-
Davenport, E.; Cronin, B.: Knowledge management : Semantic drift or conceptual shift? (2000)
0.06
0.055473126 = product of:
0.11094625 = sum of:
0.11094625 = sum of:
0.039999157 = weight(_text_:library in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039999157 = score(doc=2277,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.29050803 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
0.070947096 = weight(_text_:22 in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.070947096 = score(doc=2277,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 31. 7.2001 20:22:57
- Source
- Journal of education for library and information science. 41(2000) no.?, S.294-306
-
Cronin, B.: Vernacular and vehicular language (2009)
0.02
0.024831483 = product of:
0.049662966 = sum of:
0.049662966 = product of:
0.09932593 = sum of:
0.09932593 = weight(_text_:22 in 7192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09932593 = score(doc=7192,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7192, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7192)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 11:44:11
-
Cronin, B.: Thinking about data (2013)
0.02
0.024831483 = product of:
0.049662966 = sum of:
0.049662966 = product of:
0.09932593 = sum of:
0.09932593 = weight(_text_:22 in 4347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09932593 = score(doc=4347,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4347, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4347)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 16:18:36
-
Cronin, B.: ¬The writing on the wall (2015)
0.02
0.021284128 = product of:
0.042568255 = sum of:
0.042568255 = product of:
0.08513651 = sum of:
0.08513651 = weight(_text_:22 in 7297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08513651 = score(doc=7297,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 7297, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7297)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26. 4.2015 19:27:22
-
Cronin, B.: Library and information science in context (1998)
0.02
0.015999662 = product of:
0.031999324 = sum of:
0.031999324 = product of:
0.06399865 = sum of:
0.06399865 = weight(_text_:library in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06399865 = score(doc=1416,freq=8.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.46481284 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- State of the art review of the ways in which the library and information science (LIS) profession is adapting to the growing informatization of society, the emergence of an information society and how librarians and information scientists are positioning themselves as players in an information society, characterized by metaphors such as 'information superhighway' and 'Worldwide Library'. Identifies major change drivers and considers the kinds of strategic responses being made by, and required of, the LIS field in the face of pervasive technologization and shifting social practices
- Source
- Library and information work worldwide 1998. Ed.: M.B. Line et al
-
Snyder, H.; Cronin, B.; Davenport, E.: What's the use of citation? : Citation analysis as a literature topic in selected disciplines of the social sciences (1995)
0.01
0.011999747 = product of:
0.023999494 = sum of:
0.023999494 = product of:
0.047998987 = sum of:
0.047998987 = weight(_text_:library in 1825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047998987 = score(doc=1825,freq=8.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.34860963 = fieldWeight in 1825, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1825)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a study to investigate the place and role of citation analysis in selected disciplines in the social sciences, including library and information science. 5 core library and information science periodicals: Journal of documentation; Library quarterly; Journal of the American Society for Information Science; College and research libraries; and the Journal of information science, were studed to determine the percentage of articles devoted to citation analysis and develop an indictive typology to categorize the major foci of research being conducted under the rubric of citation analysis. Similar analysis was conducted for periodicals in other social sciences disciplines. Demonstrates how the rubric can be used to dertermine how citatiion analysis is applied within library and information science and other disciplines. By isolating citation from bibliometrics in general, this work is differentiated from other, previous studies. Analysis of data from a 10 year sample of transdisciplinary social sciences literature suggests that 2 application areas predominate: the validity of citation as an evaluation tool; and impact or performance studies of authors, periodicals, and institutions
-
Cronin, B.; Meho, L.I.: Applying the author affiliation index to library and information science journals (2008)
0.01
0.01131347 = product of:
0.02262694 = sum of:
0.02262694 = product of:
0.04525388 = sum of:
0.04525388 = weight(_text_:library in 2361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04525388 = score(doc=2361,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 2361, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2361)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The authors use a novel method - the Author Affiliation Index (AAI) - to determine whether faculty at the top-10 North American library and information science (LIS) programs have a disproportionate presence in the premier journals of the field. The study finds that LIS may be both too small and too interdisciplinary a domain for the AAI to provide reliable results.
-
Larivière, V.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Cronin, B.: ¬A bibliometric chronicling of library and information science's first hundred years (2012)
0.01
0.0070709186 = product of:
0.014141837 = sum of:
0.014141837 = product of:
0.028283674 = sum of:
0.028283674 = weight(_text_:library in 244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028283674 = score(doc=244,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.2054202 = fieldWeight in 244, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=244)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper presents a condensed history of Library and Information Science (LIS) over the course of more than a century using a variety of bibliometric measures. It examines in detail the variable rate of knowledge production in the field, shifts in subject coverage, the dominance of particular publication genres at different times, prevailing modes of production, interactions with other disciplines, and, more generally, observes how the field has evolved. It shows that, despite a striking growth in the number of journals, papers, and contributing authors, a decrease was observed in the field's market-share of all social science and humanities research. Collaborative authorship is now the norm, a pattern seen across the social sciences. The idea of boundary crossing was also examined: in 2010, nearly 60% of authors who published in LIS also published in another discipline. This high degree of permeability in LIS was also demonstrated through reference and citation practices: LIS scholars now cite and receive citations from other fields more than from LIS itself. Two major structural shifts are revealed in the data: in 1960, LIS changed from a professional field focused on librarianship to an academic field focused on information and use; and in 1990, LIS began to receive a growing number of citations from outside the field, notably from Computer Science and Management, and saw a dramatic increase in the number of authors contributing to the literature of the field.
-
Cronin, B.: Social development and the role of information (1995)
0.01
0.0069998526 = product of:
0.013999705 = sum of:
0.013999705 = product of:
0.02799941 = sum of:
0.02799941 = weight(_text_:library in 5678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02799941 = score(doc=5678,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 5678, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5678)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- New review of information and library research. 1(1995), S.23-37
