-
Dahlberg, I.: Principles for the construction of a universal classification system : a proposal (1978)
0.03
0.03472177 = product of:
0.06944354 = sum of:
0.06944354 = product of:
0.20833062 = sum of:
0.20833062 = weight(_text_:universal in 67) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20833062 = score(doc=67,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.8149731 = fieldWeight in 67, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=67)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Dahlberg, I.: Why a new universal classification system is needed (2017)
0.03
0.03472177 = product of:
0.06944354 = sum of:
0.06944354 = product of:
0.20833062 = sum of:
0.20833062 = weight(_text_:universal in 3614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20833062 = score(doc=3614,freq=8.0), product of:
0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.8149731 = fieldWeight in 3614, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3614)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Research history of the last 70 years highlights various systems for contents assessment and retrieval of scientific literature, such as universal classifications, thesauri, ontologies etc., which have followed developments of their own, notwithstanding a general trend towards interoperability, i.e. either to become instruments for cooperation or to widen their scope to encompass neighbouring fields within their framework. In the case of thesauri and ontologies, the endeavour to upgrade them into a universal system was bound to miscarry. This paper purports to indicate ways to gain from past experience and possibly rally material achievements while updating and promoting the ontologically-based faceted Information Coding Classification as a progressive universal system fit for meeting whatever requirements in the fields of information and science at large.
-
Austin, D.: Basic concept classes and primitive relations (1982)
0.03
0.029761516 = product of:
0.05952303 = sum of:
0.05952303 = product of:
0.1785691 = sum of:
0.1785691 = weight(_text_:universal in 6580) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1785691 = score(doc=6580,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.6985484 = fieldWeight in 6580, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6580)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Universal classification I: subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. of the 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification research, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982. Ed.: I. Dahlberg
-
Dahlberg, I.: ¬The Information Coding Classification (ICC) : a modern, theory-based fully-faceted, universal system of knowledge fields (2008)
0.02
0.017537143 = product of:
0.035074286 = sum of:
0.035074286 = product of:
0.10522286 = sum of:
0.10522286 = weight(_text_:universal in 1854) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10522286 = score(doc=1854,freq=4.0), product of:
0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.4116236 = fieldWeight in 1854, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1854)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Introduction into the structure, contents and specifications (especially the Systematifier) of the Information Coding Classification, developed in the seventies and used in many ways by the author and a few others following its publication in 1982. Its theoretical basis is explained consisting in (1) the Integrative Level Theory, following an evolutionary approach of ontical areas, and integrating also on each level the aspects contained in the sequence of the levels, (2) the distinction between categories of form and categories of being, (3) the application of a feature of Systems Theory (namely the element position plan) and (4) the inclusion of a concept theory, distinguishing four kinds of relationships, originated by the kinds of characteristics (which are the elements of concepts to be derived from the statements on the properties of referents of concepts). Its special Subject Groups on each of its nine levels are outlined and the combinatory facilities at certain positions of the Systematifier are shown. Further elaboration and use have been suggested, be it only as a switching language between the six existing universal classification systems at present in use internationally.
-
Szostak, R.: Basic Concepts Classification (BCC) (2020)
0.02
0.017537143 = product of:
0.035074286 = sum of:
0.035074286 = product of:
0.10522286 = sum of:
0.10522286 = weight(_text_:universal in 5883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10522286 = score(doc=5883,freq=4.0), product of:
0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.4116236 = fieldWeight in 5883, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5883)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The Basics Concept Classification (BCC) is a "universal" scheme: it attempts to encompass all areas of human understanding. Whereas most universal schemes are organized around scholarly disciplines, the BCC is instead organized around phenomena (things), the relationships that exist among phenomena, and the properties that phenomena and relators may possess. This structure allows the BCC to apply facet analysis without requiring the use of "facet indicators." The main motivation for the BCC was a recognition that existing classifications that are organized around disciplines serve interdisciplinary scholarship poorly. Complex concepts that might be understood quite differently across groups and individuals can generally be broken into basic concepts for which there is enough shared understanding for the purposes of classification. Documents, ideas, and objects are classified synthetically by combining entries from the schedules of phenomena, relators, and properties. The inclusion of separate schedules of-generally verb-like-relators is one of the most unusual aspects of the BCC. This (and the schedules of properties that serve as adjectives or adverbs) allows the production of sentence-like subject strings. Documents can then be classified in terms of the main arguments made in the document. BCC provides very precise descriptors of documents by combining phenomena, relators, and properties synthetically. The terminology employed in the BCC reduces terminological ambiguity. The BCC is still being developed and it needs to be fleshed out in certain respects. Yet it also needs to be applied; only in application can the feasibility and desirability of the classification be adequately assessed.
-
Dahlberg, I.: ¬The future of classification in libraries and networks : a theoretical point of view (1995)
0.01
0.012400633 = product of:
0.024801265 = sum of:
0.024801265 = product of:
0.07440379 = sum of:
0.07440379 = weight(_text_:universal in 5563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07440379 = score(doc=5563,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.29106182 = fieldWeight in 5563, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5563)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Some time ago, some people said classification is dead, we don't need it any more. They probably thought that subject headings could do the job of the necessary subject analysis and shelving of books. However, all of a sudden in 1984 the attitude changed, when an OCLC study of Karen Markey started to show what could be done even with an "outdated system" such as the Dewey Decimal Classification in the computer, once it was visible on a screen to show the helpfulness of a classified library catalogue called an OPAC; classification was brought back into the minds of doubtful librarians and of all those who thought they would not need it any longer. But the problem once phrased: "We are stuck with the two old systems, LCC and DDC" would not find a solution and is still with us today. We know that our systems are outdated but we seem still to be unable to replace them with better ones. What then should one do and advise, knowing that we need something better? Perhaps a new universal ordering system which more adequately represents and mediates the world of our present day knowledge? If we were to develop it from scratch, how would we create it and implement it in such a way that it would be acceptable to the majority of the present intellectual world population?
-
Dahlberg, I.: ¬A faceted classification of general concepts (2011)
0.01
0.012400633 = product of:
0.024801265 = sum of:
0.024801265 = product of:
0.07440379 = sum of:
0.07440379 = weight(_text_:universal in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07440379 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.29106182 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- General concepts are all those form-categorial concepts which - attached to a specific concept of a classification system or thesaurus - can help to widen, sometimes even in a syntactical sense, the understanding of a case. In some existing universal classification systems such concepts have been named "auxiliaries" or "common isolates" as in the Colon Classification (CC). However, by such auxiliaries, different kinds of such concepts are listed, e.g. concepts of space and time, concepts of races and languages and concepts of kinds of documents, next to them also concepts of kinds of general activities, properties, persons, and institutions. Such latter kinds form part of the nine aspects ruling the facets in the Information Coding Classification (ICC) through the principle of using a Systematiser for the subdivision of subject groups and fields. Based on this principle and using and extending existing systems of such concepts, e.g. which A. Diemer had presented to the German Thesaurus Committee as well as those found in the UDC, in CC and attached to the Subject Heading System of the German National Library, a faceted classification is proposed for critical assessment, necessary improvement and possible later use in classification systems and thesauri.
-
Dousa, T.: Everything Old is New Again : Perspectivism and Polyhierarchy in Julius O. Kaiser's Theory of Systematic Indexing (2007)
0.01
0.012400633 = product of:
0.024801265 = sum of:
0.024801265 = product of:
0.07440379 = sum of:
0.07440379 = weight(_text_:universal in 4835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07440379 = score(doc=4835,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.29106182 = fieldWeight in 4835, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4835)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In the early years of the 20th century, Julius Otto Kaiser (1868-1927), a special librarian and indexer of technical literature, developed a method of knowledge organization (KO) known as systematic indexing. Certain elements of the method-its stipulation that all indexing terms be divided into fundamental categories "concretes", "countries", and "processes", which are then to be synthesized into indexing "statements" formulated according to strict rules of citation order-have long been recognized as precursors to key principles of the theory of faceted classification. However, other, less well-known elements of the method may prove no less interesting to practitioners of KO. In particular, two aspects of systematic indexing seem to prefigure current trends in KO: (1) a perspectivist outlook that rejects universal classifications in favor of information organization systems customized to reflect local needs and (2) the incorporation of index terms extracted from source documents into a polyhierarchical taxonomical structure. Kaiser's perspectivism anticipates postmodern theories of KO, while his principled use of polyhierarchy to organize terms derived from the language of source documents provides a potentially fruitful model that can inform current discussions about harvesting natural-language terms, such as tags, and incorporating them into a flexibly structured controlled vocabulary.
-
Dahlberg, I.: Grundlagen universaler Wissensordnung : Probleme und Möglichkeiten eines universalen Klassifikationssystems des Wissens (1974)
0.01
0.010955783 = product of:
0.021911565 = sum of:
0.021911565 = product of:
0.06573469 = sum of:
0.06573469 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06573469 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Zugleich Dissertation Univ. Düsseldorf. - Rez. in: ZfBB. 22(1975) S.53-57 (H.-A. Koch)
-
Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006)
0.01
0.008764626 = product of:
0.017529253 = sum of:
0.017529253 = product of:
0.052587755 = sum of:
0.052587755 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052587755 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27. 5.2007 22:19:35
-
Tennis, J.T.: Facets and fugit tempus : considering time's effect on faceted classification schemes (2012)
0.01
0.008764626 = product of:
0.017529253 = sum of:
0.017529253 = product of:
0.052587755 = sum of:
0.052587755 = weight(_text_:22 in 826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052587755 = score(doc=826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=826)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 2. 6.2013 18:33:22
-
Perugini, S.: Supporting multiple paths to objects in information hierarchies : faceted classification, faceted search, and symbolic links (2010)
0.01
0.0076690475 = product of:
0.015338095 = sum of:
0.015338095 = product of:
0.046014283 = sum of:
0.046014283 = weight(_text_:22 in 4227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046014283 = score(doc=4227,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4227, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4227)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 46(2010) no.1, S.22-43
-
Heuvel, C. van den: Multidimensional classifications : past and future conceptualizations and visualizations (2012)
0.01
0.0076690475 = product of:
0.015338095 = sum of:
0.015338095 = product of:
0.046014283 = sum of:
0.046014283 = weight(_text_:22 in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046014283 = score(doc=632,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2013 11:31:25
-
Facets: a fruitful notion in many domains : special issue on facet analysis (2008)
0.01
0.0062003164 = product of:
0.012400633 = sum of:
0.012400633 = product of:
0.037201896 = sum of:
0.037201896 = weight(_text_:universal in 3262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037201896 = score(doc=3262,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.14553091 = fieldWeight in 3262, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3262)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Two of the papers revisit the interaction of facets with the theory of integrative levels, which posits that the organization of the natural world reflects increasingly interdependent complexity. This approach was tested as a basis for the creation of faceted classifications in the 1960s. These contemporary treatments of integrative levels are not discipline-driven as were the early approaches, but instead are ontological and phenomenological in focus. Dahlberg (p. 161-172) outlines the creation of the ICC (Information Coding System) and the application of the Systematifier in the generation of facets and the creation of a fully faceted classification. Gnoli (p. 177-192) proposes the use of fundamental categories as a way to redefine facets and fundamental categories in "more universal and level-independent ways" (p. 192). Given that Axiomathes has a stated focus on "contemporary issues in cognition and ontology" and the following thesis: "that real advances in contemporary science may depend upon a consideration of the origins and intellectual history of ideas at the forefront of current research," this venue seems well suited for the implementation of the stated agenda, to illustrate complementary approaches and to stimulate research. As situated, this special issue may well serve as a bridge to a more interdisciplinary dialogue about facet analysis than has previously been the case."
-
Gnoli, C.; Merli, G.; Pavan, G.; Bernuzzi, E.; Priano, M.: Freely faceted classification for a Web-based bibliographic archive : the BioAcoustic Reference Database (2010)
0.01
0.0054778913 = product of:
0.010955783 = sum of:
0.010955783 = product of:
0.032867346 = sum of:
0.032867346 = weight(_text_:22 in 3739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032867346 = score(doc=3739,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3739, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3739)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
-
Dousa, T.M.; Ibekwe-SanJuan, F.: Epistemological and methodological eclecticism in the construction of knowledge organization systems (KOSs) : the case of analytico-synthetic KOSs (2014)
0.01
0.0054778913 = product of:
0.010955783 = sum of:
0.010955783 = product of:
0.032867346 = sum of:
0.032867346 = weight(_text_:22 in 1417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032867346 = score(doc=1417,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1417, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1417)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Dousa, T.M.: Categories and the architectonics of system in Julius Otto Kaiser's method of systematic indexing (2014)
0.01
0.0054778913 = product of:
0.010955783 = sum of:
0.010955783 = product of:
0.032867346 = sum of:
0.032867346 = weight(_text_:22 in 1418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032867346 = score(doc=1418,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1418, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1418)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
