Search (411 results, page 1 of 21)

0.045137938 = product of:
  0.13541381 = sum of:
    0.13541381 = sum of:
      0.075729534 = weight(_text_:digital in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.075729534 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03670994 = queryNorm
          0.52297866 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
      0.059684273 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.059684273 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03670994 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

22. 9.2007 15:41:14

0.03761495 = product of:
  0.11284484 = sum of:
    0.11284484 = sum of:
      0.06310794 = weight(_text_:digital in 5846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06310794 = score(doc=5846,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03670994 = queryNorm
          0.4358155 = fieldWeight in 5846, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5846)
      0.0497369 = weight(_text_:22 in 5846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0497369 = score(doc=5846,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03670994 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5846, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5846)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Die u.a. von Bill Gates, Microsoft, Accenture und der Rockefeller Foundation finanzierte "Digital Identity Alliance" will digitale Impfnachweise mit einer globalen biometrischen digitalen Identität verbinden, die auf Lebenszeit besteht.

Date

4. 5.2020 17:22:40

0.03706267 = product of:
  0.11118801 = sum of:
    0.11118801 = sum of:
      0.07139849 = weight(_text_:digital in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07139849 = score(doc=541,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03670994 = queryNorm
          0.493069 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
      0.039789516 = weight(_text_:22 in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.039789516 = score(doc=541,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03670994 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

In this presentation, we therefore focus on a solution for providing uniform access to Digital Libraries and other online services. In order to enable uniform query access to heterogeneous sources, we must provide metadata interoperability in a way that a query language - in this case SPARQL - can cope with the incompatibility of the metadata in various sources without changing their already existing information models.

Date

26.12.2011 13:22:46

0.034279343 = product of:
  0.102838024 = sum of:
    0.102838024 = product of:
      0.30851406 = sum of:
        0.30851406 = weight(_text_:c3 in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30851406 = score(doc=31,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35795778 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03670994 = queryNorm
            0.8618728 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Content

"Mit Beginn des Jahres 2021 wird der umfassende internationale Informationsservice zbMATH in eine Open Access-Plattform überführt. Dann steht dieser bislang kostenpflichtige Dienst weltweit allen Interessierten kostenfrei zur Verfügung. Die Änderung des Geschäftsmodells ermöglicht, die meisten Informationen und Daten von zbMATH für Forschungszwecke und zur Verknüpfung mit anderen nicht-kommerziellen Diensten frei zu nutzen, siehe: https://www.mathematik.de/dmv-blog/2772-transformation-von-zbmath-zu-einer-open-access-plattform-f%C3%BCr-die-mathematik-kurz-vor-dem-abschluss."

0.032391734 = product of:
  0.097175196 = sum of:
    0.097175196 = product of:
      0.29152557 = sum of:
        0.29152557 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.29152557 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31122726 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03670994 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja

0.031808615 = product of:
  0.09542584 = sum of:
    0.09542584 = sum of:
      0.0655837 = weight(_text_:digital in 2322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0655837 = score(doc=2322,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03670994 = queryNorm
          0.4529128 = fieldWeight in 2322, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2322)
      0.029842136 = weight(_text_:22 in 2322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.029842136 = score(doc=2322,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03670994 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2322, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2322)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

The report reflects the Latvian scenario in co-operation for standardization of memory institutions. Differences and problems as well as benefits and possible solutions, tasks and activities of Standardization Technical Committee for Archives, Libraries and Museums Work (MABSTK) are analysed. Map of standards as a vision for ALM collaboration in standardization and "Digitizer's Handbook" (translated in English) prepared by the Competence Centre for Digitization of the National Library of Latvia (NLL) are presented. Shortcut to building the National Digital Library Letonica and its digital architecture (with pilot project about the Latvian composer Jazeps Vitols and the digital collection of expresident of Latvia Vaira Vike-Freiberga) reflects the practical co-operation between different players.

Date

26.12.2011 13:33:22

0.030091956 = product of:
  0.09027587 = sum of:
    0.09027587 = sum of:
      0.050486352 = weight(_text_:digital in 3481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.050486352 = score(doc=3481,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03670994 = queryNorm
          0.34865242 = fieldWeight in 3481, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3481)
      0.039789516 = weight(_text_:22 in 3481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.039789516 = score(doc=3481,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03670994 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3481, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3481)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Komplette Textsubstanz aller 30 Bände + Zusatz- und Quellentexte mit nahezu demselben Umfang wie die Brockhaus Enzyklopädie Umfassende Recherchemöglichkeiten, einschließlich natürlichsprachlicher Suchhilfe Frei dreh- und zoombarer 3-D-Globus mit mehr als 2 Millionen geografischen Karteneinträgen 25000 Bilder und Zugang zur Bilddatenbank der dpa mit mehr als 2 Millionen Bildern 280 Videos, 140 Animationen, 6000 Audios, 22 000 kommentierte Weblinks u.v. m. Zugriff auf die Brockhaus Enzyklopädie Online (auch per minibrowserfähigem PDA, Smartphone oder Pocket-PC*), kostenlos bis 31.12.2010 1 USB-Memory-Stick in Docking-Station Für Windows

0.030091956 = product of:
  0.09027587 = sum of:
    0.09027587 = sum of:
      0.050486352 = weight(_text_:digital in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.050486352 = score(doc=318,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03670994 = queryNorm
          0.34865242 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
      0.039789516 = weight(_text_:22 in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.039789516 = score(doc=318,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03670994 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

In der Session "Knowledge Representation" auf der ISI 2021 wurden unter der Moderation von Jürgen Reischer (Uni Regensburg) drei Projekte vorgestellt, in denen Knowledge Representation mit RDF umgesetzt wird. Die Domänen sind erfreulich unterschiedlich, die gemeinsame Klammer indes ist die Absicht, den Zugang zu Forschungsdaten zu verbessern: - Japanese Visual Media Graph - Taxonomy of Digital Research Activities in the Humanities - Forschungsdaten im konzeptuellen Modell von FRBR

Date

22. 5.2021 12:43:05

0.029325463 = product of:
  0.08797639 = sum of:
    0.08797639 = sum of:
      0.06310794 = weight(_text_:digital in 3200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06310794 = score(doc=3200,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03670994 = queryNorm
          0.4358155 = fieldWeight in 3200, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3200)
      0.02486845 = weight(_text_:22 in 3200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02486845 = score(doc=3200,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03670994 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3200, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3200)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

This paper builds on the findings of a workshop held at the 2015 International Conference on Digital Preservation (iPRES), entitled, "Using Open-Source Tools to Fulfill Digital Preservation Requirements" (OSS4PRES hereafter). This day-long workshop brought together participants from across the library and archives community, including practitioners proprietary vendors, and representatives from open-source projects. The resulting conversations were surprisingly revealing: while OSS' significance within the preservation landscape was made clear, participants noted that there are a number of roadblocks that discourage or altogether prevent its use in many organizations. Overcoming these challenges will be necessary to further widespread, sustainable OSS adoption within the digital preservation community. This article will mine the rich discussions that took place at OSS4PRES to (1) summarize the workshop's key themes and major points of debate, (2) provide a comprehensive analysis of the opportunities, gaps, and challenges that using OSS entails at a philosophical, institutional, and individual level, and (3) offer a tangible set of recommendations for future work designed to broaden community engagement and enhance the sustainability of open source initiatives, drawing on both participants' experience as well as additional research.

Date

28.10.2016 18:22:33

0.02668931 = product of:
  0.080067925 = sum of:
    0.080067925 = sum of:
      0.037864767 = weight(_text_:digital in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.037864767 = score(doc=1967,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03670994 = queryNorm
          0.26148933 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
      0.04220316 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04220316 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03670994 = queryNorm
          0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.

Source

Beyond libraries - subject metadata in the digital environment and semantic web. IFLA Satellite Post-Conference, 17-18 August 2012, Tallinn

0.025913386 = product of:
  0.077740155 = sum of:
    0.077740155 = product of:
      0.23322046 = sum of:
        0.23322046 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23322046 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31122726 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03670994 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H

0.022568969 = product of:
  0.067706905 = sum of:
    0.067706905 = sum of:
      0.037864767 = weight(_text_:digital in 718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.037864767 = score(doc=718,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03670994 = queryNorm
          0.26148933 = fieldWeight in 718, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=718)
      0.029842136 = weight(_text_:22 in 718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.029842136 = score(doc=718,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03670994 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 718, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=718)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Mark Stapleton and Matt Adamson began their presentation by describing how Dow Jones' Factiva range of information services processed an average of 170,000 documents every day, drawn from over 10,000 sources in 22 languages. These documents are categorized within five facets: Company, Subject, Industry, Region and Language. The digital feeds received from information providers undergo a series of processing stages, initially to prepare them for automatic categorization and then to format them ready for distribution. The categorization stage is able to handle 98% of documents automatically, the remaining 2% requiring some form of human intervention. Depending on the source, categorization can involve any combination of 'Autocoding', 'Dictionary-based Categorizing', 'Rules-based Coding' or 'Manual Coding'

0.022568969 = product of:
  0.067706905 = sum of:
    0.067706905 = sum of:
      0.037864767 = weight(_text_:digital in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.037864767 = score(doc=2946,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03670994 = queryNorm
          0.26148933 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
      0.029842136 = weight(_text_:22 in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.029842136 = score(doc=2946,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03670994 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

The author revisits the development of RDA from its inception in 2005 through to its initial release in 2010. The development effort is set in the context of an evolving digital environment that was transforming both the production and dissemination of information resources and the technologies used to create, store, and access data describing those resources. The author examines the interplay between strategic commitments to align RDA with new conceptual models, emerging database structures, and metadata developments in allied communities, on the one hand, and compatibility with AACR2 legacy databases on the other. Aspects of the development effort examined include the structuring of RDA as a resource description language, organizing the new standard as a working tool, and refining guidelines and instructions for recording RDA data.

Date

17. 5.2016 19:22:40

0.022568969 = product of:
  0.067706905 = sum of:
    0.067706905 = sum of:
      0.037864767 = weight(_text_:digital in 3082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.037864767 = score(doc=3082,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03670994 = queryNorm
          0.26148933 = fieldWeight in 3082, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3082)
      0.029842136 = weight(_text_:22 in 3082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.029842136 = score(doc=3082,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03670994 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3082, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3082)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Pages

S.15-22

Source

Proceedings of the 15th European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems Workshop (NKOS 2016) co-located with the 20th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries 2016 (TPDL 2016), Hannover, Germany, September 9, 2016. Edi. by Philipp Mayr et al. [http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1676/=urn:nbn:de:0074-1676-5]

0.018531336 = product of:
  0.055594005 = sum of:
    0.055594005 = sum of:
      0.035699245 = weight(_text_:digital in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035699245 = score(doc=1236,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03670994 = queryNorm
          0.2465345 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
      0.019894758 = weight(_text_:22 in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.019894758 = score(doc=1236,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03670994 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Dublin Core is often presented as a modern form of catalog card -- a set of elements (and now qualifiers) that describe resources in a complete package. Sometimes it is proposed as an exchange format for sharing records among multiple collections. The founding principle that "every element is optional and repeatable" reinforces the notion that a Dublin Core description is to be taken as a whole. This paper, in contrast, is based on a much different premise: Dublin Core is a language. More precisely, it is a small language for making a particular class of statements about resources. Like natural languages, it has a vocabulary of word-like terms, the two classes of which -- elements and qualifiers -- function within statements like nouns and adjectives; and it has a syntax for arranging elements and qualifiers into statements according to a simple pattern. Whenever tourists order a meal or ask directions in an unfamiliar language, considerate native speakers will spontaneously limit themselves to basic words and simple sentence patterns along the lines of "I am so-and-so" or "This is such-and-such". Linguists call this pidginization. In such situations, a small phrase book or translated menu can be most helpful. By analogy, today's Web has been called an Internet Commons where users and information providers from a wide range of scientific, commercial, and social domains present their information in a variety of incompatible data models and description languages. In this context, Dublin Core presents itself as a metadata pidgin for digital tourists who must find their way in this linguistically diverse landscape. Its vocabulary is small enough to learn quickly, and its basic pattern is easily grasped. It is well-suited to serve as an auxiliary language for digital libraries. This grammar starts by defining terms. It then follows a 200-year-old tradition of English grammar teaching by focusing on the structure of single statements. It concludes by looking at the growing dictionary of Dublin Core vocabulary terms -- its registry, and at how statements can be used to build the metadata equivalent of paragraphs and compositions -- the application profile.

Date

26.12.2011 14:01:22

0.018034598 = product of:
  0.05410379 = sum of:
    0.05410379 = product of:
      0.10820758 = sum of:
        0.10820758 = weight(_text_:digital in 48) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10820758 = score(doc=48,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03670994 = queryNorm
            0.74726796 = fieldWeight in 48, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=48)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

In this paper, we provide an introduction to the concept of digital object reuse and its various connotations in the context of current digital libraries, archives, and repositories. We will then propose a faceted categorization of the various types, contexts, and cases for digital object reuse in order to facilitate understanding and communication and to provide a conceptual framework for the assessment of digital object reuse by various cultural heritage and cultural memory organizations.

0.017849624 = product of:
  0.05354887 = sum of:
    0.05354887 = product of:
      0.10709774 = sum of:
        0.10709774 = weight(_text_:digital in 2345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10709774 = score(doc=2345,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03670994 = queryNorm
            0.7396035 = fieldWeight in 2345, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2345)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Footnote

Teil eines Themenheftes von: Journal of digital information. 4(2004) no.4.

0.016696792 = product of:
  0.050090376 = sum of:
    0.050090376 = product of:
      0.10018075 = sum of:
        0.10018075 = weight(_text_:digital in 468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10018075 = score(doc=468,freq=56.0), product of:
            0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03670994 = queryNorm
            0.6918357 = fieldWeight in 468, product of:
              7.483315 = tf(freq=56.0), with freq of:
                56.0 = termFreq=56.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=468)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Archival Information Systems (AIS) are becoming increasingly important. For decades, the amount of content created digitally is growing and its complete life cycle nowadays tends to remain digital. A selection of this content is expected to be of value for the future and can thus be considered being part of our cultural heritage. However, digital content poses many challenges for long-term or indefinite preservation, e.g. digital publications become increasingly complex by the embedding of different kinds of multimedia, data in arbitrary formats and software. As soon as these digital publications become obsolete, but are still deemed to be of value in the future, they have to be transferred smoothly into appropriate AIS where they need to be kept accessible even through changing technologies. The successful previous SDA workshop in 2011 showed: Both, the library and the archiving community have made valuable contributions to the management of huge amounts of knowledge and data. However, both are approaching this topic from different views which shall be brought together to cross-fertilize each other. There are promising combinations of pertinence and provenance models since those are traditionally the prevailing knowledge organization principles of the library and archiving community, respectively. Another scientific discipline providing promising technical solutions for knowledge representation and knowledge management is semantic technologies, which is supported by appropriate W3C recommendations and a large user community. At the forefront of making the semantic web a mature and applicable reality is the linked data initiative, which already has started to be adopted by the library community. It can be expected that using semantic (web) technologies in general and linked data in particular can mature the area of digital archiving as well as technologically tighten the natural bond between digital libraries and digital archives. Semantic representations of contextual knowledge about cultural heritage objects will enhance organization and access of data and knowledge. In order to achieve a comprehensive investigation, the information seeking and document triage behaviors of users (an area also classified under the field of Human Computer Interaction) will also be included in the research.
One of the major challenges of digital archiving is how to deal with changing technologies and changing user communities. On the one hand software, hardware and (multimedia) data formats that become obsolete and are not supported anymore still need to be kept accessible. On the other hand changing user communities necessitate technical means to formalize, detect and measure knowledge evolution. Furthermore, digital archival records are usually not deleted from the AIS and therefore, the amount of digitally archived (multimedia) content can be expected to grow rapidly. Therefore, efficient storage management solutions geared to the fact that cultural heritage is not as frequently accessed like up-to-date content residing in a digital library are required. Software and hardware needs to be tightly connected based on sophisticated knowledge representation and management models in order to face that challenge. In line with the above, contributions to the workshop should focus on, but are not limited to:
Semantic search & semantic information retrieval in digital archives and digital libraries Semantic multimedia archives Ontologies & linked data for digital archives and digital libraries Ontologies & linked data for multimedia archives Implementations and evaluations of semantic digital archives Visualization and exploration of digital content User interfaces for semantic digital libraries User interfaces for intelligent multimedia information retrieval User studies focusing on end-user needs and information seeking behavior of end-users Theoretical and practical archiving frameworks using Semantic (Web) technologies Logical theories for digital archives Semantic (Web) services implementing the OAIS standard Semantic or logical provenance models for digital archives or digital libraries Information integration/semantic ingest (e.g. from digital libraries) Trust for ingest and data security/integrity check for long-term storage of archival records Semantic extensions of emulation/virtualization methodologies tailored for digital archives Semantic long-term storage and hardware organization tailored for AIS Migration strategies based on Semantic (Web) technologies Knowledge evolution We expect new insights and results for sustainable technical solutions for digital archiving using knowledge management techniques based on semantic technologies. The workshop emphasizes interdisciplinarity and aims at an audience consisting of scientists and scholars from the digital library, digital archiving, multimedia technology and semantic web community, the information and library sciences, as well as, from the social sciences and (digital) humanities, in particular people working on the mentioned topics. We encourage end-users, practitioners and policy-makers from cultural heritage institutions to participate as well.

0.016214918 = product of:
  0.04864475 = sum of:
    0.04864475 = sum of:
      0.031236839 = weight(_text_:digital in 3451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.031236839 = score(doc=3451,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.14480425 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03670994 = queryNorm
          0.21571769 = fieldWeight in 3451, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3451)
      0.017407915 = weight(_text_:22 in 3451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.017407915 = score(doc=3451,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12855195 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03670994 = queryNorm
          0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3451, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3451)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Content

Tablets und soziale Netzwerke verwenden zu können, heißt noch lange nicht, den digitalen Wandel zu meistern. Vollständig digital kompetent ist und bleibt auf lange Sicht nur, wer die theoretischen Grundlagen versteht. Diese Grundlagen entstehen nicht als Nebeneffekt beim Lernen mit digitalen Medien, sondern müssen separat und fokussiert im Unterricht vermittelt werden. Digitale Medien können und sollten hierzu nur ergänzend eingesetzt werden. Nach Erfahrung der überwältigenden Mehrheit der Mathematikerinnen und Mathematiker weltweit sind Tafel, Papier und das direkte Unterrichtsgespräch meist viel besser geeignet. Auch dürfen diese Grundlagen nicht allein Hochbegabten oder digital Affinen vorbehalten bleiben, sondern müssen Teil der Allgemeinbildung werden. Ohne die vorherige Vermittlung dieser Grundlagen ist die Belieferung von Bildungseinrichtungen mit Soft- und Hardware hingegen eine Scheinlösung. Bleiben die richtigen Lerninhalte aus, hemmt sie sogar den Anstieg der Digitalisierungskompetenz in Deutschland. Stattdessen wird die Lernzeit der Lernenden überfrachtet, und oberflächlich sinnvolle Inhalte verdrängen den Erwerb von Grundlagen.

Date

22. 2.2017 17:14:47

0.016195867 = product of:
  0.048587598 = sum of:
    0.048587598 = product of:
      0.14576279 = sum of:
        0.14576279 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14576279 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31122726 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03670994 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Footnote

Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.