Search (43 results, page 1 of 3)

0.0443785 = product of:
  0.088757 = sum of:
    0.088757 = sum of:
      0.031999324 = weight(_text_:library in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.031999324 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052364815 = queryNorm
          0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
      0.056757677 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056757677 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052364815 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

27. 5.2007 22:19:35

Source

Journal of educational media and library sciences. 47(2006) no.2, S.153-171

0.019999579 = product of:
  0.039999157 = sum of:
    0.039999157 = product of:
      0.079998314 = sum of:
        0.079998314 = weight(_text_:library in 1806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.079998314 = score(doc=1806,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052364815 = queryNorm
            0.58101606 = fieldWeight in 1806, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1806)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.017736774 = product of:
  0.035473548 = sum of:
    0.035473548 = product of:
      0.070947096 = sum of:
        0.070947096 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070947096 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052364815 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Zugleich Dissertation Univ. Düsseldorf. - Rez. in: ZfBB. 22(1975) S.53-57 (H.-A. Koch)

0.016970206 = product of:
  0.033940412 = sum of:
    0.033940412 = product of:
      0.067880824 = sum of:
        0.067880824 = weight(_text_:library in 1285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067880824 = score(doc=1285,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052364815 = queryNorm
            0.4930085 = fieldWeight in 1285, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1285)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Imprint

London : Library Association

Series

Library Association Research Publications; no.1

0.016970206 = product of:
  0.033940412 = sum of:
    0.033940412 = product of:
      0.067880824 = sum of:
        0.067880824 = weight(_text_:library in 1286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067880824 = score(doc=1286,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052364815 = queryNorm
            0.4930085 = fieldWeight in 1286, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1286)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Imprint

London : Library Association

Series

Library Association Research Publications; no.1

0.016970206 = product of:
  0.033940412 = sum of:
    0.033940412 = product of:
      0.067880824 = sum of:
        0.067880824 = weight(_text_:library in 3403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067880824 = score(doc=3403,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052364815 = queryNorm
            0.4930085 = fieldWeight in 3403, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3403)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Imprint

London : Library Association

Series

Library Association research publication; no.2

0.016970206 = product of:
  0.033940412 = sum of:
    0.033940412 = product of:
      0.067880824 = sum of:
        0.067880824 = weight(_text_:library in 2444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067880824 = score(doc=2444,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052364815 = queryNorm
            0.4930085 = fieldWeight in 2444, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2444)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Imprint

Bangalore : Sarada Ranganathan endowment for library science

Series

Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science series; 19

0.014189419 = product of:
  0.028378839 = sum of:
    0.028378839 = product of:
      0.056757677 = sum of:
        0.056757677 = weight(_text_:22 in 826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056757677 = score(doc=826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052364815 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=826)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

2. 6.2013 18:33:22

0.013999705 = product of:
  0.02799941 = sum of:
    0.02799941 = product of:
      0.05599882 = sum of:
        0.05599882 = weight(_text_:library in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05599882 = score(doc=1833,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052364815 = queryNorm
            0.40671125 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Imprint

Madras : The Madras Library Association

0.012415742 = product of:
  0.024831483 = sum of:
    0.024831483 = product of:
      0.049662966 = sum of:
        0.049662966 = weight(_text_:22 in 4227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049662966 = score(doc=4227,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052364815 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4227, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4227)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Information processing and management. 46(2010) no.1, S.22-43

0.012415742 = product of:
  0.024831483 = sum of:
    0.024831483 = product of:
      0.049662966 = sum of:
        0.049662966 = weight(_text_:22 in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049662966 = score(doc=632,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052364815 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 2.2013 11:31:25

0.011999747 = product of:
  0.023999494 = sum of:
    0.023999494 = product of:
      0.047998987 = sum of:
        0.047998987 = weight(_text_:library in 831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047998987 = score(doc=831,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052364815 = queryNorm
            0.34860963 = fieldWeight in 831, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=831)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The main object of the paper is to demonstrate in detail the role of classification in information retrieval (IR) and the design of classificatory structures by the application of logical division to all forms of the content of records, subject and imaginative. The natural product of such division is a faceted classification. The latter is seen not as a particular kind of library classification but the only viable form enabling the locating and relating of information to be optimally predictable. A detailed exposition of the practical steps in facet analysis is given, drawing on the experience of the new Bliss Classification (BC2). The continued existence of the library as a highly organized information store is assumed. But, it is argued, it must acknowledge the relevance of the revolution in library classification that has taken place. It considers also how alphabetically arranged subject indexes may utilize controlled use of categorical (generically inclusive) and syntactic relations to produce similarly predictable locating and relating systems for IR.

Source

Library trends. 52(2004) no.3, S.515-540

0.011999747 = product of:
  0.023999494 = sum of:
    0.023999494 = product of:
      0.047998987 = sum of:
        0.047998987 = weight(_text_:library in 1158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047998987 = score(doc=1158,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052364815 = queryNorm
            0.34860963 = fieldWeight in 1158, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1158)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Acknowledging the importance of classification not only for library and information science but also for the study and mapping of the world phenomena, in this paper we revisit and systematize the main types of classifications and focus on the species of classification mainly drawing on the work of S. R. Ranganathan. We trace the evolution of library classification systems by their structures and modes of design of various shades of classification systems and make a comparative study of enumerative and faceted species of library classifications. The value of this paper is to have a picture of the whole spectrum of existing classifications, which may serve for the study of future developments and constructions of new systems. This paper updates previous works by Comaromi and Ranganathan and is also theoretically inspired by them.

0.01131347 = product of:
  0.02262694 = sum of:
    0.02262694 = product of:
      0.04525388 = sum of:
        0.04525388 = weight(_text_:library in 2760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04525388 = score(doc=2760,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052364815 = queryNorm
            0.32867232 = fieldWeight in 2760, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2760)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The article highlights the efforts and plans of Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science for revival of CC. Presents a brief history of the Scheme and explains is features. Discusses areas needing revamping for continual revision and existence of CC. Also seeks feedback from LIS professionals on the revision of the Scheme.

Source

Annals of library and information studies. 62(2015) no.4, S.231-238

0.010392087 = product of:
  0.020784173 = sum of:
    0.020784173 = product of:
      0.041568346 = sum of:
        0.041568346 = weight(_text_:library in 3402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041568346 = score(doc=3402,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052364815 = queryNorm
            0.30190483 = fieldWeight in 3402, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3402)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Enthält die Beiträge: FAIRTHORNE, R.A.: 'Browsing' schemes and 'specialist' schemes; KYLE, B.R.F.: Lessons learned from experience in drafting the Kyle classification; MILLS, J.: Inadequacies of exing general classification schemes; COATES, E.J.: CRG proposals for a new general classification; TOMLINSON, H.: Notes on initial work for NATO classification; TOMLINSON, H.: Report on work for new general classification scheme; TOMLINSON, H.: Expansion of categories using mining terms; TOMLINSON, H.: Relationship between geology and mining; TOMLINSON, H.: Use of categories for sculpture; TOMLINSON, H.: Expansion of categories using terms from physics; TOMLINSON, H.: The distinction between physical and chemical entities; TOMLINSON, H.: Concepts within politics; TOMLINSON, H.: Problems arising from first GCS papers; AUSTIN, D.: The theory of integrative levels reconsidered as the basis of a general classification; AUSTIN, D.: Demonstration: provisional scheme for naturally occuring entities; AUSTIN, D.: Stages in classing and exercises; AUSTIN, D.: Report to the Library Association Research Committee on the use of the NATO grant

Imprint

London : Library Association

Series

Library Association research publications; no.1

0.010392087 = product of:
  0.020784173 = sum of:
    0.020784173 = product of:
      0.041568346 = sum of:
        0.041568346 = weight(_text_:library in 5406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041568346 = score(doc=5406,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052364815 = queryNorm
            0.30190483 = fieldWeight in 5406, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5406)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

S R Ranganathan's ideas have influenced library classification since the inception of his Colon Classification in 1933. His address at Elsinore, "Library Classification Through a Century", was his grand vision of the century of progress in classification from 1876 to 1975, and looked to the future of faceted classification as the means to provide a cohesive system to organize the world's information. Fifty years later, the internet and its achievements, social ecology, and consequences present a far more complicated picture, with the library as he knew it as a very small part and the problems that he confronted now greatly exacerbated. The systematic nature of Ranganathan's canons, principles, postulates, and devices suggest that modern semantic algorithms could guide automatic subject tagging. The vision presented here is one of internet-wide faceted classification and retrieval, implemented as open, distributed facets providing unified faceted searching across all web sites.

0.009999789 = product of:
  0.019999579 = sum of:
    0.019999579 = product of:
      0.039999157 = sum of:
        0.039999157 = weight(_text_:library in 2564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039999157 = score(doc=2564,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052364815 = queryNorm
            0.29050803 = fieldWeight in 2564, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2564)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.009999789 = product of:
  0.019999579 = sum of:
    0.019999579 = product of:
      0.039999157 = sum of:
        0.039999157 = weight(_text_:library in 2798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039999157 = score(doc=2798,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052364815 = queryNorm
            0.29050803 = fieldWeight in 2798, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2798)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Classification is the basis of knowledge organization. Ontology, a comparatively new concept used as a tool for knowledge organization, establishes connections between terms and concepts enhancing the scope and usefulness of library classification. Ranganathan had invented the strong theory of the analytico-synthetic method in classification and devised Colon Classification. In this study a domain ontology on library and information science has been developed by implementing Raganathan's faceted approach of classification. The hierarchical relationships among terms have been established primarily keeping conformity with that of Ranganathan's Colon Classification (7th edition). But to accommodate new vocabularies, DDC 23rd edition and UDC Standard edition are consulted. The Protégé ontology editor has been used. The study carefully examines the steps in which the analytico-synthetic method have been followed. Ranganathan's Canon of Characteristics and its relevant Canons have been followed for defining the class-subclass hierarchy. It concludes by identifying the drawbacks as well as the merits faced while developing the ontology. This paper proves the relevance and importance of Ranganathan's philosophy in developing ontology based knowledge organization.

Source

Annals of library and information studies. 62(2015) no.4, S.274-280

0.009899286 = product of:
  0.019798571 = sum of:
    0.019798571 = product of:
      0.039597142 = sum of:
        0.039597142 = weight(_text_:library in 851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039597142 = score(doc=851,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13768692 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052364815 = queryNorm
            0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 851, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=851)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

This article compares the qualitative method of grounded theory (GT) with Ranganathan's construction of faceted classifications (FC) in library and information science. Both struggle with a core problem-i.e., the representation of vernacular words and processes, empirically discovered, which will, although ethnographically faithful, be powerful beyond the single instance or case study. The article compares Glaser and Strauss's (1967) work with that of Ranganathan(1950).

Source

Library trends. 47(1998) no.2, S.218-232

0.008868387 = product of:
  0.017736774 = sum of:
    0.017736774 = product of:
      0.035473548 = sum of:
        0.035473548 = weight(_text_:22 in 3739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035473548 = score(doc=3739,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18337266 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052364815 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3739, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3739)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly