Search (38 results, page 2 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Klassifizieren"
  1. Ma, Z.; Sun, A.; Cong, G.: On predicting the popularity of newly emerging hashtags in Twitter (2013) 0.01 
    0.008929707 = product of:
  0.044648536 = sum of:
    0.044648536 = weight(_text_:7 in 967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044648536 = score(doc=967,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.25881004 = fieldWeight in 967, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=967)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Because of Twitter's popularity and the viral nature of information dissemination on Twitter, predicting which Twitter topics will become popular in the near future becomes a task of considerable economic importance. Many Twitter topics are annotated by hashtags. In this article, we propose methods to predict the popularity of new hashtags on Twitter by formulating the problem as a classification task. We use five standard classification models (i.e., Naïve bayes, k-nearest neighbors, decision trees, support vector machines, and logistic regression) for prediction. The main challenge is the identification of effective features for describing new hashtags. We extract 7 content features from a hashtag string and the collection of tweets containing the hashtag and 11 contextual features from the social graph formed by users who have adopted the hashtag. We conducted experiments on a Twitter data set consisting of 31 million tweets from 2 million Singapore-based users. The experimental results show that the standard classifiers using the extracted features significantly outperform the baseline methods that do not use these features. Among the five classifiers, the logistic regression model performs the best in terms of the Micro-F1 measure. We also observe that contextual features are more effective than content features.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.7, S.1399-1410
  2. Liu, R.-L.: Context recognition for hierarchical text classification (2009) 0.01 
    0.008466644 = product of:
  0.04233322 = sum of:
    0.04233322 = weight(_text_:22 in 2760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04233322 = score(doc=2760,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2760, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2760)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:11:54
  3. Pfeffer, M.: Automatische Vergabe von RVK-Notationen mittels fallbasiertem Schließen (2009) 0.01 
    0.008466644 = product of:
  0.04233322 = sum of:
    0.04233322 = weight(_text_:22 in 3051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04233322 = score(doc=3051,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3051, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3051)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 8.2009 19:51:28
  4. Zhu, W.Z.; Allen, R.B.: Document clustering using the LSI subspace signature model (2013) 0.01 
    0.008466644 = product of:
  0.04233322 = sum of:
    0.04233322 = weight(_text_:22 in 690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04233322 = score(doc=690,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 690, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=690)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    23. 3.2013 13:22:36
  5. Egbert, J.; Biber, D.; Davies, M.: Developing a bottom-up, user-based method of web register classification (2015) 0.01 
    0.008466644 = product of:
  0.04233322 = sum of:
    0.04233322 = weight(_text_:22 in 2158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04233322 = score(doc=2158,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2158, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2158)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    4. 8.2015 19:22:04
  6. Koch, T.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: DDC and knowledge organization in the digital library : Research and development. Demonstration pages (1999) 0.01 
    0.0075771073 = product of:
  0.037885536 = sum of:
    0.037885536 = weight(_text_:7 in 942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037885536 = score(doc=942,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.21960759 = fieldWeight in 942, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=942)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    1. Increased Importance of Knowledge Organization in Internet Services - 2. Quality Subject Service and the role of classification - 3. Developing the DDC into a knowledge organization instrument for the digital library. OCLC site - 4. DESIRE's Barefoot Solutions of Automatic Classification - 5. Advanced Classification Solutions in DESIRE and CORC - 6. Future directions of research and development - 7. General references
  7. Díaz, I.; Ranilla, J.; Montañes, E.; Fernández, J.; Combarro, E.F.: Improving performance of text categorization by combining filtering and support vector machines (2004) 0.01 
    0.0075771073 = product of:
  0.037885536 = sum of:
    0.037885536 = weight(_text_:7 in 2234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037885536 = score(doc=2234,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.21960759 = fieldWeight in 2234, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2234)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 55(2004) no.7, S.579-592
  8. Hagedorn, K.; Chapman, S.; Newman, D.: Enhancing search and browse using automated clustering of subject metadata (2007) 0.01 
    0.0075771073 = product of:
  0.037885536 = sum of:
    0.037885536 = weight(_text_:7 in 1168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037885536 = score(doc=1168,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.21960759 = fieldWeight in 1168, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1168)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    D-Lib magazine. 13(2007) nos.7/8, x S
  9. Teich, E.; Degaetano-Ortlieb, S.; Fankhauser, P.; Kermes, H.; Lapshinova-Koltunski, E.: ¬The linguistic construal of disciplinarity : a data-mining approach using register features (2016) 0.01 
    0.0075771073 = product of:
  0.037885536 = sum of:
    0.037885536 = weight(_text_:7 in 3015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037885536 = score(doc=3015,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.21960759 = fieldWeight in 3015, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3015)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.7, S.1668-1678
  10. Mengle, S.; Goharian, N.: Passage detection using text classification (2009) 0.01 
    0.007055537 = product of:
  0.035277683 = sum of:
    0.035277683 = weight(_text_:22 in 2765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035277683 = score(doc=2765,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2765, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2765)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:14:43
  11. Liu, R.-L.: ¬A passage extractor for classification of disease aspect information (2013) 0.01 
    0.007055537 = product of:
  0.035277683 = sum of:
    0.035277683 = weight(_text_:22 in 1107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035277683 = score(doc=1107,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1107, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1107)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    28.10.2013 19:22:57
  12. Classification, automation, and new media : Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation e.V., University of Passau, March 15 - 17, 2000 (2002) 0.01 
    0.0063142553 = product of:
  0.031571276 = sum of:
    0.031571276 = weight(_text_:7 in 5997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031571276 = score(doc=5997,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.18300632 = fieldWeight in 5997, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5997)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Isbn
    3-540-43233-7
  13. Wartena, C.; Sommer, M.: Automatic classification of scientific records using the German Subject Heading Authority File (SWD) (2012) 0.01 
    0.0063142553 = product of:
  0.031571276 = sum of:
    0.031571276 = weight(_text_:7 in 472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031571276 = score(doc=472,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.18300632 = fieldWeight in 472, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=472)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The following paper deals with an automatic text classification method which does not require training documents. For this method the German Subject Heading Authority File (SWD), provided by the linked data service of the German National Library is used. Recently the SWD was enriched with notations of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC). In consequence it became possible to utilize the subject headings as textual representations for the notations of the DDC. Basically, we we derive the classification of a text from the classification of the words in the text given by the thesaurus. The method was tested by classifying 3826 OAI-Records from 7 different repositories. Mean reciprocal rank and recall were chosen as evaluation measure. Direct comparison to a machine learning method has shown that this method is definitely competitive. Thus we can conclude that the enriched version of the SWD provides high quality information with a broad coverage for classification of German scientific articles.
  14. Salles, T.; Rocha, L.; Gonçalves, M.A.; Almeida, J.M.; Mourão, F.; Meira Jr., W.; Viegas, F.: ¬A quantitative analysis of the temporal effects on automatic text classification (2016) 0.01 
    0.0063142553 = product of:
  0.031571276 = sum of:
    0.031571276 = weight(_text_:7 in 3014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031571276 = score(doc=3014,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.18300632 = fieldWeight in 3014, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3014)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.7, S.1639-1667
  15. Khoo, C.S.G.; Ng, K.; Ou, S.: ¬An exploratory study of human clustering of Web pages (2003) 0.01 
    0.0056444295 = product of:
  0.028222147 = sum of:
    0.028222147 = weight(_text_:22 in 2741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028222147 = score(doc=2741,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2741, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2741)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    12. 9.2004 9:56:22
  16. Reiner, U.: Automatische DDC-Klassifizierung bibliografischer Titeldatensätze der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie (2009) 0.01 
    0.0056444295 = product of:
  0.028222147 = sum of:
    0.028222147 = weight(_text_:22 in 3284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028222147 = score(doc=3284,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3284, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3284)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 1.2010 14:41:24
  17. Search Engines and Beyond : Developing efficient knowledge management systems, April 19-20 1999, Boston, Mass (1999) 0.01 
    0.0050514047 = product of:
  0.025257023 = sum of:
    0.025257023 = weight(_text_:7 in 2596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025257023 = score(doc=2596,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.14640506 = fieldWeight in 2596, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2596)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Ramana Rao (Inxight, Palo Alto, CA) 7 ± 2 Insights on achieving Effective Information Access Session One: Updates and a twelve month perspective Danny Sullivan (Search Engine Watch, US / England) Portalization and other search trends Carol Tenopir (University of Tennessee) Search realities faced by end users and professional searchers Session Two: Today's search engines and beyond Daniel Hoogterp (Retrieval Technologies, McLean, VA) Effective presentation and utilization of search techniques Rick Kenny (Fulcrum Technologies, Ontario, Canada) Beyond document clustering: The knowledge impact statement Gary Stock (Ingenius, Kalamazoo, MI) Automated change monitoring Gary Culliss (Direct Hit, Wellesley Hills, MA) User popularity ranked search engines Byron Dom (IBM, CA) Automatically finding the best pages on the World Wide Web (CLEVER) Peter Tomassi (LookSmart, San Francisco, CA) Adding human intellect to search technology Session Three: Panel discussion: Human v automated categorization and editing Ev Brenner (New York, NY)- Chairman James Callan (University of Massachusetts, MA) Marc Krellenstein (Northern Light Technology, Cambridge, MA) Dan Miller (Ask Jeeves, Berkeley, CA) Session Four: Updates and a twelve month perspective Steve Arnold (AIT, Harrods Creek, KY) Review: The leading edge in search and retrieval software Ellen Voorhees (NIST, Gaithersburg, MD) TREC update Session Five: Search engines now and beyond Intelligent Agents John Snyder (Muscat, Cambridge, England) Practical issues behind intelligent agents Text summarization Therese Firmin, (Dept of Defense, Ft George G. Meade, MD) The TIPSTER/SUMMAC evaluation of automatic text summarization systems Cross language searching Elizabeth Liddy (TextWise, Syracuse, NY) A conceptual interlingua approach to cross-language retrieval. Video search and retrieval Armon Amir (IBM, Almaden, CA) CueVideo: Modular system for automatic indexing and browsing of video/audio Speech recognition Michael Witbrock (Lycos, Waltham, MA) Retrieval of spoken documents Visualization James A. Wise (Integral Visuals, Richland, WA) Information visualization in the new millennium: Emerging science or passing fashion? Text mining David Evans (Claritech, Pittsburgh, PA) Text mining - towards decision support
  18. Oberhauser, O.: Automatisches Klassifizieren : Entwicklungsstand - Methodik - Anwendungsbereiche (2005) 0.00 
    0.0031571276 = product of:
  0.015785638 = sum of:
    0.015785638 = weight(_text_:7 in 38) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015785638 = score(doc=38,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.09150316 = fieldWeight in 38, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=38)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    7. 1.1997 16:38:05

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 27
  • d 11

Types

  • a 29
  • el 8
  • m 3
  • s 2
  • d 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects