Search (34 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  • × theme_ss:"Elektronisches Publizieren"
  1. Loos, A.: ¬Die Million ist geknackt (2015) 0.06 
    0.064175 = product of:
  0.16043751 = sum of:
    0.07577107 = weight(_text_:7 in 4208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07577107 = score(doc=4208,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.43921518 = fieldWeight in 4208, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4208)
    0.08466644 = weight(_text_:22 in 4208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08466644 = score(doc=4208,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4208, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4208)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    7. 4.2015 17:22:03
  2. Brown, D.J.: Access to scientific research : challenges facing communications in STM (2016) 0.02 
    0.02139167 = product of:
  0.053479172 = sum of:
    0.025257023 = weight(_text_:7 in 3769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025257023 = score(doc=3769,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.14640506 = fieldWeight in 3769, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3769)
    0.028222147 = weight(_text_:22 in 3769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028222147 = score(doc=3769,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3769, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3769)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    Inhalt: Chapter 1. Background -- Chapter 2. Definitions -- Chapter 3. Aims, Objectives, and Methodology -- Chapter 4. Setting the Scene -- Chapter 5. Information Society -- Chapter 6. Drivers for Change -- Chapter 7 A Dysfunctional STM Scene? -- Chapter 8. Comments on the Dysfunctionality of STM Publishing -- Chapter 9. The Main Stakeholders -- Chapter 10. Search and Discovery -- Chapter 11. Impact of Google -- Chapter 12. Psychological Issues -- Chapter 13. Users of Research Output -- Chapter 14. Underlying Sociological Developments -- Chapter 15. Social Media and Social Networking -- Chapter 16. Forms of Article Delivery -- Chapter 17. Future Communication Trends -- Chapter 18. Academic Knowledge Workers -- Chapter 19. Unaffiliated Knowledge Workers -- Chapter 20. The Professions -- Chapter 21. Small and Medium Enterprises -- Chapter 22. Citizen Scientists -- Chapter 23. Learned Societies -- Chapter 24. Business Models -- Chapter 25. Open Access -- Chapter 26. Political Initiatives -- Chapter 27. Summary and Conclusions -- Chapter 28. Research Questions Addressed
  3. Wolchover, N.: Wie ein Aufsehen erregender Beweis kaum Beachtung fand (2017) 0.02 
    0.019956073 = product of:
  0.09978036 = sum of:
    0.09978036 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09978036 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 4.2017 10:42:05
    22. 4.2017 10:48:38
  4. Schleim, S.: Warum die Wissenschaft nicht frei ist (2017) 0.01 
    0.011288859 = product of:
  0.056444295 = sum of:
    0.056444295 = weight(_text_:22 in 3882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056444295 = score(doc=3882,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3882, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3882)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    9.10.2017 15:48:22
  5. Herb, U.: Guerilla Open Access und Robin-Hood-PR gegen Marktversagen : mit der Schattenbibliothek Sci-Hub verbindet sich eine Diskussion über das Geschäftsmodell der Wissenschaftsverlage (2016) 0.01 
    0.010102809 = product of:
  0.050514046 = sum of:
    0.050514046 = weight(_text_:7 in 2870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050514046 = score(doc=2870,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.2928101 = fieldWeight in 2870, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2870)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    7. 3.2016 14:28:32
  6. Müller, S.: Schattenbibliotheken : Welche Auswirkungen haben Sci-Hub und Co. auf Verlage und Bibliotheken? (2019) 0.01 
    0.009877752 = product of:
  0.04938876 = sum of:
    0.04938876 = weight(_text_:22 in 765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04938876 = score(doc=765,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 765, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=765)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    B.I.T.online. 22(2019) H.5, S.397-404
  7. Benoit, G.; Hussey, L.: Repurposing digital objects : case studies across the publishing industry (2011) 0.01 
    0.009877752 = product of:
  0.04938876 = sum of:
    0.04938876 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04938876 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:23:07
  8. Schmale, W.: Strategische Optionen für universitäre Repositorien in den Digital Humanities (2018) 0.01 
    0.009877752 = product of:
  0.04938876 = sum of:
    0.04938876 = weight(_text_:22 in 3909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04938876 = score(doc=3909,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3909, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3909)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    20. 9.2018 12:22:39
  9. Hrachovec, H.: Offen gesagt: Beschwerden eines Archivars (2018) 0.01 
    0.009877752 = product of:
  0.04938876 = sum of:
    0.04938876 = weight(_text_:22 in 4443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04938876 = score(doc=4443,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4443, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4443)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    20. 9.2018 12:22:52
  10. Müller, H.: Rechtliche Rahmenbedingungen für Digitale Information (2010) 0.01 
    0.008839957 = product of:
  0.044199787 = sum of:
    0.044199787 = weight(_text_:7 in 3365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044199787 = score(doc=3365,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.25620884 = fieldWeight in 3365, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3365)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    7. 1.2011 16:30:46
  11. Bauer, B.; Stieg, K.: Open Access Publishing in Österreich 2010 (2010) 0.01 
    0.008839957 = product of:
  0.044199787 = sum of:
    0.044199787 = weight(_text_:7 in 3683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044199787 = score(doc=3683,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.25620884 = fieldWeight in 3683, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3683)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 44(2010) H.7, S.700-710
  12. Lamerz, L.: E-Books in der Wissenschaft - Fluch oder Segen? : Eine Untersuchung der Nutzungsstatistiken der Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Düsseldorf im Bereich E-Books (2012) 0.01 
    0.008839957 = product of:
  0.044199787 = sum of:
    0.044199787 = weight(_text_:7 in 560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044199787 = score(doc=560,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.25620884 = fieldWeight in 560, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=560)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    7. 1.2013 21:00:46
  13. Grenzebach, G.: Sichtbarkeit und Auffindbarkeit von wissenschaftlichen Artikeln in Repositorien (2018) 0.01 
    0.008839957 = product of:
  0.044199787 = sum of:
    0.044199787 = weight(_text_:7 in 4969) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044199787 = score(doc=4969,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.25620884 = fieldWeight in 4969, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4969)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Perspektive Bibliothek. 7(2018) H.2, S.24-60
  14. Münch, V.: They have a dream (2019) 0.01 
    0.008466644 = product of:
  0.04233322 = sum of:
    0.04233322 = weight(_text_:22 in 5631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04233322 = score(doc=5631,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5631, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5631)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    B.I.T.online. 22(2019) H.1, S.25-39
  15. Strecker, D.: Nutzung der Schattenbibliothek Sci-Hub in Deutschland (2019) 0.01 
    0.008466644 = product of:
  0.04233322 = sum of:
    0.04233322 = weight(_text_:22 in 596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04233322 = score(doc=596,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 596, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=596)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    1. 1.2020 13:22:34
  16. Dalen, H.P. van; Henkens, K.: Intended and unintended consequences of a publish-or-perish culture : a worldwide survey (2012) 0.01 
    0.0075771073 = product of:
  0.037885536 = sum of:
    0.037885536 = weight(_text_:7 in 2299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037885536 = score(doc=2299,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.21960759 = fieldWeight in 2299, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2299)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.7, S.1282-1293
  17. Furger, M.; Ball, R.: Weg mit den Büchern! (2016) 0.01 
    0.0075771073 = product of:
  0.037885536 = sum of:
    0.037885536 = weight(_text_:7 in 1272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037885536 = score(doc=1272,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.21960759 = fieldWeight in 1272, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1272)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    7. 2.2016 19:00:23
  18. Abella, A.; Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, M.; De-Pablos-Heredero, C.: ¬The process of open data publication and reuse (2019) 0.01 
    0.0075771073 = product of:
  0.037885536 = sum of:
    0.037885536 = weight(_text_:7 in 4989) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037885536 = score(doc=4989,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.21960759 = fieldWeight in 4989, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4989)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    7. 2.2019 10:50:00
  19. Walters, W.H.; Linvill, A.C.: Bibliographic index coverage of open-access journals in six subject areas (2011) 0.01 
    0.007055537 = product of:
  0.035277683 = sum of:
    0.035277683 = weight(_text_:22 in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035277683 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    We investigate the extent to which open-access (OA) journals and articles in biology, computer science, economics, history, medicine, and psychology are indexed in each of 11 bibliographic databases. We also look for variations in index coverage by journal subject, journal size, publisher type, publisher size, date of first OA issue, region of publication, language of publication, publication fee, and citation impact factor. Two databases, Biological Abstracts and PubMed, provide very good coverage of the OA journal literature, indexing 60 to 63% of all OA articles in their disciplines. Five databases provide moderately good coverage (22-41%), and four provide relatively poor coverage (0-12%). OA articles in biology journals, English-only journals, high-impact journals, and journals that charge publication fees of $1,000 or more are especially likely to be indexed. Conversely, articles from OA publishers in Africa, Asia, or Central/South America are especially unlikely to be indexed. Four of the 11 databases index commercially published articles at a substantially higher rate than articles published by universities, scholarly societies, nonprofit publishers, or governments. Finally, three databases-EBSCO Academic Search Complete, ProQuest Research Library, and Wilson OmniFile-provide less comprehensive coverage of OA articles than of articles in comparable subscription journals.
  20. Li, X.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ¬The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication (2015) 0.01 
    0.007055537 = product of:
  0.035277683 = sum of:
    0.035277683 = weight(_text_:22 in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035277683 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052075688 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22

Authors

Languages

  • d 19
  • e 14

Types

  • a 29
  • el 8
  • m 2
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications