Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  1. Järvelin, K.: Evaluation (2011) 0.02
    0.017679915 = product of:
      0.088399574 = sum of:
        0.088399574 = weight(_text_:7 in 548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.088399574 = score(doc=548,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.5124177 = fieldWeight in 548, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=548)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    7. 1.2013 19:34:12
  2. Mandl, T.: Evaluierung im Information Retrieval : die Hildesheimer Antwort auf aktuelle Herausforderungen der globalisierten Informationsgesellschaft (2010) 0.01
    0.010102809 = product of:
      0.050514046 = sum of:
        0.050514046 = weight(_text_:7 in 4011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050514046 = score(doc=4011,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.2928101 = fieldWeight in 4011, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4011)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 61(2010) H.6/7, S.341-348
  3. Schultz Jr., W.N.; Braddy, L.: ¬A librarian-centered study of perceptions of subject terms and controlled vocabulary (2017) 0.01
    0.008839957 = product of:
      0.044199787 = sum of:
        0.044199787 = weight(_text_:7 in 5156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044199787 = score(doc=5156,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.25620884 = fieldWeight in 5156, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5156)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 55(2017) no.7/8, S.456-466
  4. Reichert, S.; Mayr, P.: Untersuchung von Relevanzeigenschaften in einem kontrollierten Eyetracking-Experiment (2012) 0.01
    0.008466644 = product of:
      0.04233322 = sum of:
        0.04233322 = weight(_text_:22 in 328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04233322 = score(doc=328,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 328, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=328)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:25:54
  5. Colace, F.; Santo, M. de; Greco, L.; Napoletano, P.: Improving relevance feedback-based query expansion by the use of a weighted word pairs approach (2015) 0.01
    0.0075771073 = product of:
      0.037885536 = sum of:
        0.037885536 = weight(_text_:7 in 2263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037885536 = score(doc=2263,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.21960759 = fieldWeight in 2263, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2263)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    In this article, the use of a new term extraction method for query expansion (QE) in text retrieval is investigated. The new method expands the initial query with a structured representation made of weighted word pairs (WWP) extracted from a set of training documents (relevance feedback). Standard text retrieval systems can handle a WWP structure through custom Boolean weighted models. We experimented with both the explicit and pseudorelevance feedback schemas and compared the proposed term extraction method with others in the literature, such as KLD and RM3. Evaluations have been conducted on a number of test collections (Text REtrivel Conference [TREC]-6, -7, -8, -9, and -10). Results demonstrated that the QE method based on this new structure outperforms the baseline.
  6. Pal, S.; Mitra, M.; Kamps, J.: Evaluation effort, reliability and reusability in XML retrieval (2011) 0.01
    0.007055537 = product of:
      0.035277683 = sum of:
        0.035277683 = weight(_text_:22 in 4197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035277683 = score(doc=4197,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4197, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4197)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:20:56
  7. Chu, H.: Factors affecting relevance judgment : a report from TREC Legal track (2011) 0.01
    0.007055537 = product of:
      0.035277683 = sum of:
        0.035277683 = weight(_text_:22 in 4540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035277683 = score(doc=4540,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4540, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4540)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    12. 7.2011 18:29:22
  8. Wildemuth, B.; Freund, L.; Toms, E.G.: Untangling search task complexity and difficulty in the context of interactive information retrieval studies (2014) 0.01
    0.007055537 = product of:
      0.035277683 = sum of:
        0.035277683 = weight(_text_:22 in 1786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035277683 = score(doc=1786,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1786, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1786)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    6. 4.2015 19:31:22
  9. Ravana, S.D.; Taheri, M.S.; Rajagopal, P.: Document-based approach to improve the accuracy of pairwise comparison in evaluating information retrieval systems (2015) 0.01
    0.007055537 = product of:
      0.035277683 = sum of:
        0.035277683 = weight(_text_:22 in 2587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035277683 = score(doc=2587,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2587, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2587)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  10. Rajagopal, P.; Ravana, S.D.; Koh, Y.S.; Balakrishnan, V.: Evaluating the effectiveness of information retrieval systems using effort-based relevance judgment (2019) 0.01
    0.007055537 = product of:
      0.035277683 = sum of:
        0.035277683 = weight(_text_:22 in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035277683 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052075688 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22