Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Sanderson, M."
  1. Sanderson, M.: ¬The Reuters test collection (1996) 0.01
    0.011288859 = product of:
      0.056444295 = sum of:
        0.056444295 = weight(_text_:22 in 6971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056444295 = score(doc=6971,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6971, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6971)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  2. Sanderson, M.; Lawrie, D.: Building, testing, and applying concept hierarchies (2000) 0.01
    0.0075771073 = product of:
      0.037885536 = sum of:
        0.037885536 = weight(_text_:7 in 37) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037885536 = score(doc=37,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.21960759 = fieldWeight in 37, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=37)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Series
    The Kluwer international series on information retrieval; 7
  3. Sanderson, M.: Revisiting h measured on UK LIS and IR academics (2008) 0.01
    0.0075771073 = product of:
      0.037885536 = sum of:
        0.037885536 = weight(_text_:7 in 1867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037885536 = score(doc=1867,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.21960759 = fieldWeight in 1867, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1867)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.7, S.1184-1190
  4. Lee, W.M.; Sanderson, M.: Analyzing URL queries (2010) 0.01
    0.0075771073 = product of:
      0.037885536 = sum of:
        0.037885536 = weight(_text_:7 in 4105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037885536 = score(doc=4105,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.21960759 = fieldWeight in 4105, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4105)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This study investigated a relatively unexamined query type, queries composed of URLs. The extent, variation, and user click-through behavior was examined to determine the intent behind URL queries. The study made use of a search log from which URL queries were identified and selected for both qualitative and quantitative analyses. It was found that URL queries accounted for ?17% of the sample. There were statistically significant differences between URL queries and non-URL queries in the following attributes: mean query length; mean number of tokens per query; and mean number of clicks per query. Users issuing such queries clicked on fewer result list items higher up the ranking compared to non-URL queries. Classification indicated that nearly 86% of queries were navigational in intent with informational and transactional queries representing about 7% of URL queries each. This is in contrast to past research that suggested that URL queries were 100% navigational. The conclusions of this study are that URL queries are relatively common and that simply returning the page that matches a user's URL is not an optimal strategy.
  5. Aldosari, M.; Sanderson, M.; Tam, A.; Uitdenbogerd, A.L.: Understanding collaborative search for places of interest (2016) 0.01
    0.0075771073 = product of:
      0.037885536 = sum of:
        0.037885536 = weight(_text_:7 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037885536 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.21960759 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    7. 5.2016 13:09:59
  6. Aloteibi, S.; Sanderson, M.: Analyzing geographic query reformulation : an exploratory study (2014) 0.01
    0.007055537 = product of:
      0.035277683 = sum of:
        0.035277683 = weight(_text_:22 in 1177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035277683 = score(doc=1177,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1177, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1177)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    26. 1.2014 18:48:22
  7. Yulianti, E.; Huspi, S.; Sanderson, M.: Tweet-biased summarization (2016) 0.01
    0.0063142553 = product of:
      0.031571276 = sum of:
        0.031571276 = weight(_text_:7 in 2926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031571276 = score(doc=2926,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.18300632 = fieldWeight in 2926, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2926)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    7. 5.2016 13:03:40