Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Folksonomies"
  1. Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.05
    0.045137938 = product of:
      0.13541381 = sum of:
        0.13541381 = sum of:
          0.075729534 = weight(_text_:digital in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.075729534 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03670994 = queryNorm
              0.52297866 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
          0.059684273 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.059684273 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03670994 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  2. Furner, J.: Folksonomies (2009) 0.01
    0.008414392 = product of:
      0.025243176 = sum of:
        0.025243176 = product of:
          0.050486352 = sum of:
            0.050486352 = weight(_text_:digital in 3857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050486352 = score(doc=3857,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.34865242 = fieldWeight in 3857, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3857)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Digital unter: http://dx.doi.org/10.1081/E-ELIS3-120043238. Vgl.: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/book/10.1081/E-ELIS3.
  3. Mai, J.-E.: Folksonomies and the new order : authority in the digital disorder (2011) 0.01
    0.007362594 = product of:
      0.02208778 = sum of:
        0.02208778 = product of:
          0.04417556 = sum of:
            0.04417556 = weight(_text_:digital in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04417556 = score(doc=4553,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.30507088 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  4. Rafferty, P.: Tagging (2018) 0.01
    0.007362594 = product of:
      0.02208778 = sum of:
        0.02208778 = product of:
          0.04417556 = sum of:
            0.04417556 = weight(_text_:digital in 4647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04417556 = score(doc=4647,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.30507088 = fieldWeight in 4647, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4647)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article examines tagging as knowledge organization. Tagging is a kind of indexing, a process of labelling and categorizing information made to support resource discovery for users. Social tagging generally means the practice whereby internet users generate keywords to describe, categorise or comment on digital content. The value of tagging comes when social tags within a collection are aggregated and shared through a folksonomy. This article examines definitions of tagging and folksonomy, and discusses the functions, advantages and disadvantages of tagging systems in relation to knowledge organization before discussing studies that have compared tagging and conventional library-based knowledge organization systems. Approaches to disciplining tagging practice are examined and tagger motivation discussed. Finally, the article outlines current research fronts.
  5. Lee, Y.Y.; Yang, S.Q.: Folksonomies as subject access : a survey of tagging in library online catalogs and discovery layers (2012) 0.01
    0.0063107945 = product of:
      0.018932384 = sum of:
        0.018932384 = product of:
          0.037864767 = sum of:
            0.037864767 = weight(_text_:digital in 309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037864767 = score(doc=309,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.26148933 = fieldWeight in 309, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=309)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Beyond libraries - subject metadata in the digital environment and semantic web. IFLA Satellite Post-Conference, 17-18 August 2012, Tallinn
  6. Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008) 0.01
    0.0058615496 = product of:
      0.017584648 = sum of:
        0.017584648 = product of:
          0.035169296 = sum of:
            0.035169296 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035169296 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Pages
    S.14-22
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  7. Wesch, M.: Information R/evolution (2006) 0.01
    0.0058026384 = product of:
      0.017407915 = sum of:
        0.017407915 = product of:
          0.03481583 = sum of:
            0.03481583 = weight(_text_:22 in 1267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03481583 = score(doc=1267,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1267, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1267)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    5. 1.2008 19:22:48
  8. Macgregor, G.; McCulloch, E.: Collaborative tagging as a knowledge organisation and resource discovery tool (2006) 0.01
    0.005258995 = product of:
      0.015776984 = sum of:
        0.015776984 = product of:
          0.03155397 = sum of:
            0.03155397 = weight(_text_:digital in 764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03155397 = score(doc=764,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.21790776 = fieldWeight in 764, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=764)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of the paper is to provide an overview of the collaborative tagging phenomenon and explore some of the reasons for its emergence. Design/methodology/approach - The paper reviews the related literature and discusses some of the problems associated with, and the potential of, collaborative tagging approaches for knowledge organisation and general resource discovery. A definition of controlled vocabularies is proposed and used to assess the efficacy of collaborative tagging. An exposition of the collaborative tagging model is provided and a review of the major contributions to the tagging literature is presented. Findings - There are numerous difficulties with collaborative tagging systems (e.g. low precision, lack of collocation, etc.) that originate from the absence of properties that characterise controlled vocabularies. However, such systems can not be dismissed. Librarians and information professionals have lessons to learn from the interactive and social aspects exemplified by collaborative tagging systems, as well as their success in engaging users with information management. The future co-existence of controlled vocabularies and collaborative tagging is predicted, with each appropriate for use within distinct information contexts: formal and informal. Research limitations/implications - Librarians and information professional researchers should be playing a leading role in research aimed at assessing the efficacy of collaborative tagging in relation to information storage, organisation, and retrieval, and to influence the future development of collaborative tagging systems. Practical implications - The paper indicates clear areas where digital libraries and repositories could innovate in order to better engage users with information. Originality/value - At time of writing there were no literature reviews summarising the main contributions to the collaborative tagging research or debate.
  9. Morrison, P.J.: Tagging and searching : search retrieval effectiveness of folksonomies on the World Wide Web (2008) 0.00
    0.0049736896 = product of:
      0.014921068 = sum of:
        0.014921068 = product of:
          0.029842136 = sum of:
            0.029842136 = weight(_text_:22 in 2109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029842136 = score(doc=2109,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2109, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2109)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    1. 8.2008 12:39:22
  10. Kim, H.L.; Scerri, S.; Breslin, J.G.; Decker, S.; Kim, H.G.: ¬The state of the art in tag ontologies : a semantic model for tagging and folksonomies (2008) 0.00
    0.0041447417 = product of:
      0.012434225 = sum of:
        0.012434225 = product of:
          0.02486845 = sum of:
            0.02486845 = weight(_text_:22 in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02486845 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  11. Braun, M.: Lesezeichen zum Stöbern : "Social bookmark"-Seiten setzen auf die Empfehlungen ihrer Nutzer (2007) 0.00
    0.0033157931 = product of:
      0.009947379 = sum of:
        0.009947379 = product of:
          0.019894758 = sum of:
            0.019894758 = weight(_text_:22 in 3373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019894758 = score(doc=3373,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3373, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3373)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22