-
Gnoli, C.: Classification transcends library business : the case of BiblioPhil (2010)
0.02
0.018807475 = product of:
0.05642242 = sum of:
0.05642242 = sum of:
0.03155397 = weight(_text_:digital in 3698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03155397 = score(doc=3698,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.03670994 = queryNorm
0.21790776 = fieldWeight in 3698, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3698)
0.02486845 = weight(_text_:22 in 3698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02486845 = score(doc=3698,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03670994 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3698, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3698)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Although bibliographic classifications usually adopt a perspective different from that of object classifications, the two have obvious relationships. These become especially relevant when users are looking for knowledge scattered in a wide variety of forms and media. This is an increasingly common situation, as library catalogues now coexist in the global digital environment with catalogues of archives, of museums, of commercial products, and many other information resources. In order to make the subject content of all these resources searchable, a broader conception of classification is needed, that can be applied to an knowledge item, rather than only bibliographic materials. To illustrate this we take an example of the research on bagpipes in Northern Italian folklore. For this kind of research, the most effective search strategy is a cross-media one, looking for many different knowledge sources such as published documents, police archives, painting details, museum specimens, organizations devoted to related subjects. To provide satisfying results for this kind of search, the traditional disciplinary approach to classification is not sufficient. Tools are needed in which knowledge items dealing with a phenomenon of interest can be retrieved independently from the other topics with which it is combined, the disciplinary context, and the medium where it occurs. This can be made possible if the basic units of classification are taken to be the phenomena treated, as recommended in the León Manifesto, rather than disciplines or other aspect features. The concept of bagpipes should be retrievable and browsable in any combination with other phenomena, disciplines, media etc. Examples are given of information sources that could be managed by this freely-faceted technique of classification.
- Date
- 22. 7.2010 20:40:08
-
Gnoli, C.; Ledl, A.; Park, Z.; Trzmielewski, M.: Phenomenon-based vs. disciplinary classification : possibilities for evaluating and for mapping (2018)
0.01
0.011899749 = product of:
0.035699245 = sum of:
0.035699245 = product of:
0.07139849 = sum of:
0.07139849 = weight(_text_:digital in 4804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07139849 = score(doc=4804,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.03670994 = queryNorm
0.493069 = fieldWeight in 4804, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4804)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
-
Gnoli, C.: Naturalism vs pragmatism in knowledge organization (2004)
0.01
0.0063107945 = product of:
0.018932384 = sum of:
0.018932384 = product of:
0.037864767 = sum of:
0.037864767 = weight(_text_:digital in 2663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037864767 = score(doc=2663,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.03670994 = queryNorm
0.26148933 = fieldWeight in 2663, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2663)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Several authors remark that categories used in languages, including indexing ones, are affected by cultural biases, and do not reflect reality in an objective way. Hence knowledge organization would essentially be determined by pragmatic factors. However, human categories are connected with the structure of reality through biological bonds, and this allows for a naturalistic approach too. Naturalism has been adopted by Farradane in proposing relational categories, and by Dahlberg and the CRG in applying the theory of integrative levels to general classification schemes. The latter is especially relevant for possible developments in making the structure of schemes independent from disciplines, and in applying it to digital information retrieval.
-
Gnoli, C.; Pusterla, L.; Bendiscioli, A.; Recinella, C.: Classification for collections mapping and query expansion (2016)
0.01
0.0063107945 = product of:
0.018932384 = sum of:
0.018932384 = product of:
0.037864767 = sum of:
0.037864767 = weight(_text_:digital in 3102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037864767 = score(doc=3102,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.03670994 = queryNorm
0.26148933 = fieldWeight in 3102, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3102)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Proceedings of the 15th European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems Workshop (NKOS 2016) co-located with the 20th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries 2016 (TPDL 2016), Hannover, Germany, September 9, 2016. Edi. by Philipp Mayr et al. [http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1676/=urn:nbn:de:0074-1676-5]
-
Gnoli, C.: Notation (2018)
0.01
0.0063107945 = product of:
0.018932384 = sum of:
0.018932384 = product of:
0.037864767 = sum of:
0.037864767 = weight(_text_:digital in 4650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037864767 = score(doc=4650,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.03670994 = queryNorm
0.26148933 = fieldWeight in 4650, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4650)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Notations are systems of symbols that can be combined according to syntactical rules to represent meanings in a specialized domain. In knowledge organization, they are systems of numerals, letters and punctuation marks associated to a concept that mechanically produce helpful sequences of them for arranging books on shelves, browsing subjects in directories and displaying items in catalogues. Most bibliographic classification systems, like Dewey Decimal Classification, use a positional notation allowing for expression of increasingly specific subjects by additional digits. However, some notations like that of Bliss Bibliographic Classification are purely ordinal and do not reflect the hierarchical degree of a subject. Notations can also be expressive of the syntactical structure of compound subjects (common auxiliaries, facets etc.) in various ways. In the digital media, notation can be recorded and managed in databases and exploited to provide appropriate search and display functionalities.
-
Szostak, R.; Gnoli, C.; López-Huertas, M.: Interdisciplinary knowledge organization
0.01
0.0059498744 = product of:
0.017849622 = sum of:
0.017849622 = product of:
0.035699245 = sum of:
0.035699245 = weight(_text_:digital in 3804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035699245 = score(doc=3804,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.03670994 = queryNorm
0.2465345 = fieldWeight in 3804, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3804)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This book proposes a novel approach to classification, discusses its myriad advantages, and outlines how such an approach to classification can best be pursued. It encourages a collaborative effort toward the detailed development of such a classification. This book is motivated by the increased importance of interdisciplinary scholarship in the academy, and the widely perceived shortcomings of existing knowledge organization schemes in serving interdisciplinary scholarship. It is designed for scholars of classification research, knowledge organization, the digital environment, and interdisciplinarity itself. The approach recommended blends a general classification with domain-specific classification practices. The book reaches a set of very strong conclusions:
-Existing classification systems serve interdisciplinary research and teaching poorly. -A novel approach to classification, grounded in the phenomena studied rather than disciplines, would serve interdisciplinary scholarship much better. It would also have advantages for disciplinary scholarship. The productivity of scholarship would thus be increased. -This novel approach is entirely feasible. Various concerns that might be raised can each be addressed. The broad outlines of what a new classification would look like are developed. -This new approach might serve as a complement to or a substitute for existing classification systems. -Domain analysis can and should be employed in the pursuit of a general classification. This will be particularly important with respect to interdisciplinary domains. -Though the impetus for this novel approach comes from interdisciplinarity, it is also better suited to the needs of the Semantic Web, and a digital environment more generally. Though the primary focus of the book is on classification systems, most chapters also address how the analysis could be extended to thesauri and ontologies. The possibility of a universal thesaurus is explored. The classification proposed has many of the advantages sought in ontologies for the Semantic Web. The book is therefore of interest to scholars working in these areas as well.
-
Gnoli, C.: Boundaries and overlaps of disciplines in Bloch's methodology of historical knowledge (2014)
0.00
0.0049736896 = product of:
0.014921068 = sum of:
0.014921068 = product of:
0.029842136 = sum of:
0.029842136 = weight(_text_:22 in 1414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029842136 = score(doc=1414,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03670994 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1414, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1414)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Lardera, M.; Gnoli, C.; Rolandi, C.; Trzmielewski, M.: Developing SciGator, a DDC-based library browsing tool (2017)
0.00
0.0049736896 = product of:
0.014921068 = sum of:
0.014921068 = product of:
0.029842136 = sum of:
0.029842136 = weight(_text_:22 in 4144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029842136 = score(doc=4144,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03670994 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4144, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4144)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Beitrag eines Special Issue: ISKO-Italy: 8' Incontro ISKO Italia, Università di Bologna, 22 maggio 2017, Bologna, Italia.
-
Gnoli, C.: Classifying phenomena : part 4: themes and rhemes (2018)
0.00
0.0049736896 = product of:
0.014921068 = sum of:
0.014921068 = product of:
0.029842136 = sum of:
0.029842136 = weight(_text_:22 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029842136 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03670994 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 17. 2.2018 18:22:25
-
Gnoli, C.; Merli, G.; Pavan, G.; Bernuzzi, E.; Priano, M.: Freely faceted classification for a Web-based bibliographic archive : the BioAcoustic Reference Database (2010)
0.00
0.0041447417 = product of:
0.012434225 = sum of:
0.012434225 = product of:
0.02486845 = sum of:
0.02486845 = weight(_text_:22 in 3739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02486845 = score(doc=3739,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03670994 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3739, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3739)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
