Search (170 results, page 1 of 9)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Glänzel, W.; Moed, H.F.: Journal impact measures in bibliometric research (2002) 0.04
    0.03617032 = product of:
      0.108510956 = sum of:
        0.108510956 = product of:
          0.21702191 = sum of:
            0.21702191 = weight(_text_:2002 in 2904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21702191 = score(doc=2904,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                1.0483589 = fieldWeight in 2904, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2904)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Scientometrics. 53(2002) no.2, S.171-193
    Year
    2002
  2. He, Y.; Hui, S.C.: Mining a web database for author cocitation analysis (2002) 0.04
    0.03617032 = product of:
      0.108510956 = sum of:
        0.108510956 = product of:
          0.21702191 = sum of:
            0.21702191 = weight(_text_:2002 in 2584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21702191 = score(doc=2584,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                1.0483589 = fieldWeight in 2584, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2584)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 38(2002) no.4, S.491-508
    Year
    2002
  3. Haycock, L.A.: Citation analysis of education dissertations for collection development (2004) 0.03
    0.032694243 = product of:
      0.09808272 = sum of:
        0.09808272 = sum of:
          0.058824293 = weight(_text_:2002 in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.058824293 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048293278 = queryNorm
              0.28416014 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
          0.03925843 = weight(_text_:22 in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03925843 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048293278 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The reference lists of forty-three education dissertations on curriculum and instruction completed at the University of Minnesota during the calendar years 2000-2002 were analyzed to inform collection development. As one measure of use of the academic library collection, the citation analysis yielded data to guide journal selection, retention, and cancellation decisions. The project aimed to ensure that the most frequently cited journals were retained on subscription. The serial monograph ratio for citation also was evaluated in comparison with other studies and explored in the context of funding ratios. Results of citation studies can provide a basis for liaison conversations with faculty in addition to guiding selection decisions. This research project can serve as a model for similar projects in other libraries that look at literature in education as well as other fields.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  4. Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006) 0.03
    0.032694243 = product of:
      0.09808272 = sum of:
        0.09808272 = sum of:
          0.058824293 = weight(_text_:2002 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.058824293 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048293278 = queryNorm
              0.28416014 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
          0.03925843 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03925843 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048293278 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Research patterns could enhance understanding of the Information Systems (IS) field. Citation analysis is the methodology commonly used to determine such research patterns. In this study, the citation methodology is applied to one of the top-ranked Information Systems conferences - International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Information is extracted from papers in the proceedings of ICIS 2000 to 2002. A total of 145 base articles and 4,226 citations are used. Research patterns are obtained using total citations, citations per journal or conference, and overlapping citations. We then provide the citation ranking of journals and conferences. We also examine the difference between the citation ranking in this study and the ranking of IS journals and IS conferences in other studies. Based on the comparison, we confirm that IS research is a multidisciplinary research area. We also identify the most cited papers and authors in the IS research area, and the organizations most active in producing papers in the top-rated IS conference. We discuss the findings and implications of the study.
    Date
    3. 1.2007 17:22:03
  5. Albarrán, P.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: References made and citations received by scientific articles (2011) 0.03
    0.032694243 = product of:
      0.09808272 = sum of:
        0.09808272 = sum of:
          0.058824293 = weight(_text_:2002 in 4185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.058824293 = score(doc=4185,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048293278 = queryNorm
              0.28416014 = fieldWeight in 4185, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4185)
          0.03925843 = weight(_text_:22 in 4185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03925843 = score(doc=4185,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048293278 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4185, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4185)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article studies massive evidence about references made and citations received after a 5-year citation window by 3.7 million articles published in 1998 to 2002 in 22 scientific fields. We find that the distributions of references made and citations received share a number of basic features across sciences. Reference distributions are rather skewed to the right while citation distributions are even more highly skewed: The mean is about 20 percentage points to the right of the median, and articles with a remarkable or an outstanding number of citations represent about 9% of the total. Moreover, the existence of a power law representing the upper tail of citation distributions cannot be rejected in 17 fields whose articles represent 74.7% of the total. Contrary to the evidence in other contexts, the value of the scale parameter is above 3.5 in 13 of the 17 cases. Finally, power laws are typically small, but capture a considerable proportion of the total citations received.
  6. Stock, W.G.: Eugene Garfield und die Folgen : der Weg der Fußnote bis in die Wissenschaftspolitik (2002) 0.03
    0.031003129 = product of:
      0.09300938 = sum of:
        0.09300938 = product of:
          0.18601876 = sum of:
            0.18601876 = weight(_text_:2002 in 472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18601876 = score(doc=472,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.8985933 = fieldWeight in 472, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=472)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Password. 2002, H.3, S.14-19
    Year
    2002
  7. Larsen, B.: Exploiting citation overlaps for information retrieval : generating a boomerang effect from the network of scientific papers (2002) 0.03
    0.031003129 = product of:
      0.09300938 = sum of:
        0.09300938 = product of:
          0.18601876 = sum of:
            0.18601876 = weight(_text_:2002 in 4175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18601876 = score(doc=4175,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.8985933 = fieldWeight in 4175, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4175)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Scientometrics. 54(2002) no.2, S.155-178
    Year
    2002
  8. Chen, C.: CiteSpace II : detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature (2006) 0.03
    0.027245205 = product of:
      0.08173561 = sum of:
        0.08173561 = sum of:
          0.049020246 = weight(_text_:2002 in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049020246 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048293278 = queryNorm
              0.2368001 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
          0.03271536 = weight(_text_:22 in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03271536 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048293278 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes the latest development of a generic approach to detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. The work makes substantial theoretical and methodological contributions to progressive knowledge domain visualization. A specialty is conceptualized and visualized as a time-variant duality between two fundamental concepts in information science: research fronts and intellectual bases. A research front is defined as an emergent and transient grouping of concepts and underlying research issues. The intellectual base of a research front is its citation and co-citation footprint in scientific literature - an evolving network of scientific publications cited by research-front concepts. Kleinberg's (2002) burst-detection algorithm is adapted to identify emergent research-front concepts. Freeman's (1979) betweenness centrality metric is used to highlight potential pivotal points of paradigm shift over time. Two complementary visualization views are designed and implemented: cluster views and time-zone views. The contributions of the approach are that (a) the nature of an intellectual base is algorithmically and temporally identified by emergent research-front terms, (b) the value of a co-citation cluster is explicitly interpreted in terms of research-front concepts, and (c) visually prominent and algorithmically detected pivotal points substantially reduce the complexity of a visualized network. The modeling and visualization process is implemented in CiteSpace II, a Java application, and applied to the analysis of two research fields: mass extinction (1981-2004) and terrorism (1990-2003). Prominent trends and pivotal points in visualized networks were verified in collaboration with domain experts, who are the authors of pivotal-point articles. Practical implications of the work are discussed. A number of challenges and opportunities for future studies are identified.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:11:05
  9. Mukherjee, B.: Do open-access journals in library and information science have any scholarly impact? : a bibliometric study of selected open-access journals using Google Scholar (2009) 0.03
    0.027245205 = product of:
      0.08173561 = sum of:
        0.08173561 = sum of:
          0.049020246 = weight(_text_:2002 in 2745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049020246 = score(doc=2745,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048293278 = queryNorm
              0.2368001 = fieldWeight in 2745, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2745)
          0.03271536 = weight(_text_:22 in 2745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03271536 = score(doc=2745,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048293278 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2745, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2745)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Using 17 fully open-access journals published uninterruptedly during 2000 to 2004 in the field of library and information science, the present study investigates the impact of these open-access journals in terms of quantity of articles published, subject distribution of the articles, synchronous and diachronous impact factor, immediacy index, and journals' and authors' self-citation. The results indicate that during this 5-year publication period, there are as many as 1,636 articles published by these journals. At the same time, the articles have received a total of 8,591 Web citations during a 7-year citation period. Eight of 17 journals have received more than 100 citations. First Monday received the highest number of citations; however, the average number of citations per article was the highest in D-Lib Magazine. The value of the synchronous impact factor varies from 0.6989 to 1.0014 during 2002 to 2005, and the diachronous impact factor varies from 1.472 to 2.487 during 2000 to 2004. The range of the immediacy index varies between 0.0714 and 1.395. D-Lib Magazine has an immediacy index value above 0.5 in all the years whereas the immediacy index value varies from year to year for the other journals. When the citations of sample articles were analyzed according to source, it was found that 40.32% of the citations came from full-text articles, followed by 33.35% from journal articles. The percentage of journals' self-citation was only 6.04%.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:54:59
  10. Burrell, Q.L.: Will this paper ever be cited? (2002) 0.02
    0.020668752 = product of:
      0.062006254 = sum of:
        0.062006254 = product of:
          0.12401251 = sum of:
            0.12401251 = weight(_text_:2002 in 3183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12401251 = score(doc=3183,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.5990622 = fieldWeight in 3183, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3183)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.3, S.232-235
    Year
    2002
  11. Cronin, B.; Shaw, D.: Banking (on) different forms of symbolic capital (2002) 0.02
    0.020668752 = product of:
      0.062006254 = sum of:
        0.062006254 = product of:
          0.12401251 = sum of:
            0.12401251 = weight(_text_:2002 in 1263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12401251 = score(doc=1263,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.5990622 = fieldWeight in 1263, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1263)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.14, S.1267-1270
    Year
    2002
  12. Nicolaisen, J.: ¬The J-shaped distribution of citedness (2002) 0.02
    0.020668752 = product of:
      0.062006254 = sum of:
        0.062006254 = product of:
          0.12401251 = sum of:
            0.12401251 = weight(_text_:2002 in 3765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12401251 = score(doc=3765,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.5990622 = fieldWeight in 3765, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3765)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 58(2002) no.4, S.383-395
    Year
    2002
  13. Rowlands, I.: Journal diffusion factors : a new approach to measuring research influence (2002) 0.02
    0.020668752 = product of:
      0.062006254 = sum of:
        0.062006254 = product of:
          0.12401251 = sum of:
            0.12401251 = weight(_text_:2002 in 693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12401251 = score(doc=693,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.5990622 = fieldWeight in 693, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=693)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Aslib proceedings. 54(2002) no.2, S.77-84
    Year
    2002
  14. Huber, J.C.: ¬A new model that generated Lotka's law (2002) 0.02
    0.01808516 = product of:
      0.054255478 = sum of:
        0.054255478 = product of:
          0.108510956 = sum of:
            0.108510956 = weight(_text_:2002 in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.108510956 = score(doc=248,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.52417946 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.3, S.209-219
    Year
    2002
  15. Egghe, L.: Sampling and concentration values of incomplete bibliographies (2002) 0.02
    0.01808516 = product of:
      0.054255478 = sum of:
        0.054255478 = product of:
          0.108510956 = sum of:
            0.108510956 = weight(_text_:2002 in 450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.108510956 = score(doc=450,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.52417946 = fieldWeight in 450, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=450)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.4, S.271-281
    Year
    2002
  16. Park, H.W.; Barnett, G.A.; Nam, I.-Y.: Hyperlink - affiliation network structure of top Web sites : examining affiliates with hyperlink in Korea (2002) 0.02
    0.01808516 = product of:
      0.054255478 = sum of:
        0.054255478 = product of:
          0.108510956 = sum of:
            0.108510956 = weight(_text_:2002 in 584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.108510956 = score(doc=584,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.52417946 = fieldWeight in 584, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=584)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.7, S.592-601
    Year
    2002
  17. Juchem, K.: ¬Der Bibliotheksdienst in szientometrischer Analyse (2002) 0.02
    0.01808516 = product of:
      0.054255478 = sum of:
        0.054255478 = product of:
          0.108510956 = sum of:
            0.108510956 = weight(_text_:2002 in 1213) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.108510956 = score(doc=1213,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.52417946 = fieldWeight in 1213, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1213)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 36(2002) H.12, S.1732-1740
    Year
    2002
  18. Leydesdorff, L.: Dynamic and evolutionary updates of classificatory schemes in scientific journal structures (2002) 0.02
    0.01808516 = product of:
      0.054255478 = sum of:
        0.054255478 = product of:
          0.108510956 = sum of:
            0.108510956 = weight(_text_:2002 in 1249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.108510956 = score(doc=1249,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.52417946 = fieldWeight in 1249, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1249)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.12, S.987-994
    Year
    2002
  19. Marchionini, G.: Co-evolution of user and organizational interfaces : a longitudinal case study of WWW dissemination of national statistics (2002) 0.02
    0.01808516 = product of:
      0.054255478 = sum of:
        0.054255478 = product of:
          0.108510956 = sum of:
            0.108510956 = weight(_text_:2002 in 1252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.108510956 = score(doc=1252,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.52417946 = fieldWeight in 1252, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1252)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.14, S.1192-1209
    Year
    2002
  20. Whitley, K.M.: Analysis of SciFinder Scholar and Web of Science citation searches (2002) 0.02
    0.01808516 = product of:
      0.054255478 = sum of:
        0.054255478 = product of:
          0.108510956 = sum of:
            0.108510956 = weight(_text_:2002 in 1255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.108510956 = score(doc=1255,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.52417946 = fieldWeight in 1255, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1255)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.14, S.1210-1215
    Year
    2002

Years

Languages

  • e 155
  • d 14
  • ro 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 165
  • m 3
  • el 2
  • s 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…