, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6374)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.077842936 = product of:
  0.15568587 = sum of:
    0.15568587 = product of:
      0.31137174 = sum of:
        0.31137174 = weight(_text_:memory in 6618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.31137174 = score(doc=6618,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.31615055 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050156675 = queryNorm
            0.9848844 = fieldWeight in 6618, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6618)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Key aspects of memoria, the ancient Art of Memory, especially its focus on vivid representational images set against distinct backgrounds, can be helpful in creating memorable, universal, and easily retrievable computer icons

0.07203211 = product of:
  0.14406422 = sum of:
    0.14406422 = sum of:
      0.11008652 = weight(_text_:memory in 290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11008652 = score(doc=290,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.31615055 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050156675 = queryNorm
          0.34820917 = fieldWeight in 290, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=290)
      0.033977687 = weight(_text_:22 in 290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.033977687 = score(doc=290,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17564014 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050156675 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 290, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=290)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

As medical students, learning to do a Complete History and Physical is one of the first great challenges in the transition from being a classroom student to being a clinical trainee on the hospital wards. The Complete History and Physical, summarized in Table 1, is a highly structured, comprehensive data gathering exercise which combines open-ended interviewing techniques, letting the patient `tell the story' of his or her illness, with focused, orderly questioning about virtually every aspect of that patient's life which might have bearing on their health. A key feature of this procedure is that, with the exception of gender-specific questions such as an obstetric history in a man, every patient is asked every question, to ensure that the database is complete. Until it is committed to memory, many students work from a detailed list of questions, often many pages in length, based on recommended examples found in widely used textbooks (Walker & Hurst, 1976, Degowin & Degowin, 1976). This exhaustive initial data gathering activity is only the first step in the process. Once all the data have been collected and recorded, the student must organize and categorize the information into his or her Impression, a complete tabulation of the patient's health problems and possible explanations for them (Differential Diagnosis).

Date

22. 3.2002 9:42:19

0.069624834 = product of:
  0.13924967 = sum of:
    0.13924967 = product of:
      0.27849934 = sum of:
        0.27849934 = weight(_text_:memory in 3568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27849934 = score(doc=3568,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.31615055 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050156675 = queryNorm
            0.88090736 = fieldWeight in 3568, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3568)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

G. Gainotti, M.C. Silveri, A. Daniele, L. Giustolisi, Neuroanatomical Correlates of Category-specific Semantic Disorders: A Critical Survey. J. S. Snowden, H. L. Griffiths, D. Neary, Autobiographical Experience and Word Meaning. L. Cipolotti, E.K. Warrington, Towards a Unitary Account of Access Dysphasia: A Single Case Study. E. Forde, G.W. Humphreys, Refractory Semantics in Global Aphasia: On Semantic Organisation and the Access-Storage Distinction in Neuropsychology. A. E. Hillis, A. Caramazza, The Compositionality of Lexical Semantic Representations: Clues from Semantic Errors in Object Naming. H.E. Moss, L.K. Tyler, Investigating Semantic Memory Impairments: The Contribution of Semantic Priming. K.R. Laws, S.A. Humber, D.J.C. Ramsey, R.A. McCarthy, Probing Sensory and Associative Semantics for Animals and Objects in Normal Subjects. K.R. Laws, J.J. Evans, J. R. Hodges, R.A. McCarthy, Naming without Knowing and Appearance without Associations: Evidence for Constructive Processes in Semantic Memory? J. Powell, J. Davidoff, Selective Impairments of Object-knowledge in a Case of Acquired Cortical Blindness. J.R. Hodges, N. Graham, K. Patterson, Charting the Progression in Semantic Dementia: Implications for the Organisation of Semantic Memory. E. Funnell, Objects and Properties: A Study of the Breakdown of Semantic Memory. L.J. Tippett, S. McAuliffe, M. J. Farrar, Preservation of Categorical Knowledge in Alzheimer's Disease: A Computational Account. G. W. Humphreys, C. Lamote, T.J. Lloyd-Jones, An Interactive Activation Approach to Object Processing: Effects of Structural Similarity, Name Frequency, and Task in Normality and Pathology.

Footnote

This book is also a double special issue of the journal Memory which forms Issues 3 and 4 of Volume 3 (1995).

LCSH

Memory
Humans / Memory (Mental processes)

Series

Memory; 3,3/4

Subject

Memory
Humans / Memory (Mental processes)

0.066736415 = product of:
  0.13347283 = sum of:
    0.13347283 = product of:
      0.26694566 = sum of:
        0.26694566 = weight(_text_:memory in 553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26694566 = score(doc=553,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.31615055 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050156675 = queryNorm
            0.84436244 = fieldWeight in 553, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=553)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Originaltitel: The development of memory in children

LCSH

Child Development / Memory / Infant / Child

Subject

Child Development / Memory / Infant / Child

0.062274344 = product of:
  0.12454869 = sum of:
    0.12454869 = product of:
      0.24909738 = sum of:
        0.24909738 = weight(_text_:memory in 988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24909738 = score(doc=988,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.31615055 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050156675 = queryNorm
            0.7879075 = fieldWeight in 988, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=988)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Based on a generalization of reading and texts the concept of document is generalized, to encompass all the types of object controlled by the memory institutions of societies. The description of such generalized documents and their contents is discussed in terms of description in general and as used in the memory institutions, noting the distinctions between describing single documents and contexts (by themselves) and documents/contents among other documents/contents

0.062274344 = product of:
  0.12454869 = sum of:
    0.12454869 = product of:
      0.24909738 = sum of:
        0.24909738 = weight(_text_:memory in 1075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24909738 = score(doc=1075,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.31615055 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050156675 = queryNorm
            0.7879075 = fieldWeight in 1075, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.30326 = idf(docFreq=219, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1075)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

When tasks offer alternative methods for attaining subgoals, several factors may determine which method is selected. People might choose procedures that are, or appear, cognitively less demanding. These demands can operate over several different dimensions. Reports a series of studies of method selection for a task that involved locating and comparing information within an electronic document. A variety of computer based memory aids were also available to readers