-
Jones, E.: ¬The FRBR model as applied to continuing resources (2005)
0.04
0.044316597 = product of:
0.06647489 = sum of:
0.023283537 = weight(_text_:to in 2900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023283537 = score(doc=2900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.28121543 = fieldWeight in 2900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2900)
0.043191355 = product of:
0.08638271 = sum of:
0.08638271 = weight(_text_:22 in 2900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08638271 = score(doc=2900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2900)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Hirons, J.; Hawkins, L.; French, P.: AACR2 and you : revisiting AACR2 to accomodate seriality (2000)
0.04
0.044316597 = product of:
0.06647489 = sum of:
0.023283537 = weight(_text_:to in 6339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023283537 = score(doc=6339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.28121543 = fieldWeight in 6339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6339)
0.043191355 = product of:
0.08638271 = sum of:
0.08638271 = weight(_text_:22 in 6339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08638271 = score(doc=6339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6339)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 18. 8.2002 17:22:13
-
Bourdon, F.: Functional requirements and numbering of authority records (FRANAR) : to what extent can authority control be supported by technical means? (2002)
0.04
0.037985653 = product of:
0.05697848 = sum of:
0.019957317 = weight(_text_:to in 3929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019957317 = score(doc=3929,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.24104178 = fieldWeight in 3929, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3929)
0.037021164 = product of:
0.07404233 = sum of:
0.07404233 = weight(_text_:22 in 3929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07404233 = score(doc=3929,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3929, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3929)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 30. 8.2005 9:22:54
-
Gray, B.: Cataloging the special collections of Allegheny college (2005)
0.04
0.037680656 = product of:
0.056520984 = sum of:
0.034925304 = weight(_text_:to in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034925304 = score(doc=127,freq=18.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.4218231 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
0.021595677 = product of:
0.043191355 = sum of:
0.043191355 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043191355 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Scholars have long noted the significance of Allegheny College's special collections to American cultural and educational history. Special collections have value to colleges and universities as publicity devices to draw scholars, students, and funding to the institution. Catalogers have an important role to play in marketing the library and the college through improved bibliographic access to these collections. Rare book and manuscript cataloging presents many challenges to catalogers, especially at smaller institutions. This report traces the evolution of Allegheny College's catalog, from book format in 1823, through card format, and finally to online. It also explores the bibliographic challenges created as the library moved from one format to another.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Aalberg, T.; Haugen, F.B.; Husby, O.: ¬A Tool for Converting from MARC to FRBR (2006)
0.03
0.03493127 = product of:
0.0523969 = sum of:
0.030801224 = weight(_text_:to in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030801224 = score(doc=2425,freq=14.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.37201303 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
0.021595677 = product of:
0.043191355 = sum of:
0.043191355 = weight(_text_:22 in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043191355 = score(doc=2425,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The FRBR model is by many considered to be an important contribution to the next generation of bibliographic catalogues, but a major challenge for the library community is how to use this model on already existing MARC-based bibliographic catalogues. This problem requires a solution for the interpretation and conversion of MARC records, and a tool for this kind of conversion is developed as a part of the Norwegian BIBSYS FRBR project. The tool is based on a systematic approach to the interpretation and conversion process and is designed to be adaptable to the rules applied in different catalogues.
- Source
- Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
-
Coyle, K.: Future considerations : the functional library systems record (2004)
0.03
0.034193687 = product of:
0.05129053 = sum of:
0.026609756 = weight(_text_:to in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026609756 = score(doc=562,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.32138905 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.024680775 = product of:
0.04936155 = sum of:
0.04936155 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04936155 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The paper performs a thought experiment on the concept of a record based on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records and library system functions, and concludes that if we want to develop a functional bibliographic record we need to do it within the context of a flexible, functional library systems record structure. The article suggests a new way to look at the library systems record that would allow libraries to move forward in terms of technology but also in terms of serving library users.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.166-174
-
Bowen, J.: FRBR : coming soon to your library? (2005)
0.03
0.032297708 = product of:
0.04844656 = sum of:
0.029935975 = weight(_text_:to in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029935975 = score(doc=122,freq=18.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.36156267 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
0.018510582 = product of:
0.037021164 = sum of:
0.037021164 = weight(_text_:22 in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037021164 = score(doc=122,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) data model holds great potential for improving access to library resources, but may not affect all libraries in the same way. The Joint Steering Committee for Revision of AACR (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules), assisted by the work of its Format Variation Working Group, is exploring ways to incorporate FRBR into the next edition of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules to facilitate collocation at the level of the FRBR entity expression. Several library system vendors are also adding FRBR-based functionality to their systems. A combination of these two approaches to FRBR can provide significant benefits to users. Most FRBR entities and attributes are already present in library catalog records, and the influence of FRBR can also be seen in existing library activities. FRBR is thus not something totally foreign, but a fresh, more rigorous way of thinking about what libraries already do that provides a basis for designing new ways to improve users' access to library resources.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Ho, J.: Cataloging practices and access methods for videos at arl and public libraries in the United States (2004)
0.03
0.032297708 = product of:
0.04844656 = sum of:
0.029935975 = weight(_text_:to in 134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029935975 = score(doc=134,freq=18.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.36156267 = fieldWeight in 134, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=134)
0.018510582 = product of:
0.037021164 = sum of:
0.037021164 = weight(_text_:22 in 134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037021164 = score(doc=134,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 134, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=134)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Libraries may vary in the level and fullness of cataloging they give to video recordings and in the methods they use to provide access to them. This paper reports the results of a survey exploring the level of cataloging and access methods applied to videos, the degree to which catalogers view screen credits, and how often various credit information is included and used to create access points in catalog records in selected U. S. public and Association of Research Libraries member libraries. Resources for cataloging videos also were examined. Results showed that most libraries cataloged videos at the full level and provided access points to similar types of information in catalog records. Academic librarians reported viewing videos and providing access points to certain information to a greater extent than public librarians did. This study offers a general picture of the credit information libraries include or omit in video catalog records.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004)
0.03
0.03213918 = product of:
0.048208766 = sum of:
0.013304878 = weight(_text_:to in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013304878 = score(doc=2845,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.16069452 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.034903888 = product of:
0.069807775 = sum of:
0.069807775 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069807775 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The current library bibliographic infrastructure was constructed in the early days of computers - before the Web, XML, and a variety of other technological advances that now offer new opportunities. General requirements of a modern metadata infrastructure for libraries are identified, including such qualities as versatility, extensibility, granularity, and openness. A new kind of metadata infrastructure is then proposed that exhibits at least some of those qualities. Some key challenges that must be overcome to implement a change of this magnitude are identified.
- Date
- 9.12.2005 19:22:38
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
-
Hill, J.S.: Analog people for digital dreams : staffing and educational considerations for cataloging and metadata professionals (2005)
0.03
0.031817 = product of:
0.0477255 = sum of:
0.023044726 = weight(_text_:to in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023044726 = score(doc=126,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.2783311 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
0.024680775 = product of:
0.04936155 = sum of:
0.04936155 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04936155 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- As libraries attempt to incorporate increasing amounts of electronic resources into their catalogs, utilizing a growing variety of metadata standards, library and information science programs are grappling with how to educate catalogers to meet these challenges. In this paper, an employer considers the characteristics and skills that catalogers will need and how they might acquire them.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
ChaPudhry, A.S.; Periasamy, M.: ¬A study of current practices of selected libraries in cataloguing electronic journals (2001)
0.03
0.031751644 = product of:
0.047627464 = sum of:
0.026031785 = weight(_text_:to in 746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026031785 = score(doc=746,freq=10.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.3144084 = fieldWeight in 746, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=746)
0.021595677 = product of:
0.043191355 = sum of:
0.043191355 = weight(_text_:22 in 746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043191355 = score(doc=746,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 746, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=746)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- MARC records and online policy documents of selected libraries were reviewed to study the approaches taken by libraries worldwide to catalogue electronic journals. In general, libraries catalogue those electronic journals that are subscribed by them on priority basis. Most of them annotate the e-journal to the print record, some prefer to catalogue them separately, while the majority of the libraries adopt both approaches. While most of the libraries studied prefer full record, cataloguing e-journals separately with a brief record (at least containing MARC fields 245, 500, and 856) that identifies and locates the resource seems to be the best practice.
- Date
- 22. 1.2007 20:46:57
-
Simpson, B.; Williams, P.: ¬The cataloger's workstation revisited : utilizing cataloger's desktop (2001)
0.03
0.029919475 = product of:
0.044879213 = sum of:
0.023283537 = weight(_text_:to in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023283537 = score(doc=4121,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.28121543 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
0.021595677 = product of:
0.043191355 = sum of:
0.043191355 = weight(_text_:22 in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043191355 = score(doc=4121,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- A few years into the development of Cataloger's Desktop, an electronic cataloging tool aggregator available through the Library of Congress, is an opportune time to assess its impact on cataloging operations. A search for online cataloging tools on the Internet indicates a proliferation of cataloging tool aggregators which provide access to online documentation related to cataloging practices and procedures. Cataloger's Desktop stands out as a leader among these aggregators. Results of a survey to assess 159 academic ARL and large public libraries' reasons for use or non-use of Cataloger's Desktop highlight the necessity of developing strategies for its successful implementation including training staff, providing documentation, and managing technical issues.
- Date
- 28. 7.2006 20:09:22
-
Beall, J.; Kafadar, K.: ¬The effectiveness of copy cotaloging at eliminating typographical errors in shared bibliographic records (2004)
0.03
0.029919475 = product of:
0.044879213 = sum of:
0.023283537 = weight(_text_:to in 4849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023283537 = score(doc=4849,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.28121543 = fieldWeight in 4849, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4849)
0.021595677 = product of:
0.043191355 = sum of:
0.043191355 = weight(_text_:22 in 4849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043191355 = score(doc=4849,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4849, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4849)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Typographical errors in bibliographic records can cause retrieval problems in online catalogs. This study examined one hundred typographical errors in records in the OCLC WorldCat database. The local catalogs of five libraries holding the items described by the bibliographic records with typographical errors were searched to determine whether each library had corrected the errors. The study found that only 35.8 percent of the errors had been corrected. Knowledge of copy cataloging error rates can help underscore the importance of quality data in bibliographic utilities and, further, can serve as an indication to libraries whether they need to pay more attention to correcting types in the copy cataloging process.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Gatti, T.H.: Utilization of students as cataloging assistants at carnegie category I institution libraries (2005)
0.03
0.028997809 = product of:
0.043496713 = sum of:
0.018815938 = weight(_text_:to in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018815938 = score(doc=43,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.22725637 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
0.024680775 = product of:
0.04936155 = sum of:
0.04936155 = weight(_text_:22 in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04936155 = score(doc=43,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- A survey of 261 libraries was undertaken to determine the level of use of and duties performed by student assistants in monographic cataloging operations. Ninety-five of 142 responding libraries (64.1 percent) indicate that they use student assistants for some type of monographic cataloging tasks. These tasks are downloading of bibliographic and authority records, monographic cataloging, classification, subject heading authority control, holdings, database maintenance, and editing of 246 or 505 MARC tags. Some respondents expressed reluctance to use student assistants for higher-level cataloging tasks.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Yee, M.M.: New perspectives on the shared cataloging environment and a MARC 21 shopping list (2004)
0.03
0.028997809 = product of:
0.043496713 = sum of:
0.018815938 = weight(_text_:to in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018815938 = score(doc=132,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.22725637 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
0.024680775 = product of:
0.04936155 = sum of:
0.04936155 = weight(_text_:22 in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04936155 = score(doc=132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper surveys the cataloging literature to collect problems that have been identified with the MARC 21 format. The problems are sorted into (1) problems that are not the fault of MARC 21; (2) problems that perhaps are not problems at all; (3) problems that are connected with the current shared cataloging environment; and 4) other problems with MARC 21 and vendor implementation of it. The author makes recommendations to deal with the true MARC 21 problems that remain after this analysis.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Madison, O.M.A.: Utilizing the FRBR framework in designing user-focused digital content and access systems (2006)
0.03
0.028997809 = product of:
0.043496713 = sum of:
0.018815938 = weight(_text_:to in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018815938 = score(doc=1085,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.22725637 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
0.024680775 = product of:
0.04936155 = sum of:
0.04936155 = weight(_text_:22 in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04936155 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper discusses the rapidly expanding environment of emerging electronic content and the importance of librarians to partner with new research and teaching communities in meeting users' needs to find, identify, select, and obtain the information and resources they need. The methodology and framework of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions' Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records could serve as a useful tool in building expanded access and content systems.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Riva, P.: Mapping MARC 21 linking entry fields to FRBR and Tillett's taxonomy of bibliographic relationships (2004)
0.03
0.028635468 = product of:
0.0429532 = sum of:
0.02444262 = weight(_text_:to in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02444262 = score(doc=136,freq=12.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.29521468 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
0.018510582 = product of:
0.037021164 = sum of:
0.037021164 = weight(_text_:22 in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037021164 = score(doc=136,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Bibliographic relationships have taken on even greater importance in the context of ongoing efforts to integrate concepts from the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) into cataloging codes and database structures. In MARC 21, the linking entry fields are a major mechanism for expressing relationships between bibliographic records. Taxonomies of bibliographic relationships have been proposed by Tillett, with an extension by Smiraglia, and in FRBR itself. The present exercise is to provide a detailed bidirectional mapping of the MARC 21 linking fields to these two schemes. The correspondence of the Tillett taxonomic divisions to the MARC categorization of the linking fields as chronological, horizontal, or vertical is examined as well. Application of the findings to MARC format development and system functionality is discussed.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Genereux, C.: Building connections : a review of the serials literature 2004 through 2005 (2007)
0.03
0.028635468 = product of:
0.0429532 = sum of:
0.02444262 = weight(_text_:to in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02444262 = score(doc=2548,freq=12.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.29521468 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
0.018510582 = product of:
0.037021164 = sum of:
0.037021164 = weight(_text_:22 in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037021164 = score(doc=2548,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This review of 2004 and 2005 serials literature covers the themes of cost, management, and access. Interwoven through the serials literature of these two years are the importance of collaboration, communication, and linkages between scholars, publishers, subscription agents and other intermediaries, and librarians. The emphasis in the literature is on electronic serials and their impact on publishing, libraries, and vendors. In response to the crisis of escalating journal prices and libraries' dissatisfaction with the Big Deal licensing agreements, Open Access journals and publishing models were promoted. Libraries subscribed to or licensed increasing numbers of electronic serials. As a result, libraries sought ways to better manage licensing and subscription data (not handled by traditional integrated library systems) by implementing electronic resources management systems. In order to provide users with better, faster, and more current information on and access to electronic serials, libraries implemented tools and services to provide A-Z title lists, title by title coverage data, MARC records, and OpenURL link resolvers.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Creider, L.S.: Family names and the cataloger (2007)
0.03
0.027839875 = product of:
0.04175981 = sum of:
0.020164136 = weight(_text_:to in 2285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020164136 = score(doc=2285,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.24353972 = fieldWeight in 2285, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2285)
0.021595677 = product of:
0.043191355 = sum of:
0.043191355 = weight(_text_:22 in 2285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043191355 = score(doc=2285,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2285, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2285)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The Joint Steering Committee for the Revision of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, to be known as Resource Description and Access (RDA), has indicated that the replacement for the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (AACR2) will allow the use of family names as authors and will provide rules for their formation. This paper discusses what a family name describes; examines how information seekers look for family names and what they expect to find; describes the ways in which family names have been established in Anglo-American cataloging and archival traditions; asks how adequately the headings established under these rules help users seek such information; and suggests how revised cataloging rules might better enable users to identify resources that meet their needs.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Russell, B.M.: Looking for someone special : special collections cataloging, 1980-2000 and beyond (2003)
0.03
0.027215695 = product of:
0.04082354 = sum of:
0.02231296 = weight(_text_:to in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02231296 = score(doc=150,freq=10.0), product of:
0.08279609 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.26949292 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
0.018510582 = product of:
0.037021164 = sum of:
0.037021164 = weight(_text_:22 in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037021164 = score(doc=150,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15947726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045541126 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The provision of access to materials in special collections intersects the fields of cataloging and special collections librarianship, sharing characteristics and challenges with both. In order to reveal the changing expectations regarding special collections cataloging professionals, the author examined job notices for positions advertised in C&RL News from 1980 to 2000. Three related hypotheses were tested in this study: fixed-term appointments would become more common; published requirements for consideration would be more rigorous; and positions would offer less relative compensation than in the past. These hypotheses were demonstrated to be untrue. In a larger context, the results of this study can be extrapolated to suggest means of improving education and training for professionals in special collections cataloging, highlighting the skills and abilities future employing institutions will be seeking.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
