Search (45 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval"
  1. ETHICS: Detailanleitung zur On-line Abfrage; Titelwortabfrage und Sachabfrage. Stand: 30.7.1987 (1987) 0.06 
    0.056357022 = product of:
  0.2817851 = sum of:
    0.2817851 = weight(_text_:line in 111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2817851 = score(doc=111,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28424788 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050687566 = queryNorm
        0.9913358 = fieldWeight in 111, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=111)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  2. Boeckx, T.: Onderwerpontsluiting in de on-line publiekscatalogus (1986) 0.06 
    0.056357022 = product of:
  0.2817851 = sum of:
    0.2817851 = weight(_text_:line in 145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2817851 = score(doc=145,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28424788 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050687566 = queryNorm
        0.9913358 = fieldWeight in 145, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=145)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  3. Markey, K.: Findings of the Dewey Decimal Classification on-line project (1986) 0.06 
    0.056357022 = product of:
  0.2817851 = sum of:
    0.2817851 = weight(_text_:line in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2817851 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28424788 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050687566 = queryNorm
        0.9913358 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  4. McAllister-Harper, D.: Dewey Decimal Classification in the online environment : a study of libraries in North Carolina (1990) 0.04 
    0.04270579 = product of:
  0.21352895 = sum of:
    0.21352895 = weight(_text_:line in 3574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21352895 = score(doc=3574,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.28424788 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050687566 = queryNorm
        0.7512068 = fieldWeight in 3574, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3574)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Results of a survey of North Carolina Libraries revealed that of 91 respondents, 29 had on-line catalogues. Of the libraries with on-line catalogues, 11 used the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC). Survey findings indicate that the DDC has limited use in on-line searching today.
  5. Svenonius, E.: ¬An ideal classification for an on-line catalog (1989) 0.04 
    0.042267766 = product of:
  0.21133882 = sum of:
    0.21133882 = weight(_text_:line in 964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21133882 = score(doc=964,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28424788 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050687566 = queryNorm
        0.74350184 = fieldWeight in 964, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=964)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  6. Gödert, W.: ¬Die Dezimalklassifikation im Online-Retrieval (1990) 0.04 
    0.042267766 = product of:
  0.21133882 = sum of:
    0.21133882 = weight(_text_:line in 5067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21133882 = score(doc=5067,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28424788 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050687566 = queryNorm
        0.74350184 = fieldWeight in 5067, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5067)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Considers some structural features of UDC which may be of some importance to on-line information retrieval with synthesised UDC notations
  7. Williamson, N.J.: ¬The Library of Congress Classification in the computer age (1989) 0.04 
    0.036604963 = product of:
  0.18302481 = sum of:
    0.18302481 = weight(_text_:line in 2074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18302481 = score(doc=2074,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.28424788 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050687566 = queryNorm
        0.6438916 = fieldWeight in 2074, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2074)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Research leading to a detailed content analysis and profile of the Library of Congress Classification schedules. A description of the design, methodology, and preliminary findings of research in progress. Final results of the study are expected to aid the Library of Congress in the development of a MARC format for its classification schedules and in the conversion of the schedules into machine-readable form. LC's ultimate goal is the design of an integrated system which will permit on-line editing, maintenance, and control of the schedules, on-line classification and shelflisting procedures, the production of the schedules in two or more physical formats, and the use of LCC to enhance search capabilities in on-line catalogues.
  8. Aluri, R.D.; Kemp, A.; Boll, J.J.: Subject analysis in online catalogs (1991) 0.03 
    0.03486913 = product of:
  0.17434564 = sum of:
    0.17434564 = weight(_text_:line in 863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17434564 = score(doc=863,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.28424788 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050687566 = queryNorm
        0.6133578 = fieldWeight in 863, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=863)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    LCSH
    Catalogs, On / line / Subject access
    Subject
    Catalogs, On / line / Subject access
  9. High, W.H.: Library of Congress Classification numbers as subject access points in computer-based retrieval (1990) 0.03 
    0.03486913 = product of:
  0.17434564 = sum of:
    0.17434564 = weight(_text_:line in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17434564 = score(doc=3577,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.28424788 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050687566 = queryNorm
        0.6133578 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Subject retrieval by Library of Congress (LC) Classification numbers is examined from the perspective of 5 user groups of on-line catalogues. Although, at present, librarians are the user group most likely to benefit from the LC classification advances in the capabilities of on-line catalogues. Research on the use of the LC classification schedules as a component of subject retrieval should continue.
  10. Hill, J.S.: Things are taking a little longer than that : a response to Dewey Decimal Classification in the online environment (1990) 0.03 
    0.029887825 = product of:
  0.14943913 = sum of:
    0.14943913 = weight(_text_:line in 496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14943913 = score(doc=496,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.28424788 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050687566 = queryNorm
        0.52573526 = fieldWeight in 496, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=496)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Librarians are often so eager to adopt new technologies and systems that they can lose sight of the realities that must be dealt with. Among factors that may delay use of Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) for on-line catalogues retrieval are: limited use of DDC in libraries with operational on-line catalogues; limitations to the MARC bibliographic formats: lack of an authority structure for classification number for items catalogued. Factors that may delay development of effective classification retrieval mechanisms include unclear terminology and unreasonably high (or low) expectations.
  11. Classification as an enhancement of intellectual access to information in an on-line environment : papers presented as part of the 2nd Annette Lewis Phinazee Symposium, School of Library and Information Science, North Carolina Central University (1990) 0.03 
    0.028178511 = product of:
  0.14089255 = sum of:
    0.14089255 = weight(_text_:line in 476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14089255 = score(doc=476,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28424788 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050687566 = queryNorm
        0.4956679 = fieldWeight in 476, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=476)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  12. Chan, L.M.: ¬The Library of Congress Classification System in an online environment (1990) 0.03 
    0.028178511 = product of:
  0.14089255 = sum of:
    0.14089255 = weight(_text_:line in 477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14089255 = score(doc=477,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28424788 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050687566 = queryNorm
        0.4956679 = fieldWeight in 477, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=477)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Advantages and disadvantages of on-line classification access are presented with special attention to Library of Congress Classification (LCC) features for subject browsing, known item-searching, enhancement of keyword and controlled vocabulary searching, and other unique retrieval capabilities.
  13. Hill, J.S.: Online classification number access : some practical considerations (1984) 0.02 
    0.02197589 = product of:
  0.10987945 = sum of:
    0.10987945 = weight(_text_:22 in 7684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10987945 = score(doc=7684,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17749922 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050687566 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7684, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7684)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Journal of academic librarianship. 10(1984), S.17-22
  14. Gödert, W.: Klassifikationssysteme und Online-Katalog (1987) 0.02 
    0.021133883 = product of:
  0.10566941 = sum of:
    0.10566941 = weight(_text_:line in 5138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10566941 = score(doc=5138,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28424788 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050687566 = queryNorm
        0.37175092 = fieldWeight in 5138, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5138)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Free text searching with keywords in a complete data store is not necessarily the best automatic retrieval method. There must be a proper classification of documents and concepts and the use of a proper classification system avoids problems of terminological deficiency. The dialogue search form makes the on-line catalogue a new information medium. A bibliographic unit must be created with as many search access points as possible, using verbal and classificatory search elements. Verbal search categories must include free text elements for individual search access requirements and a controlled vocabulary with syntactic connections. Classified data should consist of a universal classification system with clear structural notation for access and surface searching, together with several specialist subject classifications for differentiated documentation and retrieval. The universal classification needs no detailed subdivision: it serves mainly as a guide and entry to the detailed sub-systems
  15. Saye, J.D.: ¬"The Library of Congress Classification System in an online environment" : a reaction (1990) 0.02 
    0.021133883 = product of:
  0.10566941 = sum of:
    0.10566941 = weight(_text_:line in 492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10566941 = score(doc=492,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28424788 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050687566 = queryNorm
        0.37175092 = fieldWeight in 492, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=492)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    This response to the paper by Dr. Chan, while accepting the merits of call number searching in the theoretical sense, raises questions about its usefulness in typical library situations. Compares searching on-line with call numbers and the use of classified catalogues and shelflists. Asks who is expected to do call number searching. Considers the availability of indexes to the classification scheme, problems created by the provision of only 1 class number per document, and the use of multiple cutter numbers to express the subject of a document.
  16. Speller, B.F.: Access to information in an online environment : editor's introduction (1990) 0.02 
    0.021133883 = product of:
  0.10566941 = sum of:
    0.10566941 = weight(_text_:line in 497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10566941 = score(doc=497,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28424788 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050687566 = queryNorm
        0.37175092 = fieldWeight in 497, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=497)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    There is every indication that classification systems which are international in their use, and free from the impact of national languages, will be given strong consideration as the choice for an information retrieval language in an automated environment. The aims of the Symposium were: to provide a forum for discussion of the problems and opportunities emerging from MARC records; to reconsider intellectual level as a significant determinant of information retrieval; and to explore the potential of the Dewey Decimal Classification and the Library of Congress Classification systems as information retrieval languages in an on-line environment.
  17. Classification theory in the computer age : Conversations across the disciplines. Proceedings from the Conference, Nov. 18.-19, 1988, Albany, New York (1989) 0.02 
    0.021133883 = product of:
  0.10566941 = sum of:
    0.10566941 = weight(_text_:line in 2071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10566941 = score(doc=2071,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28424788 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050687566 = queryNorm
        0.37175092 = fieldWeight in 2071, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2071)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: D. BATTY: The future of DDC in the perspective of current classification research; I. DAHLBERG: Concept and definiton theory; I.L. TRAVIS: Application of artificial intelligence to bibliographic classification; E. SVENONIUS: An ideal classification for an on-line catalog; K. MARKEY u. A.N. DEMEYER: The concept of common subject headings in subject outline searching; N. WILLIAMSON: The Library of Congress Classification in the Computer age; D.S. SCOTT: Subject classification and natural-language processing for retrieval in large databases; F. MIKSA: Shifting directions in LIS classification; C. MANDEL: A computer age classification: implications for library practice; R.S. HALSEY: Implications of classification theory in the computer age for educators of librarians and information science professionals; J. HOLIDAY: Subject access: new technology and philosophical perspectives
  18. LaBarre, K.; Cochrane, P.A.: Facet analysis as a knowledge management tool on the Internet (2006) 0.02 
    0.017611569 = product of:
  0.08805784 = sum of:
    0.08805784 = weight(_text_:line in 1489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08805784 = score(doc=1489,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28424788 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050687566 = queryNorm
        0.30979243 = fieldWeight in 1489, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1489)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    In 2001, a group of information architects involved in designing websites, and knowledge management specialists involved in creating access to corporate knowledge bases appeared to have re-discovered facet analysis and faceted classification. These groups have been instrumental in creating new and different ways of handling digital content of the Internet. Some of these practitioners explicitly use the forms and language of facet analysis and faceted classification, while others seem to do so implicitly. Following a brief overview of the work and discussions on facets and faceted classification in recent years, we focus on our observations about new information resources which seem more in line with the Fourth law of Library Science ("Save the time of the reader") than most library OPACs today. These new developments on the Internet point to a partial grasp of a disciplined approach to subject access. This is where Ranganathan and Neelameghan's approach needs to be reviewed for the new audience of information system designers. A report on the work undertaken by us forms a principal part of this paper.
  19. Losee, R.M.: Improving collection browsing : small world networking and Gray code ordering (2017) 0.02 
    0.017611569 = product of:
  0.08805784 = sum of:
    0.08805784 = weight(_text_:line in 5148) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08805784 = score(doc=5148,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28424788 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050687566 = queryNorm
        0.30979243 = fieldWeight in 5148, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5148)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Documents in digital and paper libraries may be arranged, based on their topics, in order to facilitate browsing. It may seem intuitively obvious that ordering documents by their subject should improve browsing performance; the results presented in this article suggest that ordering library materials by their Gray code values and through using links consistent with the small world model of document relationships is consistent with improving browsing performance. Below, library circulation data, including ordering with Library of Congress Classification numbers and Library of Congress Subject Headings, are used to provide information useful in generating user-centered document arrangements, as well as user-independent arrangements. Documents may be linearly arranged so they can be placed in a line by topic, such as on a library shelf, or in a list on a computer display. Crossover links, jumps between a document and another document to which it is not adjacent, can be used in library databases to allow additional paths that one might take when browsing. The improvement that is obtained with different combinations of document orderings and different crossovers is examined and applications suggested.
  20. Gödert, W.: Facet classification in online retrieval (1991) 0.02 
    0.017611569 = product of:
  0.08805784 = sum of:
    0.08805784 = weight(_text_:line in 5825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08805784 = score(doc=5825,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28424788 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050687566 = queryNorm
        0.30979243 = fieldWeight in 5825, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5825)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The study of faceted classification systems has primarily been directed towards application for precombined catalogues or bibliographies, not so much for use in post coordinated retrieval systems. Argues that faceted classification systems in some respects are superior to other techniques of on-line retrieval as far as facet and concept analysis is combined with an expressive notational system in order to guide a form of retrieval which will use Boolean operators (for combining the facets regardless of one special citation order) and truncation for retrieving hierarchically different sets of documents. This point of view is demonstrated by 2 examples. The 1st one uses a short classification system derived from B. Buchanan and the 2nd is built upon the classification system used by Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA). Further discussion is concerned with some possible consequences which could be derived from a retrieval with PRECIS strings

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 35
  • d 9
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 37
  • el 3
  • m 3
  • s 3
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications