-
Atherton, P. -> Cochrane, P.A.:
0.29
0.28719917 = product of:
0.8615975 = sum of:
0.8615975 = product of:
1.723195 = sum of:
1.723195 = weight(_text_:2775 in 2774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
1.723195 = score(doc=2774,freq=1.0), product of:
0.5011227 = queryWeight, product of:
11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
3.4386687 = fieldWeight in 2774, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
0.3125 = fieldNorm(doc=2774)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- 2775
-
Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014)
0.09
0.0914556 = product of:
0.1371834 = sum of:
0.1205523 = product of:
0.3616569 = sum of:
0.3616569 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.3616569 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38609818 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.016631098 = weight(_text_:to in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016631098 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.20086816 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- Präsentation anlässlich: European Conference on Data Analysis (ECDA 2014) in Bremen, Germany, July 2nd to 4th 2014, LIS-Workshop.
- Source
- http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
-
Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978)
0.08
0.07683852 = product of:
0.115257785 = sum of:
0.09644185 = product of:
0.28932554 = sum of:
0.28932554 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.28932554 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38609818 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.018815938 = weight(_text_:to in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018815938 = score(doc=230,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.22725637 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In this lecture I intend to challenge those who uphold a monist or even a dualist view of the universe; and I will propose, instead, a pluralist view. I will propose a view of the universe that recognizes at least three different but interacting sub-universes.
- Source
- https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
-
Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005)
0.07
0.06723371 = product of:
0.10085057 = sum of:
0.08438662 = product of:
0.25315985 = sum of:
0.25315985 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.25315985 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38609818 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.016463947 = weight(_text_:to in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016463947 = score(doc=306,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.19884932 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Although service-oriented architectures go a long way toward providing interoperability in distributed, heterogeneous environments, managing semantic differences in such environments remains a challenge. We give an overview of the issue of semantic interoperability (integration), provide a semantic characterization of services, and discuss the role of ontologies. Then we analyze four basic models of semantic interoperability that differ in respect to their mapping between service descriptions and ontologies and in respect to where the evaluation of the integration logic is performed. We also provide some guidelines for selecting one of the possible interoperability models.
- Content
- Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
-
Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009)
0.07
0.065821625 = product of:
0.098732434 = sum of:
0.072331384 = product of:
0.21699414 = sum of:
0.21699414 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21699414 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38609818 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.026401049 = weight(_text_:to in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026401049 = score(doc=2918,freq=14.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.3188683 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
- Footnote
- Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
-
Lutz, H.: Back to business : was CompuServe Unternehmen bietet (1997)
0.06
0.06427836 = product of:
0.09641753 = sum of:
0.026609756 = weight(_text_:to in 6569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026609756 = score(doc=6569,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.32138905 = fieldWeight in 6569, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6569)
0.069807775 = product of:
0.13961555 = sum of:
0.13961555 = weight(_text_:22 in 6569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13961555 = score(doc=6569,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 6569, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6569)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 2.1997 19:50:29
- Source
- Cogito. 1997, H.1, S.22-23
-
Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019)
0.06
0.06309623 = product of:
0.094644345 = sum of:
0.072331384 = product of:
0.21699414 = sum of:
0.21699414 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21699414 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38609818 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.02231296 = weight(_text_:to in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02231296 = score(doc=400,freq=10.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.26949292 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- On a scientific concept hierarchy, a parent concept may have a few attributes, each of which has multiple values being a group of child concepts. We call these attributes facets: classification has a few facets such as application (e.g., face recognition), model (e.g., svm, knn), and metric (e.g., precision). In this work, we aim at building faceted concept hierarchies from scientific literature. Hierarchy construction methods heavily rely on hypernym detection, however, the faceted relations are parent-to-child links but the hypernym relation is a multi-hop, i.e., ancestor-to-descendent link with a specific facet "type-of". We use information extraction techniques to find synonyms, sibling concepts, and ancestor-descendent relations from a data science corpus. And we propose a hierarchy growth algorithm to infer the parent-child links from the three types of relationships. It resolves conflicts by maintaining the acyclic structure of a hierarchy.
- Content
- Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.06
0.06056131 = product of:
0.090841964 = sum of:
0.072331384 = product of:
0.21699414 = sum of:
0.21699414 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21699414 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38609818 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.018510582 = product of:
0.037021164 = sum of:
0.037021164 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037021164 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022)
0.06
0.059743285 = product of:
0.08961493 = sum of:
0.072331384 = product of:
0.21699414 = sum of:
0.21699414 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21699414 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38609818 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.017283546 = weight(_text_:to in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017283546 = score(doc=862,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.20874833 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This research revisits the classic Turing test and compares recent large language models such as ChatGPT for their abilities to reproduce human-level comprehension and compelling text generation. Two task challenges- summary and question answering- prompt ChatGPT to produce original content (98-99%) from a single text entry and sequential questions initially posed by Turing in 1950. We score the original and generated content against the OpenAI GPT-2 Output Detector from 2019, and establish multiple cases where the generated content proves original and undetectable (98%). The question of a machine fooling a human judge recedes in this work relative to the question of "how would one prove it?" The original contribution of the work presents a metric and simple grammatical set for understanding the writing mechanics of chatbots in evaluating their readability and statistical clarity, engagement, delivery, overall quality, and plagiarism risks. While Turing's original prose scores at least 14% below the machine-generated output, whether an algorithm displays hints of Turing's true initial thoughts (the "Lovelace 2.0" test) remains unanswerable.
- Source
- https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
-
Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents
0.06
0.057628892 = product of:
0.086443335 = sum of:
0.072331384 = product of:
0.21699414 = sum of:
0.21699414 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21699414 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38609818 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.014111955 = weight(_text_:to in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014111955 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.17044228 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In this paper, we present two ways to improve the precision of HITS-based algorithms onWeb documents. First, by analyzing the limitations of current HITS-based algorithms, we propose a new weighted HITS-based method that assigns appropriate weights to in-links of root documents. Then, we combine content analysis with HITS-based algorithms and study the effects of four representative relevance scoring methods, VSM, Okapi, TLS, and CDR, using a set of broad topic queries. Our experimental results show that our weighted HITS-based method performs significantly better than Bharat's improved HITS algorithm. When we combine our weighted HITS-based method or Bharat's HITS algorithm with any of the four relevance scoring methods, the combined methods are only marginally better than our weighted HITS-based method. Between the four relevance scoring methods, there is no significant quality difference when they are combined with a HITS-based algorithm.
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
-
Hemminger, B.M.: Introduction to the special issue on bioinformatics (2005)
0.06
0.05624356 = product of:
0.08436534 = sum of:
0.023283537 = weight(_text_:to in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023283537 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.28121543 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
0.061081804 = product of:
0.12216361 = sum of:
0.12216361 = weight(_text_:22 in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12216361 = score(doc=4189,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 14:19:22
-
Buzydlowski, J.W.; White, H.D.; Lin, X.: Term Co-occurrence Analysis as an Interface for Digital Libraries (2002)
0.06
0.056053236 = product of:
0.084079854 = sum of:
0.019957317 = weight(_text_:to in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019957317 = score(doc=1339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.24104178 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
0.064122535 = product of:
0.12824507 = sum of:
0.12824507 = weight(_text_:22 in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12824507 = score(doc=1339,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.804159 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 2.2003 17:25:39
22. 2.2003 18:16:22
- Source
- Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries. Eds.: Börner, K. u. C. Chen
-
Piros, A.: Az ETO-jelzetek automatikus interpretálásának és elemzésének kérdései (2018)
0.05
0.05485135 = product of:
0.08227702 = sum of:
0.06027615 = product of:
0.18082845 = sum of:
0.18082845 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18082845 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38609818 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.022000873 = weight(_text_:to in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022000873 = score(doc=855,freq=14.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.2657236 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Converting UDC numbers manually to a complex format such as the one mentioned above is an unrealistic expectation; supporting building these representations, as far as possible automatically, is a well-founded requirement. An additional advantage of this approach is that the existing records could also be processed and converted. In my dissertation I would like to prove also that it is possible to design and implement an algorithm that is able to convert pre-coordinated UDC numbers into the introduced format by identifying all their elements and revealing their whole syntactic structure as well. In my dissertation I will discuss a feasible way of building a UDC-specific XML schema for describing the most detailed and complicated UDC numbers (containing not only the common auxiliary signs and numbers, but also the different types of special auxiliaries). The schema definition is available online at: http://piros.udc-interpreter.hu#xsd. The primary goal of my research is to prove that it is possible to support building, retrieving, and analyzing UDC numbers without compromises, by taking the whole syntactic richness of the scheme by storing the UDC numbers reserving the meaning of pre-coordination. The research has also included the implementation of a software that parses UDC classmarks attended to prove that such solution can be applied automatically without any additional effort or even retrospectively on existing collections.
- Content
- Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>
-
Chen, C.: Top Ten Problems in Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries (2002)
0.05
0.05371983 = product of:
0.08057974 = sum of:
0.02822391 = weight(_text_:to in 4840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02822391 = score(doc=4840,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.34088457 = fieldWeight in 4840, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4840)
0.052355833 = product of:
0.10471167 = sum of:
0.10471167 = weight(_text_:22 in 4840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10471167 = score(doc=4840,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 4840, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4840)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 2.2003 17:25:39
22. 2.2003 18:13:11
- Source
- Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries. Eds.: Börner, K. u. C. Chen
-
Börner, K.; Chen, C.: Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries : Motivation, Utilization, and Socio-technical Challenges (2002)
0.05
0.05371983 = product of:
0.08057974 = sum of:
0.02822391 = weight(_text_:to in 1359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02822391 = score(doc=1359,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.34088457 = fieldWeight in 1359, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1359)
0.052355833 = product of:
0.10471167 = sum of:
0.10471167 = weight(_text_:22 in 1359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10471167 = score(doc=1359,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 1359, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1359)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 2.2003 17:25:39
22. 2.2003 18:20:07
- Source
- Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries. Eds.: Börner, K. u. C. Chen
-
Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981)
0.05
0.05258019 = product of:
0.07887028 = sum of:
0.06027615 = product of:
0.18082845 = sum of:
0.18082845 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18082845 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38609818 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.018594133 = weight(_text_:to in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018594133 = score(doc=76,freq=10.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.22457743 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- A summary of brain theory is given so far as it is contained within the framework of Localization Theory. Difficulties of this "conventional theory" are traced back to a specific deficiency: there is no way to express relations between active cells (as for instance their representing parts of the same object). A new theory is proposed to cure this deficiency. It introduces a new kind of dynamical control, termed synaptic modulation, according to which synapses switch between a conducting and a non- conducting state. The dynamics of this variable is controlled on a fast time scale by correlations in the temporal fine structure of cellular signals. Furthermore, conventional synaptic plasticity is replaced by a refined version. Synaptic modulation and plasticity form the basis for short-term and long-term memory, respectively. Signal correlations, shaped by the variable network, express structure and relationships within objects. In particular, the figure-ground problem may be solved in this way. Synaptic modulation introduces exibility into cerebral networks which is necessary to solve the invariance problem. Since momentarily useless connections are deactivated, interference between di erent memory traces can be reduced, and memory capacity increased, in comparison with conventional associative memory
- Source
- http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
-
Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001)
0.05
0.05258019 = product of:
0.07887028 = sum of:
0.06027615 = product of:
0.18082845 = sum of:
0.18082845 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18082845 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38609818 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.018594133 = weight(_text_:to in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018594133 = score(doc=692,freq=10.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.22457743 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- What is the difference between Piaget's constructivism and Papert's "constructionism"? Beyond the mere play on the words, I think the distinction holds, and that integrating both views can enrich our understanding of how people learn and grow. Piaget's constructivism offers a window into what children are interested in, and able to achieve, at different stages of their development. The theory describes how children's ways of doing and thinking evolve over time, and under which circumstance children are more likely to let go of-or hold onto- their currently held views. Piaget suggests that children have very good reasons not to abandon their worldviews just because someone else, be it an expert, tells them they're wrong. Papert's constructionism, in contrast, focuses more on the art of learning, or 'learning to learn', and on the significance of making things in learning. Papert is interested in how learners engage in a conversation with [their own or other people's] artifacts, and how these conversations boost self-directed learning, and ultimately facilitate the construction of new knowledge. He stresses the importance of tools, media, and context in human development. Integrating both perspectives illuminates the processes by which individuals come to make sense of their experience, gradually optimizing their interactions with the world.
- Content
- Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
-
Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010)
0.05
0.0512715 = product of:
0.07690725 = sum of:
0.06027615 = product of:
0.18082845 = sum of:
0.18082845 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18082845 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38609818 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.016631098 = weight(_text_:to in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016631098 = score(doc=4997,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.20086816 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- While classifications are heavily used to categorize web content, the evolution of the web foresees a more formal structure - ontology - which can serve this purpose. Ontologies are core artifacts of the Semantic Web which enable machines to use inference rules to conduct automated reasoning on data. Lightweight ontologies bridge the gap between classifications and ontologies. A lightweight ontology (LO) is an ontology representing a backbone taxonomy where the concept of the child node is more specific than the concept of the parent node. Formal lightweight ontologies can be generated from their informal ones. The key applications of formal lightweight ontologies are document classification, semantic search, and data integration. However, these applications suffer from the following problems: the disambiguation accuracy of the state of the art NLP tools used in generating formal lightweight ontologies from their informal ones; the lack of background knowledge needed for the formal lightweight ontologies; and the limitation of ontology reuse. In this dissertation, we propose a novel solution to these problems in formal lightweight ontologies; namely, faceted lightweight ontology (FLO). FLO is a lightweight ontology in which terms, present in each node label, and their concepts, are available in the background knowledge (BK), which is organized as a set of facets. A facet can be defined as a distinctive property of the groups of concepts that can help in differentiating one group from another. Background knowledge can be defined as a subset of a knowledge base, such as WordNet, and often represents a specific domain.
- Content
- PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
-
Starchan, D.: ¬A chance to make UDC notation more computer-friendly (2000)
0.05
0.050746165 = product of:
0.076119244 = sum of:
0.032927893 = weight(_text_:to in 393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032927893 = score(doc=393,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.39769864 = fieldWeight in 393, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=393)
0.043191355 = product of:
0.08638271 = sum of:
0.08638271 = weight(_text_:22 in 393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08638271 = score(doc=393,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 393, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=393)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 22(2000), S.43-44
-
Albiges, L.-M.: Remote public access to picture databanks (1992)
0.05
0.05064754 = product of:
0.075971305 = sum of:
0.026609756 = weight(_text_:to in 5632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026609756 = score(doc=5632,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.32138905 = fieldWeight in 5632, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5632)
0.04936155 = product of:
0.0987231 = sum of:
0.0987231 = weight(_text_:22 in 5632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0987231 = score(doc=5632,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5632, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5632)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Audiovisual librarian. 18(1992) no.1, S.22-27
