Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

Schott, H.; Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: ¬Ein individuelles prozedurales Modell des Abstracting (1992) 0.02

0.017679915 = product of:
  0.088399574 = sum of:
    0.088399574 = weight(_text_:7 in 8852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.088399574 = score(doc=8852,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.5124177 = fieldWeight in 8852, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8852)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Series: Fokus; Bd.7

Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: ¬An empirical process model of abstracting (1992) 0.02

0.015154215 = product of:
  0.07577107 = sum of:
    0.07577107 = weight(_text_:7 in 8834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07577107 = score(doc=8834,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.43921518 = fieldWeight in 8834, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8834)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Series: Schriften zur Informationswissenschaft; Bd.7

Koltay, T.: ¬A hypertext tutorial on abstracting for library science students (1995) 0.01

0.014111074 = product of:
  0.07055537 = sum of:
    0.07055537 = weight(_text_:22 in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07055537 = score(doc=3061,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 27. 1.1996 18:22:06

Cremmins, E.T.: ¬The art of abstracting (1996) 0.01

0.012628511 = product of:
  0.06314255 = sum of:
    0.06314255 = weight(_text_:7 in 282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06314255 = score(doc=282,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.36601263 = fieldWeight in 282, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=282)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Footnote: Rez. in: JASIS 48(1997) no.7, S.670-671 (C.A. Bean)

Armstrong, C.J.; Wheatley, A.: Writing abstracts for online databases : results of database producers' guidelines (1998) 0.01

0.008839957 = product of:
  0.044199787 = sum of:
    0.044199787 = weight(_text_:7 in 3295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044199787 = score(doc=3295,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.25620884 = fieldWeight in 3295, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3295)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 7. 3.1999 14:37:19

Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996) 0.01

0.008466644 = product of:
  0.04233322 = sum of:
    0.04233322 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04233322 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source: Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37

Ward, M.L.: ¬The future of the human indexer (1996) 0.01

0.008466644 = product of:
  0.04233322 = sum of:
    0.04233322 = weight(_text_:22 in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04233322 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 9. 2.1997 18:44:22

Wheatley, A.; Armstrong, C.J.: Metadata, recall, and abstracts : can abstracts ever be reliable indicators of document value? (1997) 0.01
```
0.0075771073 = product of:
  0.037885536 = sum of:
    0.037885536 = weight(_text_:7 in 824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037885536 = score(doc=824,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.21960759 = fieldWeight in 824, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=824)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
```
Abstract

Abstracts from 7 Internet subject trees (Euroferret, Excite, Infoseek, Lycos Top 5%, Magellan, WebCrawler, Yahoo!), 5 Internet subject gateways (ADAM, EEVL, NetFirst, OMNI, SOSIG), and 3 online databases (ERIC, ISI, LISA) were examined for their subject content, treatment of various enriching features, physical properties such as overall length, anf their readability. Considerable differences were measured, and consistent similarities among abstracts from each type of source were demonstrated. Internet subject tree abstracts were generally the shortest, and online database abstracts the longest. Subject tree and online database abstracts were the most informative, but the level of coverage of document features such as tables, bibliographies, and geographical constraints were disappointingly poor. On balance, the Internet gateways appeared to be providing the most satisfactory abstracts. The authors discuss the continuing role in networked information retrieval of abstracts and their functional analoques such as metadata

Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.; Blurton, A.: Obtaining information accurately and quickly : are structured abstracts more efficient? (1996) 0.01

0.007055537 = product of:
  0.035277683 = sum of:
    0.035277683 = weight(_text_:22 in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035277683 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source: Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.5, S.349-356

Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Languages

Types

Themes