Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

0.047985304 = product of:
  0.09597061 = sum of:
    0.09597061 = product of:
      0.19194122 = sum of:
        0.19194122 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19194122 = score(doc=3085,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.20159319 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05178292 = queryNorm
            0.95212156 = fieldWeight in 3085, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3085)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Attempts to provide a theoretical rationale for the taxonomy of bibliographic relationships between a given work and its related bibliographic entities. Examines the bibliographic structure of the document carrying the messages in terms of their bibliographic functions of use and preservation, since the most common bibliographic relationships are normally revealed within the document itself. Defines the bibliographic characteristics of the document from the perspective of an analysis of the pattern of their structural elements. Presents 4 dimensions of the bibliographic structure as a frame of reference for the categorisation of bibliographic relationships, together with their subordinate types of equivalent relationships, focusing on common structural patterns revealed with in each entity itself

0.03877798 = product of:
  0.07755596 = sum of:
    0.07755596 = product of:
      0.15511192 = sum of:
        0.15511192 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15511192 = score(doc=491,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.20159319 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05178292 = queryNorm
            0.7694304 = fieldWeight in 491, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=491)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Examines the conceptual structure of bibliographic relationships between a work and its related bibliographic entities in terms of the idea of equivalence as a mathematical concept. Bibliographic entities, such as the work, the text, the edition, and the printing, are also considered as functional foci resulting from data elements contributed by authors, translators, editors and publishers. Examines 4 types of dominant bibliographic relationships focusing on common structural patterns revealed within each entity

0.033930738 = product of:
  0.067861475 = sum of:
    0.067861475 = product of:
      0.13572295 = sum of:
        0.13572295 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13572295 = score(doc=91,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.20159319 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05178292 = queryNorm
            0.6732516 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Several years ago a conceptual framework was proposed that was designed to capture a bibliographic item by means of a structured approach and to present it in a structured manner in a bibliographic record: the 3-layered approach. Recently IFLA published the report of a study entitled 'Functional requirements for bibliographic records: draft report for worldwide review' for the purpose of a thorough reexamination of the question based on an analysis of user needs. The IFLA report attempted to capture the bibliographic universe through E-R analysis and to define entities, attributes of entities and relationships between them, all of which constitute the bibliographic universe. Compares the 3-layered model and the IFLA model culminating in a reevaluation of the 3-layered model

0.021677552 = product of:
  0.043355104 = sum of:
    0.043355104 = product of:
      0.08671021 = sum of:
        0.08671021 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08671021 = score(doc=6343,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20159319 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05178292 = queryNorm
            0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 6343, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6343)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Proposes an approach to the analysis of cataloguing rules seen as bibliographic description in terms of 'oriented-ness'. Assesses the validity and usefulness of the proposed approach and considers its problems and issues

0.01734204 = product of:
  0.03468408 = sum of:
    0.03468408 = product of:
      0.06936816 = sum of:
        0.06936816 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06936816 = score(doc=497,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20159319 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05178292 = queryNorm
            0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 497, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=497)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Provides an explpanation of the German cataloguing rules (RAK) focusing on conceptual rules and describes their current situation and the likely nature of future revisions. The special characteristics of RAK are the clearly defined 'basic bibliographic concepts (Grundbegriffe)' as literary units and the related concepts of item (Vorlage), edition (Ausgabe) and work (Werk). RAK will be revised in the near future as RAK2 with a conceptual framework based on AACR2, clearly defined bibliographical concepts on literary units and compatibility with RAK-WB

0.01734204 = product of:
  0.03468408 = sum of:
    0.03468408 = product of:
      0.06936816 = sum of:
        0.06936816 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06936816 = score(doc=3446,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20159319 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05178292 = queryNorm
            0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 3446, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3446)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

A survey of Japanese OPACs available on the Internet was conducted relating to use of keywords for subject access. The findings suggest that present OPACs are not capable of storing subject-oriented information. Currently available keyword access derives from a merely title-based retrieval system. Contents data should be added to bibliographic records as an efficient way of providing subject access, and costings for this process should be estimated. Word standardisation issues must also be addressed

0.0151742855 = product of:
  0.030348571 = sum of:
    0.030348571 = product of:
      0.060697142 = sum of:
        0.060697142 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060697142 = score(doc=509,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20159319 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05178292 = queryNorm
            0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 509, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=509)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

An information retrieval system for a cataloguing database through the WWW is developed, and experimentally served to Japan MARC and ULIS (Univeristy of Library and Information Science) OPAC data. Since Japanese words are not separated by obvious delimiters, ensuring the same segmentation between the query and the database is a problem. The present system solves the problem by using the multiple hash screening technique for processing both book titles and query strings, based on the same dictionary and using similar algorithms. Database management is handled by ADABAS, reducing management chores and and response time. The effectiveness of the multiple hash screening technique for a Japanese text based information system is examined, and the limitation of the Web's hypertext environment for a bibliographic information retrieval service is discussed

0.014031743 = product of:
  0.028063485 = sum of:
    0.028063485 = product of:
      0.05612697 = sum of:
        0.05612697 = weight(_text_:22 in 867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05612697 = score(doc=867,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18133497 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05178292 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 867, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=867)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The Nippon Decimal Classification (NDC) system, extensively used in Japanese libraries, was devised in 1929. It is difficult to use NDC to classify world literature, such as fiction in English by non American, non British writers. This is not necessarily straightforward in other classification schemes but a survey of 40 Japanese university libraries, of which 24 responded, showed remarkable inconsistencies in the treatment of 22 world literature authors. NDC clearly needs updating to deal with this problem