Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

McIlwaine, I.C.; Williamson, N.J.: Class 61 - Medicine : restructuring progress 2002 (2002) 0.04

0.042797294 = product of:
  0.12839188 = sum of:
    0.12839188 = product of:
      0.25678375 = sum of:
        0.25678375 = weight(_text_:2002 in 3785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25678375 = score(doc=3785,freq=7.0), product of:
            0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048293278 = queryNorm
            1.2404349 = fieldWeight in 3785, product of:
              2.6457512 = tf(freq=7.0), with freq of:
                7.0 = termFreq=7.0
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3785)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source: Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 24(2002), S.36-61
Year: 2002

McIlwaine, I.C.; McIlwaine, J.H.S.J.: Photography - a proposal (2002) 0.04

0.03617032 = product of:
  0.108510956 = sum of:
    0.108510956 = product of:
      0.21702191 = sum of:
        0.21702191 = weight(_text_:2002 in 6004) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21702191 = score(doc=6004,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048293278 = queryNorm
            1.0483589 = fieldWeight in 6004, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6004)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source: Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 24(2002), S.62-72
Year: 2002

McIlwaine, I.C.; Williamson, N.J.: Class 61 - Medicine : restructuring progress 2000 (2000) 0.02

0.015267169 = product of:
  0.045801505 = sum of:
    0.045801505 = product of:
      0.09160301 = sum of:
        0.09160301 = weight(_text_:22 in 1012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09160301 = score(doc=1012,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048293278 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1012, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1012)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source: Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 22(2000), S.49-75

McIlwaine, I.C.: Where have all the flowers gone? : An investigation into the fate of some special classification schemes (2003) 0.01
```
0.009243347 = product of:
  0.027730038 = sum of:
    0.027730038 = product of:
      0.055460077 = sum of:
        0.055460077 = weight(_text_:2002 in 2764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055460077 = score(doc=2764,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048293278 = queryNorm
            0.26790875 = fieldWeight in 2764, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2764)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
```
Abstract

Prior to the OPAC many institutions devised classifications to suit their special needs. Others expanded or altered general schemes to accommodate specific approaches. A driving force in the creation of these classifications was the Classification Research Group, celebrating its golden jubilee in 2002, whose work created a framework and body of principles that remain valid for the retrieval needs of today. The paper highlights some of these special schemes and highlights the fundamental principles which remain valid. 1. Introduction The distinction between a general and a special classification scheme is made frequently in the textbooks, but is one that it is sometimes difficult to draw. The Library of Congress classification could be described as the special classification par excellence. Normally, however, a special classification is taken to be one that is restricted to a specific subject, and quite often used in one specific context only, either a library or a bibliographic listing or for a specific purpose such as a search engine and it is in this sense that I propose to examine some of these schemes. Today, there is a widespread preference for searching an words as a supplement to the use of a standard system, usually the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC). This is enhanced by the ability to search documents full-text in a computerized environment, a situation that did not exist 20 or 30 years ago. Today's situation is a great improvement in many ways, but it does depend upon the words used by the author and the searcher corresponding, and often presupposes the use of English. In libraries, the use of co-operative services and precatalogued records already provided with classification data has also spelt the demise of the special scheme. In many instances, the survival of a special classification depends upon its creaior and, with the passage of time, this becomes inevitably more precarious.

Source

Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century: Integration of knowledge across boundaries. Proceedings of the 7th ISKO International Conference Granada, Spain, July 10-13, 2002. Ed.: M. López-Huertas

McIlwaine, I.C.: Trends in knowledge organization research (2003) 0.01

0.008724097 = product of:
  0.02617229 = sum of:
    0.02617229 = product of:
      0.05234458 = sum of:
        0.05234458 = weight(_text_:22 in 2289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05234458 = score(doc=2289,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048293278 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2289, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2289)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date: 10. 6.2004 19:22:56

McIlwaine, I.C.: UDC: the present state and future prospects (1995) 0.01

0.0076335846 = product of:
  0.022900753 = sum of:
    0.022900753 = product of:
      0.045801505 = sum of:
        0.045801505 = weight(_text_:22 in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045801505 = score(doc=1899,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048293278 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source: Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.2, S.64-69

McIlwaine, I.C.: Brian Vickery : 11th September 1918-17 th October 2009 (2010) 0.01

0.0054525603 = product of:
  0.01635768 = sum of:
    0.01635768 = product of:
      0.03271536 = sum of:
        0.03271536 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03271536 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048293278 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date: 22. 7.2010 19:32:06

Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Years

Languages

Themes