-
Sawhney, H.; Jayakar, K.: Universal access (2007)
0.04
0.039682023 = product of:
0.07936405 = sum of:
0.07936405 = product of:
0.23809214 = sum of:
0.23809214 = weight(_text_:universal in 5245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23809214 = score(doc=5245,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.93139786 = fieldWeight in 5245, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5245)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Gödert, W.: Klassifikatorische Inhaltserschließung : Ein Übersichtsartikel als kommentierter Literaturbericht (1990)
0.03
0.028059429 = product of:
0.056118857 = sum of:
0.056118857 = product of:
0.16835657 = sum of:
0.16835657 = weight(_text_:universal in 5143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16835657 = score(doc=5143,freq=4.0), product of:
0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.65859777 = fieldWeight in 5143, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5143)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Identifies the interest in questions of classified catalogues generated by the development of on-line catalogues, establishing a difference between 2 large areas: free access to information items in a systematic arrangement and expressing the contents of books by means of notational symbols in a classification system in a local catalogue. Examines the elements and structure of classification systems, the internationally important universal classifications, the procedures for book display and systematic processing in West German public libraries and exhibtion techniques in West German academic libraries. Covers universal and faceted classifications, as well as classification systems in on-line catalogues
-
Lima, G.A. de; Castro, I.R.: Uso da classificacao decimal universal para a recuperacao da informacao em ambientes digitas : uma revisao sistematica da literatura (2021)
0.03
0.02772866 = product of:
0.05545732 = sum of:
0.05545732 = product of:
0.16637196 = sum of:
0.16637196 = weight(_text_:universal in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16637196 = score(doc=760,freq=10.0), product of:
0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.6508341 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Knowledge Organization Systems, even traditional ones, such as the Universal Decimal Classification, have been studied to improve the retrieval of information online, although the potential of using knowledge structures in the user interface has not yet been widespread. Objective: This study presents a mapping of scientific production on information retrieval methodologies, which make use of the Universal Decimal Classification. Methodology: Systematic Literature Review, conducted in two stages, with a selection of 44 publications, resulting in the time interval from 1964 to 2017, whose categories analyzed were: most productive authors, languages of publications, types of document, year of publication, most cited work, major impact journal, and thematic categories covered in the publications. Results: A total of nine more productive authors and co-authors were found; predominance of the English language (42 publications); works published in the format of journal articles (33); and highlight to the year 2007 (eight publications). In addition, it was identified that the most cited work was by Mcilwaine (1997), with 61 citations, and the journal Extensions & Corrections to the UDC was the one with the largest number of publications, in addition to the incidence of the theme Universal Automation linked to a thesaurus for information retrieval, present in 19 works. Conclusions: Shortage of studies that explore the potential of the Decimal Classification, especially in Brazilian literature, which highlights the need for further study on the topic, involving research at the national and international levels.
- Footnote
- Englischer Titel: Use of the Universal Decimal Classification for the recoery of information in digital environments: a systematic review of literature.
-
Enser, P.G.B.: Visual image retrieval (2008)
0.02
0.017529253 = product of:
0.035058506 = sum of:
0.035058506 = product of:
0.10517551 = sum of:
0.10517551 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10517551 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2012 13:01:26
-
Morris, S.A.: Mapping research specialties (2008)
0.02
0.017529253 = product of:
0.035058506 = sum of:
0.035058506 = product of:
0.10517551 = sum of:
0.10517551 = weight(_text_:22 in 3962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10517551 = score(doc=3962,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3962, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3962)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 9:30:22
-
Fallis, D.: Social epistemology and information science (2006)
0.02
0.017529253 = product of:
0.035058506 = sum of:
0.035058506 = product of:
0.10517551 = sum of:
0.10517551 = weight(_text_:22 in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10517551 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:22:28
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.02
0.017529253 = product of:
0.035058506 = sum of:
0.035058506 = product of:
0.10517551 = sum of:
0.10517551 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10517551 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Metz, A.: Community service : a bibliography (1996)
0.02
0.017529253 = product of:
0.035058506 = sum of:
0.035058506 = product of:
0.10517551 = sum of:
0.10517551 = weight(_text_:22 in 5341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10517551 = score(doc=5341,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5341, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5341)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17.10.1996 14:22:33
-
Belkin, N.J.; Croft, W.B.: Retrieval techniques (1987)
0.02
0.017529253 = product of:
0.035058506 = sum of:
0.035058506 = product of:
0.10517551 = sum of:
0.10517551 = weight(_text_:22 in 334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10517551 = score(doc=334,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 334, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=334)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.109-145
-
Smith, L.C.: Artificial intelligence and information retrieval (1987)
0.02
0.017529253 = product of:
0.035058506 = sum of:
0.035058506 = product of:
0.10517551 = sum of:
0.10517551 = weight(_text_:22 in 335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10517551 = score(doc=335,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 335, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=335)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.41-77
-
Warner, A.J.: Natural language processing (1987)
0.02
0.017529253 = product of:
0.035058506 = sum of:
0.035058506 = product of:
0.10517551 = sum of:
0.10517551 = weight(_text_:22 in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10517551 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.79-108
-
T.1: Classification systems and thesauri, 1950-1982 (1982) // T.2: Reference tools and conferences in classification and indexing (1984) // T.3: Classification- and indexing systems: theory - structure - methodology, 1950-1982 (1985) // T.4: On universal and special classification systems and thesauri (in Vorb.) // T.5: Language foundation, apllication and environment of classification and indexing (in Vorb.) : International classification and indexing bibliography (ICIB) (1982-)
0.02
0.017360885 = product of:
0.03472177 = sum of:
0.03472177 = product of:
0.10416531 = sum of:
0.10416531 = weight(_text_:universal in 2839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10416531 = score(doc=2839,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.40748656 = fieldWeight in 2839, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2839)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Grudin, J.: Human-computer interaction (2011)
0.02
0.015338095 = product of:
0.03067619 = sum of:
0.03067619 = product of:
0.092028566 = sum of:
0.092028566 = weight(_text_:22 in 1601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.092028566 = score(doc=1601,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1601, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1601)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27.12.2014 18:54:22
-
Chen, A.-P.; Chen, M.-Y.: ¬A review of survey research in knowledge management performance (2005)
0.01
0.014880758 = product of:
0.029761516 = sum of:
0.029761516 = product of:
0.08928455 = sum of:
0.08928455 = weight(_text_:universal in 3025) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08928455 = score(doc=3025,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.3492742 = fieldWeight in 3025, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3025)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of universal knowledge management. 0(2005) no.1, S.4-12
-
Rader, H.B.: Library orientation and instruction - 1993 (1994)
0.01
0.010955783 = product of:
0.021911565 = sum of:
0.021911565 = product of:
0.06573469 = sum of:
0.06573469 = weight(_text_:22 in 209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06573469 = score(doc=209,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 209, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=209)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Reference services review. 22(1994) no.4, S.81-
-
Callahan, E.: Interface design and culture (2004)
0.01
0.009920506 = product of:
0.019841012 = sum of:
0.019841012 = product of:
0.059523035 = sum of:
0.059523035 = weight(_text_:universal in 4281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059523035 = score(doc=4281,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.23284946 = fieldWeight in 4281, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4281)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- It is common knowledge that computer interfaces in different cultures vary. Interface designers present information in different languages, use different iconography to designate concepts, and employ different standards for dates, time, and numbers. These manifest differences beg the question of how easily an interface designed in one country can be used in and transferred to another country. Are the challenges involved in adaptation merely cosmetic or are they shaped by more profound forces? Do all cultures respond to interfaces in similar ways, or does culture itself shape user comprehension? If culture is a factor in explaining varied user reactions to comparable interfaces, what specific cultural dimensions are responsible for the divergences? Do differences reside mainly at the level of national cultures, or do they depend an other variables such as class, gender, age, education, and expertise with technology? In the face of a potentially large number of explanatory variables, how do we delimit a workable concept of culture and yet remain cognizant of other factors that might shape the results of culture and interface research? Questions such as these have been asked in the ergonomics community since the early 1970s, when the industrialization of developing countries created a need for more research an cultural differences (Honold, 1999), resulting in an increased interest in the universal applicability of ergonomic principles. This trend continued after the reunification of Germany and the emergence of market economies in Eastern Europe (Nielsen, 1990). In the mid-1990s, as markets outside the U.S. rapidly expanded, it became necessary to develop appropriate user interfaces for non-Western cultures in order to facilitate international cooperation. This fresh impetus for research led to the development of practical guidelines and a body of Gase studies and examples of possible solutions. Most recently we have seen attempts to provide a theoretical foundation for cross-cultural usability engineering and experimental comparison studies (Honold, 1999).
-
Legg, C.: Ontologies on the Semantic Web (2007)
0.01
0.009920506 = product of:
0.019841012 = sum of:
0.019841012 = product of:
0.059523035 = sum of:
0.059523035 = weight(_text_:universal in 1979) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059523035 = score(doc=1979,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.23284946 = fieldWeight in 1979, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1979)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- As an informational technology, the World Wide Web has enjoyed spectacular success. In just ten years it has transformed the way information is produced, stored, and shared in arenas as diverse as shopping, family photo albums, and high-level academic research. The "Semantic Web" is touted by its developers as equally revolutionary, although it has not yet achieved anything like the Web's exponential uptake. It seeks to transcend a current limitation of the Web - that it largely requires indexing to be accomplished merely on specific character strings. Thus, a person searching for information about "turkey" (the bird) receives from current search engines many irrelevant pages about "Turkey" (the country) and nothing about the Spanish "pavo" even if he or she is a Spanish-speaker able to understand such pages. The Semantic Web vision is to develop technology to facilitate retrieval of information via meanings, not just spellings. For this to be possible, most commentators believe, Semantic Web applications will have to draw on some kind of shared, structured, machine-readable conceptual scheme. Thus, there has been a convergence between the Semantic Web research community and an older tradition with roots in classical Artificial Intelligence (AI) research (sometimes referred to as "knowledge representation") whose goal is to develop a formal ontology. A formal ontology is a machine-readable theory of the most fundamental concepts or "categories" required in order to understand information pertaining to any knowledge domain. A review of the attempts that have been made to realize this goal provides an opportunity to reflect in interestingly concrete ways on various research questions such as the following: - How explicit a machine-understandable theory of meaning is it possible or practical to construct? - How universal a machine-understandable theory of meaning is it possible or practical to construct? - How much (and what kind of) inference support is required to realize a machine-understandable theory of meaning? - What is it for a theory of meaning to be machine-understandable anyway?
-
Hsueh, D.C.: Recon road maps : retrospective conversion literature, 1980-1990 (1992)
0.01
0.008764626 = product of:
0.017529253 = sum of:
0.017529253 = product of:
0.052587755 = sum of:
0.052587755 = weight(_text_:22 in 2193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052587755 = score(doc=2193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2193)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 14(1992) nos.3/4, S.5-22
-
Gabbard, R.: Recent literature shows accelerated growth in hypermedia tools : an annotated bibliography (1994)
0.01
0.008764626 = product of:
0.017529253 = sum of:
0.017529253 = product of:
0.052587755 = sum of:
0.052587755 = weight(_text_:22 in 8460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052587755 = score(doc=8460,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 8460, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8460)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Reference services review. 22(1994) no.2, S.31-40
-
Buckland, M.K.; Liu, Z.: History of information science (1995)
0.01
0.008764626 = product of:
0.017529253 = sum of:
0.017529253 = product of:
0.052587755 = sum of:
0.052587755 = weight(_text_:22 in 4226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052587755 = score(doc=4226,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4226, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4226)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 6.1996 19:22:20
