-
Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.; Leuven, K.U.: Erratum (2012)
0.02
0.017736774 = product of:
0.035473548 = sum of:
0.035473548 = product of:
0.070947096 = sum of:
0.070947096 = weight(_text_:22 in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.070947096 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 14. 2.2012 12:53:22
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Introduction to informetrics : quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science (1990)
0.02
0.015652146 = product of:
0.031304292 = sum of:
0.031304292 = product of:
0.062608585 = sum of:
0.062608585 = weight(_text_:library in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062608585 = score(doc=1515,freq=10.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.45471698 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- LCSH
- Library statistics
Library science / Statistical methods
- Subject
- Library statistics
Library science / Statistical methods
-
Rousseau, R.: Use of an existing thesaurus in a knowledge based indexing and retrieval system (1991)
0.01
0.011999747 = product of:
0.023999494 = sum of:
0.023999494 = product of:
0.047998987 = sum of:
0.047998987 = weight(_text_:library in 3007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047998987 = score(doc=3007,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.34860963 = fieldWeight in 3007, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3007)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Annals of library science and documentation. 38(1991) no.4, S.127-130
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data (1996)
0.01
0.010642064 = product of:
0.021284128 = sum of:
0.021284128 = product of:
0.042568255 = sum of:
0.042568255 = weight(_text_:22 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042568255 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170
-
Asonuma, A.; Fang, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Reflections on the age distribution of Japanese scientists (2006)
0.01
0.010642064 = product of:
0.021284128 = sum of:
0.021284128 = product of:
0.042568255 = sum of:
0.042568255 = weight(_text_:22 in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042568255 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:26:24
-
Rousseau, R.: Informetric laws (2009)
0.01
0.007999831 = product of:
0.015999662 = sum of:
0.015999662 = product of:
0.031999324 = sum of:
0.031999324 = weight(_text_:library in 3795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031999324 = score(doc=3795,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 3795, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3795)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
-
Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003)
0.01
0.0070947097 = product of:
0.014189419 = sum of:
0.014189419 = product of:
0.028378839 = sum of:
0.028378839 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028378839 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9. 7.2006 10:22:35
-
Rousseau, R.: Journal evaluation : technical and practical issues (2002)
0.01
0.0070709186 = product of:
0.014141837 = sum of:
0.014141837 = product of:
0.028283674 = sum of:
0.028283674 = weight(_text_:library in 816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028283674 = score(doc=816,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.2054202 = fieldWeight in 816, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=816)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Artikel in einem Themenheft "Current theory in library and information science"
- Source
- Library trends. 50(2002) no.3, S.418-439
-
Yan, S.; Rousseau, R.; Huang, S.: Contributions of chinese authors in PLOS ONE (2016)
0.01
0.0069998526 = product of:
0.013999705 = sum of:
0.013999705 = product of:
0.02799941 = sum of:
0.02799941 = weight(_text_:library in 2765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02799941 = score(doc=2765,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 2765, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2765)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Beginning with a short review of Public Library of Science (PLOS) journals, we focus on PLOS ONE and more specifically the contributions of Chinese authors to this journal. It is shown that their contribution is growing exponentially. In 2013 almost one fifth of all publications in this journal had at least one Chinese author. The average number of citations per publication is approximately the same for articles with a Chinese author and for articles without any Chinese coauthor. Using the odds-ratio, we could not find arguments that Chinese authors in PLOS ONE excessively cite other Chinese contributions.
-
Frandsen, T.F.; Rousseau, R.; Rowlands, I.: Diffusion factors (2006)
0.00
0.0049998946 = product of:
0.009999789 = sum of:
0.009999789 = product of:
0.019999579 = sum of:
0.019999579 = weight(_text_:library in 5587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019999579 = score(doc=5587,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.14525402 = fieldWeight in 5587, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5587)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to clarify earlier work on journal diffusion metrics. Classical journal indicators such as the Garfield impact factor do not measure the breadth of influence across the literature of a particular journal title. As a new approach to measuring research influence, the study complements these existing metrics with a series of formally described diffusion factors. Design/methodology/approach - Using a publication-citation matrix as an organising construct, the paper develops formal descriptions of two forms of diffusion metric: "relative diffusion factors" and "journal diffusion factors" in both their synchronous and diachronous forms. It also provides worked examples for selected library and information science and economics journals, plus a sample of health information papers to illustrate their construction and use. Findings - Diffusion factors capture different aspects of the citation reception process than existing bibliometric measures. The paper shows that diffusion factors can be applied at the whole journal level or for sets of articles and that they provide a richer evidence base for citation analyses than traditional measures alone. Research limitations/implications - The focus of this paper is on clarifying the concepts underlying diffusion factors and there is unlimited scope for further work to apply these metrics to much larger and more comprehensive data sets than has been attempted here. Practical implications - These new tools extend the range of tools available for bibliometric, and possibly webometric, analysis. Diffusion factors might find particular application in studies where the research questions focus on the dynamic aspects of innovation and knowledge transfer. Originality/value - This paper will be of interest to those with theoretical interests in informetric distributions as well as those interested in science policy and innovation studies.
