Search (146 results, page 1 of 8)

  • × theme_ss:"Elektronisches Publizieren"
  1. Jensen, M.: Digital structure, digital design : issues in designing electronic publications (1996) 0.05
    0.046920743 = product of:
      0.14076222 = sum of:
        0.14076222 = sum of:
          0.100972705 = weight(_text_:digital in 7481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.100972705 = score(doc=7481,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03670994 = queryNorm
              0.69730484 = fieldWeight in 7481, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7481)
          0.039789516 = weight(_text_:22 in 7481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.039789516 = score(doc=7481,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03670994 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7481, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7481)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In print publications, content elements are representable in visual form, but in digital presentation function may be shown through hypertext. Good design must be a tool to illuminate content, not an arbitrary add on. Sets out elements of good digital design. Consideration of the purpose of the publication, the use of the publication, the audience, and the market will help to identify appropriate design choices
    Source
    Journal of scholarly publishing. 28(1996) no.1, S.13-22
  2. Benoit, G.; Hussey, L.: Repurposing digital objects : case studies across the publishing industry (2011) 0.04
    0.037110053 = product of:
      0.11133015 = sum of:
        0.11133015 = sum of:
          0.07651432 = weight(_text_:digital in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07651432 = score(doc=4198,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03670994 = queryNorm
              0.5283983 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
          0.03481583 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03481583 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03670994 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Large, data-rich organizations have tremendously large collections of digital objects to be "repurposed," to respond quickly and economically to publishing, marketing, and information needs. Some management typically assume that a content management system, or some other technique such as OWL and RDF, will automatically address the workflow and technical issues associated with this reuse. Four case studies show that the sources of some roadblocks to agile repurposing are as much managerial and organizational as they are technical in nature. The review concludes with suggestions on how digital object repurposing can be integrated given these organizations' structures.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:23:07
  3. Alexander, M.: Digitising books, manuscripts and scholarly materials : preparation, handling, scanning, recognition, compression, storage formats (1998) 0.04
    0.03706267 = product of:
      0.11118801 = sum of:
        0.11118801 = sum of:
          0.07139849 = weight(_text_:digital in 3686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07139849 = score(doc=3686,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03670994 = queryNorm
              0.493069 = fieldWeight in 3686, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3686)
          0.039789516 = weight(_text_:22 in 3686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.039789516 = score(doc=3686,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03670994 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3686, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3686)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The British Library's Initiatives for Access programme (1993-) aims to identify the impact and value of digital and networking technologies on the Library's collections and services. Describes the projects: the Electronic Beowulf, digitisation of ageing microfilm, digital photographic images, and use of the Excalibur retrieval software. Examines the ways in which the issues of preparation, scanning, and storage have been tackled, and problems raised by use of recognition technologies and compression
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:00:52
  4. Digital libraries: current issues : Digital Libraries Workshop DL 94, Newark, NJ, May 19-20, 1994. Selected papers (1995) 0.04
    0.03519056 = product of:
      0.10557167 = sum of:
        0.10557167 = sum of:
          0.075729534 = weight(_text_:digital in 1385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.075729534 = score(doc=1385,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03670994 = queryNorm
              0.52297866 = fieldWeight in 1385, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1385)
          0.029842136 = weight(_text_:22 in 1385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029842136 = score(doc=1385,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03670994 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1385, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1385)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This volume is the first book coherently summarizing the current issues in digital libraries research, design and management. It presents, in a homogeneous way, thoroughly revised versions of 15 papers accepted for the First International Workshop on Digital Libraries, DL '94, held at Rutgers University in May 1994; in addition there are two introductory chapters provided by the volume editors, as well as a comprehensive bibliography listing 262 entries. Besides introductory aspects, the topics addressed are administration and management, information retrieval and hypertext, classification and indexing, and prototypes and applications. The volume is intended for researchers and design professionals in the field, as well as for experts from libraries administration and scientific publishing.
    Date
    22. 1.1996 18:26:45
  5. Vogt, T.: ¬Die Transformation des renommierten Informationsservices zbMATH zu einer Open Access-Plattform für die Mathematik steht vor dem Abschluss. (2020) 0.03
    0.034279343 = product of:
      0.102838024 = sum of:
        0.102838024 = product of:
          0.30851406 = sum of:
            0.30851406 = weight(_text_:c3 in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.30851406 = score(doc=31,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.35795778 = queryWeight, product of:
                  9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.8618728 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    "Mit Beginn des Jahres 2021 wird der umfassende internationale Informationsservice zbMATH in eine Open Access-Plattform überführt. Dann steht dieser bislang kostenpflichtige Dienst weltweit allen Interessierten kostenfrei zur Verfügung. Die Änderung des Geschäftsmodells ermöglicht, die meisten Informationen und Daten von zbMATH für Forschungszwecke und zur Verknüpfung mit anderen nicht-kommerziellen Diensten frei zu nutzen, siehe: https://www.mathematik.de/dmv-blog/2772-transformation-von-zbmath-zu-einer-open-access-plattform-f%C3%BCr-die-mathematik-kurz-vor-dem-abschluss."
  6. Schmale, W.: Strategische Optionen für universitäre Repositorien in den Digital Humanities (2018) 0.03
    0.026330464 = product of:
      0.07899139 = sum of:
        0.07899139 = sum of:
          0.04417556 = weight(_text_:digital in 3909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04417556 = score(doc=3909,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03670994 = queryNorm
              0.30507088 = fieldWeight in 3909, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3909)
          0.03481583 = weight(_text_:22 in 3909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03481583 = score(doc=3909,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03670994 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3909, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3909)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    20. 9.2018 12:22:39
  7. Heller, L.: Literatur- und Informationsversorgung in der Spitzenforschung (2009) 0.02
    0.022568969 = product of:
      0.067706905 = sum of:
        0.067706905 = sum of:
          0.037864767 = weight(_text_:digital in 3022) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037864767 = score(doc=3022,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03670994 = queryNorm
              0.26148933 = fieldWeight in 3022, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3022)
          0.029842136 = weight(_text_:22 in 3022) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029842136 = score(doc=3022,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03670994 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3022, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3022)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Zentrale Erwerbung von wissenschaftlichen Informationsressourcen im Netz der virtuellen Hybridbibliothek der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft »Excellent Information Services for Excellent Research« ist das Motto der Anfang 2007 gegründeten Max Planck Digital Library (MPDL). Diese ambitionierte Leitlinie würdigt die Relevanz eines modernen wissenschaftlichen Informationsmanagements für eine exzellente Spitzenforschung. Mit Gründung der MPDL wurde in der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft (MPG) ein entscheidender Schritt zur zentralen Unterstützung eines bisher weitgehend dezentralen Informationsversorgungsnetzes gegangen. Die Entscheidung zu einer Kombination aus zentraler und dezentraler Informationsversorgung trägt den Veränderungen Rechnung, die sich durch die Möglichkeiten der digitalen Welt ergeben haben. Intention der Neugründung ist jedoch nicht, ein unter der Prämisse der Institutsautonomie etabliertes, wohl durchdachtes Literatur- und Informationsversorgungssystem sukzessive durch eine zentrale Einheit abzulösen, sondern gemäß der Maxime der Subsidiarität Stärken von dezentralen und von zentralen Einheiten zu einem effizienten Gesamtsystem zu ergänzen. Der vorliegende Artikel skizziert das Netz der Informationsversorgung in der MPG mit dem Schwerpunkt auf der Versorgung mit elektronischen Medien des institutsübergreifenden Bedarfs. Dieser Schwerpunkt kennzeichnet eines der Hauptarbeitsfelder der MPDL, deren weitere Services und Arbeitsfelder kontextgebunden und ausgewählt vorgestellt werden sollen?
    Date
    22. 7.2009 13:40:29
  8. Veittes, M.: Electronic Book (1995) 0.02
    0.016578967 = product of:
      0.0497369 = sum of:
        0.0497369 = product of:
          0.0994738 = sum of:
            0.0994738 = weight(_text_:22 in 3204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0994738 = score(doc=3204,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 3204, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3204)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    RRZK-Kompass. 1995, Nr.65, S.21-22
  9. FIZ Karlsruhe unterstützt gemeinsamen Bibliotheksverbund (VZG) bei der Einführung der ESCIDOC-Infrastruktur (2008) 0.02
    0.015045978 = product of:
      0.045137934 = sum of:
        0.045137934 = sum of:
          0.025243176 = weight(_text_:digital in 1810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025243176 = score(doc=1810,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03670994 = queryNorm
              0.17432621 = fieldWeight in 1810, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1810)
          0.019894758 = weight(_text_:22 in 1810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.019894758 = score(doc=1810,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03670994 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1810, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1810)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Zum Vertragsabschluss erklärt Sabine Brünger-Weilandt, Geschäftsführerin von FIZ Karlsruhe: "Als wissenschaftlicher Dienstleister und eScidoc-Partner fühlen wir uns der Nachnutzung und Verbreitung des Systems verpflichtet. Die Kooperation mit der VZG bedeutet einen wichtigen Schritt in diesem Prozess. Damit können wir die VZG effektiv und kompetent dabei unterstützen, ihre Leistungen im Bibliotheksverbund noch besser zu erbringen und wertvolle Kulturgüter der Wissenschaft und Forschung digital verfügbar zu machen." Reiner Diedrichs, Direktor der Verbundzentrale, begründet die Entscheidung: "Die durchdachte Architektur, der flexible Umgang mit Metadaten sowie insbesondere die konsequente Verfolgung des Open-Source-Gedankens haben uns überzeugt. Die eSciDoc-Infrastruktur bietet eine solide Grundlage für die weitere Entwicklung unserer Dienstleistungen." FIZ Karlsruhe arbeitet bereits seit mehr als drei Jahren intensiv an E-Science-Lösungen. Im Projekt eSciDoc entwickeln FIZ Karlsruhe und die MaxPlanck-Gesellschaft (MPG) gemeinsam ein System für offene netzbasierte Zusammenarbeit, Kommunikation und Publikation in wissenschaftlichen Forschungsorganisationen. Aufbauend auf seinen längjährigen Erfahrungen im internationalen Informationstransfer und Wissensmanagement hat FIZ Karlsruhe seine Kompetenzen in Richtung zu E-Science erweitert. Über das neue Geschäftsfeld KnowEsis werden in dem komplexen und beratungsintensiven Umfeld von E-Science innovative Dienstleistungen angeboten. Dazu gehören Consulting, Schulung und kundenspezifische Entwicklungen ebenso wie Support sowohl für die eSciDoc-Infrastruktur als auch für das Repository-System Fedora."
    Date
    7. 4.2008 11:36:22
  10. Somers, J.: Torching the modern-day library of Alexandria : somewhere at Google there is a database containing 25 million books and nobody is allowed to read them. (2017) 0.02
    0.015045978 = product of:
      0.045137934 = sum of:
        0.045137934 = sum of:
          0.025243176 = weight(_text_:digital in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025243176 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03670994 = queryNorm
              0.17432621 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
          0.019894758 = weight(_text_:22 in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.019894758 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03670994 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    You were going to get one-click access to the full text of nearly every book that's ever been published. Books still in print you'd have to pay for, but everything else-a collection slated to grow larger than the holdings at the Library of Congress, Harvard, the University of Michigan, at any of the great national libraries of Europe-would have been available for free at terminals that were going to be placed in every local library that wanted one. At the terminal you were going to be able to search tens of millions of books and read every page of any book you found. You'd be able to highlight passages and make annotations and share them; for the first time, you'd be able to pinpoint an idea somewhere inside the vastness of the printed record, and send somebody straight to it with a link. Books would become as instantly available, searchable, copy-pasteable-as alive in the digital world-as web pages. It was to be the realization of a long-held dream. "The universal library has been talked about for millennia," Richard Ovenden, the head of Oxford's Bodleian Libraries, has said. "It was possible to think in the Renaissance that you might be able to amass the whole of published knowledge in a single room or a single institution." In the spring of 2011, it seemed we'd amassed it in a terminal small enough to fit on a desk. "This is a watershed event and can serve as a catalyst for the reinvention of education, research, and intellectual life," one eager observer wrote at the time. On March 22 of that year, however, the legal agreement that would have unlocked a century's worth of books and peppered the country with access terminals to a universal library was rejected under Rule 23(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. When the library at Alexandria burned it was said to be an "international catastrophe." When the most significant humanities project of our time was dismantled in court, the scholars, archivists, and librarians who'd had a hand in its undoing breathed a sigh of relief, for they believed, at the time, that they had narrowly averted disaster.
  11. Henze, V.: "SGML" - a solution for your digital library of the future? (1996) 0.01
    0.014725188 = product of:
      0.04417556 = sum of:
        0.04417556 = product of:
          0.08835112 = sum of:
            0.08835112 = weight(_text_:digital in 3710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08835112 = score(doc=3710,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.61014175 = fieldWeight in 3710, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3710)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  12. Carter, M.E.: Electronic highway robbery : an artist's guide to copyrights in the digital era (1996) 0.01
    0.014725188 = product of:
      0.04417556 = sum of:
        0.04417556 = product of:
          0.08835112 = sum of:
            0.08835112 = weight(_text_:digital in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08835112 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.61014175 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  13. Gaines, B.R.: Social and technical dimensions of electronic journals (1993) 0.01
    0.014574157 = product of:
      0.04372247 = sum of:
        0.04372247 = product of:
          0.08744494 = sum of:
            0.08744494 = weight(_text_:digital in 8026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08744494 = score(doc=8026,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.60388374 = fieldWeight in 8026, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8026)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the role of journals in knowledge dissemination and in the processes and value systems of scholarship. There are many different ways of attempting to improve scholarly communication using information technology, examines the dimensions of digital journals and presents a statement of objectives for the development of digital journals. Describes a number of simple initiatives oopen to the scholarly community that could develop digital publication services by mobilizing existing resources at a minimum cost with a high chance of success
  14. Dobratz, S.; Neuroth, H.: nestor: Network of Expertise in long-term STOrage of digital Resources : a digital preservation initiative for Germany (2004) 0.01
    0.014111364 = product of:
      0.04233409 = sum of:
        0.04233409 = product of:
          0.08466818 = sum of:
            0.08466818 = weight(_text_:digital in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08466818 = score(doc=1195,freq=40.0), product of:
                0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.58470786 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
                  6.3245554 = tf(freq=40.0), with freq of:
                    40.0 = termFreq=40.0
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Sponsored by the German Ministry of Education and Research with funding of 800.000 EURO, the German Network of Expertise in long-term storage of digital resources (nestor) began in June 2003 as a cooperative effort of 6 partners representing different players within the field of long-term preservation. The partners include: * The German National Library (Die Deutsche Bibliothek) as the lead institution for the project * The State and University Library of Lower Saxony Göttingen (Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen) * The Computer and Media Service and the University Library of Humboldt-University Berlin (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin) * The Bavarian State Library in Munich (Bayerische Staatsbibliothek) * The Institute for Museum Information in Berlin (Institut für Museumskunde) * General Directorate of the Bavarian State Archives (GDAB) As in other countries, long-term preservation of digital resources has become an important issue in Germany in recent years. Nevertheless, coming to agreement with institutions throughout the country to cooperate on tasks for a long-term preservation effort has taken a great deal of effort. Although there had been considerable attention paid to the preservation of physical media like CD-ROMS, technologies available for the long-term preservation of digital publications like e-books, digital dissertations, websites, etc., are still lacking. Considering the importance of the task within the federal structure of Germany, with the responsibility of each federal state for its science and culture activities, it is obvious that the approach to a successful solution of these issues in Germany must be a cooperative approach. Since 2000, there have been discussions about strategies and techniques for long-term archiving of digital information, particularly within the distributed structure of Germany's library and archival institutions. A key part of all the previous activities was focusing on using existing standards and analyzing the context in which those standards would be applied. One such activity, the Digital Library Forum Planning Project, was done on behalf of the German Ministry of Education and Research in 2002, where the vision of a digital library in 2010 that can meet the changing and increasing needs of users was developed and described in detail, including the infrastructure required and how the digital library would work technically, what it would contain and how it would be organized. The outcome was a strategic plan for certain selected specialist areas, where, amongst other topics, a future call for action for long-term preservation was defined, described and explained against the background of practical experience.
    As follow up, in 2002 the nestor long-term archiving working group provided an initial spark towards planning and organising coordinated activities concerning the long-term preservation and long-term availability of digital documents in Germany. This resulted in a workshop, held 29 - 30 October 2002, where major tasks were discussed. Influenced by the demands and progress of the nestor network, the participants reached agreement to start work on application-oriented projects and to address the following topics: * Overlapping problems o Collection and preservation of digital objects (selection criteria, preservation policy) o Definition of criteria for trusted repositories o Creation of models of cooperation, etc. * Digital objects production process o Analysis of potential conflicts between production and long-term preservation o Documentation of existing document models and recommendations for standards models to be used for long-term preservation o Identification systems for digital objects, etc. * Transfer of digital objects o Object data and metadata o Transfer protocols and interoperability o Handling of different document types, e.g. dynamic publications, etc. * Long-term preservation of digital objects o Design and prototype implementation of depot systems for digital objects (OAIS was chosen to be the best functional model.) o Authenticity o Functional requirements on user interfaces of an depot system o Identification systems for digital objects, etc. At the end of the workshop, participants decided to establish a permanent distributed infrastructure for long-term preservation and long-term accessibility of digital resources in Germany comparable, e.g., to the Digital Preservation Coalition in the UK. The initial phase, nestor, is now being set up by the above-mentioned 3-year funding project.
  15. Zschunke, P.; Svensson, P.: Bücherbrett für alle Fälle : Geräte-Speicher fassen Tausende von Seiten (2000) 0.01
    0.01406772 = product of:
      0.04220316 = sum of:
        0.04220316 = product of:
          0.08440632 = sum of:
            0.08440632 = weight(_text_:22 in 4823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08440632 = score(doc=4823,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 4823, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4823)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
    18. 6.2000 9:11:22
  16. Leuser, P.: SGML-Einsatz bei Duden und Brockhaus : ein Verlag auf neuem Weg (1993) 0.01
    0.0132631725 = product of:
      0.039789516 = sum of:
        0.039789516 = product of:
          0.07957903 = sum of:
            0.07957903 = weight(_text_:22 in 5919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07957903 = score(doc=5919,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5919, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5919)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Infodoc. 19(1993) H.3, S.20-22
  17. Polatscheck, K.: Elektronische Versuchung : Test des Sony Data Discman: eine digitale Konkurrenz für Taschenbücher? (1992) 0.01
    0.0132631725 = product of:
      0.039789516 = sum of:
        0.039789516 = product of:
          0.07957903 = sum of:
            0.07957903 = weight(_text_:22 in 6381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07957903 = score(doc=6381,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6381, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6381)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Zeit. Nr.xx vom ???, S.22
  18. Desmarais, N.: Data preparation for electronic publications (1998) 0.01
    0.0132631725 = product of:
      0.039789516 = sum of:
        0.039789516 = product of:
          0.07957903 = sum of:
            0.07957903 = weight(_text_:22 in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07957903 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Advances in librarianship. 22(1998), S.59-75
  19. Luhmann, J.; Burghardt, M.: Digital humanities - A discipline in its own right? : an analysis of the role and position of digital humanities in the academic landscape (2022) 0.01
    0.012881855 = product of:
      0.03864556 = sum of:
        0.03864556 = product of:
          0.07729112 = sum of:
            0.07729112 = weight(_text_:digital in 460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07729112 = score(doc=460,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.5337628 = fieldWeight in 460, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=460)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Although digital humanities (DH) has received a lot of attention in recent years, its status as "a discipline in its own right" (Schreibman et al., A companion to digital humanities (pp. xxiii-xxvii). Blackwell; 2004) and its position in the overall academic landscape are still being negotiated. While there are countless essays and opinion pieces that debate the status of DH, little research has been dedicated to exploring the field in a systematic and empirical way (Poole, Journal of Documentation; 2017:73). This study aims to contribute to the existing research gap by comparing articles published over the past three decades in three established English-language DH journals (Computers and the Humanities, Literary and Linguistic Computing, Digital Humanities Quarterly) with research articles from journals in 15 other academic disciplines (corpus size: 34,041 articles; 299 million tokens). As a method of analysis, we use latent Dirichlet allocation topic modeling, combined with recent approaches that aggregate topic models by means of hierarchical agglomerative clustering. Our findings indicate that DH is simultaneously a discipline in its own right and a highly interdisciplinary field, with many connecting factors to neighboring disciplines-first and foremost, computational linguistics, and information science. Detailed descriptive analyses shed some light on the diachronic development of DH and also highlight topics that are characteristic for DH.
    Series
    JASIST special issue on digital humanities (DH): A. Landscapes of DH
  20. Nicholas, D.; Huntington, P.; Watkinson, A.: Digital journals, Big Deals and online searching behaviour : a pilot study (2003) 0.01
    0.012752387 = product of:
      0.03825716 = sum of:
        0.03825716 = product of:
          0.07651432 = sum of:
            0.07651432 = weight(_text_:digital in 688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07651432 = score(doc=688,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.5283983 = fieldWeight in 688, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=688)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Evaluates, through deep log analysis, the impact of "Big Deal" agreements on the online searching behaviour of users of the Emerald digital library Web site, which provides access to more than 150 journals in the fields of business and information science. The purpose of the evaluation was to map the online information seeking behaviour of the digital library user and to see whether those signed-up to a Big Deal arrangement behaved any differently from the others. In general they did. The real surprise proved to be the strong consumer traits of the library's users. Research reported here refers to the first stage of a three-stage research project.

Years

Languages

  • e 88
  • d 57

Types

  • a 128
  • el 13
  • m 11
  • s 5
  • b 1
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects

Classifications