Search (81 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Informationsmittel"
  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Hill, L.L.; Zheng, Q.: Indirect geospatial referencing through place names in the digital library : Alexandra digital library experience with developing and implementing gazetteers (1999) 0.03
    0.03405319 = product of:
      0.102159575 = sum of:
        0.102159575 = sum of:
          0.07729112 = weight(_text_:digital in 6543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07729112 = score(doc=6543,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03670994 = queryNorm
              0.5337628 = fieldWeight in 6543, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6543)
          0.02486845 = weight(_text_:22 in 6543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02486845 = score(doc=6543,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03670994 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 6543, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6543)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    All types of information can be referenced to a geographic place. Maps, aerial photographs, and remote sensing images are spatially georeferenced. Other forms of information such as books, articles, research papers, pieces of music, and art are often linked to a geographic location through place names (geographic names). A gazetteer (a dictionary of geographic names) that is spatially referenced itself provides the bridge between these two types of georeferencing. With a georeferenced gazetteer translation service, a user can start with a geographic name and find information that is described with either geographic names or with geospatial coordinates. Use of this powerful indirect geospatially referencing tool can be applied as a common approach to libraries, bibliographic files, data centers, web resources, and museum and specimen collections and can be particular useful across language barriers since latitude and longitude coordinates are universally understood. The Alexandria Digital Library has implemented a gazetteer component for its georeferenced digital library. This experience resulted in the creation of a Gazetteer Content Standard, a Feature Type Thesaurus, and an operational interactive gazetteer service. This paper describes the development of these components and illustrates the use of this tool in a georeferenced digital library. It also relates progress in working with Federal agencies and others toward developing shareable gazetteer data through Digital Gazetteer Information Exchange programs
    Date
    29. 9.2001 20:22:45
  2. Tenopir, C.; Ennis, L.: ¬The digital reference work of academic libraries (1998) 0.03
    0.031137526 = product of:
      0.09341258 = sum of:
        0.09341258 = sum of:
          0.04417556 = weight(_text_:digital in 5170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04417556 = score(doc=5170,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03670994 = queryNorm
              0.30507088 = fieldWeight in 5170, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5170)
          0.049237017 = weight(_text_:22 in 5170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049237017 = score(doc=5170,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03670994 = queryNorm
              0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5170, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5170)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.4, S.22-28
  3. Okoli, C.; Mehdi, M.; Mesgari, M.; Nielsen, F.A.; Lanamäki, A.: Wikipedia in the eyes of its beholders : a systematic review of scholarly research on Wikipedia readers and readership (2014) 0.02
    0.022568969 = product of:
      0.067706905 = sum of:
        0.067706905 = sum of:
          0.037864767 = weight(_text_:digital in 1540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037864767 = score(doc=1540,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03670994 = queryNorm
              0.26148933 = fieldWeight in 1540, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1540)
          0.029842136 = weight(_text_:22 in 1540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029842136 = score(doc=1540,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03670994 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1540, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1540)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Hundreds of scholarly studies have investigated various aspects of Wikipedia. Although a number of literature reviews have provided overviews of this vast body of research, none has specifically focused on the readers of Wikipedia and issues concerning its readership. In this systematic literature review, we review 99 studies to synthesize current knowledge regarding the readership of Wikipedia and provide an analysis of research methods employed. The scholarly research has found that Wikipedia is popular not only for lighter topics such as entertainment but also for more serious topics such as health and legal information. Scholars, librarians, and students are common users, and Wikipedia provides a unique opportunity for educating students in digital literacy. We conclude with a summary of key findings, implications for researchers, and implications for the Wikipedia community.
    Date
    18.11.2014 13:22:03
  4. Chen, C.: Global access to Library of Congress' digital resources : National Digital Library and Internet resources (1996) 0.02
    0.018217696 = product of:
      0.054653086 = sum of:
        0.054653086 = product of:
          0.10930617 = sum of:
            0.10930617 = weight(_text_:digital in 6370) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10930617 = score(doc=6370,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.7548547 = fieldWeight in 6370, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6370)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Based on the Library of Congress's own formal and informal publications and flyers, summarizes how its digital collections can be assessed globally via the Internet and the WWW
  5. Lipow, A.G.: ¬The virtual reference librarian's handbook (2003) 0.02
    0.015904214 = product of:
      0.04771264 = sum of:
        0.04771264 = sum of:
          0.035278413 = weight(_text_:digital in 3992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035278413 = score(doc=3992,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03670994 = queryNorm
              0.2436283 = fieldWeight in 3992, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3992)
          0.012434225 = weight(_text_:22 in 3992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.012434225 = score(doc=3992,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03670994 = queryNorm
              0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 3992, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3992)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2004 14:46:50
    Footnote
    Rez. in BuB 56(2004) H.3: "Auskunfts- und Informationsdienst wird in den USA als unverzichtbare und wohl wichtigste bibliothekarische Tätigkeit betrachtet. Daher verwundert nicht, dass die Popularisierung des Internet Bibliothekare und Bibliotheken frühzeitig dazu veranlasst hat, ihre Auskunftsdienstleistungen im Web anzubieten. Dies geschah zunächst durch organisierte Auskunft per E-Mail, später per Webformular und vor allem seit 2000/2001 verstärkt per Chat. Als zusammenfassende Bezeichnung für diese Varianten wird meist der Begriff digital reference verwendet. In den USA, aber auch in Australien, Großbritannien oder Skandinavien schenkt man dem Thema Digital Reference schon seit mehreren Jahren größte Aufmerksamkeit. Die Zahl der bislang dazu publizierten Fachaufsätze lag Ende 2003 bereits weit über 600, jährlich im November findet seit 1999 die »Digital Reference Conference« statt, und mit DIG_REF sowie LiveReference existieren zwei Diskussionslisten, die sich ausschließlich mit Fragen bibliothekarischer Auskunft im Internet beschäftigen. Im vergangenen Jahr sind in den USA allein vier umfangreiche Monographien zu Digital Reference erschienen, darunter das hier zu besprechende Werk von Anne Lipow. ... Gegenwärtig deutet sich an, dass das Thema Digital Reference, Online-Auskunft oder Auskunft per Chat in deutschen Bibliotheken auf mehr Interesse stößt als in den vergangenen Jahren. Nachdem bislang vorwiegend (einige wenige) wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken ChatAuskunft anbieten, haben mehrere Öffentliche Bibliotheken, darunter die ZLB Berlin und die Stadtbücherei Frankfurt am Main, angekündigt, zukünftig auchAuskunftperChatanbieten zu wollen. Eine wichtige Rolle spielt in diesem Zusammenhang der weltweite Auskunftsverbund QuestionPoint, der von OCLC gemeinsam mit der Library of Congress betrieben wird. Sowohl denjenigen, die sich noch im Unklaren sind, als auch jenen, die entsprechende Planungen bereits beschlossen haben, kann der Band von Anne Lipow nur wärmstens empfohlen werden." (H. Rösch)
  6. Digital library use : social practice in design and evaluation (2003) 0.02
    0.015458225 = product of:
      0.046374675 = sum of:
        0.046374675 = product of:
          0.09274935 = sum of:
            0.09274935 = weight(_text_:digital in 6121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09274935 = score(doc=6121,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.6405154 = fieldWeight in 6121, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6121)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 57(2006) no.8, S.1130-1132 (S.R. Tompson): "The editors of This text in MIT Press' Digital Libraries and Electronic Publishing series deliberately view digital libraries (DLs) as "sociotechnical systems" - "networks of technology. information. documents, people and practices''. They allow an additional definition of "sociotechnical" as "an analytical stance that privileges neither the social nor the technological and in which neither is reducible to the other". This is an important definition, as it is the foundation of the contributors' sociological approach to digital libraries, an approach not typical of the DL literature which still focuses "largely on the technology itself". Bishop et al. have two stated goals for this volume: 1. "... to inform police and professional practice in DLs with socially grounded understanding of DLs as part of a web of social relations and practices. 2. "... to perform technically informed social analysis of phenomena of interest to social scientists that are highlighted by digital libraries. specifically issues of work, groups, and knowledge"."
    Series
    Digital libraries and electronic publishing
  7. Encyclopædia Britannica 2003 : Ultmate Reference Suite (2002) 0.02
    0.015045978 = product of:
      0.045137934 = sum of:
        0.045137934 = sum of:
          0.025243176 = weight(_text_:digital in 2182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025243176 = score(doc=2182,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03670994 = queryNorm
              0.17432621 = fieldWeight in 2182, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2182)
          0.019894758 = weight(_text_:22 in 2182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.019894758 = score(doc=2182,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03670994 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2182, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2182)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: c't 2002, H.23, S.229 (T.J. Schult): "Mac-Anwender hatten bisher keine große Auswahl bei Multimedia-Enzyklopädien: entweder ein grottenschlechtes Kosmos Kompaktwissen, das dieses Jahr letztmalig erscheinen soll und sich dabei als Systhema Universallexikon tarnt. Oder ein Brockhaus in Text und Bild mit exzellenten Texten, aber flauer Medienausstattung. Die von Acclaim in Deutschland vertriebenen Britannica-Enzyklopädien stellen eine ausgezeichnete Alternative für den des Englischen Kundigen dar. Während früher nur Einfach-Britannicas auf dem Mac liefen, gilt dies nun für alle drei Versionen Student, Deluxe und Ultimate Reference Suite. Die Suite enthält dabei nicht nur alle 75 000 Artikel der 32 Britannica-Bände, sondern auch die 15 000 der Student Encyclopaedia, eines eigenen Schülerlexikons, das durch sein einfaches Englisch gerade für Nicht-Muttersprachler als Einstieg taugt. Wer es noch elementarer haben möchte, klickt sich zur Britannica Elementary Encyclopaedia, welche unter der gleichen Oberfläche wie die anderen Werke zugänglich ist. Schließlich umfasst die Suite einen Weltatlas sowie einsprachige Wörterbücher und Thesauri von Merriam-Webster in der Collegiate- und Student-Ausbaustufe mit allein 555 000 Definitionen, Synonymen und Antonymen. Wer viel in englischer Sprache recherchiert oder gar schreibt, leckt sich angesichts dieses Angebots (EUR 99,95) die Finger, zumal die Printausgabe gut 1600 Euro kostet. Die Texte sind einfach kolossal - allein das Inhaltsverzeichnis des Artikels Germany füllt sieben Bildschirmseiten. Schon die Inhalte aus den BritannicaBänden bieten mehr als doppelt so viel Text wie die rund tausend Euro kostende Brockhaus Enzyklopädie digital (c't 22/02, S. 38). Allein die 220 000 thematisch einsortierten Web-Links sind das Geld wert. Wer die 2,4 Gigabyte belegende Komplettinstallation wählt, muss sogar nie mehr die DVD (alternativ vier CD-ROMs) einlegen. Dieses Jahr muss sich niemand mehr mit dem Britannica-typischen Kuddelmuddel aus Lexikonartikeln und vielen, vielen Jahrbüchern herumschlagen - außer dem Basistext der drei Enzyklopädien sind 'nur' die zwei Jahrbücher 2001 und 2002 getrennt aufgeführt. Wer des Englischen mächtig ist, mag hier die gute Gelegenheit zum Kauf nutzen."
  8. Nicholas, D.; Huntingdon, P.; Williams, P.: Evaluating digital platforms, services, channels and sites professionally (2003) 0.01
    0.014725188 = product of:
      0.04417556 = sum of:
        0.04417556 = product of:
          0.08835112 = sum of:
            0.08835112 = weight(_text_:digital in 5903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08835112 = score(doc=5903,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.61014175 = fieldWeight in 5903, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5903)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  9. Creation, use, and deployment of digital information (2005) 0.01
    0.014111364 = product of:
      0.04233409 = sum of:
        0.04233409 = product of:
          0.08466818 = sum of:
            0.08466818 = weight(_text_:digital in 6120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08466818 = score(doc=6120,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.58470786 = fieldWeight in 6120, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6120)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 57(2006) no.12, S.1709-1710 (Y. Awazu): "This hook presents a collection of research studies on the creation, use, and deployment of digital information. According to the editors, the goal of the book is "to present results of scientific research on (I) how digital information has to be designed, (2) how artifacts or systems containing digital content should maximize usability, and (3) how context can influence the nature and efficiency of digital communication" (p. 2). Contributors to this volume have a wide assortment of backgrounds in information science, classical studies, cognitive science, information systems, and organizational sciences. The editors did an excellent job in designing the book. Each chapter is unique in its theory and method. The editors successfully put these unique chapters into the life-cycle view of information: creation, use, and deployment. . . . I would highly recommend this book as a supplementary text for graduate classes in information science, especially those dealing with the design of information systems. It was a pleasure to read this book, and I believe that readers will certainly gain from the wealth of knowledge and insights contained in the volume."
  10. Lin, Z.Y.: Classification practice and implications for subject directories of the Chinese language Web-based digital library (2000) 0.01
    0.012621589 = product of:
      0.037864767 = sum of:
        0.037864767 = product of:
          0.075729534 = sum of:
            0.075729534 = weight(_text_:digital in 3438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.075729534 = score(doc=3438,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.52297866 = fieldWeight in 3438, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3438)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  11. Lunenfeld, P.: Snap to grid : a user's guide to digital arts, media, and cultures (2000) 0.01
    0.012621589 = product of:
      0.037864767 = sum of:
        0.037864767 = product of:
          0.075729534 = sum of:
            0.075729534 = weight(_text_:digital in 5065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.075729534 = score(doc=5065,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.52297866 = fieldWeight in 5065, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5065)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  12. Libraries and electronic resources : new partnerships, new practices, new perspectives (2002) 0.01
    0.011899749 = product of:
      0.035699245 = sum of:
        0.035699245 = product of:
          0.07139849 = sum of:
            0.07139849 = weight(_text_:digital in 6962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07139849 = score(doc=6962,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.493069 = fieldWeight in 6962, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6962)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    As the Internet adds new dimensions to the relationship between information and user, digital libraries face new challenges in managing electronic resources. Libraries and Electronic Resources: New Partnerships, New Practices, New Perspectives addresses challenges and new roles for libraries in creating innovative models of scholarly communication, establishing standards for ebook publishing, influencing consortial site licensing an a global basis, and enhancing access to digital collections.
  13. Rowley, J.: Current awareness in an electronic age (1998) 0.01
    0.011723099 = product of:
      0.035169296 = sum of:
        0.035169296 = product of:
          0.07033859 = sum of:
            0.07033859 = weight(_text_:22 in 183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07033859 = score(doc=183,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 183, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=183)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 17:50:37
    Source
    Online and CD-ROM review. 22(1998) no.4, S.277-279
  14. MacLeod, R.: Promoting a subject gateway : a case study from EEVL (Edinburgh Engineering Virtual Library) (2000) 0.01
    0.011723099 = product of:
      0.035169296 = sum of:
        0.035169296 = product of:
          0.07033859 = sum of:
            0.07033859 = weight(_text_:22 in 4872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07033859 = score(doc=4872,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4872, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4872)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:40:22
  15. Subject gateways (2000) 0.01
    0.011605277 = product of:
      0.03481583 = sum of:
        0.03481583 = product of:
          0.06963166 = sum of:
            0.06963166 = weight(_text_:22 in 6483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06963166 = score(doc=6483,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6483, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6483)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:43:01
  16. Janes, J.: Introduction to reference work in the digital age. (2003) 0.01
    0.010930616 = product of:
      0.03279185 = sum of:
        0.03279185 = product of:
          0.0655837 = sum of:
            0.0655837 = weight(_text_:digital in 3993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0655837 = score(doc=3993,freq=54.0), product of:
                0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.45291278 = fieldWeight in 3993, product of:
                  7.3484693 = tf(freq=54.0), with freq of:
                    54.0 = termFreq=54.0
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3993)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 56(2005) no.11, S.1237-1238 (E. Yakel): "This book provides the profession with a cogent, thorough, and thoughtful introduction to digital reference. Janes not only provides the breadth of coverage expected in an introduction, but also depth into this important topic. Janes' approach is managerial or administrative, providing guidelines for reference work that can be applied in different settings. Janes creates a decision-making framework to help reference librarians make decisions concerning how, to what extent, and in what cases digital reference services will be delivered. In this way, Janes avoids dictating a "one-size-fits-all" model. This approach is the major strength of the book. Library administrators and heads of reference services will find the administrative approach welcome by helping them think through which digital reference policies and methods will best target core constituencies and their institutional environments. However, the book deserves a broader audience as professors will find that the book fits nicely in a general reference course. For all readers, the book is readable and engaging and also challenging and questioning. The book begins with a history of reference work, nicely positioning digital reference in this tradition and noting the changes wrought by the digital age. By doing this, the author establishes both continuity and change in reference work as well as the values surrounding this activity. These values are largely those from the library community and Support people's access to information as well as activities that support the use of information. Janes closes this chapter by noting that the continuing changes in demographics, technology, and connectivity will impact reference work in ways that are not yet imaginable. This introduction sets the tone for the rest of the book. Janes defines digital reference service as "the use of digital technologies and resources to provide direct, professional assistance to people who are seeking information, wherever and whenever they need it" (p. 29). This definition covers a lot of ground. Examples include everything from a public library answering email queries to commercial ask-an-expert services. While the primary audience is librarians, Janes continually reminds readers that many others perform reference activities an the World Wide Web. Furthermore, he cautions readers that there are larger forces shaping this activity in the world that need to acknowledged. In building a framework for decision-making, Janes outlines the types of digital reference service. This discussion covers the communieations modes, such as e-mail, chat, Web forms, etc. It also analyzes the modalities by which reference service is delivered: synchronous/ asynchronous. Using these two dimensions (communication method and synchronous/asynchronous), Janes presents the variety of contexts in which digital reference can take place and then outlines the strengths and weaknesses of each of these. This translates into a decision-making framework by which readers analyze their particular setting and then select the modes and modalities that world be most effective. This is a powerful device and demonstrates the many options (and perhaps also the obstacles) for providing digital reference service.
    The discussion of modes for digital reference world be incomplete without focusing an the technologies that support this activity. E-mail, Web forms, chat, instant messaging, and videoconferencing, as well as the call center based software, are now being adapted for use in libraries. The book discusses the technologies currently available and an the horizon to support digital reference services. While these sections of the book may not age well, they will provide us with a historical glimpse of the nascent development of such tools and how they were used at the beginning of the digital reference age. True to the emphasis an decision-making, the chapter an technology includes a list of functions that reference librarians world want in software to support digital reference. While no current applications have all of these features, this list provides librarians with some ideas concerning possible features that can be prioritized to aid in a selection process. Despite the emphasis an technology, Janes contextualizes this discussion with several significant issues relating to its implementation. These include everything from infrastructure, collaborative service standards, service design, user authentication, and user expectations. The sections an collaborative service models and service design are particularly interesting since they are both in their infancy. Readers wanting an answer or the "best" design of either institutional or collaborative digital reference service will be disappointed. However, raising these considerations is important and Janes points out how crucial these issues will be as online reference service matures. User authentication in the context of reference service is especially tricky since tensions can emerge between license agreements and the range of people who may or may not be covered by these contracts querying reference librarians. Finally, no discussion of digital reference is complete without a discussion of the possibility of 24/7 reference service and the ensuing user expectations. While Janes has no answers to the dilemmas these raise, he does alert libraries providing digital reference services to some of the realities. One is that libraries will get a broader range of questions, which could impact staff time, collection development to support these questions, and necessitate either a confirmation of priorities or a reprioritization of activities. Another reality is that the users of digital reference services may never have partaken of their services before. In fact, for libraries funded to serve a particular constituency (public libraries, academic libraries) this influx of users raises questions about levels of service, funding, and policy. Finally, in keeping with the underlying theme of values that pervades the book, Janes points out the deeper issues related to technology such as increasing ability to track users an the web. While he realizes that anonymous information about those who ask reference questions world provide reference librarians with a great deal of information to hone services and better serve constituencies, he is well aware of the dangers involved in collectiog patron information in electronic form.
    Given that the Web is constantly changing, Janes turns bis focus to the future of digital reference. Topics include changes in reference practice, restructuring resource utilization, and the evolving reference interview. These are crucial dimensions of digital reference practice that require attention. The most intriguing of these is the changing nature of the interaction with the patron. The majority of digital reference takes place without physical, aural, or visual eines to gauge understanding or to sense conclusion of the interaction. While Janes provides some guidelines for both digital reference interviewing and Web forms, he honestly admits that reference interviewing in the technologically mediated environment requires additional study in both the asynchronous and particularly synchronous communication modalities. As previously noted, Janes is as concerned about developing the infrastructure for digital reference, as he is about the service itself. By infrastructure, Janes means not only the technological infrastructure, but also the people and the institution. In discussing the need for institutionalization of digital reference, he discusses (re)training reference staff, staffing models, and institutionalizing the service. The section an institutionalizing the service itself is particularly strong and presents a 10-step planning process for libraries to follow as they consider developing online services. The book ends with some final thoughts and exhortations to the readers. The author, as in the rest of the book, encourages experimentation, innovation, and risk taking. These are not characteristics that are automatically associated with librarians, but these qualities are not alien to readers either. The theme of planning and the value of connecting people with information pervade this chapter. In this closing, Janes subtly tells readers that his guidelines and proposals are just that-there is no magic bullet here. But he does argue that there has been good work done and some models that can be adopted, adapted, and improved (and then hopefully shared with others). In the end, Janes leaves readers with a feeling that there is a place for library reference service in the digital realm. Furthermore, he is convinced that the knowledge and skills of reference librarians are translatable into this arena. By focusing an the institutionalization of digital reference services, Janes is trying to get libraries to better position themselves in the virtual world, beside the commercial services and the plethora of Web-based information competing for the patrons' attention."
  17. Pack, T.: Digital circles of knowledge (1995) 0.01
    0.01051799 = product of:
      0.03155397 = sum of:
        0.03155397 = product of:
          0.06310794 = sum of:
            0.06310794 = weight(_text_:digital in 4171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06310794 = score(doc=4171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.4358155 = fieldWeight in 4171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4171)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  18. Pack, T.: Electronic worlds : a word lover's guide to digital dictionaries, thesauri, and other cyberplaces (1996) 0.01
    0.01051799 = product of:
      0.03155397 = sum of:
        0.03155397 = product of:
          0.06310794 = sum of:
            0.06310794 = weight(_text_:digital in 4957) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06310794 = score(doc=4957,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.4358155 = fieldWeight in 4957, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4957)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  19. Donaldson, B.; Barrett, H.: Adapting directories to CD-ROM (1996) 0.01
    0.01051799 = product of:
      0.03155397 = sum of:
        0.03155397 = product of:
          0.06310794 = sum of:
            0.06310794 = weight(_text_:digital in 7283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06310794 = score(doc=7283,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.4358155 = fieldWeight in 7283, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7283)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Digital publishing strategies. 1(1996) no.4, S.6-7
  20. Facts behind the Web sites making news (1997) 0.01
    0.01051799 = product of:
      0.03155397 = sum of:
        0.03155397 = product of:
          0.06310794 = sum of:
            0.06310794 = weight(_text_:digital in 960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06310794 = score(doc=960,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.4358155 = fieldWeight in 960, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=960)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Digital publishing strategies. 2(1997) no.4, S.12-13

Years

Types

  • a 65
  • m 10
  • s 6
  • el 5
  • i 3
  • More… Less…