Search (89 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Computerlinguistik"
  1. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.06
    0.064221166 = product of:
      0.096331745 = sum of:
        0.07670253 = product of:
          0.23010758 = sum of:
            0.23010758 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.23010758 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.40943095 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.019629216 = product of:
          0.03925843 = sum of:
            0.03925843 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03925843 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  2. Rösener, C.: ¬Die Stecknadel im Heuhaufen : Natürlichsprachlicher Zugang zu Volltextdatenbanken (2005) 0.05
    0.052945465 = product of:
      0.1588364 = sum of:
        0.1588364 = weight(_text_:multimedial in 548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1588364 = score(doc=548,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.35033083 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.2542357 = idf(docFreq=84, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048293278 = queryNorm
            0.45338973 = fieldWeight in 548, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.2542357 = idf(docFreq=84, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=548)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Die Möglichkeiten, die der heutigen Informations- und Wissensgesellschaft für die Beschaffung und den Austausch von Information zur Verfügung stehen, haben kurioserweise gleichzeitig ein immer akuter werdendes, neues Problem geschaffen: Es wird für jeden Einzelnen immer schwieriger, aus der gewaltigen Fülle der angebotenen Informationen die tatsächlich relevanten zu selektieren. Diese Arbeit untersucht die Möglichkeit, mit Hilfe von natürlichsprachlichen Schnittstellen den Zugang des Informationssuchenden zu Volltextdatenbanken zu verbessern. Dabei werden zunächst die wissenschaftlichen Fragestellungen ausführlich behandelt. Anschließend beschreibt der Autor verschiedene Lösungsansätze und stellt anhand einer natürlichsprachlichen Schnittstelle für den Brockhaus Multimedial 2004 deren erfolgreiche Implementierung vor
    Object
    Brockhaus Multimedial 2004
  3. Mustafa El Hadi, W.: Evaluating human language technology : general applications to information access and management (2002) 0.03
    0.031003129 = product of:
      0.09300938 = sum of:
        0.09300938 = product of:
          0.18601876 = sum of:
            0.18601876 = weight(_text_:2002 in 1840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18601876 = score(doc=1840,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.8985933 = fieldWeight in 1840, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1840)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 29(2002) nos.3/4, S.124-134
    Year
    2002
  4. Computational linguistics for the new millennium : divergence or synergy? Proceedings of the International Symposium held at the Ruprecht-Karls Universität Heidelberg, 21-22 July 2000. Festschrift in honour of Peter Hellwig on the occasion of his 60th birthday (2002) 0.03
    0.030917551 = product of:
      0.09275265 = sum of:
        0.09275265 = sum of:
          0.060037293 = weight(_text_:2002 in 4900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.060037293 = score(doc=4900,freq=3.0), product of:
              0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048293278 = queryNorm
              0.29001972 = fieldWeight in 4900, product of:
                1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                  3.0 = termFreq=3.0
                4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4900)
          0.03271536 = weight(_text_:22 in 4900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03271536 = score(doc=4900,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048293278 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4900, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4900)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Year
    2002
  5. Nielsen, M.L.: ¬The word association method (2002) 0.03
    0.028017405 = product of:
      0.08405221 = sum of:
        0.08405221 = product of:
          0.16810443 = sum of:
            0.16810443 = weight(_text_:2002 in 3811) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16810443 = score(doc=3811,freq=3.0), product of:
                0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.81205523 = fieldWeight in 3811, product of:
                  1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                    3.0 = termFreq=3.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3811)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Year
    2002
  6. Sicilia-Garcia, E.I.; Smith, F.J.: Statistical language modeling (2002) 0.03
    0.028017405 = product of:
      0.08405221 = sum of:
        0.08405221 = product of:
          0.16810443 = sum of:
            0.16810443 = weight(_text_:2002 in 4261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16810443 = score(doc=4261,freq=3.0), product of:
                0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.81205523 = fieldWeight in 4261, product of:
                  1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                    3.0 = termFreq=3.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4261)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Year
    2002
  7. Yang, C.C.; Luk, J.: Automatic generation of English/Chinese thesaurus based on a parallel corpus in laws (2003) 0.03
    0.027444884 = product of:
      0.08233465 = sum of:
        0.08233465 = sum of:
          0.059433896 = weight(_text_:2002 in 1616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.059433896 = score(doc=1616,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048293278 = queryNorm
              0.2871049 = fieldWeight in 1616, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1616)
          0.022900753 = weight(_text_:22 in 1616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.022900753 = score(doc=1616,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048293278 = queryNorm
              0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1616, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1616)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The information available in languages other than English in the World Wide Web is increasing significantly. According to a report from Computer Economics in 1999, 54% of Internet users are English speakers ("English Will Dominate Web for Only Three More Years," Computer Economics, July 9, 1999, http://www.computereconomics. com/new4/pr/pr990610.html). However, it is predicted that there will be only 60% increase in Internet users among English speakers verses a 150% growth among nonEnglish speakers for the next five years. By 2005, 57% of Internet users will be non-English speakers. A report by CNN.com in 2000 showed that the number of Internet users in China had been increased from 8.9 million to 16.9 million from January to June in 2000 ("Report: China Internet users double to 17 million," CNN.com, July, 2000, http://cnn.org/2000/TECH/computing/07/27/ china.internet.reut/index.html). According to Nielsen/ NetRatings, there was a dramatic leap from 22.5 millions to 56.6 millions Internet users from 2001 to 2002. China had become the second largest global at-home Internet population in 2002 (US's Internet population was 166 millions) (Robyn Greenspan, "China Pulls Ahead of Japan," Internet.com, April 22, 2002, http://cyberatias.internet.com/big-picture/geographics/article/0,,5911_1013841,00. html). All of the evidences reveal the importance of crosslingual research to satisfy the needs in the near future. Digital library research has been focusing in structural and semantic interoperability in the past. Searching and retrieving objects across variations in protocols, formats and disciplines are widely explored (Schatz, B., & Chen, H. (1999). Digital libraries: technological advances and social impacts. IEEE Computer, Special Issue an Digital Libraries, February, 32(2), 45-50.; Chen, H., Yen, J., & Yang, C.C. (1999). International activities: development of Asian digital libraries. IEEE Computer, Special Issue an Digital Libraries, 32(2), 48-49.). However, research in crossing language boundaries, especially across European languages and Oriental languages, is still in the initial stage. In this proposal, we put our focus an cross-lingual semantic interoperability by developing automatic generation of a cross-lingual thesaurus based an English/Chinese parallel corpus. When the searchers encounter retrieval problems, Professional librarians usually consult the thesaurus to identify other relevant vocabularies. In the problem of searching across language boundaries, a cross-lingual thesaurus, which is generated by co-occurrence analysis and Hopfield network, can be used to generate additional semantically relevant terms that cannot be obtained from dictionary. In particular, the automatically generated cross-lingual thesaurus is able to capture the unknown words that do not exist in a dictionary, such as names of persons, organizations, and events. Due to Hong Kong's unique history background, both English and Chinese are used as official languages in all legal documents. Therefore, English/Chinese cross-lingual information retrieval is critical for applications in courts and the government. In this paper, we develop an automatic thesaurus by the Hopfield network based an a parallel corpus collected from the Web site of the Department of Justice of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) Government. Experiments are conducted to measure the precision and recall of the automatic generated English/Chinese thesaurus. The result Shows that such thesaurus is a promising tool to retrieve relevant terms, especially in the language that is not the same as the input term. The direct translation of the input term can also be retrieved in most of the cases.
  8. Schulz, A.: Motivierte Maschinen : Sprachcomputer (2002) 0.03
    0.025835939 = product of:
      0.077507816 = sum of:
        0.077507816 = product of:
          0.15501563 = sum of:
            0.15501563 = weight(_text_:2002 in 1309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15501563 = score(doc=1309,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.74882776 = fieldWeight in 1309, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1309)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Gehirn und Geist: Das Magazin für Hirnforschung und Psychologie. 2002, H.3, S.54-56
    Year
    2002
  9. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.03
    0.02556751 = product of:
      0.07670253 = sum of:
        0.07670253 = product of:
          0.23010758 = sum of:
            0.23010758 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.23010758 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.40943095 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  10. Diaz, I.; Morato, J.; Lioréns, J.: ¬An algorithm for term conflation based on tree structures (2002) 0.02
    0.020668752 = product of:
      0.062006254 = sum of:
        0.062006254 = product of:
          0.12401251 = sum of:
            0.12401251 = weight(_text_:2002 in 246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12401251 = score(doc=246,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.5990622 = fieldWeight in 246, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=246)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.3, S.199-208
    Year
    2002
  11. Fox, B.; Fox, C.J.: Efficient stemmer generation (2002) 0.02
    0.020668752 = product of:
      0.062006254 = sum of:
        0.062006254 = product of:
          0.12401251 = sum of:
            0.12401251 = weight(_text_:2002 in 2585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12401251 = score(doc=2585,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.5990622 = fieldWeight in 2585, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2585)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 38(2002) no.4, S.547-558
    Year
    2002
  12. Benoit, G.: Data discretization for novel relationship discovery in information retrieval (2002) 0.02
    0.020668752 = product of:
      0.062006254 = sum of:
        0.062006254 = product of:
          0.12401251 = sum of:
            0.12401251 = weight(_text_:2002 in 5197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12401251 = score(doc=5197,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.5990622 = fieldWeight in 5197, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5197)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 53(2002) no.9, S.736-746
    Year
    2002
  13. Schürmann, H.: Software scannt Radio- und Fernsehsendungen : Recherche in Nachrichtenarchiven erleichtert (2001) 0.02
    0.019071642 = product of:
      0.057214923 = sum of:
        0.057214923 = sum of:
          0.03431417 = weight(_text_:2002 in 5759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03431417 = score(doc=5759,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048293278 = queryNorm
              0.16576007 = fieldWeight in 5759, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5759)
          0.022900753 = weight(_text_:22 in 5759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.022900753 = score(doc=5759,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048293278 = queryNorm
              0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 5759, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5759)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Um Firmen und Agenturen die Beobachtungen von Medien zu erleichtern, entwickeln Forscher an der Duisburger Hochschule zurzeit ein System zur automatischen Themenerkennung in Rundfunk und Fernsehen. Das so genannte Alert-System soll dem Nutzer helfen, die für ihn relevanten Sprachinformationen aus Nachrichtensendungen herauszufiltem und weiterzuverarbeiten. Durch die automatische Analyse durch den Computer können mehrere Programme rund um die Uhr beobachtet werden. Noch erfolgt die Informationsgewinnung aus TV- und Radiosendungen auf klassischem Wege: Ein Mensch sieht, hört, liest und wertet aus. Das ist enorm zeitaufwendig und für eine Firma, die beispielsweise die Konkurrenz beobachten oder ihre Medienpräsenz dokumentieren lassen möchte, auch sehr teuer. Diese Arbeit ließe sich mit einem Spracherkenner automatisieren, sagten sich die Duisburger Forscher. Sie arbeiten nun zusammen mit Partnern aus Deutschland, Frankreich und Portugal in einem europaweiten Projekt an der Entwicklung einer entsprechenden Technologie (http://alert.uni-duisburg.de). An dem Projekt sind auch zwei Medienbeobachtungsuntemehmen beteiligt, die Oberserver Argus Media GmbH aus Baden-Baden und das französische Unternehmen Secodip. Unsere Arbeit würde schon dadurch erleichtert, wenn Informationen, die über unsere Kunden in den Medien erscheinen, vorselektiert würden", beschreibt Simone Holderbach, Leiterin der Produktentwicklung bei Oberserver, ihr Interesse an der Technik. Und wie funktioniert Alert? Das Spracherkennungssystem wird darauf getrimmt, Nachrichtensendungen in Radio und Fernsehen zu überwachen: Alles, was gesagt wird - sei es vom Nachrichtensprecher, Reporter oder Interviewten -, wird durch die automatische Spracherkennung in Text umgewandelt. Dabei werden Themen und Schlüsselwörter erkannt und gespeichert. Diese werden mit den Suchbegriffen des Nutzers verglichen. Gefundene Übereinstimmungen werden angezeigt und dem Benutzer automatisch mitgeteilt. Konventionelle Spracherkennungstechnik sei für die Medienbeobachtung nicht einsetzbar, da diese für einen anderen Zweck entwickelt worden sei, betont Prof. Gerhard Rigoll, Leiter des Fachgebiets Technische Informatik an der Duisburger Hochschule. Für die Umwandlung von Sprache in Text wurde die Alert-Software gründlich trainiert. Aus Zeitungstexten, Audio- und Video-Material wurden bislang rund 3 50 Millionen Wörter verarbeitet. Das System arbeitet in drei Sprachen. Doch so ganz fehlerfrei sei der automatisch gewonnene Text nicht, räumt Rigoll ein. Zurzeit liegt die Erkennungsrate bei 40 bis 70 Prozent. Und das wird sich in absehbarer Zeit auch nicht ändern." Musiküberlagerungen oder starke Hintergrundgeräusche bei Reportagen führen zu Ungenauigkeiten bei der Textumwandlung. Deshalb haben die, Duisburger Wissenschaftler Methoden entwickelt, die über die herkömmliche Suche nach Schlüsselwörtern hinausgehen und eine inhaltsorientierte Zuordnung ermöglichen. Dadurch erhält der Nutzer dann auch solche Nachrichten, die zwar zum Thema passen, in denen das Stichwort aber gar nicht auftaucht", bringt Rigoll den Vorteil der Technik auf den Punkt. Wird beispielsweise "Ölpreis" als Suchbegriff eingegeben, werden auch solche Nachrichten angezeigt, in denen Olkonzerne und Energieagenturen eine Rolle spielen. Rigoll: Das Alert-System liest sozusagen zwischen den Zeilen!' Das Forschungsprojekt wurde vor einem Jahr gestartet und läuft noch bis Mitte 2002. Wer sich über den Stand der Technik informieren möchte, kann dies in dieser Woche auf der Industriemesse in Hannover. Das Alert-System wird auf dem Gemeinschaftsstand "Forschungsland NRW" in Halle 18, Stand M12, präsentiert
    Source
    Handelsblatt. Nr.79 vom 24.4.2001, S.22
  14. Chen, K.-H.: Evaluating Chinese text retrieval with multilingual queries (2002) 0.02
    0.01808516 = product of:
      0.054255478 = sum of:
        0.054255478 = product of:
          0.108510956 = sum of:
            0.108510956 = weight(_text_:2002 in 1851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.108510956 = score(doc=1851,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.52417946 = fieldWeight in 1851, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1851)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 29(2002) nos.3/4, S.156-170
    Year
    2002
  15. Bowker, L.: Information retrieval in translation memory systems : assessment of current limitations and possibilities for future development (2002) 0.02
    0.01808516 = product of:
      0.054255478 = sum of:
        0.054255478 = product of:
          0.108510956 = sum of:
            0.108510956 = weight(_text_:2002 in 1854) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.108510956 = score(doc=1854,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.52417946 = fieldWeight in 1854, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1854)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 29(2002) nos.3/4, S.198-203
    Year
    2002
  16. Warner, A.J.: Natural language processing (1987) 0.02
    0.017448194 = product of:
      0.05234458 = sum of:
        0.05234458 = product of:
          0.10468916 = sum of:
            0.10468916 = weight(_text_:22 in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10468916 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.79-108
  17. Griffiths, T.L.; Steyvers, M.: ¬A probabilistic approach to semantic representation (2002) 0.02
    0.016009945 = product of:
      0.048029836 = sum of:
        0.048029836 = product of:
          0.09605967 = sum of:
            0.09605967 = weight(_text_:2002 in 3671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09605967 = score(doc=3671,freq=3.0), product of:
                0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.46403155 = fieldWeight in 3671, product of:
                  1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                    3.0 = termFreq=3.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3671)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Year
    2002
  18. Ferret, O.; Grau, B.; Hurault-Plantet, M.; Illouz, G.; Jacquemin, C.; Monceaux, L.; Robba, I.; Vilnat, A.: How NLP can improve question answering (2002) 0.02
    0.015501564 = product of:
      0.04650469 = sum of:
        0.04650469 = product of:
          0.09300938 = sum of:
            0.09300938 = weight(_text_:2002 in 1850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09300938 = score(doc=1850,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.44929665 = fieldWeight in 1850, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1850)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 29(2002) nos.3/4, S.135-155
    Year
    2002
  19. Sidhom, S.; Hassoun, M.: Morpho-syntactic parsing for a text mining environment : An NP recognition model for knowledge visualization and information retrieval (2002) 0.02
    0.015501564 = product of:
      0.04650469 = sum of:
        0.04650469 = product of:
          0.09300938 = sum of:
            0.09300938 = weight(_text_:2002 in 1852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09300938 = score(doc=1852,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.44929665 = fieldWeight in 1852, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1852)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 29(2002) nos.3/4, S.171-180
    Year
    2002
  20. L'Homme, D.; L'Homme, M.-C.; Lemay, C.: Benchmarking the performance of two Part-of-Speech (POS) taggers for terminological purposes (2002) 0.02
    0.015501564 = product of:
      0.04650469 = sum of:
        0.04650469 = product of:
          0.09300938 = sum of:
            0.09300938 = weight(_text_:2002 in 1855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09300938 = score(doc=1855,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.44929665 = fieldWeight in 1855, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1855)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 29(2002) nos.3/4, S.204-216
    Year
    2002

Years

Languages

  • e 69
  • d 20

Types

  • a 71
  • m 9
  • el 7
  • x 5
  • s 4
  • p 2
  • d 1
  • More… Less…