Search (620 results, page 1 of 31)

0.06656775 = product of:
  0.1331355 = sum of:
    0.1331355 = sum of:
      0.047998987 = weight(_text_:library in 3373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047998987 = score(doc=3373,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052364815 = queryNorm
          0.34860963 = fieldWeight in 3373, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3373)
      0.08513651 = weight(_text_:22 in 3373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08513651 = score(doc=3373,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052364815 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3373, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3373)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 4.1996 20:07:57

Footnote

http://www-fes.gmd.de/library/index_gr.html

0.060378164 = product of:
  0.12075633 = sum of:
    0.12075633 = sum of:
      0.06399865 = weight(_text_:library in 1406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06399865 = score(doc=1406,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052364815 = queryNorm
          0.46481284 = fieldWeight in 1406, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1406)
      0.056757677 = weight(_text_:22 in 1406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056757677 = score(doc=1406,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052364815 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1406, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1406)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Reports results of the work of a new member of the ELINOR project team to review the development taking place in Z39.50 networked information retrieval protocol with a view to bringing the University's electronic library pilot systems, including ELINOR and the online catalogue into a single, unified system. Focuses particularly on the WWW client server environment

Imprint

London : Bowker-Saur for British Library

Series

British Library Research and Innovation Centre (BLRIC) report; 22

Source

ELINOR: Electronic Library Project. Ed.: A. Ramsden

0.059123613 = product of:
  0.118247226 = sum of:
    0.118247226 = sum of:
      0.06858426 = weight(_text_:library in 2207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06858426 = score(doc=2207,freq=12.0), product of:
          0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052364815 = queryNorm
          0.4981175 = fieldWeight in 2207, product of:
            3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
              12.0 = termFreq=12.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2207)
      0.049662966 = weight(_text_:22 in 2207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049662966 = score(doc=2207,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052364815 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2207, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2207)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Fac-Back-OPAC is a faceted back­ up OPAC. This advanced catalog offers features that compare favorably with the traditional catalogs for today's library systems. Fac-Back-OPAC represents the convergence of two prominent trends in library tools: the decoupling of discovery tools from the traditional integrated library system and the use of readily available open source components to rapidly produce leading-edge technology for meeting patron and library needs. Built on code that was originally developed by Casey Durfee in February 2007, Fac-Back-OPAC is available for no cost under an open source license to any library that wants to offer an advanced search interface or a backup catalog for its patrons.

Date

17. 8.2008 11:22:47

0.05609107 = product of:
  0.11218214 = sum of:
    0.11218214 = sum of:
      0.05542446 = weight(_text_:library in 4165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05542446 = score(doc=4165,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052364815 = queryNorm
          0.40253976 = fieldWeight in 4165, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4165)
      0.056757677 = weight(_text_:22 in 4165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056757677 = score(doc=4165,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052364815 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4165, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4165)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This paper reports on the successful introduction of a sophisticated online catalogue system at the library of the Scott Polar Research Institute, Cambridge, using the Muscat program package. The system provides to both end-users and library staff a choice between boolean searching on keywords and access using relevance feedback based on free text in English, mixed with UDC classification numbers. The system is implemented on an IBM 3084 computer. Significant benefits from the application of relevance feedback are reported with 10,000 records on file.

Source

Program. 22(1988), S.1-20

0.05609107 = product of:
  0.11218214 = sum of:
    0.11218214 = sum of:
      0.05542446 = weight(_text_:library in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05542446 = score(doc=695,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052364815 = queryNorm
          0.40253976 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
      0.056757677 = weight(_text_:22 in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056757677 = score(doc=695,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052364815 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

One of the most common errors in cataloguing library materials involves miscoding of the nonfiling indicator of title fields. Notes the extent of the problem and its negative effect on searching in the library's online catalogue and surveys how librarians have approached solutions to the problems. Describes how the major library automation system address this problem

Date

6. 3.1997 16:22:15

Source

Library software review. 16(1997) no.3, S.152-155

0.055473126 = product of:
  0.11094625 = sum of:
    0.11094625 = sum of:
      0.039999157 = weight(_text_:library in 1942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.039999157 = score(doc=1942,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052364815 = queryNorm
          0.29050803 = fieldWeight in 1942, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1942)
      0.070947096 = weight(_text_:22 in 1942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.070947096 = score(doc=1942,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052364815 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1942, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1942)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

16. 8.1998 11:22:08

Imprint

London : Library Association

0.05100578 = product of:
  0.10201156 = sum of:
    0.10201156 = sum of:
      0.04525388 = weight(_text_:library in 3099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04525388 = score(doc=3099,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052364815 = queryNorm
          0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 3099, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3099)
      0.056757677 = weight(_text_:22 in 3099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056757677 = score(doc=3099,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052364815 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3099, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3099)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Rules regarding cataloguing, subject headings, the way information in bibliographic records is organised and the catalogue's interface, or the way the screen is set up, are barriers to the use of online catalogues by children Describes the background to and implementation of a project to create a child orientation catalogue with a graphical user interface, or one that relies on pictures instead of text, within Denver Public Library in Colorado. Now called the Kid's catalog and commercially available from the Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries Co., the catalogue's software acts as a front end to a library's regular catalogue

Source

School library journal. 41(1995) no.7, S.22-25

0.05100578 = product of:
  0.10201156 = sum of:
    0.10201156 = sum of:
      0.04525388 = weight(_text_:library in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04525388 = score(doc=1632,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052364815 = queryNorm
          0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
      0.056757677 = weight(_text_:22 in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056757677 = score(doc=1632,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052364815 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

1st of 2 articles detailing how library management systems have been used in special libraries to launch WWW catalogue services. Describes how the Royal Postgraduate Medical School, London, UK, used Sirsi Unicorn software to add WWW browser catalogue access, WebCat, to their WWW service. Explains how WebCat was set up, its facilities, providing links to electronic journals, and links via the homepage to other sites

Date

29. 7.1998 21:22:27

Source

Library technology. 2(1997) no.4, S.77-78

0.05100578 = product of:
  0.10201156 = sum of:
    0.10201156 = sum of:
      0.04525388 = weight(_text_:library in 2765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04525388 = score(doc=2765,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052364815 = queryNorm
          0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 2765, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2765)
      0.056757677 = weight(_text_:22 in 2765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056757677 = score(doc=2765,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052364815 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2765, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2765)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Presents a brief report on a study, carried out by the Centre for Interactive Systems Research, City University, to investigate the techniques used for evaluating OPACs: to explore and assess different data gathering methods in studying information seeking behaviour at the on-line catalogue; and to examine how a transaction logging facility could be enhanced to serve as a more effective diagnostic tool. For a full report see British Library research paper 78

Imprint

London : British Library

Pages

S.20-22

0.05100578 = product of:
  0.10201156 = sum of:
    0.10201156 = sum of:
      0.04525388 = weight(_text_:library in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04525388 = score(doc=5581,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052364815 = queryNorm
          0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
      0.056757677 = weight(_text_:22 in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056757677 = score(doc=5581,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052364815 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Over the past year, innumerable discussions on the relationship between traditional library OPACs and the newly burgeoning World WideWeb have occured in many libraries and in virtually every library related discussion list. Rumors and speculation abound, some insisting that SGML will replace USMARC "soon," others maintaining that OPACs that haven't migrated to the Web will go the way of the dinosaurs.

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.97-103

0.050677385 = product of:
  0.10135477 = sum of:
    0.10135477 = sum of:
      0.058786515 = weight(_text_:library in 3013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.058786515 = score(doc=3013,freq=12.0), product of:
          0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052364815 = queryNorm
          0.42695788 = fieldWeight in 3013, product of:
            3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
              12.0 = termFreq=12.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3013)
      0.042568255 = weight(_text_:22 in 3013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042568255 = score(doc=3013,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052364815 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3013, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3013)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The primary objective of the present study was to exmine whether readers conducting bibliographic searches in ALEPH - Israel's research library network - tend to search only within the OPAC of the library within which they are working or whether they access the remote OPACs of other libraries. The ALEPH network has a dezentralized database. Therefore, it was possible to examine this question because each library has its own access code and each database can be searched separately. The data were collected by means of a one-page questionnaire lefr beside each terminal in the library of the Graduate School of Library and Archive Studies of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem during an entire academic years. results of analysis of the data collected in this survey are presented in 6 tables

Date

22. 2.1999 13:06:18

0.049079686 = product of:
  0.09815937 = sum of:
    0.09815937 = sum of:
      0.048496403 = weight(_text_:library in 1772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048496403 = score(doc=1772,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052364815 = queryNorm
          0.3522223 = fieldWeight in 1772, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1772)
      0.049662966 = weight(_text_:22 in 1772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049662966 = score(doc=1772,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052364815 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1772, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1772)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Library OPACs have long been the gateways between users and information. They present to users the achievements of library automation, and are the most widely available automated retrieval systems and the first that many user encounter. Current trends in OPAC design are toward a user oriented, individual information service which can meet the different needs of users with a variety of background and interests. Compared with the rather inactive, short term and general information service of conventional systems, this type of system focuses on active, long term and personalized service. Proposes a framework for the design of such an OPAC and discusses some recent developments in personalized information service

Date

4. 8.1998 19:36:22

Source

Bulletin of the Library Association of China. 1997, no.59, Dec., S.127-133

0.049079686 = product of:
  0.09815937 = sum of:
    0.09815937 = sum of:
      0.048496403 = weight(_text_:library in 3599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048496403 = score(doc=3599,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052364815 = queryNorm
          0.3522223 = fieldWeight in 3599, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3599)
      0.049662966 = weight(_text_:22 in 3599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049662966 = score(doc=3599,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052364815 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3599, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3599)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Patron queries at a four-year comprehensive college's online public access catalog were examined via transaction logs from March 2007. Three representative days were isolated for a more detailed examination of search characteristics. The results show that library users employed an average of one to three terms in a search, did not use Boolean operators, and made use of limits one-tenth of the time. Failed queries remained problematic, as a full one-third of searches resulted in zero hits. Implications and recommendations for improvements in the online public access catalog are discussed.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Source

Library resources and technical services. 52(2008) no.4, S.230-237

0.044630054 = product of:
  0.08926011 = sum of:
    0.08926011 = sum of:
      0.039597142 = weight(_text_:library in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.039597142 = score(doc=760,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052364815 = queryNorm
          0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
      0.049662966 = weight(_text_:22 in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049662966 = score(doc=760,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052364815 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The degree of variability in the percentage of subject searching in an online public access catalog (OPAC) among branch libraries of one university was studied. A full semester's worth of transactions was analyzed, not sampled. The time units used were hour of the day, day of the week, and week of the semester. The findings show that subject searching varies from a low of 22% to a high of 74% over the hours of a day. Variability for the days of the week ranged from 17% to 64%, and for the weeks of the semester variability ranged from 12% to 70%. Valuable management information on the utilization of the OPAC within each brach library and among all the branch libraries is provided through numerous charts and graphs.

0.0443785 = product of:
  0.088757 = sum of:
    0.088757 = sum of:
      0.031999324 = weight(_text_:library in 3098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.031999324 = score(doc=3098,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052364815 = queryNorm
          0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 3098, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3098)
      0.056757677 = weight(_text_:22 in 3098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056757677 = score(doc=3098,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052364815 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3098, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3098)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Reports an investigation into the feasibility of usinf tutorials to train students to use on-line public access catalogues (OPACs). The library developed instructional software which conveys a conceptual model of an on-line catalogue and how it works. Reports the results of an experiment conducted to compare the effectiveness of the computer tutorial and the standard introductory classroom lecture on using the OPAC at the University of Toronto

Source

Canadian journal of information science. 16(1991) no.4, S.2-22

0.0443785 = product of:
  0.088757 = sum of:
    0.088757 = sum of:
      0.031999324 = weight(_text_:library in 3860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.031999324 = score(doc=3860,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052364815 = queryNorm
          0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 3860, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3860)
      0.056757677 = weight(_text_:22 in 3860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056757677 = score(doc=3860,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052364815 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3860, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3860)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Through technology, technical service departments have increased output with unchanged staff levels. Describes how technology has cut the costs of cataloguing at the Phoenix Public Library. A CLSI online system is used. The components are the circulation module, OCLC cataloguing interface, OPAC and dial in access. This has has been linked to an INOVACQ acquisition module. Describes the work structure under this arrangement and the processing of materials

Source

OCLC micro. 7(1991) no.6, S.19-22

0.0443785 = product of:
  0.088757 = sum of:
    0.088757 = sum of:
      0.031999324 = weight(_text_:library in 8477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.031999324 = score(doc=8477,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052364815 = queryNorm
          0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 8477, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8477)
      0.056757677 = weight(_text_:22 in 8477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056757677 = score(doc=8477,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052364815 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 8477, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8477)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

LASIE. 28(1997) no.4, S.22-34

0.0443785 = product of:
  0.088757 = sum of:
    0.088757 = sum of:
      0.031999324 = weight(_text_:library in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.031999324 = score(doc=1422,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052364815 = queryNorm
          0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
      0.056757677 = weight(_text_:22 in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056757677 = score(doc=1422,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052364815 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Within the SOKRATES project Bavarian state, university and regional libraries are being equipped with locally automated systems. Regensburg university library has piloted the SISIS-OPAC-ONL version 1.0, adapted from the SINIX-based software SISIS-SE, with a machine readable stock of 1,66 million titles. OPAC-ONL offers 3 retrieval functions of different grades. Tests have been approved by Bavarian state libraries provided that certain faults are rectified statewide use of the OPAC should follow

Source

Bibliotheksforum Bayern. 22(1994) H.3, S.358-376

0.0443785 = product of:
  0.088757 = sum of:
    0.088757 = sum of:
      0.031999324 = weight(_text_:library in 933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.031999324 = score(doc=933,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052364815 = queryNorm
          0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 933, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=933)
      0.056757677 = weight(_text_:22 in 933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056757677 = score(doc=933,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052364815 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 933, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=933)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Bulletin of library and information science. 1997, no.22, S.39-55

0.042068303 = product of:
  0.084136605 = sum of:
    0.084136605 = sum of:
      0.041568346 = weight(_text_:library in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041568346 = score(doc=1187,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052364815 = queryNorm
          0.30190483 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
      0.042568255 = weight(_text_:22 in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042568255 = score(doc=1187,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052364815 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Subject access to monographs through online public access catalogs (OPACs) has always been a major concern for large research and/or academic libraries. Academic library practice of providing subject access to monographs has proven inadequate, especially in the case of composite works. Many techniques have been proposed to enhance subject treatment of monographs in OPACs. This article briefly reviews these efforts in the past and presents the case of adding Tables of Contents as one of the Most useful and probably also one of the Most costeffective ways of improving subject access to Monographs in an academic environment.

Date

22. 9.1997 19:16:05

Imprint

Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science

Source

Saving the time of the library user through subject access innovation: Papers in honor of Pauline Atherton Cochrane. Ed.: W.J. Wheeler