Search (18 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Dahlberg, I."
  1. Dahlberg, I.: Normung und Klassifikation (1978) 0.03 
    0.028222147 = product of:
  0.14111073 = sum of:
    0.14111073 = weight(_text_:22 in 1612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14111073 = score(doc=1612,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1612, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1612)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    DK-Mitteilungen. 22(1978) Nr.5/6, S.13-18
  2. Dahlberg, I.: Kolloquium Einheitsklassifikation (1975) 0.03 
    0.028222147 = product of:
  0.14111073 = sum of:
    0.14111073 = weight(_text_:22 in 1625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14111073 = score(doc=1625,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1625, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1625)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 26(1975), S.22-25
  3. Dahlberg, I.: Conceptual definitions for INTERCONCEPT (1981) 0.03 
    0.028222147 = product of:
  0.14111073 = sum of:
    0.14111073 = weight(_text_:22 in 1630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14111073 = score(doc=1630,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1630, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1630)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    International classification. 8(1981), S.16-22
  4. Dahlberg, I.: Major developments in classification (1977) 0.02 
    0.020205619 = product of:
  0.10102809 = sum of:
    0.10102809 = weight(_text_:7 in 1619) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10102809 = score(doc=1619,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.5856202 = fieldWeight in 1619, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1619)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Advances in librarianship. 7(1977), S.41-103
  5. Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die gegenstandsbezogene, analytische Begriffstheorie und ihre Definitionsarten (1987) 0.02 
    0.019755503 = product of:
  0.09877752 = sum of:
    0.09877752 = weight(_text_:22 in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09877752 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Pages
    S.9-22
  6. Dahlberg, I.: ¬The compatibility guidelines : a re-evaluation (1996) 0.02 
    0.015154215 = product of:
  0.07577107 = sum of:
    0.07577107 = weight(_text_:7 in 6047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07577107 = score(doc=6047,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.43921518 = fieldWeight in 6047, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6047)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    7. 1.1997 17:39:26
  7. Dahlberg, I.: Grundlagen universaler Wissensordnung : Probleme und Möglichkeiten eines universalen Klassifikationssystems des Wissens (1974) 0.01 
    0.014111074 = product of:
  0.07055537 = sum of:
    0.07055537 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07055537 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Footnote
    Zugleich Dissertation Univ. Düsseldorf. - Rez. in: ZfBB. 22(1975) S.53-57 (H.-A. Koch)
  8. Dahlberg, I.: Begriffsarbeit in der Wissensorganisation (2010) 0.01 
    0.011288859 = product of:
  0.056444295 = sum of:
    0.056444295 = weight(_text_:22 in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056444295 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  9. De Luca, E.W.; Dahlberg, I.: Including knowledge domains from the ICC into the multilingual lexical linked data cloud (2014) 0.01 
    0.009978036 = product of:
  0.04989018 = sum of:
    0.04989018 = weight(_text_:22 in 1493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04989018 = score(doc=1493,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1493, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1493)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 9.2014 19:01:18
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  10. Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die Pilotstudie "DB-Thesaurus" : Allgemeiner Thesaurus für Bibliotheken (1982) 0.01 
    0.008839957 = product of:
  0.044199787 = sum of:
    0.044199787 = weight(_text_:7 in 1527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044199787 = score(doc=1527,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.25620884 = fieldWeight in 1527, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1527)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Numerische und nicht-numerische Klassifikation zwischen Theorie und Praxis. Proc. der 5. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Hofgeismar, 7.-10.4.1981. Hrsg.: Peter Ihm u.a
  11. Dahlberg, I.: Tendencias actuales en organizacion del conocimiento (1995) 0.01 
    0.008839957 = product of:
  0.044199787 = sum of:
    0.044199787 = weight(_text_:7 in 5549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044199787 = score(doc=5549,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.25620884 = fieldWeight in 5549, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5549)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Pages
    S.7-25
  12. Dahlberg, I.: Wissensorganisation : Entwicklung, Aufgabe, Anwendung, Zukunft (2014) 0.01 
    0.008839957 = product of:
  0.044199787 = sum of:
    0.044199787 = weight(_text_:7 in 2198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044199787 = score(doc=2198,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.25620884 = fieldWeight in 2198, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2198)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Isbn
    978-3-95650065-7
  13. Luca, E.W. de; Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die Multilingual Lexical Linked Data Cloud : eine mögliche Zugangsoptimierung? (2014) 0.01 
    0.008466644 = product of:
  0.04233322 = sum of:
    0.04233322 = weight(_text_:22 in 1736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04233322 = score(doc=1736,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1736, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1736)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 9.2014 19:00:13
  14. Dahlberg, I.: ¬The basis of a new universal classification system seen from a philosophy of science point of view (1992) 0.01 
    0.0075771073 = product of:
  0.037885536 = sum of:
    0.037885536 = weight(_text_:7 in 2100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037885536 = score(doc=2100,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.21960759 = fieldWeight in 2100, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2100)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The implications of contributions from philosophy of science to classification theory and the construction of a new universal classification system are discussed. Starting from the purposes of universal systems and what has been considered so far to serve as main classes of the six existing major universal systems, the following theories have been treated: Theory of (1) knowledge, (2) knowledge elements and units, (3) systems, (4) the science concept, (5) knowledge fields including criteria for their identification, (6) a logical syntax, (7) an overall structure of object and aspect areas. Concludingly an evaluation was made with special regard to the representability (notation) of such a theory-based universal concept system by computer and in telecommunication. This, as well as the heuristics contained in such a theory-based system facilitate its general applicability
  15. Dahlberg, I.: Zur 'Begriffskultur' in den Sozialwissenschaften : lassen sich ihre Probleme lösen? (1996) 0.01 
    0.0075771073 = product of:
  0.037885536 = sum of:
    0.037885536 = weight(_text_:7 in 3941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037885536 = score(doc=3941,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.21960759 = fieldWeight in 3941, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3941)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Ethik und Sozialwissenschaften. 7(1996) H.1, S.3-13
  16. Dahlberg, I.: Desiderate für die Wissensorganisation (2013) 0.01 
    0.0063142553 = product of:
  0.031571276 = sum of:
    0.031571276 = weight(_text_:7 in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031571276 = score(doc=915,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.18300632 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    In 2009 wurde die ISKO 20 Jahre alt, ein Zeitmoment für eine kurze Rückschau auf bisher Erreichtes und zur Ventilierung möglicher zukünftiger Erkenntnisse und Aktivitäten. Als wesentlich erschienen dabei - neben einigen am Schluß genannten Vorschläge - die folgenden zehn Desiderate. Ausgehend von der Notwendigkeit, den fundamentalen Unterschied zwischen dem Begriff (als die Wissenseinheit), mithin der begrifflichen Ebene, gegenüber dem Wort, dem Term oder dem Code), also der Ausdrucksebene in der Ordnung des Wissens zu erkennen und entsprechend theoretisch und praktisch zu vollziehen (Desiderat 1), werden eine Reihe von nützlichen Anregungen vorgebracht. Als Desiderat 2 somit die norwendigen Übersichten über vorhandene und benutzte Klassifikationssysteme, Thesauri und sonstige Mittel der Ordnung zur Erschließung des Wissens, 3. eine verbesserte Situation der Ausbildung zum Experten der Wissensorganisation (WO), auch Lehrpläne und Berufsbild betreffend, 4. der bisher noch nicht bedachte Ausbau von nationalen Sekretariaten und dem internationalen Sekretariat, 5. Erstellung einer systematischen Ordnung der WO-relevanten Begriffe als Modellsystem für andere Sachgebiete, 6. die Einrichtung von Instituten der WO, 7. Verfügbarkeit des ISKO-eigenen Expertenwissens für alle Anfragenden, 8. ISKO's globale Verbreitung, also Mitgliedschaften und Sektionen in allen Ländern der Welt, 9. Erweiterung der Publikationstätigkeit in der ISKO und 10. Entwicklung der WO als eigenständige Disziplin im Bereich der Wissenschaftswissenschaft.
  17. Dahlberg, I.: Zur Begriffskultur in den Sozialwissenschaften : Evaluation einer Herausforderung (2006) 0.01 
    0.0050514047 = product of:
  0.025257023 = sum of:
    0.025257023 = weight(_text_:7 in 3128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025257023 = score(doc=3128,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.14640506 = fieldWeight in 3128, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3128)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Wissensorganisation und Verantwortung: Gesellschaftliche, ökonomische und technische Aspekte. Proceedings der 9. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Duisburg, 5.-7. November 2004. Hrsg. von H.P. Ohly u.a
  18. Dahlberg, I.: How to improve ISKO's standing : ten desiderata for knowledge organization (2011) 0.00 
    0.0044648536 = product of:
  0.022324268 = sum of:
    0.022324268 = weight(_text_:7 in 4300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022324268 = score(doc=4300,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.12940502 = fieldWeight in 4300, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4300)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    In 2009 ISKO had its 20th anniversary, a time for review and reflection on what might be envisaged to further Knowledge Organization in the forthcoming years. In addition to some proposals set forth at the end of this contribution, ten desiderata appear urgent. A preliminary condition to any other consideration is the recognition of the fundamental difference in the organization of knowledge between the concept (i.e., the unit of knowledge)-the conceptual level-and the word, term or code-the verbal level-and the need for implementing this distinction in theory and practice (Desideratum 1). On this basis, some further proposals are enunciated. The 2nd proposition concerns the surveying of extant classification systems, thesauri, and other means of organizing, ordering, and indexing knowledge; the 3rd proposition envisages the improvement of expert training in Knowledge Organization (KO), also with regard to curricula and professional acknowledgment. Nr.4) refers to the professionalization of the hitherto rather neglected national ISKO secretariats, as well as the international ISKO secretariat. Nr.5) urges a systematic survey of KO-relevant concepts to serve as a model or standard for other subject fields, Nr.6) claims the establishment of KO Institutes, Nr.7) views consultancy to the effect that anybody interested in KO may approach ISKO for help, Nr 8) urges ISKO's promotion of membership and chapters in as many countries as possible, Nr.9) presses for intensification of ISKO's publication activities, and Nr.10) pleads for KO as a scientific discipline on its own.
    Content
    6. Establishment of national Knowledge Organization Institutes should be scheduled by national chapters, planned energetically and submitted to corresponding administrative authorities for support. They could be attached to research institutions, e.g., the Max-Planck or Fraunhofer Institutes in Germany or to universities. Their scope and research areas relate to the elaboration of knowledge systems of subject related concepts, according to Desideratum 1, and may be connected to training activities and KOsubject-related research work. 7. ISKO experts should not accept to be impressed by Internet and Computer Science, but should demonstrate their expertise more actively on the public plane. They should tend to take a leading part in the ISKO Secretariats and the KO Institutes, and act as consultants and informants, as well as editors of statistics and other publications. 8. All colleagues trained in the field of classification/indexing and thesauri construction and active in different countries should be identified and approached for membership in ISKO. This would have to be accomplished by the General Secretariat with the collaboration of the experts in the different secretariats of the countries, as soon as they start to work. The more members ISKO will have, the greater will be its reputation and influence. But it will also prove its professionalism by the quality of its products, especially its innovating conceptual order systems to come. 9. ISKO should-especially in view of global expansion-intensify the promotion of knowledge about its own subject area through the publications mentioned here and in further publications as deemed necessary. It should be made clear that, especially in ISKO's own publications, professional subject indexes are a sine qua non. 10. 1) Knowledge Organization, having arisen from librarianship and documentation, the contents of which has many points of contact with numerous application fields, should-although still linked up with its areas of descent-be recognized in the long run as an independent autonomous discipline to be located under the science of science, since only thereby can it fully play its role as an equal partner in all application fields; and, 2) An "at-a-first-glance knowledge order" could be implemented through the Information Coding Classification (ICC), as this system is based on an entirely new approach, namely based on general object areas, thus deviating from discipline-oriented main classes of the current main universal classification systems. It can therefore recoup by simple display on screen the hitherto lost overview of all knowledge areas and fields. On "one look", one perceives 9 object areas subdivided into 9 aspects which break down into 81 subject areas with their 729 subject fields, including further special fields. The synthesis and place of order of all knowledge becomes thus evident at a glance to everybody. Nobody would any longer be irritated by the abundance of singular apparently unrelated knowledge fields or become hesitant in his/her understanding of the world.

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 16
  • m 2

Themes