Search (54 results, page 2 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  1. Allan, J.; Callan, J.P.; Croft, W.B.; Ballesteros, L.; Broglio, J.; Xu, J.; Shu, H.: INQUERY at TREC-5 (1997) 0.01 
    0.0109051205 = product of:
  0.03271536 = sum of:
    0.03271536 = product of:
      0.06543072 = sum of:
        0.06543072 = weight(_text_:22 in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06543072 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048293278 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:55:22
  2. Ng, K.B.; Loewenstern, D.; Basu, C.; Hirsh, H.; Kantor, P.B.: Data fusion of machine-learning methods for the TREC5 routing tak (and other work) (1997) 0.01 
    0.0109051205 = product of:
  0.03271536 = sum of:
    0.03271536 = product of:
      0.06543072 = sum of:
        0.06543072 = weight(_text_:22 in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06543072 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048293278 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:59:22
  3. Saracevic, T.: On a method for studying the structure and nature of requests in information retrieval (1983) 0.01 
    0.0109051205 = product of:
  0.03271536 = sum of:
    0.03271536 = product of:
      0.06543072 = sum of:
        0.06543072 = weight(_text_:22 in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06543072 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048293278 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Pages
    S.22-25
  4. Ruthven, I.; Lalmas, M.; Rijsbergen, K. van: Combining and selecting characteristics of information use (2002) 0.01 
    0.010334376 = product of:
  0.031003127 = sum of:
    0.031003127 = product of:
      0.062006254 = sum of:
        0.062006254 = weight(_text_:2002 in 5208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062006254 = score(doc=5208,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048293278 = queryNorm
            0.2995311 = fieldWeight in 5208, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5208)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.5, S.378-396
    Year
    2002
  5. Serrano Cobos, J.; Quintero Orta, A.: Design, development and management of an information recovery system for an Internet Website : from documentary theory to practice (2003) 0.01 
    0.0098040495 = product of:
  0.029412147 = sum of:
    0.029412147 = product of:
      0.058824293 = sum of:
        0.058824293 = weight(_text_:2002 in 2726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058824293 = score(doc=2726,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048293278 = queryNorm
            0.28416014 = fieldWeight in 2726, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2726)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century: Integration of knowledge across boundaries. Proceedings of the 7th ISKO International Conference Granada, Spain, July 10-13, 2002. Ed.: M. López-Huertas
  6. Abdou, S.; Savoy, J.: Searching in Medline : query expansion and manual indexing evaluation (2008) 0.01 
    0.0098040495 = product of:
  0.029412147 = sum of:
    0.029412147 = product of:
      0.058824293 = sum of:
        0.058824293 = weight(_text_:2002 in 2062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058824293 = score(doc=2062,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048293278 = queryNorm
            0.28416014 = fieldWeight in 2062, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2062)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Based on a relatively large subset representing one third of the Medline collection, this paper evaluates ten different IR models, including recent developments in both probabilistic and language models. We show that the best performing IR models is a probabilistic model developed within the Divergence from Randomness framework [Amati, G., & van Rijsbergen, C.J. (2002) Probabilistic models of information retrieval based on measuring the divergence from randomness. ACM-Transactions on Information Systems 20(4), 357-389], which result in 170% enhancements in mean average precision when compared to the classical tf idf vector-space model. This paper also reports on our impact evaluations on the retrieval effectiveness of manually assigned descriptors (MeSH or Medical Subject Headings), showing that by including these terms retrieval performance can improve from 2.4% to 13.5%, depending on the underling IR model. Finally, we design a new general blind-query expansion approach showing improved retrieval performances compared to those obtained using the Rocchio approach.
  7. Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬A test for the separation of relevant and non-relevant documents in experimental retrieval collections (1973) 0.01 
    0.008724097 = product of:
  0.02617229 = sum of:
    0.02617229 = product of:
      0.05234458 = sum of:
        0.05234458 = weight(_text_:22 in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05234458 = score(doc=5002,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048293278 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    19. 3.1996 11:22:12
  8. Sanderson, M.: ¬The Reuters test collection (1996) 0.01 
    0.008724097 = product of:
  0.02617229 = sum of:
    0.02617229 = product of:
      0.05234458 = sum of:
        0.05234458 = weight(_text_:22 in 6971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05234458 = score(doc=6971,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048293278 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6971, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6971)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  9. Lespinasse, K.: TREC: une conference pour l'evaluation des systemes de recherche d'information (1997) 0.01 
    0.008724097 = product of:
  0.02617229 = sum of:
    0.02617229 = product of:
      0.05234458 = sum of:
        0.05234458 = weight(_text_:22 in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05234458 = score(doc=744,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048293278 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  10. ¬The Fifth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-5) (1997) 0.01 
    0.008724097 = product of:
  0.02617229 = sum of:
    0.02617229 = product of:
      0.05234458 = sum of:
        0.05234458 = weight(_text_:22 in 3087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05234458 = score(doc=3087,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048293278 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3087, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3087)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Proceedings of the 5th TREC-confrerence held in Gaithersburgh, Maryland, Nov 20-22, 1996. Aim of the conference was discussion on retrieval techniques for large test collections. Different research groups used different techniques, such as automated thesauri, term weighting, natural language techniques, relevance feedback and advanced pattern matching, for information retrieval from the same large database. This procedure makes it possible to compare the results. The proceedings include papers, tables of the system results, and brief system descriptions including timing and storage information
  11. Pemberton, J.K.; Ojala, M.; Garman, N.: Head to head : searching the Web versus traditional services (1998) 0.01 
    0.008724097 = product of:
  0.02617229 = sum of:
    0.02617229 = product of:
      0.05234458 = sum of:
        0.05234458 = weight(_text_:22 in 3572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05234458 = score(doc=3572,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048293278 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3572, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3572)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.3, S.24-26,28
  12. Ellis, D.: Progress and problems in information retrieval (1996) 0.01 
    0.008724097 = product of:
  0.02617229 = sum of:
    0.02617229 = product of:
      0.05234458 = sum of:
        0.05234458 = weight(_text_:22 in 789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05234458 = score(doc=789,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048293278 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 789, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=789)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    26. 7.2002 20:22:46
  13. Hansen, P.; Karlgren, J.: Effects of foreign language and task scenario on relevance assessment (2005) 0.01 
    0.008170041 = product of:
  0.024510123 = sum of:
    0.024510123 = product of:
      0.049020246 = sum of:
        0.049020246 = weight(_text_:2002 in 4393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049020246 = score(doc=4393,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048293278 = queryNorm
            0.2368001 = fieldWeight in 4393, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4393)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper aims to investigate how readers assess relevance of retrieved documents in a foreign language they know well compared with their native language, and whether work-task scenario descriptions have effect on the assessment process. Design/methodology/approach - Queries, test collections, and relevance assessments were used from the 2002 Interactive CLEF. Swedish first-language speakers, fluent in English, were given simulated information-seeking scenarios and presented with retrieval results in both languages. Twenty-eight subjects in four groups were asked to rate the retrieved text documents by relevance. A two-level work-task scenario description framework was developed and applied to facilitate the study of context effects on the assessment process. Findings - Relevance assessment takes longer in a foreign language than in the user first language. The quality of assessments by comparison with pre-assessed results is inferior to those made in the users' first language. Work-task scenario descriptions had an effect on the assessment process, both by measured access time and by self-report by subjects. However, effects on results by traditional relevance ranking were detectable. This may be an argument for extending the traditional IR experimental topical relevance measures to cater for context effects. Originality/value - An extended two-level work-task scenario description framework was developed and applied. Contextual aspects had an effect on the relevance assessment process. English texts took longer to assess than Swedish and were assessed less well, especially for the most difficult queries. The IR research field needs to close this gap and to design information access systems with users' language competence in mind.
  14. Blagden, J.F.: How much noise in a role-free and link-free co-ordinate indexing system? (1966) 0.01 
    0.0076335846 = product of:
  0.022900753 = sum of:
    0.022900753 = product of:
      0.045801505 = sum of:
        0.045801505 = weight(_text_:22 in 2718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045801505 = score(doc=2718,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048293278 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2718, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2718)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 22(1966), S.203-209
  15. Smithson, S.: Information retrieval evaluation in practice : a case study approach (1994) 0.01 
    0.0076335846 = product of:
  0.022900753 = sum of:
    0.022900753 = product of:
      0.045801505 = sum of:
        0.045801505 = weight(_text_:22 in 7302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045801505 = score(doc=7302,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048293278 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7302, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7302)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The evaluation of information retrieval systems is an important yet difficult operation. This paper describes an exploratory evaluation study that takes an interpretive approach to evaluation. The longitudinal study examines evaluation through the information-seeking behaviour of 22 case studies of 'real' users. The eclectic approach to data collection produced behavioral data that is compared with relevance judgements and satisfaction ratings. The study demonstrates considerable variations among the cases, among different evaluation measures within the same case, and among the same measures at different stages within a single case. It is argued that those involved in evaluation should be aware of the difficulties, and base any evaluation on a good understanding of the cases in question
  16. Blair, D.C.: STAIRS Redux : thoughts on the STAIRS evaluation, ten years after (1996) 0.01 
    0.0076335846 = product of:
  0.022900753 = sum of:
    0.022900753 = product of:
      0.045801505 = sum of:
        0.045801505 = weight(_text_:22 in 3002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045801505 = score(doc=3002,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048293278 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3002, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3002)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.1, S.4-22
  17. Losee, R.M.: Determining information retrieval and filtering performance without experimentation (1995) 0.01 
    0.0076335846 = product of:
  0.022900753 = sum of:
    0.022900753 = product of:
      0.045801505 = sum of:
        0.045801505 = weight(_text_:22 in 3368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045801505 = score(doc=3368,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048293278 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3368, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3368)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    22. 2.1996 13:14:10
  18. Hodges, P.R.: Keyword in title indexes : effectiveness of retrieval in computer searches (1983) 0.01 
    0.0076335846 = product of:
  0.022900753 = sum of:
    0.022900753 = product of:
      0.045801505 = sum of:
        0.045801505 = weight(_text_:22 in 5001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045801505 = score(doc=5001,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048293278 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5001, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5001)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    14. 3.1996 13:22:21
  19. Brown, M.E.: By any other name : accounting for failure in the naming of subject categories (1995) 0.01 
    0.0076335846 = product of:
  0.022900753 = sum of:
    0.022900753 = product of:
      0.045801505 = sum of:
        0.045801505 = weight(_text_:22 in 5598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045801505 = score(doc=5598,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048293278 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5598, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5598)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    2.11.1996 13:08:22
  20. Iivonen, M.: Consistency in the selection of search concepts and search terms (1995) 0.01 
    0.006543072 = product of:
  0.019629216 = sum of:
    0.019629216 = product of:
      0.03925843 = sum of:
        0.03925843 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03925843 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048293278 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Considers intersearcher and intrasearcher consistency in the selection of search terms. Based on an empirical study where 22 searchers from 4 different types of search environments analyzed altogether 12 search requests of 4 different types in 2 separate test situations between which 2 months elapsed. Statistically very significant differences in consistency were found according to the types of search environments and search requests. Consistency was also considered according to the extent of the scope of search concept. At level I search terms were compared character by character. At level II different search terms were accepted as the same search concept with a rather simple evaluation of linguistic expressions. At level III, in addition to level II, the hierarchical approach of the search request was also controlled. At level IV different search terms were accepted as the same search concept with a broad interpretation of the search concept. Both intersearcher and intrasearcher consistency grew most immediately after a rather simple evaluation of linguistic impressions

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 45
  • d 7
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 50
  • s 3
  • el 2
  • m 2
  • More… Less…

Themes