Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Bornmann, L."
  1. Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014) 0.01
    0.013086144 = product of:
      0.03925843 = sum of:
        0.03925843 = product of:
          0.07851686 = sum of:
            0.07851686 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07851686 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    18. 3.2014 19:13:22
  2. Bauer, J.; Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: Highly cited papers in Library and Information Science (LIS) : authors, institutions, and network structures (2016) 0.01
    0.011554184 = product of:
      0.034662552 = sum of:
        0.034662552 = product of:
          0.069325104 = sum of:
            0.069325104 = weight(_text_:2002 in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.069325104 = score(doc=3231,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.33488595 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    As a follow-up to the highly cited authors list published by Thomson Reuters in June 2014, we analyzed the top 1% most frequently cited papers published between 2002 and 2012 included in the Web of Science (WoS) subject category "Information Science & Library Science." In all, 798 authors contributed to 305 top 1% publications; these authors were employed at 275 institutions. The authors at Harvard University contributed the largest number of papers, when the addresses are whole-number counted. However, Leiden University leads the ranking if fractional counting is used. Twenty-three of the 798 authors were also listed as most highly cited authors by Thomson Reuters in June 2014 (http://highlycited.com/). Twelve of these 23 authors were involved in publishing 4 or more of the 305 papers under study. Analysis of coauthorship relations among the 798 highly cited scientists shows that coauthorships are based on common interests in a specific topic. Three topics were important between 2002 and 2012: (a) collection and exploitation of information in clinical practices; (b) use of the Internet in public communication and commerce; and (c) scientometrics.
  3. Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014) 0.01
    0.008724097 = product of:
      0.02617229 = sum of:
        0.02617229 = product of:
          0.05234458 = sum of:
            0.05234458 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05234458 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:05:18
  4. Bornmann, L.: How to analyze percentile citation impact data meaningfully in bibliometrics : the statistical analysis of distributions, percentile rank classes, and top-cited papers (2013) 0.01
    0.006543072 = product of:
      0.019629216 = sum of:
        0.019629216 = product of:
          0.03925843 = sum of:
            0.03925843 = weight(_text_:22 in 656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03925843 = score(doc=656,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 656, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=656)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:44:17
  5. Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.; Wagner, C.S.: ¬The relative influences of government funding and international collaboration on citation impact (2019) 0.01
    0.006543072 = product of:
      0.019629216 = sum of:
        0.019629216 = product of:
          0.03925843 = sum of:
            0.03925843 = weight(_text_:22 in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03925843 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    8. 1.2019 18:22:45
  6. Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor : normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science (2011) 0.01
    0.0054525603 = product of:
      0.01635768 = sum of:
        0.01635768 = product of:
          0.03271536 = sum of:
            0.03271536 = weight(_text_:22 in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03271536 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 12:51:07