Search (590 results, page 1 of 30)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Gradmann, S.; Olensky, M.: Semantische Kontextualisierung von Museumsbeständen in Europeana (2013) 0.06
    0.05615715 = product of:
      0.16847144 = sum of:
        0.16847144 = weight(_text_:multimedial in 939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16847144 = score(doc=939,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35033083 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.2542357 = idf(docFreq=84, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048293278 = queryNorm
            0.48089242 = fieldWeight in 939, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.2542357 = idf(docFreq=84, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=939)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Europeana ist eine Initiative der Europäischen Kommission, die 2005 den Aufbau einer "Europäischen digitalen Bibliothek" als Teil ihrer i2010 Agenda ankündigte. Europeana soll ein gemeinsamer multilingualer Zugangspunkt zu Europas digitalem Kulturerbe und gleichzeitig mehr als "nur" eine digitale Bibliothek werden: eine offene Schnittstelle (API) für Wissenschaftsanwendungen, die ein Netzwerk von Objektsurrogaren darstellt, die semantikbasiertes Objektretrieval und - verwendung ermöglichen. Einerseits ist die semantische Kontextualisierung der digitalen Objekte eine unabdingbare Voraussetzung für effektives Information Retrieval, da aufgrund der Beschaffenheit der Öbjekte (bildlich, multimedial) deskriptive Metadaten meist nicht ausreichen, auf der anderen Seite bildet sie die Grundlage für neues Wissen. Kern geisteswissenschaftlicher Arbeit ist immer schon die Reaggregation und Interpretation kultureller Artefakte gewesen und Europeana ermöglicht nun mit (teil-)automatisierbaren, semantikbasierten Öperationen über große kulturelle Quellcorpora völlig neue Perspektiven für die digital humanities. Folglich hat Europeans das Potenzial eine Schlüsselressource der Geistes- und Kulturwissenschaften und damit Teil deren zukünftiger digitaler Arbeitsumgebungen zu werden.
  2. Moneda Corrochano, M. de la; López-Huertas, M.J.; Jiménez-Contreras, E.: Spanish research in knowledge organization (2002-2010) (2013) 0.05
    0.04761888 = product of:
      0.14285664 = sum of:
        0.14285664 = sum of:
          0.09705514 = weight(_text_:2002 in 3363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09705514 = score(doc=3363,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048293278 = queryNorm
              0.4688403 = fieldWeight in 3363, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3363)
          0.045801505 = weight(_text_:22 in 3363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.045801505 = score(doc=3363,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048293278 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3363, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3363)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This study analyzes Spanish research on Knowledge Organization from 2002 to 2010. The first stage involved extraction of records from national and international databases that were interrogated. After getting the pertinent records, they we re normalized and processed according to the usual bibliometric procedure. The results point to a mature specialty follow ing the path of the past decade. There is a remarkable increase of male vs. female authors per publication, although the gender gap is not big. It is also evident that ther e is a remarkable internationalization in publication and that the content map of the specialty is more varied than in the previous decade.
    Date
    22. 2.2013 12:10:07
  3. Albarrán, P.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: References made and citations received by scientific articles (2011) 0.03
    0.032694243 = product of:
      0.09808272 = sum of:
        0.09808272 = sum of:
          0.058824293 = weight(_text_:2002 in 4185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.058824293 = score(doc=4185,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048293278 = queryNorm
              0.28416014 = fieldWeight in 4185, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4185)
          0.03925843 = weight(_text_:22 in 4185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03925843 = score(doc=4185,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048293278 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4185, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4185)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article studies massive evidence about references made and citations received after a 5-year citation window by 3.7 million articles published in 1998 to 2002 in 22 scientific fields. We find that the distributions of references made and citations received share a number of basic features across sciences. Reference distributions are rather skewed to the right while citation distributions are even more highly skewed: The mean is about 20 percentage points to the right of the median, and articles with a remarkable or an outstanding number of citations represent about 9% of the total. Moreover, the existence of a power law representing the upper tail of citation distributions cannot be rejected in 17 fields whose articles represent 74.7% of the total. Contrary to the evidence in other contexts, the value of the scale parameter is above 3.5 in 13 of the 17 cases. Finally, power laws are typically small, but capture a considerable proportion of the total citations received.
  4. Milani, S.O.; Chaves Guimarães, J.A.; Olson, H.A.: Bias in subject representation : convergences and divergences in the international literature (2014) 0.03
    0.032694243 = product of:
      0.09808272 = sum of:
        0.09808272 = sum of:
          0.058824293 = weight(_text_:2002 in 1443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.058824293 = score(doc=1443,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048293278 = queryNorm
              0.28416014 = fieldWeight in 1443, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1443)
          0.03925843 = weight(_text_:22 in 1443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03925843 = score(doc=1443,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048293278 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1443, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1443)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Terms chosen to represent document subjects, the classification notations assigned to them, the abstracts and indices contain biases in two contexts. In a negative context, document surrogates are constructed with bias when they leave out diverse features, disenfranchise groups and topics outside an accepted norm (Olson, 2002). In this way, these document surrogates would convey inclinations, or prejudices. In a positive context, slanting or tendency (Hjørland, 2008a, McIlwaine, 2003) conveyed by the document surrogates to ensure specificity to particular discursive communities or knowledge domains can be observed. Considering that topics related to biases are scarce in the Information Organization literature, this paper proposes a discussion on the characteristics and occurrences of bias in subject representation. This study is exploratory and bibliographic, and adopts an inductive method.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  5. Hümmer, C.: TELOTA - Aspekte eines Wissensportals für geisteswissenschaftliche Forschung (2010) 0.03
    0.027245205 = product of:
      0.08173561 = sum of:
        0.08173561 = sum of:
          0.049020246 = weight(_text_:2002 in 3745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049020246 = score(doc=3745,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20701107 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048293278 = queryNorm
              0.2368001 = fieldWeight in 3745, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3745)
          0.03271536 = weight(_text_:22 in 3745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03271536 = score(doc=3745,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048293278 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3745, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3745)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    TELOTA (The Electronic Life of the Academy) ist eine Initiative der Berlin-Brandenburgischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, die es sich zur Aufgabe gemacht hat, in verstärktem Maße die Möglichkeiten und Chancen der Informationstechnologie für die Akademie und ihre Forschungsvorhaben zu explorieren und umzusetzen. TELOTA betreut die Akademievorhaben in Hinblick auf die Einführung von elektronischen Arbeits- und Publikationsstrategien und trifft deshalb auf sehr unterschiedliche Bedürfnisse und Ausgangssituationen. Nach einer ersten Projektphase, in der vor allem die Breite der Möglichkeiten des elektronischen Mediums exploriert wurden, widmete sich TELOTA zwischen März 2007 und Dezember 2008 der Entwicklung von projektübergreifenden Lösungen für die Bereiche Digitale Edition, Personendatenbanken und elektronische Wörterbücher. Für die Zukunft gibt es erste Ansätze, die elektronischen Ressourcen der Akademie zu einem vernetzten Wissensportal für geisteswissenschaftliche Grundlagenforschung auszubauen. Aufgaben und Ziele von TELOTA Der vorliegende Artikel gibt einen Überblick über die Arbeit der TELOTA-Initiative der Berlin-Brandenburgischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (BBAW). Auf Initiative der "Arbeitsgruppe elektronisches Publizieren" ins Leben gerufen, widmet sich TELOTA seit 2002 der Aufgabe, moderne Informationstechnologie bewusst, geplant und nachhaltig für die Belange der BBAW nutzbar zu machen. Diese Aufgabe versteht sich sowohl im Sinne eines verstärkten Einsatzes zur Unterstützung des Forschungsprozesses als auch im Sinne einer kostenfreien Online-Präsentation von Daten und Ergebnissen für die interessierte Öffentlichkeit. Darüber hinaus soll die verstärkte "Digitalisierung" der Akademievorhaben auch den wissenschaftlichen Austausch und die Kommunikation unter Fachwissenschaftlern erleichtern und fördern (vgl. den Bericht der Arbeitsgruppe "Elektronisches Publizieren" an den Vorstand 2001). Das Akronym TELOTA steht - zusammenfassend für diese Aufgabengebiete - für "The Electronic Life of the Academy".
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  6. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.03
    0.02556751 = product of:
      0.07670253 = sum of:
        0.07670253 = product of:
          0.23010758 = sum of:
            0.23010758 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.23010758 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.40943095 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  7. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.03
    0.02556751 = product of:
      0.07670253 = sum of:
        0.07670253 = product of:
          0.23010758 = sum of:
            0.23010758 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.23010758 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.40943095 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
  8. Schöne neue Welt? : Fragen und Antworten: Wie Facebook menschliche Gedanken auslesen will (2017) 0.02
    0.015422169 = product of:
      0.046266507 = sum of:
        0.046266507 = product of:
          0.092533015 = sum of:
            0.092533015 = weight(_text_:22 in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.092533015 = score(doc=2810,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2004 9:42:33
    22. 4.2017 11:58:05
  9. Wolchover, N.: Wie ein Aufsehen erregender Beweis kaum Beachtung fand (2017) 0.02
    0.015422169 = product of:
      0.046266507 = sum of:
        0.046266507 = product of:
          0.092533015 = sum of:
            0.092533015 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.092533015 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 4.2017 10:42:05
    22. 4.2017 10:48:38
  10. Poscher, R.: ¬Die Zukunft der informationellen Selbstbestimmung als Recht auf Abwehr von Grundrechtsgefährdungen (2012) 0.02
    0.015422169 = product of:
      0.046266507 = sum of:
        0.046266507 = product of:
          0.092533015 = sum of:
            0.092533015 = weight(_text_:22 in 3975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.092533015 = score(doc=3975,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3975, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3975)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2018 12:06:44
    22. 2.2018 12:13:53
  11. Cronin, B.: Thinking about data (2013) 0.02
    0.015267169 = product of:
      0.045801505 = sum of:
        0.045801505 = product of:
          0.09160301 = sum of:
            0.09160301 = weight(_text_:22 in 4347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09160301 = score(doc=4347,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4347, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4347)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2013 16:18:36
  12. Grudin, J.: Human-computer interaction (2011) 0.02
    0.015267169 = product of:
      0.045801505 = sum of:
        0.045801505 = product of:
          0.09160301 = sum of:
            0.09160301 = weight(_text_:22 in 1601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09160301 = score(doc=1601,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1601, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1601)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    27.12.2014 18:54:22
  13. Williamson, N.J.: Classification issues in 2011 : report (2012) 0.01
    0.013086144 = product of:
      0.03925843 = sum of:
        0.03925843 = product of:
          0.07851686 = sum of:
            0.07851686 = weight(_text_:22 in 6224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07851686 = score(doc=6224,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6224, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6224)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:17:00
  14. Cronin, B.: ¬The writing on the wall (2015) 0.01
    0.013086144 = product of:
      0.03925843 = sum of:
        0.03925843 = product of:
          0.07851686 = sum of:
            0.07851686 = weight(_text_:22 in 7297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07851686 = score(doc=7297,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 7297, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7297)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    26. 4.2015 19:27:22
  15. Deisseroth, K.: Lichtschalter im Gehirn (2011) 0.01
    0.013086144 = product of:
      0.03925843 = sum of:
        0.03925843 = product of:
          0.07851686 = sum of:
            0.07851686 = weight(_text_:22 in 4248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07851686 = score(doc=4248,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4248, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4248)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2011, H.2, S.22-29
  16. Xiao, G.: ¬A knowledge classification model based on the relationship between science and human needs (2013) 0.01
    0.013086144 = product of:
      0.03925843 = sum of:
        0.03925843 = product of:
          0.07851686 = sum of:
            0.07851686 = weight(_text_:22 in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07851686 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2013 12:36:34
  17. Szostak, R.: Speaking truth to power in classification : response to Fox's review of my work; KO 39:4, 300 (2013) 0.01
    0.013086144 = product of:
      0.03925843 = sum of:
        0.03925843 = product of:
          0.07851686 = sum of:
            0.07851686 = weight(_text_:22 in 591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07851686 = score(doc=591,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 591, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=591)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2013 12:35:05
  18. Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014) 0.01
    0.013086144 = product of:
      0.03925843 = sum of:
        0.03925843 = product of:
          0.07851686 = sum of:
            0.07851686 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07851686 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    18. 3.2014 19:13:22
  19. Antos, G.: Wie Sprache Entscheidungen (vor)prägt : zum Einfluss und zur Rhetorik kollektiver Selbsttäuschungen (2014) 0.01
    0.013086144 = product of:
      0.03925843 = sum of:
        0.03925843 = product of:
          0.07851686 = sum of:
            0.07851686 = weight(_text_:22 in 1489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07851686 = score(doc=1489,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1489, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1489)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    6. 7.2014 18:22:33
  20. Pohl, A.; Danowski, P.: Linked Open Data in der Bibliothekswelt : Überblick und Herausforderungen (2015) 0.01
    0.013086144 = product of:
      0.03925843 = sum of:
        0.03925843 = product of:
          0.07851686 = sum of:
            0.07851686 = weight(_text_:22 in 2057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07851686 = score(doc=2057,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16911483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048293278 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2057, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2057)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    26. 8.2015 10:22:00

Authors

Languages

  • e 443
  • d 145
  • a 1
  • More… Less…

Types

Themes