Search (17 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × type_ss:"el"
  • × theme_ss:"Suchmaschinen"
  1. Dunning, A.: Do we still need search engines? (1999) 0.02 
    0.019755503 = product of:
  0.09877752 = sum of:
    0.09877752 = weight(_text_:22 in 6021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09877752 = score(doc=6021,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6021, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6021)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Ariadne. 1999, no.22
  2. Birmingham, J.: Internet search engines (1996) 0.02 
    0.016933288 = product of:
  0.08466644 = sum of:
    0.08466644 = weight(_text_:22 in 5664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08466644 = score(doc=5664,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5664, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5664)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10.11.1996 16:36:22
  3. Lischka, K.; Kremp, M.: Was der Google-Gegner weiß - und was nicht (2009) 0.01 
    0.012628511 = product of:
  0.06314255 = sum of:
    0.06314255 = weight(_text_:7 in 4443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06314255 = score(doc=4443,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.36601263 = fieldWeight in 4443, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4443)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    7. 5.2009 20:06:39
  4. Griesbaum, J.; Rittberger, M.; Bekavac, B.: Deutsche Suchmaschinen im Vergleich : AltaVista.de, Fireball.de, Google.de und Lycos.de (2002) 0.01 
    0.012628511 = product of:
  0.06314255 = sum of:
    0.06314255 = weight(_text_:7 in 1159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06314255 = score(doc=1159,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.36601263 = fieldWeight in 1159, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1159)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Information und Mobilität: Optimierung und Vermeidung von Mobilität durch Information. Proceedings des 8. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2002), 7.-10.10.2002, Regensburg. Hrsg.: Rainer Hammwöhner, Christian Wolff, Christa Womser-Hacker
  5. Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013) 0.01 
    0.011288859 = product of:
  0.056444295 = sum of:
    0.056444295 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056444295 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    17.12.2013 11:02:22
  6. Schaat, S.: Von der automatisierten Manipulation zur Manipulation der Automatisierung (2019) 0.01 
    0.011288859 = product of:
  0.056444295 = sum of:
    0.056444295 = weight(_text_:22 in 4996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056444295 = score(doc=4996,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4996, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4996)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    19. 2.2019 17:22:00
  7. Advanced online media use (2023) 0.01 
    0.010102809 = product of:
  0.050514046 = sum of:
    0.050514046 = weight(_text_:7 in 954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050514046 = score(doc=954,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.2928101 = fieldWeight in 954, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=954)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    "1. Use a range of different media 2. Access paywalled media content 3. Use an advertising and tracking blocker 4. Use alternatives to Google Search 5. Use alternatives to YouTube 6. Use alternatives to Facebook and Twitter 7. Caution with Wikipedia 8. Web browser, email, and internet access 9. Access books and scientific papers 10. Access deleted web content"
  8. Place, E.: Internationale Zusammenarbeit bei Internet Subject Gateways (1999) 0.01 
    0.008466644 = product of:
  0.04233322 = sum of:
    0.04233322 = weight(_text_:22 in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04233322 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:35:09
  9. Warnick, W.L.; Leberman, A.; Scott, R.L.; Spence, K.J.; Johnsom, L.A.; Allen, V.S.: Searching the deep Web : directed query engine applications at the Department of Energy (2001) 0.01 
    0.0075771073 = product of:
  0.037885536 = sum of:
    0.037885536 = weight(_text_:7 in 1215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037885536 = score(doc=1215,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.21960759 = fieldWeight in 1215, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1215)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    D-Lib magazine. 7(2001) no.1, xx S
  10. Talbot, D.: Wolfram Alpha vs. Google (2009) 0.01 
    0.0075771073 = product of:
  0.037885536 = sum of:
    0.037885536 = weight(_text_:7 in 2820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037885536 = score(doc=2820,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.21960759 = fieldWeight in 2820, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2820)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    7. 5.2009 19:56:30
  11. Boldi, P.; Santini, M.; Vigna, S.: PageRank as a function of the damping factor (2005) 0.01 
    0.007055537 = product of:
  0.035277683 = sum of:
    0.035277683 = weight(_text_:22 in 2564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035277683 = score(doc=2564,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2564, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2564)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    16. 1.2016 10:22:28
  12. Baeza-Yates, R.; Boldi, P.; Castillo, C.: Generalizing PageRank : damping functions for linkbased ranking algorithms (2006) 0.01 
    0.007055537 = product of:
  0.035277683 = sum of:
    0.035277683 = weight(_text_:22 in 2565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035277683 = score(doc=2565,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2565, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2565)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    16. 1.2016 10:22:28
  13. Brin, S.; Page, L.: ¬The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine (1998) 0.01 
    0.0063142553 = product of:
  0.031571276 = sum of:
    0.031571276 = weight(_text_:7 in 947) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031571276 = score(doc=947,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.18300632 = fieldWeight in 947, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=947)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Computer networks. 30(1998) no.1-7, S.107-117
  14. Gillitzer, B.: Yewno (2017) 0.01 
    0.0056444295 = product of:
  0.028222147 = sum of:
    0.028222147 = weight(_text_:22 in 3447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028222147 = score(doc=3447,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3447, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3447)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 2.2017 10:16:49
  15. Search Engines and Beyond : Developing efficient knowledge management systems, April 19-20 1999, Boston, Mass (1999) 0.01 
    0.0050514047 = product of:
  0.025257023 = sum of:
    0.025257023 = weight(_text_:7 in 2596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025257023 = score(doc=2596,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.14640506 = fieldWeight in 2596, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2596)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Ramana Rao (Inxight, Palo Alto, CA) 7 ± 2 Insights on achieving Effective Information Access Session One: Updates and a twelve month perspective Danny Sullivan (Search Engine Watch, US / England) Portalization and other search trends Carol Tenopir (University of Tennessee) Search realities faced by end users and professional searchers Session Two: Today's search engines and beyond Daniel Hoogterp (Retrieval Technologies, McLean, VA) Effective presentation and utilization of search techniques Rick Kenny (Fulcrum Technologies, Ontario, Canada) Beyond document clustering: The knowledge impact statement Gary Stock (Ingenius, Kalamazoo, MI) Automated change monitoring Gary Culliss (Direct Hit, Wellesley Hills, MA) User popularity ranked search engines Byron Dom (IBM, CA) Automatically finding the best pages on the World Wide Web (CLEVER) Peter Tomassi (LookSmart, San Francisco, CA) Adding human intellect to search technology Session Three: Panel discussion: Human v automated categorization and editing Ev Brenner (New York, NY)- Chairman James Callan (University of Massachusetts, MA) Marc Krellenstein (Northern Light Technology, Cambridge, MA) Dan Miller (Ask Jeeves, Berkeley, CA) Session Four: Updates and a twelve month perspective Steve Arnold (AIT, Harrods Creek, KY) Review: The leading edge in search and retrieval software Ellen Voorhees (NIST, Gaithersburg, MD) TREC update Session Five: Search engines now and beyond Intelligent Agents John Snyder (Muscat, Cambridge, England) Practical issues behind intelligent agents Text summarization Therese Firmin, (Dept of Defense, Ft George G. Meade, MD) The TIPSTER/SUMMAC evaluation of automatic text summarization systems Cross language searching Elizabeth Liddy (TextWise, Syracuse, NY) A conceptual interlingua approach to cross-language retrieval. Video search and retrieval Armon Amir (IBM, Almaden, CA) CueVideo: Modular system for automatic indexing and browsing of video/audio Speech recognition Michael Witbrock (Lycos, Waltham, MA) Retrieval of spoken documents Visualization James A. Wise (Integral Visuals, Richland, WA) Information visualization in the new millennium: Emerging science or passing fashion? Text mining David Evans (Claritech, Pittsburgh, PA) Text mining - towards decision support
  16. Hillenbrand, T.: Googles Zehn Gebote (2005) 0.00 
    0.0044199787 = product of:
  0.022099894 = sum of:
    0.022099894 = weight(_text_:7 in 4314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022099894 = score(doc=4314,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.12810442 = fieldWeight in 4314, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4314)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Footnote
    Die 10 Google-Gebote: Du sollst ... 1. ... nie weniger als drei Begriffe eingeben 2. ... Artikel und Hilfsverben ächten 3. ... Nomen bevorzugen 4. ... "Phrasen in Anführungszeichen" setzen 5. ... Wörter gebrauchen, die du in deinen Ergebnissen zu finden erwartest 6. ... die Syntax des Heiligen Boole in Ehren halten 7. ... alles andere klein schreiben 8. ... auch die ehrwürdigen Verzeichnisse befragen 9. ... andere Suchmaschinen haben neben mir 10. ... auch der Auskunft und dem Telefon huldigen
  17. Maurer, H.; Balke, T.; Kappe,, F.; Kulathuramaiyer, N.; Weber, S.; Zaka, B.: Report on dangers and opportunities posed by large search engines, particularly Google (2007) 0.00 
    0.0037885536 = product of:
  0.018942768 = sum of:
    0.018942768 = weight(_text_:7 in 754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018942768 = score(doc=754,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.109803796 = fieldWeight in 754, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=754)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The preliminary intended and approved list was: Section 1: To concentrate on Google as virtual monopoly, and Google's reported support of Wikipedia. To find experimental evidence of this support or show that the reports are not more than rumours. Section 2: To address the copy-past syndrome with socio-cultural consequences associated with it. Section 3: To deal with plagiarism and IPR violations as two intertwined topics: how they affect various players (teachers and pupils in school; academia; corporations; governmental studies, etc.). To establish that not enough is done concerning these issues, partially due to just plain ignorance. We will propose some ways to alleviate the problem. Section 4: To discuss the usual tools to fight plagiarism and their shortcomings. Section 5: To propose ways to overcome most of above problems according to proposals by Maurer/Zaka. To examples, but to make it clear that do this more seriously a pilot project is necessary beyond this particular study. Section 6: To briefly analyze various views of plagiarism as it is quite different in different fields (journalism, engineering, architecture, painting, .) and to present a concept that avoids plagiarism from the very beginning. Section 7: To point out the many other dangers of Google or Google-like undertakings: opportunistic ranking, analysis of data as window into commercial future. Section 8: To outline the need of new international laws. Section 9: To mention the feeble European attempts to fight Google, despite Google's growing power. Section 10. To argue that there is no way to catch up with Google in a frontal attack.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 10
  • d 7

Themes