Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Tudhope, D."
  1. Tudhope, D.; Binding, C.; Blocks, D.; Cunliffe, D.: Compound descriptors in context : a matching function for classifications and thesauri (2002) 0.02 
    0.015284747 = product of:
  0.04585424 = sum of:
    0.04585424 = product of:
      0.09170848 = sum of:
        0.09170848 = weight(_text_:2002 in 3179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09170848 = score(doc=3179,freq=7.0), product of:
            0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048293278 = queryNorm
            0.44301245 = fieldWeight in 3179, product of:
              2.6457512 = tf(freq=7.0), with freq of:
                7.0 = termFreq=7.0
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3179)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Proceedings of the Second ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries : JCDL 2002 ; July 14 - 18, 2002, Portland, Oregon, USA. Ed. by Gary Marchionini
    Year
    2002
  2. Tudhope, D.: Knowledge Organization System Services : brief review of NKOS activities and possibility of KOS registries (2007) 0.01 
    0.013086144 = product of:
  0.03925843 = sum of:
    0.03925843 = product of:
      0.07851686 = sum of:
        0.07851686 = weight(_text_:22 in 100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07851686 = score(doc=100,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048293278 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 100, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=100)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  3. Tudhope, D.; Binding, C.; Blocks, D.; Cunliffe, D.: FACET: thesaurus retrieval with semantic term expansion (2002) 0.01 
    0.012227798 = product of:
  0.03668339 = sum of:
    0.03668339 = product of:
      0.07336678 = sum of:
        0.07336678 = weight(_text_:2002 in 175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07336678 = score(doc=175,freq=7.0), product of:
            0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048293278 = queryNorm
            0.35440996 = fieldWeight in 175, product of:
              2.6457512 = tf(freq=7.0), with freq of:
                7.0 = termFreq=7.0
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=175)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Proceedings of the Second ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries : JCDL 2002 ; July 14 - 18, 2002, Portland, Oregon, USA. Ed. by Gary Marchionini
    Year
    2002
  4. Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007) 0.01 
    0.0109051205 = product of:
  0.03271536 = sum of:
    0.03271536 = product of:
      0.06543072 = sum of:
        0.06543072 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06543072 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048293278 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:07
  5. Tudhope, D.; Binding, C.; Blocks, D.; Cuncliffe, D.: Representation and retrieval in faceted systems (2003) 0.01 
    0.008170041 = product of:
  0.024510123 = sum of:
    0.024510123 = product of:
      0.049020246 = sum of:
        0.049020246 = weight(_text_:2002 in 2703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049020246 = score(doc=2703,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048293278 = queryNorm
            0.2368001 = fieldWeight in 2703, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2703)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century: Integration of knowledge across boundaries. Proceedings of the 7th ISKO International Conference Granada, Spain, July 10-13, 2002. Ed.: M. López-Huertas
  6. Golub, K.; Tudhope, D.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Terminology registries for knowledge organization systems : functionality, use, and attributes (2014) 0.01 
    0.006543072 = product of:
  0.019629216 = sum of:
    0.019629216 = product of:
      0.03925843 = sum of:
        0.03925843 = weight(_text_:22 in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03925843 = score(doc=1347,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048293278 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:12:54
  7. Tudhope, D.; Binding, C.: Toward terminology services : experiences with a pilot Web service thesaurus browser (2006) 0.01 
    0.0065360325 = product of:
  0.019608097 = sum of:
    0.019608097 = product of:
      0.039216194 = sum of:
        0.039216194 = weight(_text_:2002 in 1955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039216194 = score(doc=1955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048293278 = queryNorm
            0.18944009 = fieldWeight in 1955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1955)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Dublin Core recommends controlled terminology for the subject of a resource. Knowledge organization systems (KOS), such as classifications, gazetteers, taxonomies and thesauri, provide controlled vocabularies that organize and structure concepts for indexing, classifying, browsing and search. For example, a thesaurus employs a set of standard semantic relationships (ISO 2788, ISO 5964), and major thesauri have a large entry vocabulary of terms considered equivalent for retrieval purposes. Many KOS have been made available for Web-based access. However, they are often not fully integrated into indexing and search systems and the full potential for networked and programmatic access remains untapped. The lack of standardized access and interchange formats impedes wider use of KOS resources. We developed a Web demonstrator (www.comp.glam.ac.uk/~FACET/webdemo/) for the FACET project (www.comp.glam.ac.uk/~facet/facetproject.html) that explored thesaurus-based query expansion with the Getty Art and Architecture Thesaurus. A Web demonstrator was implemented via Active Server Pages (ASP) with server-side scripting and compiled server-side components for database access, and cascading style sheets for presentation. The browser-based interactive interface permits dynamic control of query term expansion. However, being based on a custom thesaurus representation and API, the techniques cannot be applied directly to thesauri in other formats on the Web. General programmatic access requires commonly agreed protocols, for example, building on Web and Grid services. The development of common KOS representation formats and service protocols are closely linked. Linda Hill and colleagues argued in 2002 for a general KOS service protocol from which protocols for specific types of KOS can be derived. Thus, in the future, a combination of thesaurus and query protocols might permit a thesaurus to be used with a choice of search tools on various kinds of databases. Service-oriented architectures bring an opportunity for moving toward a clearer separation of interface components from the underlying data sources. In our view, basing distributed protocol services on the atomic elements of thesaurus data structures and relationships is not necessarily the best approach because client operations that require multiple client-server calls would carry too much overhead. This would limit the interfaces that could be offered by applications following such a protocol. Advanced interactive interfaces require protocols that group primitive thesaurus data elements (via their relationships) into composites to achieve reasonable response.
  8. Jones, I.; Cunliffe, D.; Tudhope, D.: Natural language processing and knowledge organization systems as an aid to retrieval (2004) 0.01 
    0.0057190284 = product of:
  0.017157085 = sum of:
    0.017157085 = product of:
      0.03431417 = sum of:
        0.03431417 = weight(_text_:2002 in 2677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03431417 = score(doc=2677,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048293278 = queryNorm
            0.16576007 = fieldWeight in 2677, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2677)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    1. Introduction The need for research into the application of linguistic techniques in Information Retrieval (IR) in general, and a similar need in faceted Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS) has been indicated by various authors. Smeaton (1997) points out the inherent limitations of conventional approaches to IR based an "bags of words", mainly difficulties caused by lexical ambiguity in the words concerned, and goes an to suggest the possibility of using Natural Language Processing (NLP) in query formulation. Past experience with a faceted retrieval system highlighted the need for integrating the linguistic perspective in order to fully utilise the potential of a KOS (Tudhope et al." 2002). The present research seeks to address some of these needs in using NLP to improve the efficacy of KOS tools in query and retrieval systems. Syntactic parsing and part-of-speech tagging can substantially reduce lexical ambiguity through homograph disambiguation. Given the two strings "1 fable the motion" and "I put the motion an the fable", for instance, the parser used in this research clearly indicates that 'fable' in the first string is a verb, while 'table' in the second string is a noun, a distinction that would be missed in the "bag of words" approach. This syntactic disambiguation enables a more precise matching from free text to the controlled vocabulary of a KOS and vice versa. The use of a general linguistic resource, namely Roget's Thesaurus of English Words and Phrases (RTEWP), as an intermediary in this process, is investigated. The adaptation of the Link parser (Sleator & Temperley, 1993) to the purposes of the research is reported. The design and implementation of the early practical stages of the project are described, and the results of the initial experiments are presented and evaluated. Applications of the techniques developed are foreseen in the areas of query disambiguation, information retrieval and automatic indexing. In the first section of the paper a brief review of the literature and relevant current work in the field is presented. The second section includes reports an the development of algorithms, the construction of data sets and theoretical and experimental work undertaken to date. The third section evaluates the results obtained, and outlines directions for future research.

Authors

Years

Types

Themes