Search (15 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Stock, W.G."
  1. Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002) 0.07
    0.07348212 = product of:
      0.22044635 = sum of:
        0.22044635 = sum of:
          0.15501563 = weight(_text_:2002 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.15501563 = score(doc=613,freq=5.0), product of:
              0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048293278 = queryNorm
              0.74882776 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
                2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                  5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
          0.06543072 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06543072 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048293278 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
    Year
    2002
  2. Stock, W.G.: Hochschulmanagement, Information Appliances, Fairness als Grundsatz : Information und Mobilität (2002) 0.04
    0.03674106 = product of:
      0.110223174 = sum of:
        0.110223174 = sum of:
          0.077507816 = weight(_text_:2002 in 1364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.077507816 = score(doc=1364,freq=5.0), product of:
              0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048293278 = queryNorm
              0.37441388 = fieldWeight in 1364, product of:
                2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                  5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1364)
          0.03271536 = weight(_text_:22 in 1364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03271536 = score(doc=1364,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048293278 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1364, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1364)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2003 19:39:36
    Source
    Password. 2002, H.12, S.10-13
    Year
    2002
  3. Stock, W.G.: Eugene Garfield und die Folgen : der Weg der Fußnote bis in die Wissenschaftspolitik (2002) 0.03
    0.031003129 = product of:
      0.09300938 = sum of:
        0.09300938 = product of:
          0.18601876 = sum of:
            0.18601876 = weight(_text_:2002 in 472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18601876 = score(doc=472,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.8985933 = fieldWeight in 472, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=472)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Password. 2002, H.3, S.14-19
    Year
    2002
  4. Stock, W.G.: Wissenschaftsinformatik : Fundierung, Gegenstand und Methoden (1980) 0.02
    0.017448194 = product of:
      0.05234458 = sum of:
        0.05234458 = product of:
          0.10468916 = sum of:
            0.10468916 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10468916 = score(doc=2808,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Ratio. 22(1980), S.155-164
  5. Stock, W.G.: Informationsmangel trotz Überfluß : Informationsgesellschaft verlangt neue Berufe und Berufsbilder (1995) 0.02
    0.017448194 = product of:
      0.05234458 = sum of:
        0.05234458 = product of:
          0.10468916 = sum of:
            0.10468916 = weight(_text_:22 in 2027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10468916 = score(doc=2027,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2027, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2027)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Insider. 1995, Nr.4, Juli, S.19-22
  6. Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: Recherchieren im Internet (2004) 0.02
    0.017448194 = product of:
      0.05234458 = sum of:
        0.05234458 = product of:
          0.10468916 = sum of:
            0.10468916 = weight(_text_:22 in 4686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10468916 = score(doc=4686,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4686, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4686)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    27.11.2005 18:04:22
  7. Stock, W.G.: Forschung im internationalen Vergleich - Wissenschaftsindikatoren auf Zitationsbasis : ISI Essential Science Indicators (2002) 0.02
    0.017331276 = product of:
      0.051993825 = sum of:
        0.051993825 = product of:
          0.10398765 = sum of:
            0.10398765 = weight(_text_:2002 in 474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10398765 = score(doc=474,freq=9.0), product of:
                0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.50232893 = fieldWeight in 474, product of:
                  3.0 = tf(freq=9.0), with freq of:
                    9.0 = termFreq=9.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=474)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Bewertung wissenschaftlicher Forschungsergebnisse aus einer elektronischen Datenbank heraus? Rangordnungen der wichtigsten Institutionen, Wissenschaftler, Zeitschriften und sogar Länder in Fachdisziplinen nach Einfluss? Markierung "heißer", hochaktueller Artikel? Auflisten der hochzitierten Forschungsfronten in den einzelnen Wissenschaftsdisziplinen? Und das alles auf Knopfdruck und nicht mittels umständlicher szientometrischer Verfahren? Geht so etwas überhaupt? Es geht. Mit den "Essential Science Indicators" (ESI) legt das ISl ein webbasiertes Informationssystem zur Wissenschaftsevaluation vor, das einzigartige Ergebnisse präsentiert und in der Tat ausgesprochen einfach zu bedienen ist. Aber es geht, verglichen mit ausgeklügelten Methoden der empirischen Wissenschaftsforschung, nicht alles. Wo liegen die Grenzen des Systems? Wir werden die Arbeitsweise der ESI, seine Datenbasis, die eingesetzten informetrischen Algorithmen - und deren methodischen Probleme, die Suchoberfläche sowie die Ergebnisdarstellung skizzieren. Als Beispiel dienen uns Aspekte deutscher Forschung. Etwa: In welcher Disziplin haben Deutschlands Forscher den größten internationalen Einfluss? Welches deutsche Institut der Neurowissenschaften kann aufglobaler Ebene mitmischen? Oder: Welcher in Deutschland tätige Wissenschaftler führt eine disziplinspezifische Rangordnung an?Letztlich: Wer braucht die "Essential Science Indicators"? - Wir testeten die Essential Science Indicators Mitte Februar 2002 anhand der Version vom 1. Januar 2002, die das Zehn-Jahres-Intervall 1991 bis 2000 sowie die ersten zehn Monate aus 2001 berücksichtigt.
    Source
    Password. 2002, H.3, S.21-30
    Year
    2002
  8. Stock, W.G.: Endnutzersystem für internationale Geschäftsinformationen (1998) 0.02
    0.015267169 = product of:
      0.045801505 = sum of:
        0.045801505 = product of:
          0.09160301 = sum of:
            0.09160301 = weight(_text_:22 in 2407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09160301 = score(doc=2407,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2407, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2407)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Password. 1998, H.10, S.22-28
  9. Grazia Colonia; Dimmler, E.; Dresel, R.; Messner, C.; Krobath, A.; Petz, S.; Sypien, M.; Boxen, P. van; Harders, M.; Heuer, D.; Jordans, I.; Juchem, K.; Linnertz, M.; Mittelhuber, I.; Schwammel, S.; Schlögl, C.; Stock, W.G.: Informationswissenschaftliche Zeitschriften in szientometrischer Analyse (2002) 0.01
    0.014008703 = product of:
      0.042026106 = sum of:
        0.042026106 = product of:
          0.08405221 = sum of:
            0.08405221 = weight(_text_:2002 in 1075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08405221 = score(doc=1075,freq=3.0), product of:
                0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.40602762 = fieldWeight in 1075, product of:
                  1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                    3.0 = termFreq=3.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1075)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Year
    2002
  10. Linde, F.; Stock, W.G.: Informationsmarkt : Informationen im I-Commerce anbieten und nachfragen (2011) 0.01
    0.008724097 = product of:
      0.02617229 = sum of:
        0.02617229 = product of:
          0.05234458 = sum of:
            0.05234458 = weight(_text_:22 in 291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05234458 = score(doc=291,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 291, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=291)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    23. 9.2010 11:15:22
  11. Bredemeier, W.; Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: ¬Die Branche elektronischer Geschäftsinformationen in Deutschland 2000/2001 (2001) 0.01
    0.008170041 = product of:
      0.024510123 = sum of:
        0.024510123 = product of:
          0.049020246 = sum of:
            0.049020246 = weight(_text_:2002 in 621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049020246 = score(doc=621,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.2368001 = fieldWeight in 621, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=621)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: nfd 53(2002) H.4, S.250-251 (C. Schlögl)
  12. Schumann, L.; Stock, W.G.: ¬Ein umfassendes ganzheitliches Modell für Evaluation und Akzeptanzanalysen von Informationsdiensten : Das Information Service Evaluation (ISE) Modell (2014) 0.01
    0.0076335846 = product of:
      0.022900753 = sum of:
        0.022900753 = product of:
          0.045801505 = sum of:
            0.045801505 = weight(_text_:22 in 1492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045801505 = score(doc=1492,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1492, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1492)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2014 18:56:46
  13. Schloegl, C.; Stock, W.G.: Impact and relevance of LIS journals : a scientometric analysis of international and German-language LIS journals - Citation analysis versus reader survey (2004) 0.01
    0.0065360325 = product of:
      0.019608097 = sum of:
        0.019608097 = product of:
          0.039216194 = sum of:
            0.039216194 = weight(_text_:2002 in 5249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039216194 = score(doc=5249,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.18944009 = fieldWeight in 5249, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5249)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The goal of the scientometric analysis presented in this article was to investigate international and regional (i.e., German-language) periodicals in the field of library and information science (LIS). This was done by means of a citation analysis and a reader survey. For the citation analysis, impact factor, citing half-life, number of references per article, and the rate of self-references of a periodical were used as indicators. In addition, the leading LIS periodicals were mapped. For the 40 international periodicals, data were collected from ISI's Social Sciences Citation Index Journal Citation Reports (JCR); the citations of the 10 German-language journals were counted manually (overall 1,494 source articles with 10,520 citations). Altogether, the empirical base of the citation analysis consisted of nearly 90,000 citations in 6,203 source articles that were published between 1997 and 2000. The expert survey investigated reading frequency, applicability of the journals to the job of the reader, publication frequency, and publication preference both for all respondents and for different groups among them (practitioners vs. scientists, librarians vs. documentalists vs. LIS scholars, public sector vs. information industry vs. other private company employees). The study was conducted in spring 2002. A total of 257 questionnaires were returned by information specialists from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Having both citation and readership data, we performed a comparative analysis of these two data sets. This enabled us to identify answers to questions like: Does reading behavior correlate with the journal impact factor? Do readers prefer journals with a short or a long half-life, or with a low or a high number of references? Is there any difference in this matter among librarians, documentalists, and LIS scholars?
  14. Stock, W.G.: Qualitätskriterien von Suchmaschinen : Checkliste für Retrievalsysteme (2000) 0.01
    0.0054525603 = product of:
      0.01635768 = sum of:
        0.01635768 = product of:
          0.03271536 = sum of:
            0.03271536 = weight(_text_:22 in 5773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03271536 = score(doc=5773,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5773, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5773)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Password. 2000, H.5, S.22-31
  15. Stock, W.G.: Informational cities : analysis and construction of cities in the knowledge society (2011) 0.01
    0.0054525603 = product of:
      0.01635768 = sum of:
        0.01635768 = product of:
          0.03271536 = sum of:
            0.03271536 = weight(_text_:22 in 4452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03271536 = score(doc=4452,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4452, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4452)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    3. 7.2011 19:22:49