-
Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007)
0.02
0.021284128 = product of:
0.042568255 = sum of:
0.042568255 = product of:
0.08513651 = sum of:
0.08513651 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08513651 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:41:14
-
Pera, M.S.; Lund, W.; Ng, Y.-K.: ¬A sophisticated library search strategy using folksonomies and similarity matching (2009)
0.02
0.01936451 = product of:
0.03872902 = sum of:
0.03872902 = product of:
0.07745804 = sum of:
0.07745804 = weight(_text_:library in 2939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07745804 = score(doc=2939,freq=30.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.5625664 = fieldWeight in 2939, product of:
5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
30.0 = termFreq=30.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2939)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Libraries, private and public, offer valuable resources to library patrons. As of today, the only way to locate information archived exclusively in libraries is through their catalogs. Library patrons, however, often find it difficult to formulate a proper query, which requires using specific keywords assigned to different fields of desired library catalog records, to obtain relevant results. These improperly formulated queries often yield irrelevant results or no results at all. This negative experience in dealing with existing library systems turns library patrons away from directly querying library catalogs; instead, they rely on Web search engines to perform their searches first, and upon obtaining the initial information (e.g., titles, subject headings, or authors) on the desired library materials, they query library catalogs. This searching strategy is an evidence of failure of today's library systems. In solving this problem, we propose an enhanced library system, which allows partial, similarity matching of (a) tags defined by ordinary users at a folksonomy site that describe the content of books and (b) unrestricted keywords specified by an ordinary library patron in a query to search for relevant library catalog records. The proposed library system allows patrons posting a query Q using commonly used words and ranks the retrieved results according to their degrees of resemblance with Q while maintaining the query processing time comparable with that achieved by current library search engines.
-
Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008)
0.01
0.012541793 = product of:
0.025083587 = sum of:
0.025083587 = product of:
0.050167173 = sum of:
0.050167173 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050167173 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.14-22
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Wesch, M.: Information R/evolution (2006)
0.01
0.012415742 = product of:
0.024831483 = sum of:
0.024831483 = product of:
0.049662966 = sum of:
0.049662966 = weight(_text_:22 in 1267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049662966 = score(doc=1267,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1267, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1267)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 5. 1.2008 19:22:48
-
Johansson, S.; Golub, K.: LibraryThing for libraries : how tag moderation and size limitations affect tag clouds (2019)
0.01
0.011180105 = product of:
0.02236021 = sum of:
0.02236021 = product of:
0.04472042 = sum of:
0.04472042 = weight(_text_:library in 5398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04472042 = score(doc=5398,freq=10.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.32479787 = fieldWeight in 5398, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5398)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The aim of this study is to analyse differences between tags on LibraryThing's web page and tag clouds in their "Library-Thing for Libraries" service, and assess if, and how, the Library-Thing tag moderation and limitations to the size of the tag cloud in the library catalogue affect the description of the information resource. An e-mail survey was conducted with personnel at LibraryThing, and the results were compared against tags for twenty different fiction books, collected from two different library catalogues with disparate tag cloud sizes, and Library-Thing's web page. The data were analysed using a modified version of Golder and Huberman's tag categories (2006). The results show that while LibraryThing claims to only remove the inherently personal tags, several other types of tags are found to have been discarded as well. Occasionally a certain type of tag is in-cluded in one book, and excluded in another. The comparison between the two tag cloud sizes suggests that the larger tag clouds provide a more pronounced picture regarding the contents of the book but at the cost of an increase in the number of tags with synonymous or redundant information.
-
Morrison, P.J.: Tagging and searching : search retrieval effectiveness of folksonomies on the World Wide Web (2008)
0.01
0.010642064 = product of:
0.021284128 = sum of:
0.021284128 = product of:
0.042568255 = sum of:
0.042568255 = weight(_text_:22 in 2109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042568255 = score(doc=2109,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2109, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2109)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.2008 12:39:22
-
Lee, Y.Y.; Yang, S.Q.: Folksonomies as subject access : a survey of tagging in library online catalogs and discovery layers (2012)
0.01
0.010392087 = product of:
0.020784173 = sum of:
0.020784173 = product of:
0.041568346 = sum of:
0.041568346 = weight(_text_:library in 309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041568346 = score(doc=309,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.30190483 = fieldWeight in 309, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=309)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper describes a survey on how system vendors and libraries handled tagging in OPACs and discovery layers. Tags are user added subject metadata, also called folksonomies. This survey also investigated user behavior when they face the possibility to tag. The findings indicate that legacy/classic systems have no tagging capability. About 47% of the discovery tools provide tagging function. About 49% of the libraries that have a system with tagging capability have turned the tagging function on in their OPACs and discovery tools. Only 40% of the libraries that turned tagging on actually utilized user added subject metadata as access point to collections. Academic library users are less active in tagging than public library users.
-
Kim, H.L.; Scerri, S.; Breslin, J.G.; Decker, S.; Kim, H.G.: ¬The state of the art in tag ontologies : a semantic model for tagging and folksonomies (2008)
0.01
0.008868387 = product of:
0.017736774 = sum of:
0.017736774 = product of:
0.035473548 = sum of:
0.035473548 = weight(_text_:22 in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035473548 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Peters, I.; Stock, W.G.: Power tags in information retrieval (2010)
0.01
0.008660072 = product of:
0.017320145 = sum of:
0.017320145 = product of:
0.03464029 = sum of:
0.03464029 = weight(_text_:library in 865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03464029 = score(doc=865,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.25158736 = fieldWeight in 865, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=865)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose - Many Web 2.0 services (including Library 2.0 catalogs) make use of folksonomies. The purpose of this paper is to cut off all tags in the long tail of a document-specific tag distribution. The remaining tags at the beginning of a tag distribution are considered power tags and form a new, additional search option in information retrieval systems. Design/methodology/approach - In a theoretical approach the paper discusses document-specific tag distributions (power law and inverse-logistic shape), the development of such distributions (Yule-Simon process and shuffling theory) and introduces search tags (besides the well-known index tags) as a possibility for generating tag distributions. Findings - Search tags are compatible with broad and narrow folksonomies and with all knowledge organization systems (e.g. classification systems and thesauri), while index tags are only applicable in broad folksonomies. Based on these findings, the paper presents a sketch of an algorithm for mining and processing power tags in information retrieval systems. Research limitations/implications - This conceptual approach is in need of empirical evaluation in a concrete retrieval system. Practical implications - Power tags are a new search option for retrieval systems to limit the amount of hits. Originality/value - The paper introduces power tags as a means for enhancing the precision of search results in information retrieval systems that apply folksonomies, e.g. catalogs in Library 2.0environments.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 28(2010) no.1, S.81-93
-
Spiteri, L.: ¬The structure and form of folksonomy tags : the road to the public library catalogue (2007)
0.01
0.007999831 = product of:
0.015999662 = sum of:
0.015999662 = product of:
0.031999324 = sum of:
0.031999324 = weight(_text_:library in 1141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031999324 = score(doc=1141,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 1141, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1141)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Furner, J.: Folksonomies (2009)
0.01
0.007999831 = product of:
0.015999662 = sum of:
0.015999662 = product of:
0.031999324 = sum of:
0.031999324 = weight(_text_:library in 3857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031999324 = score(doc=3857,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 3857, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3857)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
-
Braun, M.: Lesezeichen zum Stöbern : "Social bookmark"-Seiten setzen auf die Empfehlungen ihrer Nutzer (2007)
0.01
0.0070947097 = product of:
0.014189419 = sum of:
0.014189419 = product of:
0.028378839 = sum of:
0.028378839 = weight(_text_:22 in 3373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028378839 = score(doc=3373,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3373, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3373)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3. 5.1997 8:44:22
-
Moreiro-González, J.-A.; Bolaños-Mejías, C.: Folksonomy indexing from the assignment of free tags to setup subject : a search analysis into the domain of legal history (2018)
0.01
0.0070709186 = product of:
0.014141837 = sum of:
0.014141837 = product of:
0.028283674 = sum of:
0.028283674 = weight(_text_:library in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028283674 = score(doc=4640,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.2054202 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The behaviour and lexical quality of the folksonomies is examined by comparing two online social networks: Library-Thing (for books) and Flickr (for photos). We presented a case study that combines quantitative and qualitative elements, singularized by the lexical and functional framework. Our query was made by "Legal History" and by the synonyms "Law History" and "History of Law." We then examined the relevance, consistency and precision of the tags attached to the retrieved documents, in addition to their lexical composition. We identified the difficulties caused by free tagging and some of the folksonomy solutions that have been found to solve them. The results are presented in comparative tables, giving special attention to related tags within each retrieved document. Although the number of ambiguous or inconsistent tags is not very large, these do nevertheless represent the most obvious problem to search and retrieval in folksonomies. Relevance is high when the terms are assigned by especially competent taggers. Even with less expert taggers, ambiguity is often successfully corrected by contextualizing the concepts within related tags. A propinquity to associative and taxonomic lexical semantic knowledge is reached via contextual relationships.
- Object
- Library-Thing
-
Peterson, E.: Parallel systems : the coexistence of subject cataloging and folksonomy (2008)
0.01
0.0069998526 = product of:
0.013999705 = sum of:
0.013999705 = product of:
0.02799941 = sum of:
0.02799941 = weight(_text_:library in 251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02799941 = score(doc=251,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 251, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=251)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library philosophy & Practice (Annual volume 2008), S.1-5
-
Rafferty, P.: Tagging (2018)
0.01
0.0069998526 = product of:
0.013999705 = sum of:
0.013999705 = product of:
0.02799941 = sum of:
0.02799941 = weight(_text_:library in 4647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02799941 = score(doc=4647,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 4647, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4647)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article examines tagging as knowledge organization. Tagging is a kind of indexing, a process of labelling and categorizing information made to support resource discovery for users. Social tagging generally means the practice whereby internet users generate keywords to describe, categorise or comment on digital content. The value of tagging comes when social tags within a collection are aggregated and shared through a folksonomy. This article examines definitions of tagging and folksonomy, and discusses the functions, advantages and disadvantages of tagging systems in relation to knowledge organization before discussing studies that have compared tagging and conventional library-based knowledge organization systems. Approaches to disciplining tagging practice are examined and tagger motivation discussed. Finally, the article outlines current research fronts.
-
Schwartz, C.: Thesauri and facets and tags, Oh my! : a look at three decades in subject analysis (2008)
0.01
0.0069998526 = product of:
0.013999705 = sum of:
0.013999705 = product of:
0.02799941 = sum of:
0.02799941 = weight(_text_:library in 5566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02799941 = score(doc=5566,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 5566, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5566)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library trends. 56(2008) no.4, S.830-842
-
Macgregor, G.; McCulloch, E.: Collaborative tagging as a knowledge organisation and resource discovery tool (2006)
0.00
0.0049998946 = product of:
0.009999789 = sum of:
0.009999789 = product of:
0.019999579 = sum of:
0.019999579 = weight(_text_:library in 764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019999579 = score(doc=764,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.14525402 = fieldWeight in 764, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=764)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library review. 55(2006) no.5, S.291-300
-
Sauperl, A.: UDC and Folksonomies (2010)
0.00
0.0049998946 = product of:
0.009999789 = sum of:
0.009999789 = product of:
0.019999579 = sum of:
0.019999579 = weight(_text_:library in 4069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019999579 = score(doc=4069,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.14525402 = fieldWeight in 4069, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4069)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Social tagging systems, known as "folksonomies," represent an important part of web resource discovery as they enable free and unrestricted browsing through information space. Folksonomies consisting of subject designators (tags) assigned by users, however, have one important drawback: they do not express semantic relationships, either hierarchical or associative, between tags. As a consequence, the use of tags to browse information resources requires moving from one resource to another, based on coincidence and not on the pre-established meaningful or logical connections that may exist between related resources. We suggest that the semantic structure of the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) may be used in complementing and supporting tag-based browsing. In this work, two specific questions were investigated: 1) Are terms used as tags in folksonomies included in the UDC?; and, 2) Which facets of UDC match the characteristics of documents or information objects that are tagged in folksonomies? A collection of the most popular tags from Amazon, LibraryThing, Delicious, and 43Things was investigated. The universal nature of UDC was examined through the universality of topics and facets covering diverse human interests which are at the same time interconnected and form a rich and intricate semantic structure. The results suggest that UDC-supported folksonomies could be implemented in resource discovery, in particular in library portals and catalogues.
-
Cope, J.: Librarianship as intellectual craft : the ethics of classification in the realms of leisure and waged labor (2012)
0.00
0.0049998946 = product of:
0.009999789 = sum of:
0.009999789 = product of:
0.019999579 = sum of:
0.019999579 = weight(_text_:library in 421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019999579 = score(doc=421,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.14525402 = fieldWeight in 421, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=421)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper develops an ethical conception of library labor as an intellectual craft that can serve as an alternative to a deterministic discourse of technological transformation. In this paper, the author proposes a model of librarianship as an intellectual craft that can be used as an "ideal type" in comparison to recent transformations in the practice of librarianship. This paper then examines the rise of participatory classification in the realm of leisure in user-generated classification schemes (e.g., folksonomies) as a way of examining some of the difficult ethical questions that this ideal of intellectual craft poses when applied to contemporary conditions. Marx's concept of surplus value is used to examine how donated labor adds to the general knowledge. This paper concludes by advocating for the general expansion of leisure coupled with the promotion public institutions that support the craft of those who organize information in a broadly defined public interest. In an era of dramatic change, such a framework offers a positive ethical account of librarians and information professionals' labor that is not wholly dependent on a discourse of market exchange.
-
Hayman, S.; Lothian, N.: Taxonomy directed folksonomies : integrating user tagging and controlled vocabularies for Australian education networks (2007)
0.00
0.0039999154 = product of:
0.007999831 = sum of:
0.007999831 = product of:
0.015999662 = sum of:
0.015999662 = weight(_text_:library in 705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015999662 = score(doc=705,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.052364815 = queryNorm
0.11620321 = fieldWeight in 705, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=705)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vortrag anlässlich: WORLD LIBRARY AND INFORMATION CONGRESS: 73RD IFLA GENERAL CONFERENCE AND COUNCIL 19-23 August 2007, Durban, South Africa. - 157 - Classification and Indexing
