Search (128 results, page 1 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval"
  1. Vizine-Goetz, D.: OCLC investigates using classification tools to organize Internet data (1998) 0.05
    0.052830894 = product of:
      0.10566179 = sum of:
        0.10566179 = sum of:
          0.05599882 = weight(_text_:library in 2342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05599882 = score(doc=2342,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.40671125 = fieldWeight in 2342, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2342)
          0.049662966 = weight(_text_:22 in 2342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049662966 = score(doc=2342,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2342, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2342)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The knowledge structures that form traditional library classification schemes hold great potential for improving resource description and discovery on the Internet and for organizing electronic document collections. The advantages of assigning subject tokens (classes) to documents from a scheme like the DDC system are well documented
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Imprint
    Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science
    Source
    Visualizing subject access for 21st century information resources: Papers presented at the 1997 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 2-4 Mar 1997, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Ed.: P.A. Cochrane et al
  2. Chandler, A.; LeBlanc, J.: Exploring the potential of a virtual undergraduate library collection based on the hierarchical interface to LC Classification (2006) 0.05
    0.04811638 = product of:
      0.09623276 = sum of:
        0.09623276 = sum of:
          0.0536645 = weight(_text_:library in 769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0536645 = score(doc=769,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.38975742 = fieldWeight in 769, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=769)
          0.042568255 = weight(_text_:22 in 769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042568255 = score(doc=769,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 769, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=769)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Hierarchical Interface to Library of Congress Classification (HILCC) is a system developed by the Columbia University Library to leverage call number data from the MARC holdings records in Columbia's online catalog to create a structured, hierarchical menuing system that provides subject access to the library's electronic resources. In this paper, the authors describe a research initiative at the Cornell University Library to discover if the Columbia HILCC scheme can be used as developed or in modified form to create a virtual undergraduate print collection outside the context of the traditional online catalog. Their results indicate that, with certain adjustments, an HILCC model can indeed, be used to represent the holdings of a large research library's undergraduate collection of approximately 150,000 titles, but that such a model is not infinitely scalable and may require a new approach to browsing such a large information space.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 50(2006) no.3, S.157-165
  3. Ferris, A.M.: If you buy it, will they use it? : a case study on the use of Classification web (2006) 0.04
    0.044630054 = product of:
      0.08926011 = sum of:
        0.08926011 = sum of:
          0.039597142 = weight(_text_:library in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.039597142 = score(doc=88,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
          0.049662966 = weight(_text_:22 in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049662966 = score(doc=88,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents a study conducted at the University of Colorado at Boulder (CU-Boulder) to assess the extent to which its catalogers were using Classification Web (Class Web), the subscription-based, online cataloging documentation resource provided by the Library of Congress. In addition, this paper will explore assumptions made by management regarding CU-Boulder catalogers' use of the product, possible reasons for the lower-than-expected use, and recommendations for promoting a more efficient and cost-effective use of Class Web at other institutions similar to CU-Boulder.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 50(2006) no.2, S.129-137
  4. Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000) 0.04
    0.0443785 = product of:
      0.088757 = sum of:
        0.088757 = sum of:
          0.031999324 = weight(_text_:library in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031999324 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
          0.056757677 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056757677 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article gives an overview of the design and organisation of DutchESS, a Dutch information subject gateway created as a national collaborative effort of the National Library and a number of academic libraries. The combined centralised and distributed model of DutchESS is discussed, as well as its selection policy, its metadata format, classification scheme and retrieval options. Also some options for future collaboration on an international level are explored
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:39:23
  5. Dack, D.: Australian attends conference on Dewey (1989) 0.04
    0.03883119 = product of:
      0.07766238 = sum of:
        0.07766238 = sum of:
          0.02799941 = weight(_text_:library in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02799941 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
          0.049662966 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049662966 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Edited version of a report to the Australian Library and Information Association on the Conference on classification theory in the computer age, Albany, New York, 18-19 Nov 88, and on the meeting of the Dewey Editorial Policy Committee which preceded it. The focus of the Editorial Policy Committee Meeting lay in the following areas: browsing; potential for improved subject access; system design; potential conflict between shelf location and information retrieval; and users. At the Conference on classification theory in the computer age the following papers were presented: Applications of artificial intelligence to bibliographic classification, by Irene Travis; Automation and classification, By Elaine Svenonious; Subject classification and language processing for retrieval in large data bases, by Diana Scott; Implications for information processing, by Carol Mandel; and implications for information science education, by Richard Halsey.
    Date
    8.11.1995 11:52:22
  6. Jenkins, C.: Automatic classification of Web resources using Java and Dewey Decimal Classification (1998) 0.04
    0.03883119 = product of:
      0.07766238 = sum of:
        0.07766238 = sum of:
          0.02799941 = weight(_text_:library in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02799941 = score(doc=1673,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
          0.049662966 = weight(_text_:22 in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049662966 = score(doc=1673,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Wolverhampton Web Library (WWLib) is a WWW search engine that provides access to UK based information. The experimental version developed in 1995, was a success but highlighted the need for a much higher degree of automation. An interesting feature of the experimental WWLib was that it organised information according to DDC. Discusses the advantages of classification and describes the automatic classifier that is being developed in Java as part of the new, fully automated WWLib
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  7. Frâncu, V.; Sabo, C.-N.: Implementation of a UDC-based multilingual thesaurus in a library catalogue : the case of BiblioPhil (2010) 0.04
    0.038254336 = product of:
      0.07650867 = sum of:
        0.07650867 = sum of:
          0.033940412 = weight(_text_:library in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033940412 = score(doc=3697,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.24650425 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
          0.042568255 = weight(_text_:22 in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042568255 = score(doc=3697,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In order to enhance the use of Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) numbers in information retrieval, the authors have represented classification with multilingual thesaurus descriptors and implemented this solution in an automated way. The authors illustrate a solution implemented in a BiblioPhil library system. The standard formats used are UNIMARC for subject authority records (i.e. the UDC-based multilingual thesaurus) and MARC XML support for data transfer. The multilingual thesaurus was built according to existing standards, the constituent parts of the classification notations being used as the basis for search terms in the multilingual information retrieval. The verbal equivalents, descriptors and non-descriptors, are used to expand the number of concepts and are given in Romanian, English and French. This approach saves the time of the indexer and provides more user-friendly and easier access to the bibliographic information. The multilingual aspect of the thesaurus enhances information access for a greater number of online users
    Date
    22. 7.2010 20:40:56
  8. Lardera, M.; Gnoli, C.; Rolandi, C.; Trzmielewski, M.: Developing SciGator, a DDC-based library browsing tool (2017) 0.04
    0.038254336 = product of:
      0.07650867 = sum of:
        0.07650867 = sum of:
          0.033940412 = weight(_text_:library in 4144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033940412 = score(doc=4144,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.24650425 = fieldWeight in 4144, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4144)
          0.042568255 = weight(_text_:22 in 4144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042568255 = score(doc=4144,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4144, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4144)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Exploring collections by their subject matter is an important functionality for library users. We developed an online tool called SciGator in order to allow users to browse the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) classes used in different libraries at the University of Pavia and to perform different types of search in the OPAC. Besides navigation of DDC hierarchies, SciGator suggests "see-also" relationships with related classes and maps equivalent classes in local shelving schemes, thus allowing the expansion of search queries to include subjects contiguous to the initial one. We are developing new features, including the possibility to expand searches even more to national and international catalogues.
    Content
    Beitrag eines Special Issue: ISKO-Italy: 8' Incontro ISKO Italia, Università di Bologna, 22 maggio 2017, Bologna, Italia.
  9. Kwasnik, B.H.: ¬The role of classification in knowledge representation (1999) 0.03
    0.033283874 = product of:
      0.06656775 = sum of:
        0.06656775 = sum of:
          0.023999494 = weight(_text_:library in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.023999494 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
          0.042568255 = weight(_text_:22 in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042568255 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.22-47
  10. Hill, J.S.: Online classification number access : some practical considerations (1984) 0.03
    0.028378839 = product of:
      0.056757677 = sum of:
        0.056757677 = product of:
          0.113515355 = sum of:
            0.113515355 = weight(_text_:22 in 7684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.113515355 = score(doc=7684,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052364815 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7684, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7684)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of academic librarianship. 10(1984), S.17-22
  11. Lim, E.: Southeast Asian subject gateways : an examination of their classification practices (2000) 0.02
    0.021284128 = product of:
      0.042568255 = sum of:
        0.042568255 = product of:
          0.08513651 = sum of:
            0.08513651 = weight(_text_:22 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08513651 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052364815 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:42:47
  12. Comaromi, C.L.: Summation of classification as an enhancement of intellectual access to information in an online environment (1990) 0.02
    0.017736774 = product of:
      0.035473548 = sum of:
        0.035473548 = product of:
          0.070947096 = sum of:
            0.070947096 = weight(_text_:22 in 3576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070947096 = score(doc=3576,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052364815 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3576, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3576)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8. 1.2007 12:22:40
  13. Reiner, U.: Automatische DDC-Klassifizierung von bibliografischen Titeldatensätzen (2009) 0.02
    0.017736774 = product of:
      0.035473548 = sum of:
        0.035473548 = product of:
          0.070947096 = sum of:
            0.070947096 = weight(_text_:22 in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070947096 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052364815 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2009 12:54:24
  14. Markey, K.; Demeyer, A.N.: Dewey Decimal Classification online project: evaluation of a library schedule and index integrated into the subject searching capabilities of an online catalog : final report to the Council of Library Resources (1986) 0.02
    0.017320145 = product of:
      0.03464029 = sum of:
        0.03464029 = product of:
          0.06928058 = sum of:
            0.06928058 = weight(_text_:library in 3472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06928058 = score(doc=3472,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052364815 = queryNorm
                0.5031747 = fieldWeight in 3472, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3472)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Series
    Research report. Online Computer Library Center; OCLC/OPR/RR-86/1
  15. National Seminar on Classification in the Digital Environment : Papers contributed to the National Seminar an Classification in the Digital Environment, Bangalore, 9-11 August 2001 (2001) 0.02
    0.016038792 = product of:
      0.032077584 = sum of:
        0.032077584 = sum of:
          0.017888166 = weight(_text_:library in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.017888166 = score(doc=2047,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.12991914 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
          0.014189419 = weight(_text_:22 in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.014189419 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052364815 = queryNorm
              0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    2. 1.2004 10:35:22
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 30(2003) no.1, S.40-42 (J.-E. Mai): "Introduction: This is a collection of papers presented at the National Seminar an Classification in the Digital Environment held in Bangalore, India, an August 9-11 2001. The collection contains 18 papers dealing with various issues related to knowledge organization and classification theory. The issue of transferring the knowledge, traditions, and theories of bibliographic classification to the digital environment is an important one, and I was excited to learn that proceedings from this seminar were available. Many of us experience frustration an a daily basis due to poorly constructed Web search mechanisms and Web directories. As a community devoted to making information easily accessible we have something to offer the Web community and a seminar an the topic was indeed much needed. Below are brief summaries of the 18 papers presented at the seminar. The order of the summaries follows the order of the papers in the proceedings. The titles of the paper are given in parentheses after the author's name. AHUJA and WESLEY (From "Subject" to "Need": Shift in Approach to Classifying Information an the Internet/Web) argue that traditional bibliographic classification systems fall in the digital environment. One problem is that bibliographic classification systems have been developed to organize library books an shelves and as such are unidimensional and tied to the paper-based environment. Another problem is that they are "subject" oriented in the sense that they assume a relatively stable universe of knowledge containing basic and fixed compartments of knowledge that can be identified and represented. Ahuja and Wesley suggest that classification in the digital environment should be need-oriented instead of subjectoriented ("One important link that binds knowledge and human being is his societal need. ... Hence, it will be ideal to organise knowledge based upon need instead of subject." (p. 10)).
    AHUJA and SATIJA (Relevance of Ranganathan's Classification Theory in the Age of Digital Libraries) note that traditional bibliographic classification systems have been applied in the digital environment with only limited success. They find that the "inherent flexibility of electronic manipulation of documents or their surrogates should allow a more organic approach to allocation of new subjects and appropriate linkages between subject hierarchies." (p. 18). Ahija and Satija also suggest that it is necessary to shift from a "subject" focus to a "need" focus when applying classification theory in the digital environment. They find Ranganathan's framework applicable in the digital environment. Although Ranganathan's focus is "subject oriented and hence emphasise the hierarchical and linear relationships" (p. 26), his framework "can be successfully adopted with certain modifications ... in the digital environment." (p. 26). SHAH and KUMAR (Model for System Unification of Geographical Schedules (Space Isolates)) report an a plan to develop a single schedule for geographical Subdivision that could be used across all classification systems. The authors argue that this is needed in order to facilitate interoperability in the digital environment. SAN SEGUNDO MANUEL (The Representation of Knowledge as a Symbolization of Productive Electronic Information) distills different approaches and definitions of the term "representation" as it relates to representation of knowledge in the library and information science literature and field. SHARADA (Linguistic and Document Classification: Paradigmatic Merger Possibilities) suggests the development of a universal indexing language. The foundation for the universal indexing language is Chomsky's Minimalist Program and Ranganathan's analytico-synthetic classification theory; Acording to the author, based an these approaches, it "should not be a problem" (p. 62) to develop a universal indexing language.
    SELVI (Knowledge Classification of Digital Information Materials with Special Reference to Clustering Technique) finds that it is essential to classify digital material since the amount of material that is becoming available is growing. Selvi suggests using automated classification to "group together those digital information materials or documents that are "most similar" (p. 65). This can be attained by using Cluster analysis methods. PRADHAN and THULASI (A Study of the Use of Classification and Indexing Systems by Web Resource Directories) compare and contrast the classificatory structures of Google, Yahoo, and Looksmart's directories and compare the directories to Dewey Decimal Classification, Library of Congress Classification and Colon Classification's classificatory structures. They find differentes between the directories' and the bibliographic classification systems' classificatory structures and principles. These differentes stem from the fact that bibliographic classification systems are used to "classify academic resources for the research community" (p. 83) and directories "aim to categorize a wider breath of information groups, entertainment, recreation, govt. information, commercial information" (p. 83). NEELAMEGHAN (Hierarchy, Hierarchical Relation and Hierarchical Arrangement) reviews the concept of hierarchy and the formation of hierarchical structures across a variety of domains. NEELAMEGHAN and PRADAD (Digitized Schemes for Subject Classification and Thesauri: Complementary Roles) demonstrate how thesaural relationships (NT, BT, and RT) can be applied to a classification scheme, the Colon Classification in this Gase. NEELAMEGHAN and ASUNDI (Metadata Framework for Describing Embodied Knowledge and Subject Content) propose to use the Generalized Facet Structure framework which is based an Ranganathan's General Theory of Knowledge Classification as a framework for describing the content of documents in a metadata element set for the representation of web documents. CHUDAMANI (Classified Catalogue as a Tool for Subject Based Information Retrieval in both Traditional and Electronic Library Environment) explains why the classified catalogue is superior to the alphabetic cata logue and argues that the same is true in the digital environment.
    Imprint
    Bangalore : Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library science
  16. Richmond, P.A.: Futuristic aspects of subject access (1983) 0.02
    0.015999662 = product of:
      0.031999324 = sum of:
        0.031999324 = product of:
          0.06399865 = sum of:
            0.06399865 = weight(_text_:library in 107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06399865 = score(doc=107,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052364815 = queryNorm
                0.46481284 = fieldWeight in 107, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=107)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 27(1983), S.88-93
  17. Svenonius, E.: Use of classification in online retrieval (1983) 0.02
    0.015999662 = product of:
      0.031999324 = sum of:
        0.031999324 = product of:
          0.06399865 = sum of:
            0.06399865 = weight(_text_:library in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06399865 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052364815 = queryNorm
                0.46481284 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 27(1983), S.76-80
  18. Williamson, N.J.: ¬The Library of Congress Classification : problems and prospects in online retrieval (1986) 0.02
    0.015999662 = product of:
      0.031999324 = sum of:
        0.031999324 = product of:
          0.06399865 = sum of:
            0.06399865 = weight(_text_:library in 1905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06399865 = score(doc=1905,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052364815 = queryNorm
                0.46481284 = fieldWeight in 1905, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1905)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  19. Markey, K.: Subject searching in library catalogs : Before and after the introduction of online catalogs (1984) 0.02
    0.015999662 = product of:
      0.031999324 = sum of:
        0.031999324 = product of:
          0.06399865 = sum of:
            0.06399865 = weight(_text_:library in 2284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06399865 = score(doc=2284,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052364815 = queryNorm
                0.46481284 = fieldWeight in 2284, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2284)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  20. Dhyani, P.: Library classification in computer age (1999) 0.02
    0.015999662 = product of:
      0.031999324 = sum of:
        0.031999324 = product of:
          0.06399865 = sum of:
            0.06399865 = weight(_text_:library in 3153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06399865 = score(doc=3153,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052364815 = queryNorm
                0.46481284 = fieldWeight in 3153, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3153)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Library classification is constantly being influenced by multifaceted, multidimensional, and infinite growth of literature on one hand and the users needs on the other. Dewey pioneered in devising a scheme of classification for the documentation utility of the organised knowledge. Subsequent schemes of classification worked purely without any theoretical foundation, colon classification being the exception. With the emergence of computer technology the library classification is being metamorphised. This paper attempts to delve a state-of-the-art of library classification in the new computer age.

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 113
  • el 12
  • m 4
  • s 4
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications