-
Rousseau, R.: Egghe's g-index is not a proper concentration measure (2015)
0.02
0.015154215 = product of:
0.07577107 = sum of:
0.07577107 = weight(_text_:7 in 1864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07577107 = score(doc=1864,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.052075688 = queryNorm
0.43921518 = fieldWeight in 1864, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1864)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.7, S.1518-1519
-
Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.; Leuven, K.U.: Erratum (2012)
0.01
0.014111074 = product of:
0.07055537 = sum of:
0.07055537 = weight(_text_:22 in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07055537 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052075688 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 14. 2.2012 12:53:22
-
Zhang, L.; Rousseau, R.; Glänzel, W.: Document-type country profiles (2011)
0.01
0.010102809 = product of:
0.050514046 = sum of:
0.050514046 = weight(_text_:7 in 4487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050514046 = score(doc=4487,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.052075688 = queryNorm
0.2928101 = fieldWeight in 4487, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4487)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.7, S.1403-1411
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data (1996)
0.01
0.008466644 = product of:
0.04233322 = sum of:
0.04233322 = weight(_text_:22 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04233322 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052075688 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170
-
Asonuma, A.; Fang, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Reflections on the age distribution of Japanese scientists (2006)
0.01
0.008466644 = product of:
0.04233322 = sum of:
0.04233322 = weight(_text_:22 in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04233322 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052075688 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:26:24
-
Zhang, L.; Rousseau, R.; Glänzel, W.: Diversity of references as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of journals : taking similarity between subject fields into account (2016)
0.01
0.0063142553 = product of:
0.031571276 = sum of:
0.031571276 = weight(_text_:7 in 2902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031571276 = score(doc=2902,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.052075688 = queryNorm
0.18300632 = fieldWeight in 2902, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2902)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- The objective of this article is to further the study of journal interdisciplinarity, or, more generally, knowledge integration at the level of individual articles. Interdisciplinarity is operationalized by the diversity of subject fields assigned to cited items in the article's reference list. Subject fields and subfields were obtained from the Leuven-Budapest (ECOOM) subject-classification scheme, while disciplinary diversity was measured taking variety, balance, and disparity into account. As diversity measure we use a Hill-type true diversity in the sense of Jost and Leinster-Cobbold. The analysis is conducted in 3 steps. In the first part, the properties of this measure are discussed, and, on the basis of these properties it is shown that the measure has the potential to serve as an indicator of interdisciplinarity. In the second part the applicability of this indicator is shown using selected journals from several research fields ranging from mathematics to social sciences. Finally, the often-heard argument, namely, that interdisciplinary research exhibits larger visibility and impact, is studied on the basis of these selected journals. Yet, as only 7 journals, representing a total of 15,757 articles, are studied, albeit chosen to cover a large range of interdisciplinarity, further research is still needed.
-
Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003)
0.01
0.0056444295 = product of:
0.028222147 = sum of:
0.028222147 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028222147 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052075688 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 9. 7.2006 10:22:35
