Search (30 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Zumer, M."
  1. Zumer, M.; Clavel, G.: EDLproject : one more step towards the European digtial library (2007) 0.08
    0.084136605 = product of:
      0.16827321 = sum of:
        0.16827321 = sum of:
          0.08313669 = weight(_text_:library in 3184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08313669 = score(doc=3184,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.60380965 = fieldWeight in 3184, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3184)
          0.08513651 = weight(_text_:22 in 3184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08513651 = score(doc=3184,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3184, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3184)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anläasslich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  2. O'Neill, E.; Zumer, M.; Mixter, J.: FRBR aggregates : their types and frequency in library collections (2015) 0.05
    0.045283623 = product of:
      0.090567246 = sum of:
        0.090567246 = sum of:
          0.047998987 = weight(_text_:library in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047998987 = score(doc=2610,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.34860963 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
          0.042568255 = weight(_text_:22 in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042568255 = score(doc=2610,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Aggregates have been a frequent topic of discussion between library science researchers. This study seeks to better understand aggregates through the analysis of a sample of bibliographic records and review of the cataloging treatment of aggregates. The study focuses on determining how common aggregates are in library collections, what types of aggregates exist, how aggregates are described in bibliographic records, and the criteria for identifying aggregates from the information in bibliographic records. A sample of bibliographic records representing textual resources was taken from OCLC's WorldCat database. More than 20 percent of the sampled records represented aggregates and more works were embodied in aggregates than were embodied in single work manifestations. A variety of issues, including cataloging practices and the varying definitions of aggregates, made it difficult to accurately identify and quantify the presence of aggregates using only the information from bibliographic records.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 59(2015) no.3, S.120-129
  3. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2012) 0.04
    0.04210005 = product of:
      0.0842001 = sum of:
        0.0842001 = sum of:
          0.023999494 = weight(_text_:library in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.023999494 = score(doc=1967,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
          0.06020061 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06020061 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
  4. Zumer, M.: Guidelines for (electronic) national bibliographies : work in progress (2005) 0.04
    0.03883119 = product of:
      0.07766238 = sum of:
        0.07766238 = sum of:
          0.02799941 = weight(_text_:library in 4346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02799941 = score(doc=4346,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 4346, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4346)
          0.049662966 = weight(_text_:22 in 4346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049662966 = score(doc=4346,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4346, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4346)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1.11.2005 18:56:22
    Footnote
    Vortrag, World Library and Information Congress: 71th IFLA General Conference and Council "Libraries - A voyage of discovery", August 14th - 18th 2005, Oslo, Norway.
  5. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2014) 0.04
    0.035083376 = product of:
      0.07016675 = sum of:
        0.07016675 = sum of:
          0.019999579 = weight(_text_:library in 1962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.019999579 = score(doc=1962,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.14525402 = fieldWeight in 1962, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1962)
          0.050167173 = weight(_text_:22 in 1962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.050167173 = score(doc=1962,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1962, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1962)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The article discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and/or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the Dewey Decimal Classification [DDC] (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
  6. Zeng, M.L.; Gracy, K.F.; Zumer, M.: Using a semantic analysis tool to generate subject access points : a study using Panofsky's theory and two research samples (2014) 0.03
    0.033283874 = product of:
      0.06656775 = sum of:
        0.06656775 = sum of:
          0.023999494 = weight(_text_:library in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.023999494 = score(doc=1464,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
          0.042568255 = weight(_text_:22 in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042568255 = score(doc=1464,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper attempts to explore an approach of using an automatic semantic analysis tool to enhance the "subject" access to materials that are not included in the usual library subject cataloging process. Using two research samples the authors analyzed the access points supplied by OpenCalais, a semantic analysis tool. As an aid in understanding how computerized subject analysis might be approached, this paper suggests using the three-layer framework that has been accepted and applied in image analysis, developed by Erwin Panofsky.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  7. Riva, P.; Boeuf, P. le; Zumer, M.: IFLA Library Reference Model : a conceptual model for bibliographic information (2017) 0.01
    0.012124101 = product of:
      0.024248201 = sum of:
        0.024248201 = product of:
          0.048496403 = sum of:
            0.048496403 = weight(_text_:library in 5179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048496403 = score(doc=5179,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052364815 = queryNorm
                0.3522223 = fieldWeight in 5179, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5179)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Definition of a conceptual reference model to provide a framework for the analysis of non-administrative metadata relating to library resources. The resulting model definition was approved by the FRBR Review Group (November 2016), and then made available to the Standing Committees of the Sections on Cataloguing and Subject Analysis & Access, as well as to the ISBD Review Group, for comment in December 2016. The final document was approved by the IFLACommittee on Standards (August 2017).
    Object
    IFLA Library Reference Model
  8. Zumer, M.: IFLA Library Reference Model (IFLA LRM)-harmonisation of the FRBR family (2018) 0.01
    0.011999747 = product of:
      0.023999494 = sum of:
        0.023999494 = product of:
          0.047998987 = sum of:
            0.047998987 = weight(_text_:library in 4378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047998987 = score(doc=4378,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052364815 = queryNorm
                0.34860963 = fieldWeight in 4378, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4378)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In 1998, the FRBR model (Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records) was developed under the auspices of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA). The library domain finally developed its conceptual model of the bibliographic universe and thus the basis for the development of novel bibliographic information systems. In 2017, the IFLA Library Reference Model (Riva, LeBoeuf and Zumer 2017) was formally accepted as an IFLA standard. The FRBR family of models as well as LRM all start from the user tasks that need to be enabled and supported by bibliographic information systems. The consolidation process included a detailed analysis of all entities, attributes and relationships defined by the FRBR family. In this paper, the main features of the model are presented and described. With IFLA LRM, we finally have a modern model, compatible with the semantic web.
  9. Zumer, M.; Clavel, G.: Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Liibrary : resuls & findings (2008) 0.01
    0.01131347 = product of:
      0.02262694 = sum of:
        0.02262694 = product of:
          0.04525388 = sum of:
            0.04525388 = weight(_text_:library in 858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04525388 = score(doc=858,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052364815 = queryNorm
                0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 858, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=858)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Develop the European library network's localisation and multilingual capabilities, improving access for end-users through multi language interfaces and advanced search mechanisms in a standardised way
    Content
    Vortrag "One more step towards the European digital library: International Conference, Deutsche Nationalbibliothek, Frankfurt am Main 31 January - 1 February 2008.
  10. Golub, K.; Tudhope, D.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Terminology registries for knowledge organization systems : functionality, use, and attributes (2014) 0.01
    0.010642064 = product of:
      0.021284128 = sum of:
        0.021284128 = product of:
          0.042568255 = sum of:
            0.042568255 = weight(_text_:22 in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042568255 = score(doc=1347,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052364815 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:12:54
  11. Svab, K.; Zumer, M.: ¬The value of a library catalog for selecting children's picture books (2015) 0.01
    0.009899286 = product of:
      0.019798571 = sum of:
        0.019798571 = product of:
          0.039597142 = sum of:
            0.039597142 = weight(_text_:library in 2614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039597142 = score(doc=2614,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052364815 = queryNorm
                0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 2614, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2614)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The aim of this study was to determine how parents select picture books for their children and which bibliographic data are important as they choose between different versions of the same title. Thirty-six parents of preschool children aged one to six years were interviewed and observed as they chose one version of the picture book Cinderella from among six bibliographic records and then selected from among six physical versions. Parents described the criteria and the reasons for their selections. The results indicate that the parents experienced difficulties using the library catalog and that the current bibliographic elements are inadequate.
  12. Pauman Budanovic, M.; Zumer, M.: Prototype cataloging interface based on the IFLA Library Reference Model (LRM). Part 2 : usability evaluation (2021) 0.01
    0.009899286 = product of:
      0.019798571 = sum of:
        0.019798571 = product of:
          0.039597142 = sum of:
            0.039597142 = weight(_text_:library in 714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039597142 = score(doc=714,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052364815 = queryNorm
                0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 714, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=714)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reports on usability evaluation that was carried out to evaluate the LRM-based prototype interface, presented in Part 1. A combination of focus group, Wizard of Oz method, and think-aloud protocol was used. The study was conducted in May 2019 with seven Slovenian catalogers from Maribor Public Library. Although participants had some difficulties understanding the LRM model, the user interface proved to be quite easy to use, quick to understand, and transparent. The functionality of the proposed prototype proved to be adequate, since the catalogers successfully and independently completed all the tasks without major problems and errors.
  13. Riva, P.; Doerr, M.; Zumer, M.: FRBRoo: enabling a common view of information from memory institutions (2008) 0.01
    0.008660072 = product of:
      0.017320145 = sum of:
        0.017320145 = product of:
          0.03464029 = sum of:
            0.03464029 = weight(_text_:library in 3743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03464029 = score(doc=3743,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052364815 = queryNorm
                0.25158736 = fieldWeight in 3743, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3743)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In 2008 the FRBR/CRM Harmonisation Working Group has achieved a major milestone: a complete version of the object-oriented definition of FRBR (FRBRoo) was released for comment. After a brief overview of the history and context of the Working Group, this paper focuses on the primary contributions resulting from this work. - FRBRoo is a self-contained document which expresses the concepts of FRBR using the objectoriented methodology and framework of CIDOC CRM. It is an alternative view on library conceptualisation for a different purpose, not a replacement for FRBR. - This 'translation' process presented an opportunity to verify and confirm FRBR's internal consistency. - FRBRoo offers a common view of library and museum documentation as two kinds of information from memory institutions. Such a common view is necessary to provide interoperable information systems for all users interested in accessing common or related content. - The analysis provided an opportunity for mutual enrichment of FRBR and CIDOC CRM. Examples include: - - Addition of the modelling of time and events to FRBR, which can be seen in its application to the publishing process - - Clarification of the manifestation entity - - Explicit modelling of performances and recordings in FRBR - - Adding the work entity to CRM - - Adding the identifier assignment process to CRM. - Producing a formalisation which is more suited for implementation with object-oriented tools, and which facilitates the testing and adoption of FRBR concepts in implementations with different functional specifications and in different environments.
    Content
    Beitrag während: World library and information congress: 74th IFLA general conference and council, 10-14 August 2008, Québec, Canada.
  14. Landry, P.; Zumer, M.; Clavel-Merrin, G.: Report on cross-language subject access options (2006) 0.01
    0.008485103 = product of:
      0.016970206 = sum of:
        0.016970206 = product of:
          0.033940412 = sum of:
            0.033940412 = weight(_text_:library in 2433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033940412 = score(doc=2433,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052364815 = queryNorm
                0.24650425 = fieldWeight in 2433, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2433)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This report presents the results of desk-top based study of projects and initiatives in the area of linking and mapping subject tools. While its goal is to provide areas of further study for cross-language subject access in the European Library, and specifically the national libraries of the Ten New Member States, it is not restricted to cross-language mappings since some of the tools used to create links across thesauri or subject headings in the same language may also be appropriate for cross-language mapping. Tools reviewed have been selected to represent a variety of approaches (e.g. subject heading to subject heading, thesaurus to thesaurus, classification to subject heading) reflecting the variety of subject access tools in use in the European Library. The results show that there is no single solution that would be appropriate for all libraries but that parts of several initiatives may be applicable on a technical, organisational or content level.
  15. Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Zumer, M.: FRBR and FRANAR : subject access (2004) 0.01
    0.007999831 = product of:
      0.015999662 = sum of:
        0.015999662 = product of:
          0.031999324 = sum of:
            0.031999324 = weight(_text_:library in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031999324 = score(doc=2646,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052364815 = queryNorm
                0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In the last decade a discussion has been going an in the Division of Bibliographic Control of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) about the principles of cataloguing. This discussion was initiated by the widespread replacement of the card and list catalogues by Online Public Access Catalogues (OPACs) since 1980. In this paper we discuss the role of subject cataloguing in three important documents that are the results of this discussion. Our conclusion is that the interest in subject cataloguing has grown remarkably, but is still not an the level it deserves given the fact that a great part of all searches in OPACs are subject oriented.
    Content
    1. Introduction In this paper we address two questions: 1. What is the position of subject indexing in the thinking of the library world after the publication of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (1998)? 2. Is this position in accordance with the requirements of the users searching for documents about a given subject? Research Shows that searching an a topic (i.e. subject access) is an important, even predominant type of end-user searching of library catalogues and even more so of other bibliographic databases. Between one third and two thirds of all OPAC searches are probably subject searches (Large & Beheshti, 199%). Taking into account different ways in which searching an a topic is implemented in library catalogues (subject headings, classification, keywords only) the percentage may be even higher. For example title word searching may be a substitute for subject searching if no better tools are available. In the light of this it is not surprising that the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) (1998) pays attention to subject searching, as well as the Functional Requirements and Numbering of Authority Records (FRANAR) (2003). Also the Statement of International Cataloguing Principles: Final draft of 19 December 2003, which is the result of the first First IFLA Meeting of Experts an an International Cataloguing Code mentiong subject access as a function of cataloguing (Statement, 2003). In this paper we discuss the ways these three documents deal with subjects.
  16. Zumer, M.: Implementation of FRBR : European research initiative (2004) 0.01
    0.007999831 = product of:
      0.015999662 = sum of:
        0.015999662 = product of:
          0.031999324 = sum of:
            0.031999324 = weight(_text_:library in 5858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031999324 = score(doc=5858,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052364815 = queryNorm
                0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 5858, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5858)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The short history of European FRBR research is summarized. Immediately following the publication there was a lot of discussion, focusing mainly on the model itself and its appropriateness for description of library materials. Only later the focus has shifted towards implementation issues. Main topics are identified and two initiatives, originating from ELAG and IFLA, are described. An agenda of future research, which should result in FRBR implementation, is proposed.
  17. Zumer, M.: ¬The new "Guidelines for national bibliographies in the digital age" (2007) 0.01
    0.0069998526 = product of:
      0.013999705 = sum of:
        0.013999705 = product of:
          0.02799941 = sum of:
            0.02799941 = weight(_text_:library in 696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02799941 = score(doc=696,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052364815 = queryNorm
                0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 696, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=696)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich: WORLD LIBRARY AND INFORMATION CONGRESS: 73RD IFLA GENERAL CONFERENCE AND COUNCIL 19-23 August 2007, Durban, South Africa. - 89 - Bibliography with National Libraries and Classification and Indexing
  18. Zumer, M.; Zeng, M.L.; Salaba, A.: FRSAD: conceptual modeling of aboutness (2012) 0.01
    0.0069998526 = product of:
      0.013999705 = sum of:
        0.013999705 = product of:
          0.02799941 = sum of:
            0.02799941 = weight(_text_:library in 1960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02799941 = score(doc=1960,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052364815 = queryNorm
                0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 1960, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1960)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This book offers the first comprehensive exploration of the development and use of the International Federation of Library Association's newly released model for subject authority data, covering everything from the rationale for creating the model to practical steps for implementing it.
  19. Aalberg, T.; O'Neill, E.; Zumer, M.: Extending the LRM Model to integrating resources (2021) 0.01
    0.0069998526 = product of:
      0.013999705 = sum of:
        0.013999705 = product of:
          0.02799941 = sum of:
            0.02799941 = weight(_text_:library in 295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02799941 = score(doc=295,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052364815 = queryNorm
                0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 295, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=295)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Integrating resources are distinct in that they change over time in such a way that their previous content is replaced with updated content. This study examines how integrating resources can be modeled using the entities and relationships of the IFLA Library Reference Model (LRM) and clarifies how they can be identified. While monographs have been extensively analyzed, integrating resources have received very little attention. Applying the model unmodified to integrating resources is neither practical nor theoretically sound. With the addition of two proposed relationships, the model can be extended to accommodate the diachronic relationship intrinsic between expressions and manifestations exhibited by integrating resources.
  20. Pauman Budanovic, M.; Zumer, M.: Prototype cataloging interface based on the IFLA Library Reference Model (LRM). Part 1 : conceptual design (2021) 0.01
    0.0069998526 = product of:
      0.013999705 = sum of:
        0.013999705 = product of:
          0.02799941 = sum of:
            0.02799941 = weight(_text_:library in 700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02799941 = score(doc=700,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052364815 = queryNorm
                0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 700, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=700)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)