Search (18 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  • × theme_ss:"Benutzerstudien"
  1. Werner, K.: das Confirmation/Disconfirmation-Paradigma der Kundenzufriedenheit im Kontext des Information Retrieval : Größere Zufriedenheit durch bessere Suchmaschinen? (2010) 0.01
    0.010102809 = product of:
      0.050514046 = sum of:
        0.050514046 = weight(_text_:7 in 4016) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050514046 = score(doc=4016,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.2928101 = fieldWeight in 4016, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4016)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 61(2010) H.6/7, S.385-396
  2. Bergman, O.; Gradovitch, N.; Bar-Ilan, J.; Beyth-Marom, R.: Folder versus tag preference in personal information management (2013) 0.01
    0.008929707 = product of:
      0.044648536 = sum of:
        0.044648536 = weight(_text_:7 in 1103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044648536 = score(doc=1103,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.25881004 = fieldWeight in 1103, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1103)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Users' preferences for folders versus tags was studied in 2 working environments where both options were available to them. In the Gmail study, we informed 75 participants about both folder-labeling and tag-labeling, observed their storage behavior after 1 month, and asked them to estimate the proportions of different retrieval options in their behavior. In the Windows 7 study, we informed 23 participants about tags and asked them to tag all their files for 2 weeks, followed by a period of 5 weeks of free choice between the 2 methods. Their storage and retrieval habits were tested prior to the learning session and, after 7 weeks, using special classification recording software and a retrieval-habits questionnaire. A controlled retrieval task and an in-depth interview were conducted. Results of both studies show a strong preference for folders over tags for both storage and retrieval. In the minority of cases where tags were used for storage, participants typically used a single tag per information item. Moreover, when multiple classification was used for storage, it was only marginally used for retrieval. The controlled retrieval task showed lower success rates and slower retrieval speeds for tag use. Possible reasons for participants' preferences are discussed.
  3. Cole, C.; Beheshti, J.; Abuhimed, D.; Lamoureux, I.: ¬The end game in Kuhlthau's ISP Model : knowledge construction for grade 8 students researching an inquiry-based history project (2015) 0.01
    0.008929707 = product of:
      0.044648536 = sum of:
        0.044648536 = weight(_text_:7 in 2265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044648536 = score(doc=2265,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.25881004 = fieldWeight in 2265, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2265)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This article reports on a field study of the information behavior of Grade 8 students researching an inquiry-based class history project. Kuhlthau's 7-stage Information Search Process (ISP) model forms the conceptual framework for the study. The aim of the study was to define an end game for the ISP model by answering the following question: How do the student participants' feelings, thoughts, and information behavior lead to the construction of new knowledge? Study findings tentatively indicate that knowledge construction results from an iterative process between the student and information, which can be divided into 3 phases. In the first phase, the students formulate questions from their previous knowledge to start knowledge construction; in the second phase, newly found topic information causes students to ask questions; and in the third phase, the students answer the questions asked by this newly found topic information. Based on these results and Kuhlthau's own ISP stage 7 assessment definition of the ISP model end game, we propose a model of knowledge construction inserted as an extra row in the ISP model framework.
  4. Stallmann, A.: Silver Surfer im Internet (2012) 0.01
    0.008839957 = product of:
      0.044199787 = sum of:
        0.044199787 = weight(_text_:7 in 408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044199787 = score(doc=408,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.25620884 = fieldWeight in 408, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=408)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    7. 1.2013 21:01:39
  5. Okoli, C.; Mehdi, M.; Mesgari, M.; Nielsen, F.A.; Lanamäki, A.: Wikipedia in the eyes of its beholders : a systematic review of scholarly research on Wikipedia readers and readership (2014) 0.01
    0.008466644 = product of:
      0.04233322 = sum of:
        0.04233322 = weight(_text_:22 in 1540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04233322 = score(doc=1540,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1540, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1540)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    18.11.2014 13:22:03
  6. Foss, E.; Druin, A.; Brewer, R.; Lo, P.; Sanchez, L.; Golub, E.; Hutchinson, H.: Children's search roles at home : implications for designers, researchers, educators, and parents (2012) 0.01
    0.0075771073 = product of:
      0.037885536 = sum of:
        0.037885536 = weight(_text_:7 in 74) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037885536 = score(doc=74,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.21960759 = fieldWeight in 74, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=74)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents the results of a large-scale, qualitative study conducted in the homes of children aged 7, 9, and 11 investigating internet searching processes on Google. Seven search roles, representing distinct behavior patterns displayed by children when interacting with the Google search engine, are described, including Developing Searchers, Domain-specific Searchers, Power Searchers, Nonmotivated Searchers, Distracted Searchers, Rule-bound Searchers, and Visual Searchers. Other trends are described and selected to present a view of the whole child searcher. These roles and trends are used to make recommendations to designers, researchers, educators, and parents about the directions to take when considering how to best aid children to become search literate.
  7. Foss, E.; Druin, A.; Yip, J.; Ford, W.; Golub, E.; Hutchinson, H.: Adolescent search roles (2013) 0.01
    0.0075771073 = product of:
      0.037885536 = sum of:
        0.037885536 = weight(_text_:7 in 536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037885536 = score(doc=536,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.21960759 = fieldWeight in 536, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=536)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    In this article, we present an in-home observation and in-context research study investigating how 38 adolescents aged 14-17 search on the Internet. We present the search trends adolescents display and develop a framework of search roles that these trends help define. We compare these trends and roles to similar trends and roles found in prior work with children ages 7, 9, and 11. We use these comparisons to make recommendations to adult stakeholders such as researchers, designers, and information literacy educators about the best ways to design search tools for children and adolescents, as well as how to use the framework of searching roles to find better methods of educating youth searchers. Major findings include the seven roles of adolescent searchers, and evidence that adolescents are social in their computer use, have a greater knowledge of sources than younger children, and that adolescents are less frustrated by searching tasks than younger children.
  8. Smith, C.L.: Domain-independent search expertise : a description of procedural knowledge gained during guided instruction (2015) 0.01
    0.0075771073 = product of:
      0.037885536 = sum of:
        0.037885536 = weight(_text_:7 in 2034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037885536 = score(doc=2034,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.21960759 = fieldWeight in 2034, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2034)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.7, S.1388-1405
  9. Westman, S.; Laine-Hernandez, M.; Oittinen, P.: Development and evaluation of a multifaceted magazine image categorization model (2011) 0.01
    0.007055537 = product of:
      0.035277683 = sum of:
        0.035277683 = weight(_text_:22 in 4193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035277683 = score(doc=4193,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4193, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4193)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:09:26
  10. Mizrachi, D.; Bates, M.J.: Undergraduates' personal academic information management and the consideration of time and task-urgency (2013) 0.01
    0.007055537 = product of:
      0.035277683 = sum of:
        0.035277683 = weight(_text_:22 in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035277683 = score(doc=1003,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Young undergraduate college students are often described as "digital natives," presumed to prefer living and working in completely digital information environments. In reality, their world is part-paper/part-digital, in constant transition among successive forms of digital storage and communication devices. Studying for a degree is the daily work of these young people, and effective management of paper and digital academic materials and resources contributes crucially to their success in life. Students must also constantly manage their work against deadlines to meet their course and university requirements. This study, following the "Personal Information Management" (PIM) paradigm, examines student academic information management under these various constraints and pressures. A total of 41 18- to 22-year-old students were interviewed and observed regarding the content, structure, and uses of their immediate working environment within their dormitory rooms. Students exhibited remarkable creativity and variety in the mixture of automated and manual resources and devices used to support their academic work. The demands of a yearlong procession of assignments, papers, projects, and examinations increase the importance of time management activities and influence much of their behavior. Results provide insights on student use of various kinds of information technology and their overall planning and management of information associated with their studies.
  11. Aloteibi, S.; Sanderson, M.: Analyzing geographic query reformulation : an exploratory study (2014) 0.01
    0.007055537 = product of:
      0.035277683 = sum of:
        0.035277683 = weight(_text_:22 in 1177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035277683 = score(doc=1177,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1177, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1177)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    26. 1.2014 18:48:22
  12. Beaudoin, J.E.: Content-based image retrieval methods and professional image users (2016) 0.01
    0.007055537 = product of:
      0.035277683 = sum of:
        0.035277683 = weight(_text_:22 in 2637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035277683 = score(doc=2637,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2637, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2637)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 12:32:25
  13. Monchaux, S.; Amadieu, F.; Chevalier, A.; Mariné, C.: Query strategies during information searching : effects of prior domain knowledge and complexity of the information problems to be solved (2015) 0.01
    0.007055537 = product of:
      0.035277683 = sum of:
        0.035277683 = weight(_text_:22 in 2680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035277683 = score(doc=2680,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2680, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2680)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    25. 1.2016 18:46:22
  14. Savolainen, R.: Judging the quality and credibility of information in Internet discussion forums (2011) 0.01
    0.0063142553 = product of:
      0.031571276 = sum of:
        0.031571276 = weight(_text_:7 in 4477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031571276 = score(doc=4477,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.18300632 = fieldWeight in 4477, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4477)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.7, S.1243-1256
  15. Nicholas, D.; Clark, D.; Rowlands, I.; Jamali, H.R.: Information on the go : a case study of Europeana mobile users (2013) 0.01
    0.0063142553 = product of:
      0.031571276 = sum of:
        0.031571276 = weight(_text_:7 in 961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031571276 = score(doc=961,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.18300632 = fieldWeight in 961, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=961)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.7, S.1311-1322
  16. Watson, C.: ¬An exploratory study of secondary students' judgments of the relevance and reliability of information (2014) 0.01
    0.0063142553 = product of:
      0.031571276 = sum of:
        0.031571276 = weight(_text_:7 in 1305) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031571276 = score(doc=1305,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.18300632 = fieldWeight in 1305, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1305)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.7, S.1385-1408
  17. Vuong, T.; Saastamoinen, M.; Jacucci, G.; Ruotsalo, T.: Understanding user behavior in naturalistic information search tasks (2019) 0.01
    0.0063142553 = product of:
      0.031571276 = sum of:
        0.031571276 = weight(_text_:7 in 5419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031571276 = score(doc=5419,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.18300632 = fieldWeight in 5419, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5419)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Understanding users' search behavior has largely relied on the information available from search engine logs, which provide limited information about the contextual factors affecting users' behavior. Consequently, questions such as how users' intentions, task goals, and substances of the users' tasks affect search behavior, as well as what triggers information needs, remain largely unanswered. We report an experiment in which naturalistic information search behavior was captured by analyzing 24/7 continuous recordings of information on participants' computer screens. Written task diaries describing the participants' tasks were collected and used as real-life task contexts for further categorization. All search tasks were extracted and classified under various task categories according to users' intentions, task goals, and substances of the tasks. We investigated the effect of different task categories on three behavioral factors: search efforts, content-triggers, and application context. Our results suggest four findings: (i) Search activity is integrally associated with the users' creative processes. The content users have seen prior to searching more often triggers search, and is used as a query, within creative tasks. (ii) Searching within intellectual and creative tasks is more time-intensive, while search activity occurring as a part of daily routine tasks is associated with more frequent searching within a search task. (iii) Searching is more often induced from utility applications in tasks demanding a degree of intellectual effort. (iv) Users' leisure information-seeking activity is occurring inherently within social media services or comes from social communication platforms. The implications of our findings for information access and management systems are discussed.
  18. Griesbaum, J.; Mahrholz, N.; Kiedrowski, K. von Löwe; Rittberger, M.: Knowledge generation in online forums : a case study in the German educational domain (2015) 0.01
    0.0056444295 = product of:
      0.028222147 = sum of:
        0.028222147 = weight(_text_:22 in 4440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028222147 = score(doc=4440,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4440, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4440)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22