Search (49 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Klassifizieren"
  1. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.10
    0.10445333 = sum of:
      0.08316921 = product of:
        0.24950762 = sum of:
          0.24950762 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.24950762 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.4439495 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.021284128 = product of:
        0.042568255 = sum of:
          0.042568255 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042568255 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  2. Subramanian, S.; Shafer, K.E.: Clustering (2001) 0.07
    0.06656775 = product of:
      0.1331355 = sum of:
        0.1331355 = sum of:
          0.047998987 = weight(_text_:library in 1046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047998987 = score(doc=1046,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.34860963 = fieldWeight in 1046, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1046)
          0.08513651 = weight(_text_:22 in 1046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08513651 = score(doc=1046,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1046, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1046)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 5.2003 14:17:22
    Source
    Journal of library administration. 34(2001) nos.3/4, S.221-228
  3. Yi, K.: Automatic text classification using library classification schemes : trends, issues and challenges (2007) 0.05
    0.052830894 = product of:
      0.10566179 = sum of:
        0.10566179 = sum of:
          0.05599882 = weight(_text_:library in 2560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05599882 = score(doc=2560,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.40671125 = fieldWeight in 2560, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2560)
          0.049662966 = weight(_text_:22 in 2560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049662966 = score(doc=2560,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2560, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2560)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The proliferation of digital resources and their integration into a traditional library setting has created a pressing need for an automated tool that organizes textual information based on library classification schemes. Automated text classification is a research field of developing tools, methods, and models to automate text classification. This article describes the current popular approach for text classification and major text classification projects and applications that are based on library classification schemes. Related issues and challenges are discussed, and a number of considerations for the challenges are examined.
    Date
    22. 9.2008 18:31:54
  4. Dubin, D.: Dimensions and discriminability (1998) 0.05
    0.049079686 = product of:
      0.09815937 = sum of:
        0.09815937 = sum of:
          0.048496403 = weight(_text_:library in 2338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048496403 = score(doc=2338,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.3522223 = fieldWeight in 2338, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2338)
          0.049662966 = weight(_text_:22 in 2338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049662966 = score(doc=2338,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2338, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2338)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Imprint
    Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science
    Source
    Visualizing subject access for 21st century information resources: Papers presented at the 1997 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 2-4 Mar 1997, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Ed.: P.A. Cochrane et al
  5. Automatic classification research at OCLC (2002) 0.04
    0.03883119 = product of:
      0.07766238 = sum of:
        0.07766238 = sum of:
          0.02799941 = weight(_text_:library in 1563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02799941 = score(doc=1563,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 1563, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1563)
          0.049662966 = weight(_text_:22 in 1563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049662966 = score(doc=1563,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1563, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1563)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    OCLC enlists the cooperation of the world's libraries to make the written record of humankind's cultural heritage more accessible through electronic media. Part of this goal can be accomplished through the application of the principles of knowledge organization. We believe that cultural artifacts are effectively lost unless they are indexed, cataloged and classified. Accordingly, OCLC has developed products, sponsored research projects, and encouraged the participation in international standards communities whose outcome has been improved library classification schemes, cataloging productivity tools, and new proposals for the creation and maintenance of metadata. Though cataloging and classification requires expert intellectual effort, we recognize that at least some of the work must be automated if we hope to keep pace with cultural change
    Date
    5. 5.2003 9:22:09
  6. Jenkins, C.: Automatic classification of Web resources using Java and Dewey Decimal Classification (1998) 0.04
    0.03883119 = product of:
      0.07766238 = sum of:
        0.07766238 = sum of:
          0.02799941 = weight(_text_:library in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02799941 = score(doc=1673,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
          0.049662966 = weight(_text_:22 in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049662966 = score(doc=1673,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Wolverhampton Web Library (WWLib) is a WWW search engine that provides access to UK based information. The experimental version developed in 1995, was a success but highlighted the need for a much higher degree of automation. An interesting feature of the experimental WWLib was that it organised information according to DDC. Discusses the advantages of classification and describes the automatic classifier that is being developed in Java as part of the new, fully automated WWLib
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  7. Reiner, U.: Automatische DDC-Klassifizierung von bibliografischen Titeldatensätzen (2009) 0.02
    0.017736774 = product of:
      0.035473548 = sum of:
        0.035473548 = product of:
          0.070947096 = sum of:
            0.070947096 = weight(_text_:22 in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070947096 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052364815 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2009 12:54:24
  8. HaCohen-Kerner, Y. et al.: Classification using various machine learning methods and combinations of key-phrases and visual features (2016) 0.02
    0.017736774 = product of:
      0.035473548 = sum of:
        0.035473548 = product of:
          0.070947096 = sum of:
            0.070947096 = weight(_text_:22 in 2748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070947096 = score(doc=2748,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052364815 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2748, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2748)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
  9. Rijsbergen, C.J. van: Automatic classification in information retrieval (1978) 0.02
    0.015999662 = product of:
      0.031999324 = sum of:
        0.031999324 = product of:
          0.06399865 = sum of:
            0.06399865 = weight(_text_:library in 2412) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06399865 = score(doc=2412,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052364815 = queryNorm
                0.46481284 = fieldWeight in 2412, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2412)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Drexel library quarterly. 14(1978), S.75-89
  10. Yi, K.: Challenges in automated classification using library classification schemes (2006) 0.02
    0.015999662 = product of:
      0.031999324 = sum of:
        0.031999324 = product of:
          0.06399865 = sum of:
            0.06399865 = weight(_text_:library in 5810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06399865 = score(doc=5810,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052364815 = queryNorm
                0.46481284 = fieldWeight in 5810, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5810)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A major library classification scheme has long been standard classification framework for information sources in traditional library environment, and text classification (TC) becomes a popular and attractive tool of organizing digital information. This paper gives an overview of previous projects and studies on TC using major library classification schemes, and summarizes a discussion of TC research challenges.
  11. Pong, J.Y.-H.; Kwok, R.C.-W.; Lau, R.Y.-K.; Hao, J.-X.; Wong, P.C.-C.: ¬A comparative study of two automatic document classification methods in a library setting (2008) 0.02
    0.015811056 = product of:
      0.03162211 = sum of:
        0.03162211 = product of:
          0.06324422 = sum of:
            0.06324422 = weight(_text_:library in 2532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06324422 = score(doc=2532,freq=20.0), product of:
                0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052364815 = queryNorm
                0.45933354 = fieldWeight in 2532, product of:
                  4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                    20.0 = termFreq=20.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2532)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In current library practice, trained human experts usually carry out document cataloguing and indexing based on a manual approach. With the explosive growth in the number of electronic documents available on the Internet and digital libraries, it is increasingly difficult for library practitioners to categorize both electronic documents and traditional library materials using just a manual approach. To improve the effectiveness and efficiency of document categorization at the library setting, more in-depth studies of using automatic document classification methods to categorize library items are required. Machine learning research has advanced rapidly in recent years. However, applying machine learning techniques to improve library practice is still a relatively unexplored area. This paper illustrates the design and development of a machine learning based automatic document classification system to alleviate the manual categorization problem encountered within the library setting. Two supervised machine learning algorithms have been tested. Our empirical tests show that supervised machine learning algorithms in general, and the k-nearest neighbours (KNN) algorithm in particular, can be used to develop an effective document classification system to enhance current library practice. Moreover, some concrete recommendations regarding how to practically apply the KNN algorithm to develop automatic document classification in a library setting are made. To our best knowledge, this is the first in-depth study of applying the KNN algorithm to automatic document classification based on the widely used LCC classification scheme adopted by many large libraries.
  12. Frank, E.; Paynter, G.W.: Predicting Library of Congress Classifications from Library of Congress Subject Headings (2004) 0.01
    0.013416125 = product of:
      0.02683225 = sum of:
        0.02683225 = product of:
          0.0536645 = sum of:
            0.0536645 = weight(_text_:library in 2218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0536645 = score(doc=2218,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052364815 = queryNorm
                0.38975742 = fieldWeight in 2218, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2218)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper addresses the problem of automatically assigning a Library of Congress Classification (LCC) to a work given its set of Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH). LCCs are organized in a tree: The root node of this hierarchy comprises all possible topics, and leaf nodes correspond to the most specialized topic areas defined. We describe a procedure that, given a resource identified by its LCSH, automatically places that resource in the LCC hierarchy. The procedure uses machine learning techniques and training data from a large library catalog to learn a model that maps from sets of LCSH to classifications from the LCC tree. We present empirical results for our technique showing its accuracy an an independent collection of 50,000 LCSH/LCC pairs.
  13. Bock, H.-H.: Datenanalyse zur Strukturierung und Ordnung von Information (1989) 0.01
    0.012415742 = product of:
      0.024831483 = sum of:
        0.024831483 = product of:
          0.049662966 = sum of:
            0.049662966 = weight(_text_:22 in 141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049662966 = score(doc=141,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052364815 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 141, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=141)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.1-22
  14. Yoon, Y.; Lee, C.; Lee, G.G.: ¬An effective procedure for constructing a hierarchical text classification system (2006) 0.01
    0.012415742 = product of:
      0.024831483 = sum of:
        0.024831483 = product of:
          0.049662966 = sum of:
            0.049662966 = weight(_text_:22 in 5273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049662966 = score(doc=5273,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052364815 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5273, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5273)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:24:52
  15. Shafer, K.E.: Automatic Subject Assignment via the Scorpion System (2001) 0.01
    0.011999747 = product of:
      0.023999494 = sum of:
        0.023999494 = product of:
          0.047998987 = sum of:
            0.047998987 = weight(_text_:library in 1043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047998987 = score(doc=1043,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052364815 = queryNorm
                0.34860963 = fieldWeight in 1043, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1043)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of library administration. 34(2001) nos.1/2, S.187-189
  16. Desale, S.K.; Kumbhar, R.: Research on automatic classification of documents in library environment : a literature review (2013) 0.01
    0.011999747 = product of:
      0.023999494 = sum of:
        0.023999494 = product of:
          0.047998987 = sum of:
            0.047998987 = weight(_text_:library in 1071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047998987 = score(doc=1071,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052364815 = queryNorm
                0.34860963 = fieldWeight in 1071, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1071)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper aims to provide an overview of automatic classification research, which focuses on issues related to the automatic classification of documents in a library environment. The review covers literature published in mainstream library and information science studies. The review was done on literature published in both academic and professional LIS journals and other documents. This review reveals that basically three types of research are being done on automatic classification: 1) hierarchical classification using different library classification schemes, 2) text categorization and document categorization using different type of classifiers with or without using training documents, and 3) automatic bibliographic classification. Predominantly this research is directed towards solving problems of organization of digital documents in an online environment. However, very little research is devoted towards solving the problems of arrangement of physical documents.
  17. Godby, C. J.; Stuler, J.: ¬The Library of Congress Classification as a knowledge base for automatic subject categorization (2001) 0.01
    0.01131347 = product of:
      0.02262694 = sum of:
        0.02262694 = product of:
          0.04525388 = sum of:
            0.04525388 = weight(_text_:library in 1567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04525388 = score(doc=1567,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052364815 = queryNorm
                0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 1567, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1567)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes a set of experiments in adapting a subset of the Library of Congress Classification for use as a database for automatic classification. A high degree of concept integrity was obtained when subject headings were mapped from OCLC's WorldCat database and filtered using the log-likelihood statistic
  18. Liu, R.-L.: Context recognition for hierarchical text classification (2009) 0.01
    0.010642064 = product of:
      0.021284128 = sum of:
        0.021284128 = product of:
          0.042568255 = sum of:
            0.042568255 = weight(_text_:22 in 2760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042568255 = score(doc=2760,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052364815 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2760, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2760)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:11:54
  19. Pfeffer, M.: Automatische Vergabe von RVK-Notationen mittels fallbasiertem Schließen (2009) 0.01
    0.010642064 = product of:
      0.021284128 = sum of:
        0.021284128 = product of:
          0.042568255 = sum of:
            0.042568255 = weight(_text_:22 in 3051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042568255 = score(doc=3051,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052364815 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3051, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3051)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2009 19:51:28
  20. Zhu, W.Z.; Allen, R.B.: Document clustering using the LSI subspace signature model (2013) 0.01
    0.010642064 = product of:
      0.021284128 = sum of:
        0.021284128 = product of:
          0.042568255 = sum of:
            0.042568255 = weight(_text_:22 in 690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042568255 = score(doc=690,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052364815 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 690, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=690)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    23. 3.2013 13:22:36

Languages

  • e 41
  • d 6
  • a 1
  • chi 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 38
  • el 12
  • m 1
  • s 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…