-
Paice, C.D.: Automatic abstracting (1994)
0.02
0.015999662 = product of:
0.031999324 = sum of:
0.031999324 = product of:
0.06399865 = sum of:
0.06399865 = weight(_text_:library in 1255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06399865 = score(doc=1255,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.46481284 = fieldWeight in 1255, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1255)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.53, [=Suppl.16]
-
Goh, A.; Hui, S.C.: TES: a text extraction system (1996)
0.01
0.014189419 = product of:
0.028378839 = sum of:
0.028378839 = product of:
0.056757677 = sum of:
0.056757677 = weight(_text_:22 in 6599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056757677 = score(doc=6599,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6599, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6599)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26. 2.1997 10:22:43
-
Robin, J.; McKeown, K.: Empirically designing and evaluating a new revision-based model for summary generation (1996)
0.01
0.014189419 = product of:
0.028378839 = sum of:
0.028378839 = product of:
0.056757677 = sum of:
0.056757677 = weight(_text_:22 in 6751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056757677 = score(doc=6751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6751)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 3.1997 16:22:15
-
Jones, P.A.; Bradbeer, P.V.G.: Discovery of optimal weights in a concept selection system (1996)
0.01
0.014189419 = product of:
0.028378839 = sum of:
0.028378839 = product of:
0.056757677 = sum of:
0.056757677 = weight(_text_:22 in 6974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056757677 = score(doc=6974,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6974, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6974)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
-
Paice, C.D.: Automatic abstracting (1994)
0.01
0.014141837 = product of:
0.028283674 = sum of:
0.028283674 = product of:
0.05656735 = sum of:
0.05656735 = weight(_text_:library in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05656735 = score(doc=917,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.4108404 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The final report of the 2nd British Library abstracting project (the BLAB project), 1990-1992, which was carried out partly at the Computing Department of Lancaster University, and partly at the Centre for Computational Linguistics, UMIST. This project built on the results of the first project, of 1985-1987, to build a system designed create abstracts automatically from given texts
- Imprint
- London : British Library
-
Johnson, F.C.: ¬A critical view of system-centered to user-centered evaluation of automatic abstracting research (1999)
0.01
0.011999747 = product of:
0.023999494 = sum of:
0.023999494 = product of:
0.047998987 = sum of:
0.047998987 = weight(_text_:library in 2994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047998987 = score(doc=2994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.34860963 = fieldWeight in 2994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2994)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- New review of information and library research. 5(1999), S.49-63
-
Vanderwende, L.; Suzuki, H.; Brockett, J.M.; Nenkova, A.: Beyond SumBasic : task-focused summarization with sentence simplification and lexical expansion (2007)
0.01
0.010642064 = product of:
0.021284128 = sum of:
0.021284128 = product of:
0.042568255 = sum of:
0.042568255 = weight(_text_:22 in 948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042568255 = score(doc=948,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 948, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=948)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In recent years, there has been increased interest in topic-focused multi-document summarization. In this task, automatic summaries are produced in response to a specific information request, or topic, stated by the user. The system we have designed to accomplish this task comprises four main components: a generic extractive summarization system, a topic-focusing component, sentence simplification, and lexical expansion of topic words. This paper details each of these components, together with experiments designed to quantify their individual contributions. We include an analysis of our results on two large datasets commonly used to evaluate task-focused summarization, the DUC2005 and DUC2006 datasets, using automatic metrics. Additionally, we include an analysis of our results on the DUC2006 task according to human evaluation metrics. In the human evaluation of system summaries compared to human summaries, i.e., the Pyramid method, our system ranked first out of 22 systems in terms of overall mean Pyramid score; and in the human evaluation of summary responsiveness to the topic, our system ranked third out of 35 systems.
-
Su, H.: Automatic abstracting (1996)
0.01
0.009999789 = product of:
0.019999579 = sum of:
0.019999579 = product of:
0.039999157 = sum of:
0.039999157 = weight(_text_:library in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039999157 = score(doc=150,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.29050803 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Bulletin of the Library Association of China. 1996, no.56, Jun., S.41-47
-
Wu, Y.-f.B.; Li, Q.; Bot, R.S.; Chen, X.: Finding nuggets in documents : a machine learning approach (2006)
0.01
0.008868387 = product of:
0.017736774 = sum of:
0.017736774 = product of:
0.035473548 = sum of:
0.035473548 = weight(_text_:22 in 5290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035473548 = score(doc=5290,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5290, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5290)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 17:25:48
-
Kim, H.H.; Kim, Y.H.: Generic speech summarization of transcribed lecture videos : using tags and their semantic relations (2016)
0.01
0.008868387 = product of:
0.017736774 = sum of:
0.017736774 = product of:
0.035473548 = sum of:
0.035473548 = weight(_text_:22 in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035473548 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 12:29:41
-
Oh, H.; Nam, S.; Zhu, Y.: Structured abstract summarization of scientific articles : summarization using full-text section information (2023)
0.01
0.008868387 = product of:
0.017736774 = sum of:
0.017736774 = product of:
0.035473548 = sum of:
0.035473548 = weight(_text_:22 in 889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035473548 = score(doc=889,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 889, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=889)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 18:57:12
-
Jiang, Y.; Meng, R.; Huang, Y.; Lu, W.; Liu, J.: Generating keyphrases for readers : a controllable keyphrase generation framework (2023)
0.01
0.008868387 = product of:
0.017736774 = sum of:
0.017736774 = product of:
0.035473548 = sum of:
0.035473548 = weight(_text_:22 in 1012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035473548 = score(doc=1012,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1012, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1012)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 14:55:20
-
Craven, T.C.: ¬A computer-aided abstracting tool kit (1993)
0.01
0.007999831 = product of:
0.015999662 = sum of:
0.015999662 = product of:
0.031999324 = sum of:
0.031999324 = weight(_text_:library in 6506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031999324 = score(doc=6506,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 6506, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6506)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Canadian journal of information and library science. 18(1993) no.2, S.20-31
-
Johnson, F.: Automatic abstracting research (1995)
0.01
0.007999831 = product of:
0.015999662 = sum of:
0.015999662 = product of:
0.031999324 = sum of:
0.031999324 = weight(_text_:library in 3847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031999324 = score(doc=3847,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 3847, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3847)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library review. 44(1995) no.8, S.28-36
-
Craven, T.C.: ¬A phrase flipper for the assistance of writers of abstracts and other text (1995)
0.01
0.007999831 = product of:
0.015999662 = sum of:
0.015999662 = product of:
0.031999324 = sum of:
0.031999324 = weight(_text_:library in 4897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031999324 = score(doc=4897,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 4897, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4897)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Canadian journal of information and library science. 20(1995) nos.3/4, S.41-49
-
Gomez, J.; Allen, K.; Matney, M.; Awopetu, T.; Shafer, S.: Experimenting with a machine generated annotations pipeline (2020)
0.01
0.007999831 = product of:
0.015999662 = sum of:
0.015999662 = product of:
0.031999324 = sum of:
0.031999324 = weight(_text_:library in 657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031999324 = score(doc=657,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 657, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=657)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The UCLA Library reorganized its software developers into focused subteams with one, the Labs Team, dedicated to conducting experiments. In this article we describe our first attempt at conducting a software development experiment, in which we attempted to improve our digital library's search results with metadata from cloud-based image tagging services. We explore the findings and discuss the lessons learned from our first attempt at running an experiment.
-
Marcu, D.: Automatic abstracting and summarization (2009)
0.01
0.0069998526 = product of:
0.013999705 = sum of:
0.013999705 = product of:
0.02799941 = sum of:
0.02799941 = weight(_text_:library in 3748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02799941 = score(doc=3748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 3748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3748)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
-
Ou, S.; Khoo, S.G.; Goh, D.H.: Automatic multidocument summarization of research abstracts : design and user evaluation (2007)
0.00
0.0049998946 = product of:
0.009999789 = sum of:
0.009999789 = product of:
0.019999579 = sum of:
0.019999579 = weight(_text_:library in 522) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019999579 = score(doc=522,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.14525402 = fieldWeight in 522, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=522)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The purpose of this study was to develop a method for automatic construction of multidocument summaries of sets of research abstracts that may be retrieved by a digital library or search engine in response to a user query. Sociology dissertation abstracts were selected as the sample domain in this study. A variable-based framework was proposed for integrating and organizing research concepts and relationships as well as research methods and contextual relations extracted from different dissertation abstracts. Based on the framework, a new summarization method was developed, which parses the discourse structure of abstracts, extracts research concepts and relationships, integrates the information across different abstracts, and organizes and presents them in a Web-based interface. The focus of this article is on the user evaluation that was performed to assess the overall quality and usefulness of the summaries. Two types of variable-based summaries generated using the summarization method-with or without the use of a taxonomy-were compared against a sentence-based summary that lists only the research-objective sentences extracted from each abstract and another sentence-based summary generated using the MEAD system that extracts important sentences. The evaluation results indicate that the majority of sociological researchers (70%) and general users (64%) preferred the variable-based summaries generated with the use of the taxonomy.
-
Atanassova, I.; Bertin, M.; Larivière, V.: On the composition of scientific abstracts (2016)
0.00
0.0049998946 = product of:
0.009999789 = sum of:
0.009999789 = product of:
0.019999579 = sum of:
0.019999579 = weight(_text_:library in 3028) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019999579 = score(doc=3028,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.14525402 = fieldWeight in 3028, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3028)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose - Scientific abstracts reproduce only part of the information and the complexity of argumentation in a scientific article. The purpose of this paper provides a first analysis of the similarity between the text of scientific abstracts and the body of articles, using sentences as the basic textual unit. It contributes to the understanding of the structure of abstracts. Design/methodology/approach - Using sentence-based similarity metrics, the authors quantify the phenomenon of text re-use in abstracts and examine the positions of the sentences that are similar to sentences in abstracts in the introduction, methods, results and discussion structure, using a corpus of over 85,000 research articles published in the seven Public Library of Science journals. Findings - The authors provide evidence that 84 percent of abstract have at least one sentence in common with the body of the paper. Studying the distributions of sentences in the body of the articles that are re-used in abstracts, the authors show that there exists a strong relation between the rhetorical structure of articles and the zones that authors re-use when writing abstracts, with sentences mainly coming from the beginning of the introduction and the end of the conclusion. Originality/value - Scientific abstracts contain what is considered by the author(s) as information that best describe documents' content. This is a first study that examines the relation between the contents of abstracts and the rhetorical structure of scientific articles. The work might provide new insight for improving automatic abstracting tools as well as information retrieval approaches, in which text organization and structure are important features.
-
Wang, S.; Koopman, R.: Embed first, then predict (2019)
0.00
0.0049998946 = product of:
0.009999789 = sum of:
0.009999789 = product of:
0.019999579 = sum of:
0.019999579 = weight(_text_:library in 5400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019999579 = score(doc=5400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.14525402 = fieldWeight in 5400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5400)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Automatic subject prediction is a desirable feature for modern digital library systems, as manual indexing can no longer cope with the rapid growth of digital collections. It is also desirable to be able to identify a small set of entities (e.g., authors, citations, bibliographic records) which are most relevant to a query. This gets more difficult when the amount of data increases dramatically. Data sparsity and model scalability are the major challenges to solving this type of extreme multilabel classification problem automatically. In this paper, we propose to address this problem in two steps: we first embed different types of entities into the same semantic space, where similarity could be computed easily; second, we propose a novel non-parametric method to identify the most relevant entities in addition to direct semantic similarities. We show how effectively this approach predicts even very specialised subjects, which are associated with few documents in the training set and are more problematic for a classifier.
