Search (36 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  1. Ullah, A.; Khusro, S.; Ullah, I.: Bibliographic classification in the digital age : current trends & future directions (2017) 0.01
    0.014725188 = product of:
      0.04417556 = sum of:
        0.04417556 = product of:
          0.08835112 = sum of:
            0.08835112 = weight(_text_:digital in 5717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08835112 = score(doc=5717,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.61014175 = fieldWeight in 5717, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5717)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliographic classification is among the core activities of Library & Information Science that brings order and proper management to the holdings of a library. Compared to printed media, digital collections present numerous challenges regarding their preservation, curation, organization and resource discovery & access. Therefore, true native perspective is needed to be adopted for bibliographic classification in digital environments. In this research article, we have investigated and reported different approaches to bibliographic classification of digital collections. The article also contributes two evaluation frameworks that evaluate the existing classification schemes and systems. The article presents a bird's-eye view for researchers in reaching a generalized and holistic approach towards bibliographic classification research, where new research avenues have been identified.
  2. Broughton, V.: Faceted classification as a basis for knowledge organization in a digital environment : the Bliss Bibliographic Classification as a model for vocabulary management and the creation of multidimensional knowledge structures (2003) 0.01
    0.012621589 = product of:
      0.037864767 = sum of:
        0.037864767 = product of:
          0.075729534 = sum of:
            0.075729534 = weight(_text_:digital in 2631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.075729534 = score(doc=2631,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.52297866 = fieldWeight in 2631, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2631)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The paper examines the way in which classification schemes can be applied to the organization of digital resources. The case is argued for the particular suitability of schemes based an faceted principles for the organization of complex digital objects. Details are given of a co-operative project between the School of Library Archive & Information Studies, University College London, and the United Kingdom Higher Education gateways Arts and Humanities Data Service and Humbul, in which a faceted knowledge structure is being developed for the indexing and display of digital materials within a new combined humanities portal.
  3. Bragato Barros, T.H.; Libonati Gomes, D.: Classification and knowledge organization systems : ontologies and archival classification (2018) 0.01
    0.011899749 = product of:
      0.035699245 = sum of:
        0.035699245 = product of:
          0.07139849 = sum of:
            0.07139849 = weight(_text_:digital in 4715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07139849 = score(doc=4715,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.493069 = fieldWeight in 4715, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4715)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
  4. Gnoli, C.; Ledl, A.; Park, Z.; Trzmielewski, M.: Phenomenon-based vs. disciplinary classification : possibilities for evaluating and for mapping (2018) 0.01
    0.011899749 = product of:
      0.035699245 = sum of:
        0.035699245 = product of:
          0.07139849 = sum of:
            0.07139849 = weight(_text_:digital in 4804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07139849 = score(doc=4804,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.493069 = fieldWeight in 4804, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4804)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
  5. Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999) 0.01
    0.009947379 = product of:
      0.029842136 = sum of:
        0.029842136 = product of:
          0.059684273 = sum of:
            0.059684273 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059684273 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  6. Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999) 0.01
    0.009947379 = product of:
      0.029842136 = sum of:
        0.029842136 = product of:
          0.059684273 = sum of:
            0.059684273 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059684273 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  7. Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017) 0.01
    0.009947379 = product of:
      0.029842136 = sum of:
        0.029842136 = product of:
          0.059684273 = sum of:
            0.059684273 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059684273 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    6. 5.2017 18:46:22
  8. Broughton, V.: Faceted classification as a basis for knowledge organization in a digital environment : the Bliss Bibliographic Classification as a model for vocabulary management and the creation of multi-dimensional knowledge structures (2001) 0.01
    0.009108848 = product of:
      0.027326543 = sum of:
        0.027326543 = product of:
          0.054653086 = sum of:
            0.054653086 = weight(_text_:digital in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054653086 = score(doc=5895,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.37742734 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Broughton is one of the key people working on the second edition of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification (BC2). Her article has a brief, informative history of facets, then discusses semantic vs. syntactic relationships, standard facets used by Ranganathan and the Classification Research Group, facet analysis and citation order, and how to build subject indexes out of faceted classifications, all with occasional reference to digital environments and hypertext, but never with any specifics. It concludes by saying of faceted classification that the "capacity which it has to create highly sophisticated structures for the accommodation of complex objects suggests that it is worth investigation as an organizational tool for digital materials, and that the results of such investigation would be knowledge structures of unparalleled utility and elegance." How to build them is left to the reader, but this article provides an excellent starting point. It includes an example that shows how general concepts can be applied to a small set of documents and subjects, and how terms can be adapted to suit the material and users
  9. Frické, M.: Logic and the organization of information (2012) 0.01
    0.00823163 = product of:
      0.024694888 = sum of:
        0.024694888 = product of:
          0.049389776 = sum of:
            0.049389776 = weight(_text_:digital in 1782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049389776 = score(doc=1782,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.3410796 = fieldWeight in 1782, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1782)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Logic and the Organization of Information closely examines the historical and contemporary methodologies used to catalogue information objects-books, ebooks, journals, articles, web pages, images, emails, podcasts and more-in the digital era. This book provides an in-depth technical background for digital librarianship, and covers a broad range of theoretical and practical topics including: classification theory, topic annotation, automatic clustering, generalized synonymy and concept indexing, distributed libraries, semantic web ontologies and Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS). It also analyzes the challenges facing today's information architects, and outlines a series of techniques for overcoming them. Logic and the Organization of Information is intended for practitioners and professionals working at a design level as a reference book for digital librarianship. Advanced-level students, researchers and academics studying information science, library science, digital libraries and computer science will also find this book invaluable.
    Content
    Digital unter: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3088-9.
  10. Furner, J.; Dunbar, A.W.: ¬The treatment of topics relating to people of mixed race in bibliographic classification schemes : a critical race-theoretic approach (2004) 0.01
    0.007362594 = product of:
      0.02208778 = sum of:
        0.02208778 = product of:
          0.04417556 = sum of:
            0.04417556 = weight(_text_:digital in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04417556 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.30507088 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The classification of documents about topics relating to people of mixed race is problematic, partly because of the obscurity of racial categorization in general, and partly because of the limitations and inherent biases of bibliographic classification schemes designed primarily for usage in non-digital environments. Critical race theory is an approach that may prove useful in deterrnining how classification systems such as the Dewey Decimal Classification should most appropriately be stuctured.
  11. Grove, A.: Taxonomy (2009) 0.01
    0.007362594 = product of:
      0.02208778 = sum of:
        0.02208778 = product of:
          0.04417556 = sum of:
            0.04417556 = weight(_text_:digital in 3846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04417556 = score(doc=3846,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.30507088 = fieldWeight in 3846, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3846)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Digital unter: http://dx.doi.org/10.1081/E-ELIS3-120044405. Vgl.: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/book/10.1081/E-ELIS3.
  12. Connaway, L.S.; Sievert, M.C.: Comparison of three classification systems for information on health insurance (1996) 0.01
    0.0066315862 = product of:
      0.019894758 = sum of:
        0.019894758 = product of:
          0.039789516 = sum of:
            0.039789516 = weight(_text_:22 in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039789516 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 4.1997 21:10:19
  13. Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997) 0.01
    0.0066315862 = product of:
      0.019894758 = sum of:
        0.019894758 = product of:
          0.039789516 = sum of:
            0.039789516 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039789516 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
  14. Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006) 0.01
    0.0066315862 = product of:
      0.019894758 = sum of:
        0.019894758 = product of:
          0.039789516 = sum of:
            0.039789516 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039789516 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    27. 5.2007 22:19:35
  15. Lorenz, B.: Zur Theorie und Terminologie der bibliothekarischen Klassifikation (2018) 0.01
    0.0066315862 = product of:
      0.019894758 = sum of:
        0.019894758 = product of:
          0.039789516 = sum of:
            0.039789516 = weight(_text_:22 in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039789516 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Pages
    S.1-22
  16. Gnoli, C.: Naturalism vs pragmatism in knowledge organization (2004) 0.01
    0.0063107945 = product of:
      0.018932384 = sum of:
        0.018932384 = product of:
          0.037864767 = sum of:
            0.037864767 = weight(_text_:digital in 2663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037864767 = score(doc=2663,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.26148933 = fieldWeight in 2663, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2663)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Several authors remark that categories used in languages, including indexing ones, are affected by cultural biases, and do not reflect reality in an objective way. Hence knowledge organization would essentially be determined by pragmatic factors. However, human categories are connected with the structure of reality through biological bonds, and this allows for a naturalistic approach too. Naturalism has been adopted by Farradane in proposing relational categories, and by Dahlberg and the CRG in applying the theory of integrative levels to general classification schemes. The latter is especially relevant for possible developments in making the structure of schemes independent from disciplines, and in applying it to digital information retrieval.
  17. Beghtol, C.: Classification theory (2010) 0.01
    0.0063107945 = product of:
      0.018932384 = sum of:
        0.018932384 = product of:
          0.037864767 = sum of:
            0.037864767 = weight(_text_:digital in 3761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037864767 = score(doc=3761,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.26148933 = fieldWeight in 3761, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3761)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Digital unter: http://dx.doi.org/10.1081/E-ELIS3-120043230. Vgl.: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/book/10.1081/E-ELIS3.
  18. Winske, E.: ¬The development and structure of an urban, regional, and local documents classification scheme (1996) 0.01
    0.0058026384 = product of:
      0.017407915 = sum of:
        0.017407915 = product of:
          0.03481583 = sum of:
            0.03481583 = weight(_text_:22 in 7241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03481583 = score(doc=7241,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7241, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7241)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Paper presented at conference on 'Local documents, a new classification scheme' at the Research Caucus of the Florida Library Association Annual Conference, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 22 Apr 95
  19. Olson, H.A.: Sameness and difference : a cultural foundation of classification (2001) 0.01
    0.0058026384 = product of:
      0.017407915 = sum of:
        0.017407915 = product of:
          0.03481583 = sum of:
            0.03481583 = weight(_text_:22 in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03481583 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  20. Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017) 0.01
    0.0058026384 = product of:
      0.017407915 = sum of:
        0.017407915 = product of:
          0.03481583 = sum of:
            0.03481583 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03481583 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03670994 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Pages
    S.22-36